← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · xmetalhead
Thread ID: 20687 | Posts: 9 | Started: 2005-10-18
2005-10-18 19:01 | User Profile
[I]Will this film be an Oscar contender?[/I]
[IMG]http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/thinkfilm/protocols_of_zion/protocolsofzion_releaseposter.jpg[/IMG]
Despite all the evidence, millions around the world continue to blame the Jews for 9/11. This belief is a modern-day incarnation of the infamous "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion," the century-old forgery that some people claimed to be the Jews' master plan to rule the world. Filmmaker Marc Levin sets out to understand why "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" has been revived, and to challenge one of the most persistent, insidious conspiracy theories of all time. In the course of his explosive journey, Levin finds himself delving into the heart of hate, facing those who would traffic in bigotry, all in the name of God.
Genres: Documentary
Running Time: 1 hr. 30 min.
Release Date: October 21st, 2005 (NY)
MPAA Rating: Not Rated
Distributor: Think Film
[url]http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hv&cf=info&id=1808627812&intl=us[/url]
2005-10-19 02:57 | User Profile
Looks like another Jew saw the need for a little damage control.
As for the Protocols being a forgery, I've always supposed that to be the case. But whether that book was written by Jews or anti-Semites doesn't really matter anyway. What's important is that whoever wrote that book obviously understood Jewish tribal behavior and sought to inform others. The Protocols match the observable scheming and actions of the Tribe, both past and present, to a remarkable degree.
2005-10-19 03:33 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Angler]Looks like another Jew saw the need for a little damage control. I'm just waiting till they put one out on [I]Culture of Critique[/I] :lol:
Seriousy, I've always read that if one wants to appear to win a debate with the putative oposition, as opposed to just monopolizing the discussion, what you do is select the most inarticulate, weird member of the opposition I can find. For instance if you Angler want to win a debate in a school setting concerning creation sciene, you'd pick an opponent who believed in the flat earth theory or that the NEA leaders were all practicing witches.
As for the Protocols being a forgery, I've always supposed that to be the case. But whether that book was written by Jews or anti-Semites doesn't really matter anyway. What's important is that whoever wrote that book obviously understood Jewish tribal behavior and sought to inform others. The Protocols match the observable scheming and actions of the Tribe, both past and present, to a remarkable degree.[/QUOTE]I read the protocols too. To say they were forgeries doesn't seem to really match with their own claims. If a government agent (most people say it was the Czarist secret police) was going to write a book on a criminal organization, he might do it similarly creating characters and documents that were sort of composites. People now just call that creative writing or reporting.
Athough I haven't studied the authenticity really carefully, as its sort of water under the bridge now.
2005-10-19 11:21 | User Profile
If the Protocols were a forgery, what were they a forgery of?
Those of you who believe a gentile wrote it to expose Jewish agendas should come up with a better word for it. Although I think it is unlikely that a gentile wrote them, I concede that it is possible. If so, he had a very keen sense of strategy to pattern their methods so well and predict the future as closely as the Protocols do.
Regardless of whether or not you believe them, you cannot deny they are a masterpiece of strategy, dwarfing the works of Machiavelli, as well as being extremely prophetic. It should be required high school reading. I have read them four times and each time I find more things that fit what is happening today. The language, being a century old, is a little hard to decypher, but at around 40 pages it is worth reading again.
[url]http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-references-protocols-folder.html[/url]
2005-10-19 12:41 | User Profile
Regardless of who wrote the "Protocols", the most frightening aspect of that manifesto is that they've all been effectively implemented and gentiles across the world are reaping it's terrible effects.
2005-10-19 16:07 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Angler]... As for the Protocols being a forgery, I've always supposed that to be the case. But whether that book was written by Jews or anti-Semites doesn't really matter anyway. What's important is that whoever wrote that book obviously understood Jewish tribal behavior and sought to inform others. The Protocols match the observable scheming and actions of the Tribe, both past and present, to a remarkable degree.[/QUOTE] My thoughts exactly !
2005-10-19 18:52 | User Profile
[QUOTE=xmetalhead]Despite all the evidence, millions around the world continue to blame the Jews for 9/11.
Not according to the controlled Imperial governmedia, all of whom are unanimous that the disaster was caused by Evil Arab Enemies of Holy Israel who Hate Our Freedom and Democracy, and anyone who suggests otherwise is a Racist Hater.
This belief is a modern-day incarnation of the infamous "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion," the century-old forgery that some people claimed to be the Jews' master plan to rule the world.
So we begin with the predicate that the Protocols are both "infamous" and "a forgery." Apparently there is no need to justify this explanation, since it comes from a jew.
Filmmaker Marc Levin sets out to understand why "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" has been revived, and to challenge one of the most persistent, insidious conspiracy theories of all time.
Again, we begin with a conclusion, instead of having to go to the tedious bother of actually proving anything. And of course a jew like Levin wouldn't be at all biased, would he? I mean, jews are never biased, and only a Hateful Anti-semite would claim that such a thing was possible.
In the course of his explosive journey, Levin finds himself delving into the heart of hate, facing those who would traffic in bigotry, all in the name of God.
And the inevitable name-calling begins: anyone who takes the content (if not the authorship) of the Protocols seriously is a "hateful bigot," end of message.
I wonder how many of the people who sneer at the Protocols have actually ever read them? Do you think this "documentary" will expose its audience to their content? Of course not. Like governmedia "news articles" about "White supremacist" publications, it will simply repeat "hate, hate; lie, lie; bigot, bigot" over and over, without ever allowing the readership to see the material in question and make up its own collective mind.
For the record, I believe that the Protocols were not written by a jew or jews. But it's their content that's important, not their authorship. By focusing on the question of the Protocols' authorship rather than their accuracy, jew Levin is simply pulling the same old Chosen now-you-see-it-now-we-tell-you-that-you-don't parlor trick that we've seen so many times in the past.
Genres: jewish self-worship Running Time: Far too long Release Date: Always MPAA Rating: PG (Propaganda for Gentiles) Distributor: God's Chosen People
2005-10-19 19:00 | User Profile
[B]'Protocols of Zion'[/B] by J. Hoberman October 18th, 2005 2:18 PM
Soon after 9-11, a chatty cabdriver informed Marc Levin that, thanks to an advance warning, no Jews died in the World Trade Center. The spread of this rumor sent the veteran filmmaker, best known for his 1998 quasi-doc Slam, back to the mother of all liesââ¬âthe infamous Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Forged by Czar Nicholas II's secret police around the turn of the 20th century, distributed by Henry Ford, paraphrased by Adolf Hitler (and more recently, former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad), adapted for Egyptian TV, incorporated in the Hamas charter, sold by white supremacists, and cited by some black nationalists, The Protocols advance the notion that a Jewish cabal has conspired to run the world.
Whole Village Voice article here: [URL="http://www.villagevoice.com/film/0542,tracking9,68958,20.html"]http://www.villagevoice.com/film/0542,tracking9,68958,20.html[/URL]
2005-10-19 19:08 | User Profile
[quote=xmetalhead]The spread of this rumor sent the veteran filmmaker, best known for his 1998 quasi-doc Slam, back to [B]the mother of all lies[/B]ââ¬âthe infamous Protocols of the Elders of Zion. That is a pretty grandiose claim for something less than 100 years old. These people's egomania is simply astounding.