← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Faust
Thread ID: 20215 | Posts: 5 | Started: 2005-09-15
2005-09-15 00:32 | User Profile
Professor Andrew Fraser to publish article defending ââ¬ÅWhite Australiaââ¬Â policy.
Race-Row Professor to Publish Views
Bernard Lane, Australian (Sydney), Sept. 14
Sydney academic Andrew Fraser is to publish his contentious views on race and culture in a Victorian university law journal only weeks after his own university banned him from teaching.
Professor Fraser, of Macquarie University, said the acceptance of his 6800-word article by the peer-reviewed journal of Deakin University law school vindicated his stand.
The article, Rethinking the White Australia Policy, will appear later this month, and argues that the latest science supports the decision by the founding fathers to preserve Australia as an Anglo-Saxon bastion.
Professor Fraser chides the revisionist historian Keith Windschuttle for being ââ¬Åtender mindedââ¬Â in his recent book on the policy.
Mr Windschuttle defends the policy from accusations of racism but, like its critics on the Left, hetoo refuses to accept the reality of racial difference, Professor Fraser writes.
Starting with a letter to a suburban newspaper about Sudanese immigration, Professor Fraser, who taught public law, has made a series of claims about race, intelligence, crime and social cohesion.
Macquarie vice-chancellor Di Yerbury condemned him for speaking outside his expertise, although she cited threats and safety concerns when suspending him from teaching.
ââ¬ÅThe fact that the Deakin Law Review has seen fit to publish my article ââ¬Â¦ so quickly after the media controversy over my public comments exposes the claim made by Professor Yerbury and others that I have been speaking outside my area of expertise as an obvious furphy,ââ¬Â Professor Fraser told The Australian.
Professor Yerbury had not had time to read the article yesterday but said: ââ¬ÅIf it is an article which deals with the alleged links between race and IQ, or race and propensity for violence, I am advised that the relevant expertise would at least have to include cognitive psychology, genetics and anthropology.
ââ¬ÅThese are not Drew Fraserââ¬â¢s qualifications.ââ¬Â
Deakin journal editor and law lecturer James McConvill said there had been ââ¬Åsome hesitation (about publishing the article), I guess, simply because of the drama that Macquarie got itself intoââ¬Â.
He said the Fraser article dealt with public policy and fell within the journalââ¬â¢s charter ââ¬Åto raise legal, moral and social issuesââ¬Â.
Journal policy was to act on advice from ââ¬Ådouble blindââ¬Â academic reviewââ¬âneither author nor reviewer should know each otherââ¬â¢s identity.
But Professor Fraserââ¬â¢s authorship was clear to two potential reviewers who ââ¬Årejected it in terms of not wanting to consider itââ¬Â, Mr McConvill said.
Two other reviewersââ¬âa legal academic and a sociologist with expertise in the White Australia policyââ¬âadvised publication.
Mr McConvill said he could not reveal the identity of the reviewers.
Asked whether he expected the decision to publish would attract criticism or protest, he said: ââ¬ÅFrom my perspective, it was quite a well-considered piece, it wasnââ¬â¢t overly rhetorical. Before people could judge, they should actually read the article.ââ¬Â The university suspended Professor Fraser from lecturing in July when he declared he would ignore an edict that he stop using his position to express his views on race, which included a claim that Africans had low IQs and were therefore a high crime risk.
Professor Fraser has admitted to links with the Patriotic Youth League but has denied the neo-Nazi groupââ¬â¢s claim that he was its legal adviser.
(Posted on September 14, 2005)
[url]http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2005/09/racerow_profess.php[/url]
2005-09-15 00:46 | User Profile
Interesting. Something somewhat related, and something a lot of people might not expect, the third largest party (by seats in parliament) in New Zealand is an anti-immigration Nationalist Party.
*[url]http://www.nzfirst.org.nz/index.php[/url]
*Real success on a certain scale, and not a single Nazi flag or reference to Odin to be found.
2005-09-15 05:27 | User Profile
[QUOTE=robinder]Interesting. Something somewhat related, and something a lot of people might not expect, the third largest party (by seats in parliament) in New Zealand is an anti-immigration Nationalist Party.
*[url="http://www.nzfirst.org.nz/index.php"]http://www.nzfirst.org.nz/index.php[/url]
*Real success on a certain scale, and not a single Nazi flag or reference to Odin to be found.[/QUOTE] The leader of NZ-First is a Maori named Winston Peters. NZF is often referred to as "Winston First" because of his large ego and propensity for self-aggrandizement. His constituency is mostly made up of old age pensioners (the "Grey Power" movement) many of whom are WW2 vets and anti-immigrationists. One interesting aspect of NZ politics is that many Maoris are quite vehemently anti-immigration, particularly of Asians, who aren't affected by the post-colonial left-wing guilt trip to the same extent as White Europeans and therefore show less deference or respect towards Maoris and Maoritanga (culture). Understandably, it makes their feeling of being a dispossesed minority in what was once solely their country more acute. Britain negotiated a treaty with Maori chieftains (the Treaty of Waitangi) in 1840, in which the chieftains gave the English permission to settle in the country in return for the rights and privelages of being made subjects of the British crown. Hence there isn't really any reason for Maoris to accept the immigration of anyone else.
P.S. New Zealand is having a General Election this Saturday (the 17th of September)
2005-09-15 07:33 | User Profile
[QUOTE=RowdyRoddyPiper]One interesting aspect of NZ politics is that many Maoris are quite vehemently anti-immigration, particularly of Asians, who aren't affected by the post-colonial left-wing guilt trip to the same extent as White Europeans[/QUOTE]
The aboriginal tribes people of this country (so-called "Native Americans," as if my Alabama Birth Certificate doesn't qualify me as a native) also tend to be very hostile to Third World immigration. Being a largely impoverished, indolent, ignorant remnant consisting of merely 0.6% of the U.S. population, however, their wise opinions on this one subject do not count for much. Some of them are not even permitted to vote (nor are they required to pay Federal and state taxes, other than those excise taxes that apply to all, such as when they purchase tobacco in an ordinary store; tobacco purchased on an Indian Reservation, however, would not be subject to either the Federal or state excise tax otherwise imposed on tobacco, a fact which can benefit a frugal White man who happens to live near the border of one of these rural communities).
2005-09-16 08:14 | User Profile
I'm a staunch supporter of the White Australia policy!
I'm not suprised that Andrew Fraser has been banned from teaching, the Zionuts don't want us Whites to have a chance!
"We should fight a good fight, and keep Australia White" (an old saying my father told me)
We have to many illegals and non-White "legals" here, If I didn't know better Brisbane looked like Tokyo with the amount of Japanese walking around...Disgusting!
Melbourne (my home city) and Sydney are just as bad, if not worse...and I've heard bad things about Adelade!
These people should be sent back, I can't get over Howards bad immigration policy...sure it keeps them off the streets, but their hands are still in our wallets as we fork out tax dollars to keep them fed! They should be sent home...forced if nessessary!