← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · JoseyWales
Thread ID: 20413 | Posts: 12 | Started: 2005-09-26
2005-09-26 15:27 | User Profile
I was talking to a friend a few days back and he mentioned that himself and a nagro co-worker of his started talking about the hurricane mess in new orleans. needless to say, my buddy is today a little less blind about just how many negros think like ive told him before. my point to him is that its other whites, not the negros you should be talking to, and then only gradually.
2005-10-10 01:57 | User Profile
I think we should take seriously the task of 'waking up' our fellow Whites and be careful in our broaching of these topics with them. long term goals and depth of puddle-headedness always in mind.
BUT - what a satisfaction in challenging Blacks with the truth. If it can't come back at you in school or workplace I'd recommend the occassional outburst of honesty. Good for the soul!
2005-10-10 02:24 | User Profile
[QUOTE=art]
BUT - what a satisfaction in challenging Blacks with the truth. If it can't come back at you in school or workplace I'd recommend the occassional outburst of honesty. Good for the soul![/QUOTE]
No, i disagree. Its a waste of time, imo. In the end, what is the point of debating with negros or other non-whites ? What would one gain from it ? Its not as though they are likely to say, "oh i see it now" and then start emigrating out of the country or start promoting the return of white rule?
2005-10-10 03:07 | User Profile
[QUOTE=JoseyWales]No, i disagree. Its a waste of time, imo. In the end, what is the point of debating with negros or other non-whites ? What would one gain from it ? Its not as though they are likely to say, "oh i see it now" and then start emigrating out of the country or start promoting the return of white rule?[/QUOTE]
The easiest way to convert someone is to convince them their problems are caused by others. However, since most of the problems in this country are caused by Yankees (Bush is a Yankee, not a Texan) and Jews, blaming them for most of our problems is not the wrong thing.
2005-10-10 03:29 | User Profile
It's not about some universal justice of fairness. Certainly an argument can be built on that foundation about the US being white Christian blah-blah-blah, and it's good to build on this argument as a platform for your own comsumption but not for debating other competing groups -- you'll just divert argument in the direction of who has been here first etc. etc., while the crux of the matter is that it's all about acting in the interests of your own group that other groups may be opposed to. There are fundamentally different interests clashing here, and everyone is supposed to root for his own team -- brainwashed whitey notwithstanding.
The decaying infrastructure can still support negroes for many years ahead; the increasing chaos will present them with looting and pillaging possibilities. Just like they haven't built anything, they have no stake here and they have nothing to lose. You won't scare a nigger with Africa-like chaos and squalor. They will only embrace it for the kicks.
By the way, blaming Yankees and Jews is an approach diamtrally opposite to the one AmRen chose. Zhids don't exist there.
2005-10-10 10:52 | User Profile
[QUOTE=madrussian]By the way, blaming Yankees and Jews is an approach diamtrally opposite to the one AmRen chose. Zhids don't exist there.[/QUOTE]
I've noticed that about AmRen. They concentrate too much on race. I sometimes wonder what would happen if the U.S. deported all blacks but still had those Empire-building Zionists and Yale-and-Harvard Yankees running the government. Things might even be WORSE because the lack of domestic problems and a better economy would allow the government to meddle more internationally! Everyone rails against Jews but the East Coast types are just as bad, and just as powerful. Bush and people like him are dangerous fools, but the Zionists could have done nothing unless he already agreed with them.
2005-10-10 13:31 | User Profile
It is true, there is no real point in debating non-Whites on certain issues. Certain imperatives are based on biology thus rendering debate a waste of time. For instance on immigration, why should a non-White support a White person's desire not to become a minority in this country? None whatsoever.
2005-10-10 15:57 | User Profile
If you want to help be a little more productive, focuse on the one-or-two issues most important to you and don't attempt to debate other issues because it delutes your cause.
It makes good sense not to debate with non-whites, unless you can make common cause. If you meet a black guy who supports illegal hispanic immigration, you might let him now that illegal hispanic immigration isn't good for him.
2005-10-10 16:06 | User Profile
That's right, Happy. There are a lot of Blacks who are mad as hell about illegal immigration and how it impacts negatively on them. Anyone who has listen to Terry Anderson is aware of this.
2005-10-11 03:40 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius]That's right, Happy. There are a lot of Blacks who are mad as hell about illegal immigration and how it impacts negatively on them. Anyone who has listen to Terry Anderson is aware of this.[/QUOTE] It's about time. I would think that the immigration issue is a white problem and that the Rainbow Coalition welcomes the invders according to the no news accounts.
2005-10-20 01:45 | User Profile
[QUOTE=madrussian]It's not about some universal justice of fairness. Certainly an argument can be built on that foundation about the US being white Christian blah-blah-blah, and it's good to build on this argument as a platform for your own comsumption but not for debating other competing groups -- you'll just divert argument in the direction of who has been here first etc. etc., while the crux of the matter is that it's all about acting in the interests of your own group that other groups may be opposed to. There are fundamentally different interests clashing here, and everyone is supposed to root for his own team -- brainwashed whitey notwithstanding.[/QUOTE]
Precisely. That's what makes "our issues" so tough. Everyone is trained to believe that whatever position they hold, be it "liberal" or "conservative," must comport with a universal fairness that includes everyone on Earth. But racialism or racial advocacy isn't like that. So white advocates have a tough time of it. The best way to reconcile racial interests with universal fairness notions is to point out that the planet is still pretty big.
2005-11-01 05:37 | User Profile
The premise behind all the various anti-white organizations -- NAACP, ADL, MALDEF, etc. -- is that non-whites have an agenda opposed to white interests. The inevitable corollary -- that whites have interests opposed to non-whites -- is drowned out by shrieks of "racism."
The more sophisticated anti-whites try to convince us that their agenda is in our best interests -- that defending Israel is the same as defending America, or "Diversity is our strength." Their arguments are as thin as tissue paper and as easily shredded, at which point the shrieks of "racism" begin again.