← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Kevin_O'Keeffe

A small, yet very poignant example of cruelty and indifference in New Orleans

Thread ID: 19944 | Posts: 5 | Started: 2005-09-02

Wayback Archive


Kevin_O'Keeffe [OP]

2005-09-02 11:19 | User Profile

[url=http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050901/NEWS/50901021]Shreveport Times link[/url]

"Many people had dogs and they cannot take them on the bus. A police officer took one from a little boy, who cried until he vomited. “Snowball, snowball,” he cried. The policeman told a reporter he didn’t know what would happen to the dog."

The dog will no doubt be set free to run loose in the city. If its very lucky, it will eventually wind up with another human family. My guess is, some Negro thug has already shot it, or beaten it to death with a 2X4, as part of his idea of "fun."

I understand that in such a situation, not everyone's dog is going to be able to be transported out by the authorities (especially within the context of such poor and irresponsible planning on the part of those same authorities; President Patrick J. Buchanan and Gov. David E. Duke would have done a better job dealing with this crisis, I suspect, and in any event, the Louisiana National Guard would have been in Louisiana, rather than some Middle Eastern Hellhole where they aren't wanted. More likely such patriotic leaders woukd have avoided the crisis more-or-less altogether by having rebuilt the Lake Pontchartrain (sic?) levees some years ago, as the New Orleans-Times Picayune, Scentific American magazine, and the experts in charge of evaluating such matters in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, have all been calling for since the friggin' 1980s!), but surely some provision could have been made to permit one small-to-medium size dog to board each given bus, in order to alleviate such hard luck cases as the one described above with the miserable young boy. I don't care if he is Black, either. No homo sapien, at least one that isn't a vile criminal of some sort, deserves to be subjected to such wanton cruelty at the indifferent hands of the state. The dog no doubt deserved better as well.

At the very least some provision should have been made to board those dogs in the hope of being able to return them to their families in the future. Instead, nearly all will die. A little innocent canine blood to go on Bush's hands, along with that of Iraqi children (some still in the womb), nearly 1,900 U.S. soldiers (with many more to come, of course), and the numerous victims of violent crimes perpetrated by the endless flood of Mestizo colonists swarming over our so-called "border" with the hostile, enemy nation known as Mexico (upon whom we should declare war in the name of national/territorial, cultural, and yes, RACIAL self-defense; Bush will continue to lavish privileges, favors, and praise upon it, and its vile, corrupt leader, the former Coca-Cola executive Vicente Fox, just like the cowardly, worthless traitor Bush is, naturally).

Sigh.


il ragno

2005-09-02 11:43 | User Profile

[QUOTE]President Patrick J. Buchanan and Gov. David E. Duke would have done a better job dealing with this crisis, I suspect, and in any event, the Louisiana National Guard would have been in Louisiana, rather than some Middle Eastern Hellhole where they aren't wanted. [/QUOTE]

No getting away from the fact that the majority of those Louisiana voters who would be the only [I]eligible [/I] voters under yours and Walter's "plan" voted OVERWHELMINGLY for Bush, and indeed make up a sizable phalanx of the Christian Zionists agitating so strongly for the War on Terror.

I think they call that 'irony'.


Pennsylvania_Dutch

2005-09-02 11:59 | User Profile

Governor Duke...you would have happy darkies carrying sandbags balanced on their heads to the broken dikes...Pat would be blowing hard from Alabama...


Kevin_O'Keeffe

2005-09-02 12:22 | User Profile

[QUOTE=il ragno]No getting away from the fact that the majority of those Louisiana voters who would be the only [I]eligible [/I] voters under yours and Walter's "plan" voted OVERWHELMINGLY for Bush, and indeed make up a sizable phalanx of the Christian Zionists agitating so strongly for the War on Terror.

I think they call that 'irony'.[/QUOTE]

Such is the state of contemporary America, due largely to the soul-destroying and brain-contaminating devices known as the media and public education; even supposed conservative/right-wingers often tend to be useless idiots aiding in the bringing about of their own demise. When our schools teach the truth, and our media tells them its fashionable to admire Lester Maddox and Sir Oswald Mosley, they'll buy right into it, just like they now, um, "think" that $15,000 for a Rolex wristwatch is a pretty good deal....


Petr

2005-09-02 13:02 | User Profile

[COLOR=DarkRed][FONT=Arial][B][I] - "No getting away from the fact that the majority of those Louisiana voters who would be the only eligible voters under yours and Walter's "plan" voted OVERWHELMINGLY for Bush, and indeed make up a sizable phalanx of the Christian Zionists agitating so strongly for the War on Terror."[/I][/B][/FONT][/COLOR]

If we would want to nitpick on this issue, I could point out that the people who are suffering most are Blacks, who are mostly Democrats and anti-war.

Petr