← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Robbie
Thread ID: 197 | Posts: 13 | Started: 2002-03-20
2002-03-20 02:51 | User Profile
There is a new commercial I saw on the televitz earlier today for Women's Bayer (aspirin). The spokesbroad was a big Negress (but that's besides the point).
There is also a Tylenol For Women, Kellogg's "Nutrition For Women", and other assorted products for the "masculincally-challenged" tribe.
So I guess I was right all along; "equality" is only so when wimmin get their OWN pie along with whatever they eat off the man's. Hmmm... so I guess regular food isn't good enough for them, eh (ooh, does it do bad things to their naturally frail physical being??)
All of this "women's only" food is just another trick coming out of the wimminist's magic hat. Just more proof that wimmin were destined to be a DEPENDENT sex, regardless of the "independent, empowered" agit prop.
2002-03-20 03:16 | User Profile
well, not all of them. but an awful large %, fer sure.
the craving for security explains it all. women didnt line up en masse to vote for george wallace.
i harken back to when the swiss gave women the vote. soon after they had a referendum on gun grabbing. 33% of voters voted to grab (2/3 of women?).
uh-oh.
2002-03-20 07:27 | User Profile
Yes, it's an infuriating fact of life that most women will trade real freedom for an ever-elusive safety & security every time. Freedom is just a quaint cliche for them, something to burble on the 4th of July. The hebes & the race traitors understand this completely and use it to forge the chains of our bondage link by link.
And yeah, all these bogus products geared toward "confident, independent" womyn are good for a smirk. One of the most laughable of the recent ones features a stone-faced broad in karate class facing down several men. They all attack at once, and of course, she dispatches them with ease. As she walks out the door, she snaps open a folding white cane - she's blind......
You'd think women would be offended by these cheap, ham-handed attempts to get them to waste their money, but apparently not.
2002-12-18 02:54 | User Profile
[QUOTE]...it's an infuriating fact of life that most women will trade real freedom for an ever-elusive safety & security every time. Freedom is just a quaint cliche for them, something to burble on the 4th of July. The hebes & the race traitors understand this completely and use it to forge the chains of our bondage link by link.
IF men were responsible in protecting women, women wouldn't be so afraid! (And who is it attacking women? Other men!!) Women are TARGETS in this society (H*ll, in this WORLD!) -- and since society teaches them they cannot protect themselves (sheesh!), they are unprotected!
I cannot express how much more RELAXED I am, now that I have found (or, more accurately, been found by) a man who protects me. He is consciously and intentionally aware of my safety (he wears a handgun on his hip!) (I carry one in my purse -- not as accessible.). When I am with him in public, for the first time in 40+ years, I do not have to be hyper-alert and hyper-careful and worry about where I am and who is near me or behind me or around the corner.
How many men take that role? How many men make sure their women are safe -- FEEL safe, so they can vote in accordance with what's best for the country? Ask your women, men... do THEY feel safe? Are they able to relax into the safety you provide? Where should they look for their safety, then?
2002-12-18 03:10 | User Profile
Originally posted by Avalanche@Dec 18 2002, 02:54 Ask your women, men... do THEY feel safe? Are they able to relax into the safety you provide? Where should they look for their safety, then?
My wife feels safe but if she didn't I don't think she'd get any comfort knowing that Tylenol has a pill just for her.
This is mostly a market thing, not a male-female thing. Wall Street will stroke you and take your last dime if you let 'em.
As far as safety goes, my lady is a good shot and every man should get his wife a custom 9mm for her birthday just like I did. If she didn't have the benefit of a rural upbringing like mine did, some time at a friendly shooting range might be just the thing.
This wasn't in any way advice. Christmas is almost here and it might spark a gift idea. :D
2002-12-18 05:17 | User Profile
Originally posted by Avalanche@Dec 18 2002, 02:54 ** IF men were responsible in protecting women, women wouldn't be so afraid! (And who is it attacking women? Other men!!) Women are TARGETS in this society (H*ll, in this WORLD!) -- and since society teaches them they cannot protect themselves (sheesh!), they are unprotected!
**
Yes, men are responsible for protecting women, and women are most certainly prey for male predators (who are disproportionately non-White). White women need good White men to protect them from slavering dusky savages. This is natural & fulfilling for both the man *and* the woman. The sensible ladies, comfortable with their femininity, not only admit it but embrace it, as you clearly do.
2002-12-18 18:01 | User Profile
Well, I've got my wife's back covered, and she's pretty good with a compact .45 (hey the recoil doesn't bother her, and I want Leroy to stay down, not bounce back up with a couple of "nines" in him).
Anyway, yeah, men overall are protecting women less overall and I find that very sad, but who shoved men away en masse with the old, "I am woman, hear me roar" stuff anyway? Chivalry's dying or dead, but it ain't all men's fault. I know NOW might say feminism and chivalry are not mutually exclusive, but really they're just opposite ways of telling you you're wrong!
Tell women they don't need men for anything, lest they become some kind of domesticated animal, yet when they find out rapists don't respect their newfound liberation, they run to state for protection, not men! The very same state that is "manufacturing" the very rapists they fear!
Weird world, folks.
2002-12-20 05:33 | User Profile
N.B. Forrest
White women need good White men to protect them from slavering dusky savages. This is natural & fulfilling for both the man and the woman. The sensible ladies, comfortable with their femininity, not only admit it but embrace it, as you clearly do.
Ah, but too many men don't realize (and neither do most women), that the women must be retrained / untrained / unbrainwashed from this subverted society! A great deal of my hostility toward men was actually fear and mistrust! Most women don't feel entirely safe,and as (some) men are the threat, ALL men are viewed cautiously. I was raised in NY -- so I was alert all the time, always aware of everything (some, granted, resulting from an unpredictable father, too.) -- and even now, 5+ years into my marriage, I am worried (my husband says TOO worried...) about my safety.
Anyway, I had never MET a man who was willing to break through the strong and "macho" woman I was. "Femininity" was a disparaged flaw in women... I was the equal of any man I worked with! No man was trustworthy! and so on... (In fact, because I had SO lost trust in men, especially MY ability to pick a good one, I had taken a 10-yr celibacy vow (with myself...) so I could work out why I picked men who cheated or emotionally mistreated me.)
Michael my husband, my lord and master (tee hee hee!), my "real" man (and he HATES it when I say that!) recognized (from my website, of all places, and a couple of messages I sent to a Stevie Ray Vaughan mailing list) that I was a woman in great pain, and, by fate? predestination? we connected (completely, like poles of a magnet!) It took a huge amount of talking before I began to recognize that this was a man who WAS both stronger and smarter than I am... two qualities I had determined in my 10 years were necessary (I did NOT want to 'control' a man, I wanted to be controlled by one! I want to tune the sails of my life to HIM, not have to be responsible for him!).
The strangest thing, the thing I struggled with tremendously was that Michael found me (ME!) feminine!! I was SO against "feminine" women -- to me, it was a weakness: feminine women were in danger -- and yet this very strong man found me so! In how I wrote, in how I felt, in what I did and concentrated on and so on...
So I'd suggest that there are SURELY women out there who are (self-) shielded, on-guard, self-protected and, as I did, RADIATE hostility toward men... and yet, underneath is the pain and fear that ONLY a strong man can end! It is a struggle -- because for a woman to 'set down' her guard, to become vulnerable, takes SO MUCH TRUST! And so many (peasant!) men have destroyed that trust again and again!
I refer you-all to the book Michael and I call the Bible of our Marriage.... It's by Dr. Patriica Allen, and it's called "Getting to I Do..." She teaches that there must be complements in a marriage -- a male energy and a female energy, (which can be either sex, but two male energy folks will CLASH!). And work/business requires male energy -- so a woman (usually) must be taught to let go of her male energy when she comes home.
And Pat shows the working out of how to answer a man's need for respect and a women's for care -- and when each gets those, they the woman also feel srespected, and the man cared for... Even (maybe esp.) if you're married, it is worth a read!
I recommend it also to single men -- think of it as a fishing guide -- it'll help you figure out where to fish, and who might be a keeper!
2002-12-21 02:41 | User Profile
I've opened this topic over in a new thread called Women vs. Men, because I had a lot to say! Hope y'all join me there! :D
2002-12-21 07:10 | User Profile
Is it possible that these pills are simply their own brand's version of Midol (specifically made for pre-menstrual symptoms)?
As for the Womyn-only cereal, I have no idea what that's all about... unless it has crushed Midol in it. It's a silly and obvious marketing ploy (why would I want to buy high-priced Womyn-only cereal when I have meat and potatoes?), but will likely work. I'm rather disheartened at the way my gender falls for every cheap marketing ploy in the book.
2002-12-21 18:01 | User Profile
Originally posted by Edana@Dec 21 2002, 01:10 As for the Womyn-only cereal, I have no idea what that's all about... unless it has crushed Midol in it.
It's probably like womyn's-only energy bars, which have small quantities of added calcium and folic acid, as compared to regular (and apparently sexist) energy bars. They also have delightful pink perfumed packaging.
These trace quantities of minor nutrients are no doubt essential to the busy, active lifestyle of modern women, who surely would keel over their desk if they didn't get the extra 5 IU of liberating folic acid and 10mg of empowering calcium in their breakfast cereal every morning.
Fight the power! Incinerate your underwear!
Drakmal
2002-12-21 19:31 | User Profile
I agree that this womyn only marketing is stupid but there are men-only marketing techniques that are just as stupid that men fall for like flies. One is the famous jock advertising beer and the other is a scantly clade anorexic woman advertising everything from cars to beer. Men, don't you feel insulted that marketers assume that you can only make make decisions by looking at scantly-clad women or that some stupid jock likes a product? I think this is just as insulting and yet men always fall for it each time as these women who fall for these womyn-only prioducts.
2002-12-22 16:43 | User Profile
Ragnar: This is mostly a market thing, not a male-female thing. Wall Street will stroke you and take your last dime if you let 'em.
It's mostly a trademark thing. If a drug company can make a new "niche" for a drug, the FDA allows them to retain their "no generics allowed" control for ANOTHER 7 or so years.
You know that 'anti-worry' drug they're now hacking? ("Honey, you worry too much, the kids are FINE!") It's Paxil in a new box. And it means Paxil's maker keeps it's financial control over that drug for that much longer! It's THE SAME DRUG!!!