← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · travis
Thread ID: 20668 | Posts: 10 | Started: 2005-10-16
2005-10-16 16:17 | User Profile
[url]http://judicial-inc.biz/1_master_supreme.htm[/url]
What do y'all think about this website?
2005-10-16 17:24 | User Profile
It's the site of famous The_Skunk :D
2005-10-16 22:45 | User Profile
[QUOTE=madrussian]It's the site of famous The_Skunk :D[/QUOTE] I don't know of him. The website seems to fill a niche. A large segment of the population hates to read. Not that they want to be ignorant but they have a short attention span. I have a little of that problem myself. Also many people learn by visualization. judicial-inc is perfect for them. I sent the link to a friend of mine who would rather watch TV or golf than read about Jews. I've been sending him stuff for a long time but he never responded because he didn't read it. He replied to my email and said he checked out every link on it and was really shocked. He said " Damn. I'd rather be golfing than thinking about this stuff.".
2005-10-16 22:49 | User Profile
Go to libertyforum.org and behold the_skunk in all of his glory.
2005-10-17 02:02 | User Profile
[QUOTE=travis]I don't know of him. The website seems to fill a niche. A large segment of the population hates to read. Not that they want to be ignorant but they have a short attention span. I have a little of that problem myself. Also many people learn by visualization. judicial-inc is perfect for them. I sent the link to a friend of mine who would rather watch TV or golf than read about Jews. I've been sending him stuff for a long time but he never responded because he didn't read it. He replied to my email and said he checked out every link on it and was really shocked. He said " Damn. I'd rather be golfing than thinking about this stuff.".[/QUOTE]As propaganda that style of presentation is effective. It's the content itself and its sources that are suspect.
The problem is, Skunkie is either off his rocker, or he is a "joooo plant" himself. Everything is a goddamn "joooo conspiracy" to him. He accuses everyone, or very nearly everyone, of being a "jooo" or a "jooo poodle" or something. David Irving, Stormfront, Don Black, VNN, Alex Linder, Overthrow.com, Bill White, the National Socialist Movement, IHR, WCOTC, William Pierce, National Alliance, National Vanguard, you name it: all "jooos" or "jooo plants" or "jooo poodles".
Here he even admits to being a "jooo" himself, although maybe he was being ironic:
[url]http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_members&Number=294050626&page=&view=&sb=&o=&vc=1&t=0#Post294050626[/url]
I have nevered denied my jewish ethenicity
Which is a claim that I think is a lie either way, in that 1) he did deny it earlier, either explicitly or implicitly, or 2) he is lying now about his ancestry. Not that I would care about his "ethenicity" if his tactics weren't so destructive and his methods and sources suspect and motivation so murky, but I don't trust him and I don't think any rational person should, no matter how slick he is. An Israel Shahak or Norman Finkelstein is a much more positive contributor to the cause of the truth than Skunkie will ever be.
Sure, some of his "historical" stuff is truthful enough, but it is never sourced properly, and his contemporary stuff is pure spin and theory and speculation disguised as fact. Here's a classic one blaming white nationalists for the "racist" media coverage of blacks after the NOLA Katrina hurricane:
[url]http://judicial-inc.biz/kaatrina_WN_Sites.htm[/url]
Zionist-Owned 'White Nationalist' Websites
To begin with, the 'Liberal Crowd' puts up the silly labels such as 'White Nationalist', 'White Supremacist', 'White Power', and then portray them as tobacco-spitting idiots.
The truth is, 99% of these people are just normal, and if anything, are ultra-patriotic. But they hit these websites and are fed insane drivel, by a bunch of Zionist provocateurs, about how blacks are after their women and want to mass murder white people wholesale.
See that? "Racism" is a "joooo conspiracy" theory just like everything else! If it weren't for "joooos" the races would be getting along just fine! So if you see a "white nationalist" website telling the truth about race that the media won't cover, it must be "Zionist owned".
More lunacy:
Phony Websites And Zionist Provocateurs
Experts estimate that probably at least 10,000 Blacks are dead, and Chertoff and Bush blew the rescue attempts. 20,000 live in the Superdome for five days, with the first two days being without water
But, Zionists scream about rape, pillage, lawlessness. People are dying in the streets, but the Zionist media clowns take a video of poor blacks grabbing some $5.00 crap from Wal-Mart.
It's crap like this that makes anti-Zionist and anti-"joooo" people look like lunatics. Which may be the whole point of Skunkie's operation. If Skunkie isn't a fake, then he's so fixated on the "evil joooos" that he bends all of reality to fit his obsession, with consequential massive distortion of reality.
2005-10-17 02:44 | User Profile
grep, I can know this guy is a bit strange, but I see things differently.
I see everything from the strategic angle, as few people wish to do because of their ideas about morality and their predispositions. Looking over his site I see a man who has a keen insight about strategy. No doubt much of it is poorly documented, but how do you document criticism of the documentors? I agree that in many cases he does not make a case with any high degree of certainty, and much of it is speculation based on a combination of insufficient evidence and strategic value. I think the way to read it is to look at it as what is probable rather than what is certain. Very little of what we already "know" about history is actually certain anyway.
Although evidence is not always conclusive, one has to look at modus operandi and modus agendi....things like "qui bono" (who benefits). Connect the dots. When you do things begin to fit together.
2005-10-17 03:43 | User Profile
[QUOTE=travis]grep, I can know this guy is a bit strange, but I see things differently.
I see everything from the strategic angle, as few people wish to do because of their ideas about morality and their predispositions. Looking over his site I see a man who has a keen insight about strategy. No doubt much of it is poorly documented, but how do you document criticism of the documentors? I agree that in many cases he does not make a case with any high degree of certainty, and much of it is speculation based on a combination of insufficient evidence and strategic value. I think the way to read it is to look at it as what is probable rather than what is certain. Very little of what we already "know" about history is actually certain anyway.
Although evidence is not always conclusive, one has to look at modus operandi and modus agendi....things like "qui bono" (who benefits). Connect the dots. When you do things begin to fit together.[/QUOTE] Sorry, we have to have some standards or we look like idiots. Where Skunkie is correct, on the historical stuff, he needs better documentation so that his readers can do their own research and look up the original sources. Otherwise they are bound to suspect they are being manipulated.
In fact I've followed some of his sources and Skunkie often misrepresents them or makes them say things that are not in the original source. That's dishonest and it drives honest people away.
As to his current event "analysis" it is so speculative as to be practically worthless. Skunkie talks as though every single damn bomb going off in Iraq is being planted by Mossad; he really can't grasp the concept that Iraqis might be capable of doing it themselves. He never weighs the relative probabilities but always goes for the most extreme interpretation. He might attract some people, but he drives away others; worse he attracts some of the worst types of people and drives away the more intelligent (check out Liberty Forum if you don't believe me).
I only see Skunkie as being useful for comedic relief and as a decoy to distract some of the more useless elements away from the rest of us. Let them go off and play with their little conspiracy theories; the people who are doing real research and real work are those who are going to advance the cause, and I'm happy to wait (a long time if need be) for their output rather than latching on to the easy and quick crapola that Skunkie dishes out.
2005-10-17 04:44 | User Profile
I have nevered denied my jewish ethenicity
I'm interested in knowing if anyone here would still support Skunk if the above statement of his is true.
It's bad enough supporting someone whose theories stipulate that if you point out the bad things blacks are doing, you must be a "jooo poodle". But if he himself turns out to be a "jooo" aren't you going to feel more than a bit foolish?
Skunk's latest schtick on Liberty Forum is claiming that Bill White's real name is Weiss, and that Bill White is a Jew, and of course the whole Toledo thing and the NSM was "jooo run".
Seriously, this is funny. I don't recall even any of the VNN'ers or National Vanguard people making such claims when they were fighting with Bill White; they would have loved to have proved that he was a "jooo".
Skunk literally has no shame. I wonder if this is a genetic defect of his.
2005-10-17 05:52 | User Profile
Skunk is a comedy act. The world must start laughing about zhids. Skunk will be the chief comedian.
Geizers of blood, hahahah.
2005-10-17 11:16 | User Profile
As far as skunk being a Jew, I think it was a joke, but having a (part) Jew criticize Jews is not completely out of the question. Bobby Fischer is an example.
Suggesting WN leaders could be Jews does not seem ridiculous to me at all. In fact the modus operandi has long been established of Jews creating their own opposition. I think basic common sense tells us that almost anyone in the WN movement is suspect. If I were a big name in the movement and was accused of being a Jew it would not rile me at all, as a matter of fact I would be dissapointed if everyone was so complacent that no one ever made such an accusation. My understanding of this Jewish modus operandi is precisely why I'm extremely cautious about supporting any WM organization or figure. I thought this was just common sense.
We have been trained to base our beliefs on what public schools, colleges, and books tell us, yet all these "sources" are controlled by Jews. A logical mind bases his beliefs on what fits together. Judicial-biz presents us with "what if" scenarios that make us think. He does a reasonable job of establishing modus operandi, which is something that seems to go over the heads of many here....then applies this modus operandi to other events. I realize that modus operandi does not prove anything 100% but it is still one form of proof, as is the question "who benefits?". All these bombings and "terruh".....who benefits? Don't you ever try to fit events together with that kind of criteria?
If any of you have taken IQ tests you remember reading patterns. The test would provide a series of sets of dots or some kind of pattern and you would be asked to select one more set that fits this pattern. Just apply this kind of thinking.....as judicial does...and you will see that modus operandi is a form of proof, and one to be taken seriously.