← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · BlueBonnet
Thread ID: 19888 | Posts: 49 | Started: 2005-08-30
2005-08-30 13:24 | User Profile
[url="http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46019"]http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46019[/url]
[font=Palatino, Book Antiqua, Times New Roman, Georgia, Times]A president like Teddy Roosevelt would have led the Army to the border years ago. And if Fox did not cooperate, T.R. would have gone on to Mexico City. Nor would Ike, who deported all illegal aliens in 1953, have stood still for this being done to the country he had defended in war. [/font]
[font=Palatino, Book Antiqua, Times New Roman, Georgia, Times]What are these Bush Republicans afraid of? Dirty looks from the help at the country club? [/font]
2005-08-30 13:30 | User Profile
It isn't the dirty looks from the help at the country club they're afraid of. It's the Jews who run the media & government that they're deathly afraid of.
2005-08-30 13:37 | User Profile
"It's the Jews"
Nonsense. Republicans and Democrats alike stand to lose their Corporate Backing if they oppose illegal immigration.
2005-08-30 13:53 | User Profile
It's both groups.
2005-08-30 14:00 | User Profile
Good rant from Pat, and it's not just the Southwest. The cockroaches are everywhere.
2005-08-30 14:02 | User Profile
[QUOTE=SteamshipTime] The cockroaches are everywhere.[/QUOTE]
Start mowing your own lawn.
2005-08-30 14:05 | User Profile
Savrola,
Do you have anything positive to contribute or is it your intention to insult everyone? This isn't going to fly.
2005-08-30 14:06 | User Profile
[QUOTE=savrola]Start mowing your own lawn.[/QUOTE]
I do and so does everyone else on my street, which is wonderfully Mexican free.
:gunsmilie
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/29/Battleflag.png[/img]
2005-08-30 14:10 | User Profile
I've never NOT mowed my own lawn. Or not shovelled my own snow (which is a lot more laborious).
I haven't clicked the link yet but I can't quite believe Pat seriously called for impeachment (or that WND would've run it if he did).
2005-08-30 14:10 | User Profile
[QUOTE=savrola]Start mowing your own lawn.[/QUOTE] I do. However, I'm not qualified to take down trees so I have to call a tree removal contractor. That contractor has a choice: go out of business or hire Mexican crews like all his competitors. He also risks a Title VII lawsuit by "hiring American."
This sort of change has to come from the top. Grass roots enforcement has been all but outlawed.
2005-08-30 15:18 | User Profile
Wow, I think this is a first for Pat isnt it ? Im not aware of any other time he has called for impeachment, has anyone else ?
Go Pat!
:lol:
2005-08-30 15:21 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]I've never NOT mowed my own lawn. Or not shovelled my own snow (which is a lot more laborious).
I haven't clicked the link yet but I can't quite believe Pat seriously called for impeachment (or that WND would've run it if he did).[/QUOTE]
Me thinks that WND tolerates the anti-bush articles because (1) even a good portion of the you-know-whos are critical of the illegal mess. Not because of the demographic troubles it causes, but because the beaners tend to be more openly anti-joo. (2) bush has pizzed off many of the zionists that were not exactly happy for bush putting pressure on sharon to get out of gaza.
2005-08-30 15:25 | User Profile
This is the first for Pat. Not too different from Tancredo stating that if there was another terrorist incident and it orginated from illegal border crossings, he would introduce a bill to impeach.
2005-08-30 18:59 | User Profile
Pat to appear on Seany's today show to discuss this column.
2005-08-30 19:46 | User Profile
Ed,
Thanks for the heads up. This should put "Baby J" in a real quandry though, at the end he'll keep being the good little Bush b.s. burger eater that he is. I mean, what would the Party think!?
2005-08-30 20:00 | User Profile
Also, don't miss Susan Estrich's dire concerns over whether Cindy Sheehan is an anti-semite.
2005-08-30 20:14 | User Profile
what show is this Pat is going to be on. yes, id like to hear that Sleestack (land of the lost) known as Estrich rant, for a while at least.
2005-08-30 22:40 | User Profile
I forgot that the show here is on tape delay. The only thing Pat said that I disagree with was he'd be willing to see them [B]reapply[/B] (if memory serves me correct on that word) for entry. Two things wrong here. They didn't apply in the first place and the objective here should be to keep the third world out. For this nation to have a future it has to be at a minimum 90+ White. Our social problems really took off around the time of Brown v Board of Education and the repeal of the 1924 Immigration Act.
2005-08-31 03:36 | User Profile
pat has the b*lls of a brass ass monkey. If he ran for [I][B]King[/I][/B] I'd vote for him!
2005-08-31 05:08 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius]It's both groups.[/QUOTE]
Jews basically run corporate America.
Look at the names of the top management of the Forbes 500.
Jews are VASTLY overrepresented key positions across the board.
As Stalin put it "The Cadres Determine Everything."
If you have Jews leading the bureaucracy, then you get Jewish policies, such as "internationalism" and vicious Jewish chauvanism masquerading as Marxism.
If you have Russians leading the bureaucracy, then you get Russian policies, like "socialism in one country" and Slavic jingoism masquerading as Marxism.
Part of the our "countermarch through the institutions" must include replacing Jews with Euro-American Christians at every level of the permanent government, be they in the "private sector" of huge, publicly traded companies, the government, unions, and so forth.
Stalin pointed the way. It's the only way to ensure Christian rule.
2005-08-31 05:17 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Is this not an indictment of democracy itself? What dictatorial regime would put up with this? [/QUOTE] Bingo, Pat.
I'm not sure he's willing to take that thought to its logical conclusion, though.
I detest democracy.
2005-08-31 05:18 | User Profile
Don't forget "replacing chinks and hindoos" too.
2005-08-31 05:31 | User Profile
[URL=http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1473900/posts]Freeper Thread[/URL]
2005-08-31 12:14 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis][URL=http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1473900/posts]Freeper Thread[/URL][/QUOTE] There's actually something of a debate going on here. Check it out.
It's definitely muted, but still not bad for mindless Freepers.
2005-08-31 13:17 | User Profile
It's both, Walter.
I am of the opinion that the Jews and Plutocrats came to an understanding years ago. I'd go so far to say this understanding evolved in the late 1800s- early 1900s. I am not going to blame all of this on the Jews. There is enough blame to go around and plenty of Gentiles are involved. All will have to be dealt with. Call them shabbos goys if you wish. As far as I am concerned they are co-equals when it comes to screwing the rest of us.
We're going to have to agree to disagree on this one.
2005-08-31 13:43 | User Profile
Walter, I found that Freeper thread to be "more of the same" from those dummies. Alot of them are openly hostile to Pat Buchanan, and I find that absolutely sickening coming from a camp that's supposedly "conservative".
Actually, I found that Joseph Farah diatribe about Bush's failure on immigration to be pretty decent, not bad at all, for a shabbos goy waterboy.
2005-08-31 16:49 | User Profile
[QUOTE=xmetalhead]Walter, I found that Freeper thread to be "more of the same" from those dummies. Alot of them are openly hostile to Pat Buchanan, and I find that absolutely sickening coming from a camp that's supposedly "conservative".
Actually, I found that Joseph Farah diatribe about Bush's failure on immigration to be pretty decent, not bad at all, for a shabbos goy waterboy.[/QUOTE] There were some posters taking Shrub to task for failing to secure the border during the "War on Terror." One actually pointed out my constant refrain that the fact that Shrub allows the border to be crossed by anybody at will proves that the "War on Terror" is phony.
For if Shrub and his ilk really believed that there was a threat of trained terrorists smuggling a WMD device into the country, the first thing they'd do is seal the border "tighter than a bull's ass in fly time" as we used to say in Wisconsin. But they don't close the border, which compels the conclusion that there is no such terrorist threat, or at least (more likely) there is no terrorist threat that the neo-Khans don't control.
2005-08-31 17:00 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]Bingo, Pat.
I'm not sure he's willing to take that thought to its logical conclusion, though.
I detest democracy.[/QUOTE] In your opinion, Walter Yannis, what is its logical conclusion?
2005-08-31 17:12 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]There were some posters taking Shrub to task for failing to secure the border during the "War on Terror." One actually pointed out my constant refrain that the fact that Shrub allows the border to be crossed by anybody at will proves that the "War on Terror" is phony.
For if Shrub and his ilk really believed that there was a threat of trained terrorists smuggling a WMD device into the country, the first thing they'd do is seal the border "tighter than a bull's ass in fly time" as we used to say in Wisconsin. But they don't close the border, which compels the conclusion that there is no such terrorist threat, or at least (more likely) there is no terrorist threat that the neo-Khans don't control.[/QUOTE]
I believe this also, Walter. If the arabs were really at war with us, there would be suicide bombers going off at the mall and subways and cars blowing up in public places.
2005-08-31 18:12 | User Profile
Why should bin Laden risk his people when the Bush Administration is doing such a fine job wrecking the country?
2005-08-31 19:16 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Thomas777]In your opinion, Walter Yannis, what is its logical conclusion?[/QUOTE]
A military coup to oust (and imprison) the Bush administration, followed by a 5-year dictatorship by some sensible fellow, such as Patrick J. Buchanan or Paul Craig Roberts (or even David Duke, although he lacks some of the gravitas which might make those two better candidates for Dictator).
Afterwards, Constitutional government will be reinstated, albeit of a less democratic nature, i.e. state legislatures to resume electing Senators, no vote for females, Jews & assorted nonWhite Gentiles, never-married men, and the chronically unemployed, poll taxes, raising of the voting age to 25, etc. That's one approach, anyway.
2005-08-31 19:31 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kevin_O'Keeffe]A military coup to oust (and imprison) the Bush administration, followed by a 5-year dictatorship by some sensible fellow, such as Patrick J. Buchanan or Paul Craig Roberts (or even David Duke, although he lacks some of the gravitas which might make those two better candidates for Dictator).
Afterwards, Constitutional government will be reinstated, albeit of a less democratic nature, i.e. state legislatures to resume electing Senators, no vote for females, Jews & assorted nonWhite Gentiles, never-married men, and the chronically unemployed, poll taxes, raising of the voting age to 25, etc. That's one approach, anyway.[/QUOTE] I would support all of the measures that you propose.
I guess I thought Buchanan's choice of words (i.e. "democratic" vs. "dictatorial") was a bit odd. A "dictatorial" ZOG regime that does not hold regular (albeit sham) elections is no more likely to take measures against the Mestizo invasion than a "democratic" ZOG regime that allows ritualized voting.
2005-08-31 19:38 | User Profile
It will take more than a military coup, Kevin. It will take a revolution, and that won't happen until the ruling class has botched things so badly that they lose their grip on power.
With that in mind, we should be encouraging their follies. More foreign wars, more globalism, more immigration. It's going to take a lot of pain before those idiot Freepers abandon their betrayers.
We're like the folks in New Orleans -- the home we grew up in is gone forever; all we can do is clear away the wreckage and start again.
2005-08-31 23:00 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Stanley]It will take more than a military coup, Kevin. It will take a revolution, and that won't happen until the ruling class has botched things so badly that they lose their grip on power.[/QUOTE]
I think the New London ruling is a step in that direction. It's surprised me that even the Repbulisheeple have bucked that one.
2005-09-01 02:48 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kevin_O'Keeffe] Afterwards, Constitutional government will be reinstated, albeit of a less democratic nature, i.e. state legislatures to resume electing Senators, no vote for females, Jews & assorted nonWhite Gentiles, never-married men, and the chronically unemployed, poll taxes, raising of the voting age to 25, etc. That's one approach, anyway.[/QUOTE] Interesting that you think this would be less democratic in nature when what you describe is exactly what the original democracy of the ancient Greeks was.
2005-09-01 05:22 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Thomas777]In your opinion, Walter Yannis, what is its logical conclusion?[/QUOTE] Well, leaving out how we actually get there, my goal is a Republic where the right to vote, hold office, serve in the military and speak publicly about matters political is restricted to European, Christian and English-speaking males who have not been convicted of a felony for the past 20 years or of a misdomeanor the past five years, and who can demonstrate a minimum amount of net property value (say, equal to a couple years worth of fulltime minimum wage, we don't want any bums voting themselves access to our wallets).
Women and minorities must be disenfranchised. Women will be returned to their exalted-yet-subordinate status as God intended, and minorities (both religious and racial) will be relegated to a secure (and in a sense even dignified) dhimmitude. I mean to say that while racial and religious dhimmis will have their current privileges to speak and assert political power severely curtailed, their rights to feel secure in their persons and property must be carefully protected.
That's what I want.
How do we get there from here?
We have to pull off a counter-march through the institutions. That process has already begun. Patrick Henry University with its pipeline into the military and intelligence services is an outstanding example from the Protestant side of how Christians can infiltrate and take over the permanent government. Orthodox Catholic schools such as Ave Maria, University of Dallas, St. Francis University (Stuebenville, OH) and others are also busy training a new generation of orthodox Catholics with marching orders to impose Christian values on the greater culture, although I think that these institutions can be comparatively wimpy.
I'm a sort of a Catholic Rushdoonian, if indeed such a thing is possible (I don't claim to have it all figured out). But I find what I call Rushdoony's "Christian shariat" extremely attractive, really made to order for us and our goal of reestablishing a Republic of white and Christian men.
There's a distinct possibility of acts of questionable legality, but as Lenin liked to say you have to break a few eggs to make an omlette.
2005-09-01 05:57 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]Well, leaving out how we actually get there, my goal is a Republic where the right to vote, hold office, serve in the military and speak publicly about matters political is restricted to European, Christian and English-speaking males who have not been convicted of a felony for the past 20 years or of a misdomeanor the past five years, and who can demonstrate a minimum amount of net property value (say, equal to a couple years worth of fulltime minimum wage, we don't want any bums voting themselves access to our wallets).
Women and minorities must be disenfranchised. Women will be returned to their exalted-yet-subordinate status as God intended, and minorities (both religious and racial) will be relegated to a secure (and in a sense even dignified) dhimmitude. I mean to say that while racial and religious dhimmis will have their current privileges to speak and assert political power severely curtailed, their rights to feel secure in their persons and property must be carefully protected.
That's what I want.
How do we get there from here?
We have to pull off a counter-march through the institutions. That process has already begun. Patrick Henry University with its pipeline into the military and intelligence services is an outstanding example from the Protestant side of how Christians can infiltrate and take over the permanent government. Orthodox Catholic schools such as Ave Maria, University of Dallas, St. Francis University (Stuebenville, OH) and others are also busy training a new generation of orthodox Catholics with marching orders to impose Christian values on the greater culture, although I think that these institutions can be comparatively wimpy.
I'm a sort of a Catholic Rushdoonian, if indeed such a thing is possible (I don't claim to have it all figured out). But I find what I call Rushdoony's "Christian shariat" extremely attractive, really made to order for us and our goal of reestablishing a Republic of white and Christian men.
There's a distinct possibility of acts of questionable legality, but as Lenin liked to say you have to break a few eggs to make an omlette.[/QUOTE] Good analysis.
If I remember correctly, you are an attorney...I am as well. Something that I have noticed is the following:
The law enforcement community (State's attorneys and higher echelon police officers) seem to know the score more than the general public. I live in a very "cosmopolitan" city and time and again, I have encountered very pro-White attitudes and sentiments amongst this class of civil servants. These guys need to be actively (yet somewhat delicately) courted, IMO. There are entire pro-White constituencies out there that are very sympathetic to our politics that would be willing to pursue these ends, given the right impetus.
I take exception to it when I hear WNs throw there hands up and say "all is lost, worse is better, etc." Its not. Do you agree with that assessment?
2005-09-01 06:39 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kevin_O'Keeffe]A military coup to oust (and imprison) the Bush administration, followed by a 5-year dictatorship by some sensible fellow, such as Patrick J. Buchanan or Paul Craig Roberts (or even David Duke, although he lacks some of the gravitas which might make those two better candidates for Dictator).
Afterwards, Constitutional government will be reinstated, albeit of a less democratic nature, i.e. state legislatures to resume electing Senators, no vote for females, Jews & assorted nonWhite Gentiles, never-married men, and the chronically unemployed, poll taxes, raising of the voting age to 25, etc. That's one approach, anyway.[/QUOTE]
Pretty good, although the niggers & shits should be shipped out altogether, no matter how many of them would be killed in the process, and an upper age limit for White male voting privileges should be established as well as a minimum, say 75.
As for the kikes.......
2005-09-01 06:42 | User Profile
[QUOTE=N.B. Forrest] As for the kikes.......[/QUOTE] :lol: :hitler:
2005-09-01 10:32 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Thomas777]I take exception to it when I hear WNs throw there hands up and say "all is lost, worse is better, etc." Its not. Do you agree with that assessment?[/QUOTE] Oh, yes.
Our victory is certain. It's just that we're going to have to slog through a lot of shite to get there.
I think that Yggdrasil diagnosed the problem quite well. The thing is that we wear altruistic, PeeCee opinions as badges of status. Correctly altruistic opinions - such as promoting unqualified racial and sexual minorities in favor of ourselves and our own children - constitute the same sort of wasteful ostentation as $500 designer pumps and Ferrari convertibles. PeeCee opinions and Armani suits say to the world "I'm so fit - my genes are so great - that I scoff at these petty costs. You should therefore mate with me and/or my offspring." Ygg lists "The Mating Mind" on his classics list, and it really is a "must read" book that explains this basic concept in brilliant detail.
But this sexual advertising can only go so far before it runs up against survival. As America becomes less white and discrimination against whites becomes more pronounced, the cost of PeeCee opinions will become unbearable, and people will start to jettison them. Other ways of advertising sexual fitness through altruistic acts will come to the fore that limit altuism to white Christians. In short, whites will grow far less tolerant of opinions that coddle wogs and fags over the interests of their own children.
And once that point is passed, and depending on the prevailing conditions, whites will get mean. And then our enemies will be crushed, because after all blacks and faggots are little more than a skin irritant, we can brush them off pretty easily.
The big problem will be challenging Jews, but then again, they're a small minority (albeit one with nukes) and once we get racially aware they'll be packing their bags for Tel Aviv.
So, it's just of question of time.
In the meantime, as Ygg says, we have to build local communities. I say reach out to your local white cops. And it goes without saying build our own business, become as wealthy and powerful as we can, and use our position to help whites move up. Hire them, train them, educate them, protect them.
I'm now trying to put togther a "base community" (Catholic term of "home church) of my fellow far right Catholics. I believe strongly in Napolean Hill's "Master Mind" concept.
2005-09-01 12:01 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Thomas777]I guess I thought Buchanan's choice of words (i.e. "democratic" vs. "dictatorial") was a bit odd. A "dictatorial" ZOG regime that does not hold regular (albeit sham) elections is no more likely to take measures against the Mestizo invasion than a "democratic" ZOG regime that allows ritualized voting.[/QUOTE]
Yes, well, we know that, and Pat knows that, but he's trying to communicate with and educate people who haven't quite figured it out yet, many of whom scare easily in the face of socio-political tabus (ridding them of that tendency is part of their education), so he doesn't always make perfect sense to those of us already in the know, who no longer benefit from soft-pedaling of the relevant issues (and are starting to wonder, in the face of the various catastrophes our nation is sliding into, whether Mr. Buchanan ought to start sounding a little more like the late Dr. Sam Francis, Professor Kevin MacDonald, a Judeo critical version of Jared Taylor, ex-Rep. David Duke, etc.; we only have so much time left, so maybe sensible people on the inside, like Mr. Buchanan, ought to use their public platform for all its worth, while it still exists).
2005-09-01 12:20 | User Profile
[QUOTE=N.B. Forrest]Pretty good, although the niggers & shits should be shipped out altogether, no matter how many of them would be killed in the process, and an upper age limit for White male voting privileges should be established as well as a minimum, say 75.
As for the kikes.......[/QUOTE]
I also advocate deportation of all Jews and nonWhite Gentiles (other than the "Native"/Aboriginal Americans, who are nearly extinct anyway). In the event a small number of Blacks and/or Japanese, etc. were to remain in a post-coup/revolutionary America, we'd want it spelled out very clearly that they couldn't vote, hold public office, inter-marry with Whites, etc. I'm leaning in favor of an upper age limit for voting, although it had never occurred to me before.
2005-09-03 10:24 | User Profile
Oh, and just one more thing: the vote should be further restricted to White men with an I.Q. of at least 95.
Morons should always be kept out of the voting booth, no matter what their hue.
2005-09-03 10:27 | User Profile
N.B.,
That would keep the "freepers" and "dittoheads" out, for sure.
2005-09-03 16:54 | User Profile
Well, while we're planning the Revolution here, there are two points I see consistently left out of calculations around immigration, by both sides, that really affect the analysis.
The first is that the discussion seems focused on the Republic, not the hemisphere. Perhaps this is out of ignorance of the old Latin American ruling classes, mixed with some residual anti-catholicism ("they're white but they don't count because they are Catholics"). I was a Spanish translator at a Cuban regugee camp during the Mariel boatlift. (For those who don't know, refugee camps are run like prisons). So, basically I was tossed into a prison setting with a badge saying Hey, I'm an American for 18 hours a day back when I was 18. Anyway, immediately they arrived the blancos sought me, and presumably other whites, out to explain how white they were [and Cuban prison material is by no means the Latin American ruling class, though frankly a lot of them probably were descendants of such]. The presumed that since they were fleeing to a white country, that they would form an alliance with the rulers to help keep down the non-whites.
So, point 1 is, isn't it easier to shut down the drug lords by eliminating their markets and stopping the covert support, and give the Latin American ruling class its chance? Let's make some distinctions here--it is not all Latin Americans who want to migrate to the US. And I don't think the white Latin Americans are lining up with tanks to invade any time soon--they've got their hands full.
Second point, about Asian migration. I think both the left and right have missed the fact that it may be largely a protestant Asian migration. I happen to be an Orthodox Christian. So lots of immigrants from Russia on the West coast is a good thing right? We'll fill lots of churches, etc. Well, it turns out they are largely protestant Russians, i.e. evangelical converts.
So here's the thing: immigration reinforces neo-conservative goals--and gives evangelical Christians a stake in meddling in the old continent's affairs. Why migrate, if you are a persecuted Asian protestant, to America? It's the Protestant homeland. It's a defensive fortress of your faith. It's where you go to get weapons, go back, and even up some old scores.
Point three is 1+2: are all those hispanics coming across really catholic? Who says they'll have lots of babies? A lot are economically motivated of course, but there might be a small, but important segment of (potentially militant) protestant refugees. I'd like to see numbers before drawing conclusions.
2005-09-03 20:43 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Macrobius]
Point three is 1+2: are all those hispanics coming across really catholic? Who says they'll have lots of babies? A lot are economically motivated of course, but there might be a small, but important segment of (potentially militant) protestant refugees. I'd like to see numbers before drawing conclusions.[/QUOTE] Exactly, most of the newly arrived hispanics that I've come into contact with practice a cross of catholisism and pagan,witch-doctor-voodoo.
In fact when I was at the county hospital with my mom I saw a group of wetbacks in the waiting area with their little girl in her hospital pajamas. Sitting across from her was this woman who was putting her hands at the girls forehead and then pulling them away and shaking them like she was wiping water off of the girls head. A few seats away I could hear two other wetbacks speaking in Spanish that she was their "Brooha". That's wetback for witch. These folks brought their witch doctor with them to the hospital.
2005-09-03 20:58 | User Profile
[QUOTE=BlueBonnet]Exactly, most of the newly arrived hispanics that I've come into contact with practice a cross of catholisism and pagan,witch-doctor-voodoo. In fact when I was at the county hospital with my mom I saw a group of wetbacks in the waiting area with their little girl in her hospital pajamas. Sitting across from her was this woman who was putting her hands at the girls forehead and then pulling them away and shaking them like she was wiping water off of the girls head. A few seats away I could hear two other wetbacks speaking in Spanish that she was their "Brooha". That's wetback for witch. These folks brought their witch doctor with them to the hospital.[/QUOTE] Yep...and the Catholic authorities know it too! Just ask 'em. The catholic church has always been more than happy to blend native practice with Roman Catholic practice. They have done the same thing in Africa too.
The Catholic priesthood must enjoy these foreign spirits, and the related mumbo jumbo. Of course there are some primitive European Christian practices that take some biblical quotations literally...like the Pennsylvania Dutch stuff I posted thanks to National Vanguard News Org...
2005-09-04 13:18 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Pennsylvania_Dutch]Yep...and the Catholic authorities know it too! Just ask 'em. The catholic church has always been more than happy to blend native practice with Roman Catholic practice. They have done the same thing in Africa too.
The Catholic priesthood must enjoy these foreign spirits, and the related mumbo jumbo. Of course there are some primitive European Christian practices that take some biblical quotations literally...like the Pennsylvania Dutch stuff I posted thanks to National Vanguard News Org...[/QUOTE] It's interesting that the pagans love to talk about how the Catholic Church ruthlessly destroyed every last vestige of paganism, destroyed their sacred groves, and burned 20 million witches, while the Protestants love to talk about how the Catholic Church merrily incorporates any element of paganism it can find. I wonder if the truth is somewhere in the middle, with alternating policies of repression and assimilation, as the situation warranted?
2005-09-06 14:57 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]
For if Shrub and his ilk really believed that there was a threat of trained terrorists smuggling a WMD device into the country, the first thing they'd do is seal the border "tighter than a bull's ass in fly time" as we used to say in Wisconsin. But they don't close the border, which compels the conclusion that there is no such terrorist threat, or at least (more likely) there is no terrorist threat that the neo-Khans don't control.[/QUOTE] Bingo.
"In treason there's no profit, and what's the reason? If it profit, none dare call it treason." Forget who that is attributted to.
AE