← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Kevin_O'Keeffe
Thread ID: 20527 | Posts: 6 | Started: 2005-10-05
2005-10-05 14:34 | User Profile
Dear Dr. Roberts,
Having become a devoted enthusiast of your journalistic efforts over the last three years or so (you're probably the best we've got in this country these days, in light of the tragic passing of that magnificently eloquent patriot, Dr. Samuel Francis), I just wanted to briefly extend a word of thanks for all your splendid work on behalf of the authentic American nation, her Constitution and libertarianesque virtues, and in opposition to the neo-"conservative" terrorist vermin who've criminally appropriated much of our Federal government and previously conservative media outlets (National Review magazine, talk radio, etc.)
If a man (Rep. Tom Tancredo, perhaps?) who shares much of the values associated with yourself, Mr. Patrick J. Buchanan, the late Dr. Francis, Mr. Jared Taylor, Dr. Paul Gottfried, and the like, isn't elected to the Presidency in 2008, but instead we get another "liberal," or worse, another neo-"conservative," then I fear we are utterly doomed; there simply won't be time to pull this nation out of its political, economic, military-strategic, and moral tailspins. With that fact in mind, I beg of you to keep on swinging hard against the Bush/Cheney quasi-fascistic moral degenerates, and their multinational corporate gangster class supporters, international Zionist co-conspirators, Trotskyite polemicists like Christopher Hitchens, David Horowitz, and Stephen Schwartz, (anti)'Christian' heretical 'Christian Zionists' and Dispensationalist blasphemers, and the various other corrupt and vile allies of the present illegitimate regime. Simply put, our nation is a sinking ship, and you're one of the only people suggesting we do a bit of baling; keep suggesting it, loudly and often, please!
To be honest, I have found myself turning a sympathetic ear to much of what White Nationalist/National Socialist types such as Mr. Kevin Alfred Strom of National Vanguard, and the Hon. David Duke have to say of late. I understand such a path may well also lead inexorably to the destruction of our Constitution, but at least the general program offered by such people does seem to hold out some hope for America's continued existence as something other than a Balkanized, Third World, service-based economy led by a criminal cabal of Zionists, national security specialists, and crony capitalist pigs. When faced with the immediate prospect of the effective destruction of one's country, and the near-extinction of one's European-derived race here in North America within a few decades, one tends to reach towards whatever hope beckons. Minuteman Jim Gilchrist's disappointing 14% showing in Orange County has punctured the modicum of hope I had just barely been able to muster for a revival of American democracy, but then who's to say the reported 14% wasn't really 25 or 30%, yet suppressed by California's 'black box' ballot casting computers?
With that said, I believe its time for patriots such as yourself to break with any semblance of legal submission to the present gang of Satanic murderers masquerading as the Federal government of the United States of America, and to call on loyal, patriotic military officers to stage a coup de tat (sic?), as the only realistic hope of preserving America, her values & traditions, and indeed her very people themselves. The 'black boxes' will give us Presidents Hillary Clinton & Jebadiah Bush, and they will usher in a Dark Age upon the Continental United States. Force of arms is today justified in order to remove America from her trajectory of death, and thus we need to establish a Provisional Revolutionary Government for the purposes of restoring the Constitutional order in the wake of the military's rightful liquidation of the Bush/Cheney regime. Hopefully, such a provisional revolutionary government would not be perceived as exclusively right-wing, but would include sincere Americans of leftist orientation, such as Messrs. Gore Vidal and Ralph Nader.
Thank you for your time, and may God protect you and yours in this dishonorable and dangerous interregnum.
Sincerely,
Kevin Riley O'Keeffe of San Jose, California (age 35, husband & father of one son, grocery clerk)
PS: I believe the Bush/Cheney regime engineered the 9/11 attacks in order to create a national panic that would enable them to weaken the Bill of Rights and seize Iraq. Force is justified against criminals of that magnitude, and its damn well time we started telling people so (or at least that is what I fear to be the case).
2005-10-05 14:49 | User Profile
Kevin,
When you get a chance, how about giving us an after action review on what happen in the 48th Congressional District. When I checked last night, Cambell has something like 47% to Gilchrist's 13%. It sounds like the "Party First" mentality prevailed out there.
2005-10-06 09:12 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius]The only thing I wouldn't agree with is the idea the Bush gang engineered 9/11. That's your opinion and I can understand why you would think that.
Based on some of his remarks in a recent article (which I posted here somewhere at the time, unless someone else already had; I forget how it was entitled), its pretty clear that it is also the opinion of Dr. Roberts (as well as the opinion of a man who's name presently escapes me, but he served as George H.W. Bush's Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, as well as the opinion of a great many structural engineers & architects who simply don't buy the "burning jet fuel" scenario, as well as the opinion of various others who, like Dr. Roberts and that other economist referenced above, are part & parcel to the authentic American establishment, yet are choosing to be more discrete about their opinions at the present time).
I wanted to emphasize that point by simple virtue of the fact that since Dr. Roberts apparently shares my opinion, my calling for the forcibly armed expulsion of the present, piratical regime does not constitute the act of innate folhardy irresponsibility one might reasonably associate with such otherwise intemperate remarks. After all, when the President of the USA is directly complicit in a treasonous criminal conspiracy to overthrow our Constitutional republic, and has killed, in most cases quite deliberately, approximately 5,000 Americans (I'm including those civilians & others killed on 9/11/01, as well as our battle deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan), in order to concentrate all state powers (both real ones, and extra-legal, self-inflicted-emergency-derived ones) in the hands of his illicit administration and its presumed successor regime (and in any event, placing the levers of national power into the hands of the "neo-'conservative'" political faction; a faction which seems to be dominated by people who hold "dual," U.S.-Israeli citizenship, and/or own personal, residential real estate in Israel*), then its perfectly reasonable, and even downright moderate of me, to suggest we need a Cincinnatus (but we'll take a Pinochet), who will do whatever needs doing in order to place the reins of state authority outside the hands of blood-drenched, murderous, treasonous criminal conspirators of the very lowest moral character, and who adhere to/collaborate with the most potentially dangerous & destructive political faction to have achieved such prominence in the history of the English speaking world. Its no more extreme than my suggesting Washington and Jefferson were better men than the sort we see campaigning in Iowa and New Hampshire on a quadrennial basis (its bordering on the flippin' self-evident, that is).
The one that squats in the very White House which Sen. John "Lesser Evil" Kerry (albeit not a whole lot lesser; I voted for Nader) had stolen from him when he was fraudulently deprived of the Ohio Electoral College delegation (with the active collusion of the Republican Secretary of State, which is Ohio's chief elections officer - and thus obviously ought to be a non-partisan office - yet Ohio's Secretary of State was not only elected to that post as the formal Republican Party nominee, he served as the Ohio Chairman of the 2004 Bush/Cheney campaign! How's [B]THAT* for a conflict of interest?!?)
**Which implies the commission of a crime not all that different from the one King Louis the 16th committed when he asked the Austrian royalist regime to send in their national army against the native-French Jacobin mobs; that was sufficient for him to have his head severed from his neck via the guillotine, not merely face forced expulsion from office, as I am advocating for the Bush/Cheney regime (though if the Commandant of the Marine Corps issues a statement that Bush got shot to death while trying to resist arrest, while Cheney's heart gave out due to the stress, and apparently Donald Rumsfeld committed suicide by leaping off the roof of the Pentagon, I can't say I'd be particularly inclined to swing into investigative journalist mode, if you know what I mean; that's one sleeping dog I would let lie, in the event I were to encounter it).
2005-10-06 09:43 | User Profile
Very well done, Kevin. PCR is one of my favorite columnists, too.
2005-10-06 13:28 | User Profile
Kevin,
This must be what you refer to. I took your meaning to be that he had charged the Bush Administration outright involvement in 9/11. He appears to me to be someone who falls in the catagory of "the jury is still out". Anyway, whatever. You don't need to convince me that Bush is guity of treason.
[QUOTE]Enter Paul Craig Roberts
A former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Reagan stepped back into the political spotlight earlier this year, expressing doubt about the official 9/11 story and asserted: "if they lied to us about Ruby Ridge, Waco and weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, why should we believe them now?"
Paul Craig Roberts, listed by Who's Who in America as one of the 1,000 most influential political thinkers in the world, has evolved over the years into a major Bush basher and neo con critic. Roberts said he hasn't changed his political ideology or jumped from the Republican-conservative ship but "just can't respect a party leadership who doesn't respect the truth."
Serving under President Reagan in 1981-82, Treasury Secretary Regan credited Roberts with having a major role in the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981. He was awarded the Treasury Department's Meritorious Service Award and is given much of the credit for structuring and drafting a major portion of the famous Kemp-Roth bill as well as having a leading role in developing bipartisan support for a supply-side economic policy. In 1987, the French government recognized him as "the artisan of a renewal in economic science and policy after half a century of state interventionism," inducting him into that country's Legion of Honor.
Even with his impressive background, Roberts, once a former columnist for Business Week and a thorn in the side of liberals back then, said "the times have drastically changed," adding his views are no longer welcome in the mainstream media if they are critical of Bush or any of his policies.
He is another in the long list of "Republican faithful," including top-ranking government and military officials, who have left or been pushed out of Washington, by the Bush neo con agenda.
Expressing doubt about the government's official version of 9/11 but deferring detailed criticism to the experts, Roberts' concerns come on the heels of recent criticism leveled by Professor Reynolds.
Saying 9/11 is only a part of a mysterious but deadly neo con puzzle, Roberts looked back at history for some answers: "The Bush neo cons are making fatalistic mistakes as insane as Hitler and the Nazi Party when they invaded Russia in the dead of the winter."
Although professing to know "a little about engineering" from his undergraduate days at Georgia Tech, Roberts deferred formulating any serious conclusions about the fall of the WTC, but expressed doubt as to the credibility of the entire official version based on past government lies uncovered at Waco, Ruby Ridge and the threat of WMD in Iraq.
Roberts said the recent statements made by Reynolds, however, reveal just how "flimsy and unbelievable" the government story comes across.
"This is not some kind of conspiracy nut or kook talking. He is a man with extremely qualified credentials, whose opinions I respect," said Roberts referring to Reynolds' comments, which have been highly publicized across the country.
"The real story is not Morgan Reynolds or myself, but rather, why have so many former Republican conservatives and top ranking officials who disagree with the neo cons been systematically run out of Washington? And, also, why is the media so intent on covering up the Bush neo con agenda and all the mistakes surrounding it?
[B]"I guess the real story about 9/11 is what the people are actually saying. I've gotten hundreds of emails in response to my columns and many of them talk about not getting the truth from the government or the media about what really happened at the World Trade Center. I know many qualified engineers and scientists have said the WTC collapsed from explosives. In fact, if you look at the manner in which the buildings fell, you have to give their conclusions credibility."[/B]
Besides 9/11 and blasting the neo con economic agenda as suicide for America, Roberts in a recent column seriously attacks the Bush Iraq war policy without mincing words: " The reasons that the American people were given by their president, vice president, secretary of defense, national security adviser, secretary of state, and the sycophantic media were nothing but a pack of lies."[/QUOTE] [url]http://www.lasvegastribune.com/20050729/headline3.html[/url] ============== Speaking of PRC... [url]http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20544[/url] With this gang, anything is possible, save serving American First.
2005-10-07 00:29 | User Profile
Kevin:
respectfully....why are you a grocery clerk? You seem very educated. I would be interested to know about this. Thanks,