← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Angler

Bush Is Cooking Up Two More Wars

Thread ID: 20473 | Posts: 8 | Started: 2005-10-01

Wayback Archive

Angler [OP]

2005-10-01 08:35 | User Profile

[url]http://www.vdare.com/roberts/050930_iraq.htm[/url]

Bush Is Cooking Up Two More Wars By Paul Craig Roberts

Mired in interminable conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Bush administration is moving toward initiating two more wars, one with Iran and one with North Korea. With no US troops available, the Bush administration is revamping US war doctrine to allow for “preventative nuclear attack.” In short, the Bush administration is planning to make the US the first country in history to initiate war with nuclear weapons. The Pentagon document, “Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations,” calls for the use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear adversaries in order “to ensure success of US and multinational operations.”

In the case of Iran and North Korea, the Bush administration is using diplomacy not for diplomatic purposes of reaching agreements, but in order to set the two countries up for nuclear attack. In the case of Iran, the Bush administration’s plan is now obvious. The Bush administration is leveling false charges against Iran, just as it did against Iraq, of conspiring to make nuclear weapons. These charges are known to be false by the Bush administration and by the entire world.

For the past two years the International Atomic Energy Agency has had unfettered access to inspect Iran for any sign of a nuclear weapons program. The head of the IAEA has announced that there is no sign of a weapons program. The Bush administration nevertheless insists that Iran is making weapons, but can produce no evidence. As in the case of Iraq, the Bush administration substitutes allegations for facts.

Gordon Prather, an expert on the subject, has reported the straight facts in fine detail. Readers can become familiar with them by consulting his archive at Antiwar.com.

By bullying the 35 members of the IAEA, the Bush administration last week managed to get 22 votes that could lead to the referral of Iran to the UN Security Council. The Bush administration will now lobby for the referral. Once it has the referral, even if the Security Council does not act on it, the Bush administration can use it as an excuse to attack Iran. The Bush administration knows that few Americans have any knowledge of international law and procedures and will simply believe whatever President Bush says. The highly concentrated US media is a proven walkover for the war-mongering Bush administration.

As Dr. Prather has shown, Iran has gone beyond compliance to propose that new additional safeguards be established to monitor its nuclear energy program. The bad intentions are on the part of the Bush administration.

The Bush administration’s plan is to create Iranian intransigence in place of cooperation by forcing the Iranian government to stand up to the bullying by reducing its cooperation. The goal of the Bush administration is to attack Iran, not to create cooperative relationships.

Needless to say, Iranians are angry at the Bush administration’s manipulation of the IAEA members. Last Wednesday protesters in Tehran attacked the British embassy, which serves as a proxy for the non-existent US embassy, and legislation was introduced that, if it passes, will scale back Iran’s cooperation with the IAEA. Iran has also threatened to cut off oil deliveries to some of the countries that caved in to US pressure, thereby permitting the US to increase tensions and escalate the conflict.

The Bush administration is betting that it can demonize Iran the way it did Iraq. As both Congress and the American public have failed to hold Bush accountable for deceiving them about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, the administration assumes that its tactics will work a second time.

However, a nuclear attack on Iran would leave the Bush administration isolated. The US would instantly become a pariah nation, loathed and hated everywhere else.

Moreover, it would leave our battered troops in Iraq in a perilous situation. The only reason our army in Iraq has not been destroyed is that the Shi’ites, who comprise the vast majority of the population, have not taken up arms against us, expecting the US to turn over Iraq to them. As the Iraqi Shi’ites are allied with the Iranians, who also are Shi’ite, the US cannot attack Iran without destroying its position in Iraq.

The Bush administration, filled with hubris and delusion, is too stupid to know this.

The American people need to ask themselves why of all the countries in the world, only the US and Israel believe that it is imperative to attack Iran. If Iran is such a threat to the world, why isn’t Russia, for example, concerned and ready to invade?

Americans need to ask themselves the same question about North Korea. Why is the US, half a world away, so concerned about North Korea? If North Korea is such a threat, would not China, sitting on its border, know it? Wouldn’t Japan know it? South Korea? Wouldn’t some other country besides the US see the problem and take action? According to the Voice of America (August 11, 2005), “Senior South Korean officials on Thursday defended what they say is North Korea’s ‘natural right’ to pursue civilian nuclear power. The move may cause friction with the United States, which has expressed firm opposition to the North having any nuclear facilities whatsoever.”

If the US doesn’t want other countries to develop nuclear weapons, the US must stop bombing, invading and threatening invasions and nuclear attacks. How does President Bush serve the cause of peace by making countries paranoid by declaring them to be our enemies?

For there to be peace, the US must drop its belligerent role. The proper function of diplomacy is to build trust by drawing countries into economic and cultural relationships, not to isolate them for attack. It is past time for the US to give up its quarter century feud with Iran. US interference in Iranian internal affairs was the source of the feud. We need to acknowledge it and get over it.

The Korean war ended a half century ago. Isn’t it time the US acknowledged the war’s end and signed a treaty with North Korea? The Korean war was essentially a war between the US and China. It was Chinese troops that prevented American victory. Yet we are getting on with China, a much greater potential threat to the US than North Korea or Iran could ever be.

By creating instability in the Middle East, the US undermines Israel’s security. As a few thousand Iraqi insurgents have proven, American armies are not going to be able to sit over the oil in the Middle East. If we can’t produce enough valuable goods or maintain a strong currency, we won’t have access to the oil. There is no possibility whatsoever of the US pushing around powers like China, India, or Russia.

Bush’s hubris makes him unrealistic. He greatly overestimates America’s power. Congress and the American people must find a way to supply the judgment that is missing in the executive branch.

There would be no terrorism if the US would stop interfering in the internal affairs of Middle Eastern countries and if Israel stopped stealing the West Bank from the Palestinians. The Bush administration knows this, and that is why the administration spreads the propagandistic lie that “they” (Muslims) hate us and our way of life. This lie is the excuse for American aggression.

xmetalhead

2005-10-01 15:59 | User Profile

In other words, Bushovitz is planning nuclear WWIII to save face because of the unmitigated disaster which is the outcome of his Iraq invasion.

And people talk about rebuilding levees in Nawlins! Bwhaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!

Sertorius

2005-10-01 16:22 | User Profile

XM,

Could be the case. It wouldn't be the first time tyrants have engaged in some foreign adventure to bail themselves out of domestic problems. Galtieri did it with Argentina back in '82 over the Falklands. With this bunch it may be something simpler. They are insane.

JoseyWales

2005-10-01 16:28 | User Profile

Call me naive , but I really dont think W & company can pull it off. :unsure:

Sertorius

2005-10-01 16:32 | User Profile

I don't know, Josey. So far, the Bush gang has shown an uncanny ability to do the dumbest things. I don't think I could count the fingers on one hand where they have done something that was actually in the nation's best interest.

I hope you are right, though.

Angeleyes

2005-10-02 16:12 | User Profile

[QUOTE=JoseyWales]Call me naive , but I really dont think W & company can pull it off. :unsure:[/QUOTE]I get the feeling that quite a few folks in Congress, both houses, are feeling like damned fools for having taken too much on faith during the lead up to March 2003.

Fool me twice, shame on me. The credibility gap is growing, I think.

I hope.

OBTW, I linked to the New Joint Pub on Nuke doctrine that Mr Roberts cites here.

[url="http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20167"]http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20167[/url]

Feel free to scan it and see if you feel, as I do, that Mr Roberts is interpreting it for his own ends. That said, I concur with his unease for my own reasons.

I am displeased with the whole doctrinal matter leading to "tactical nukes is a problem solution" attitudes taken by far too many in the present administration. They are forgetting the political milieu that war is a subset of the political continuum. When your war is over, you have to get up the next day and deal with the world." It's not a football game, it is part of the continuous play of geopolitics.

AE

Cracker of the Whip

2005-10-03 00:01 | User Profile

The Bush administration is just following orders. [url=http://www.washtimes.com/world/20050929-114709-2065r_page2.htm][B]Israelis urge U.S. to stop Iran's nuke goals[/B][/url] September 30, 2005 [QUOTE]... Mr. Eldad said Israelis across the political spectrum see Iran as the country's most serious threat and one that cannot be ignored. But he added that unilateral action by Israel was the "worst possible scenario," likely to inflame opinion throughout the Muslim world. "If we have to do it, we'll do it," he said with a shrug. "If the United States and the world community do it, there is a chance the issue can be contained. If Israel has to do it alone, there is no chance the conflict can be contained." [B]Mr. Lapid said he was sensitive to criticism that Israel was trying to push Washington into a potentially armed conflict with Iran that many Americans now oppose. [/B] "Our mission is to point out the dangers we see, to ourselves and to our friends," he said. "Avoiding speaking the truth does not mean you can then avoid facing the consequences of those facts," he said. The lawmakers met with their U.S. counterparts, as well as with senior administration officials, saying they highlighted the Iranian danger in all their meetings. [B][SIZE=4]Asked if he thought the message got through, Mr. Steinitz said, "I did not get the feeling we were talking to the walls." [/SIZE] [/B] [/QUOTE] Remember Scott Ritter? Well, he's on the warpath again against the Bush administration. [url=http://westchesterweekly.com/gbase/News/content?oid=oid:127517][B]Preparing for War With Iran?[/B][/url] [QUOTE]... [B]A second person asked Ritter what he could tell his high-school-aged children. [/B] Ritter responded, "I have two girls, 12-year-old twins. We need to make this world safe for them and their children. When I speak at high schools around the nation, I tell the students that [B]my generation has failed them. Yes, we have failed them. They should not listen to us, because we have created a world of permanent war, and because we lie to them on a regular basis. [COLOR=Red]Do not trust your government[/COLOR], I tell them. Trust yourself. [COLOR=Red]Question authority[/COLOR]. Take responsibility for the world. Take action. Only you can save the world." [/B] [/QUOTE]

[url=http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:-UIEJIaYXP0J:www.philosophynotes.com/politics/neocon_ascendency6.htm+betar+movement+origins'&hl=en][B]The Neo-cons[/B][/url]

[url=http://judicial-inc.biz/Dov_zakheim.htm][B]Dov Zakheim[/B][/url] Zakheim, who is a dual Israeli/American citizen and a Shul Rabbi, has stalked the halls of US government for 25 yrs. He has set defense policy which influenced Presidents Reagan, Clinton and Bush Sr. and Jr. This rabid Zionist was the controller of the Pentagon when an audit discovered over a trillion dollars was missing.
[url=http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:Y_mUdEMLTYUJ:www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2775+pearlharbor+dov+zakheim&hl=en][B]Dov Zakheim[/B][/url] and his paper.

Sather_Gate

2005-10-03 01:34 | User Profile

Time for the loyal remainder of the US military/career State/and Intelligence, active and retired, to take a hand in this. It's come to that. We've heard that high Air Force officers for example have been aghast at Vader's/Sharon's directive to draw up plans for the preemptive nuclear bombing of Iran.

They know their oath is to the Constitution, not to traitors, fools, chickenhawks, and incompetents, and their foreign masters.

God bless the memory of old America in this perilous time. [img]http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/u/us-1nj.gif[/img] First Navy Jack