← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Gabrielle
Thread ID: 19396 | Posts: 15 | Started: 2005-08-02
2005-08-02 23:46 | User Profile
Like a frenzied pack of howling curs, America's malignant Left ravenously feasted upon the Abu Ghraib scandal when it broke. The opportunity it provided for them to engage in a wholesale orgy of America bashing was an allure they could not resist.
In short order, horrified gasps of moral outrage were heard from leftist mainstream media as their headlines blared, "House of Horrors...sadism at Abu Ghraib prison!" (U.S. News and World Report) and "sexual depravity, sadism and violence orchestrated by US soldiers" (Chicago Tribune). Soon, pictures of Iraqi prisoners were being gleefully brandished by them as evidence that American soldiers were indeed, sexual sadists...not baby killers this time, but sexual sadists. By the time their virulent hate-fest finally subsided, they had managed to maliciously smear and hold up to shame America, our president, and our military while simultaneously causing as much trouble for our troops as possible by stirring up Islamic jihadists.
Not content with the initial damage, they are readying themselves to embark on Abu Ghraib Hate-Fest II. The ACLU has demanded the release of more 'torture' pictures, and a compliant federal judge has just granted them their desire.
According to the treacherous Left and their lapdog, the ACLU, their request for more pictures is grounded in concern for the civil liberties and well-being of the prisoners. If the Left possessed even a sliver of integrity perhaps we could accept their stated concerns at face value. However, the truth is that they are contemptible liars who have been passing themselves off as liberals, progressives, and Democrats since the 1960's. In reality they are a motley collection of Marxist, Stalinist, and Trotskyite communists who have been waging a stealthy Marxist-style revolution in America for the last thirty-five years. That they chose to be communists despite the fact that past socialist schemes have failed horrendously, leading to the genocide of more than one-hundred million people, gives the lie to their phony claims of concern. Any concerns they have are for themselves and for the success of their glorious revolution.
Sounding just as hollow are their claims of moral outrage over the sexual sadism at Abu Ghraib for the Left is the champion of sadomasochism and depravity in America. They are responsible for 'finding' a Constitutional right to obscenity and for the making and distribution of pornography. They created an entire class of constituents out of thin air by decreeing that the type of sexual activity a person engages in...no matter how depraved... gives them class distinction and special rights. This has led to the open celebration of sadomasochism at 'leather boy' fests, 'fisting' events, and 'pup and trainer' shows throughout America, including America's capitol.
If the Left was so outraged by sadomasochism and depravity at Abu Ghraib, then why are they teaching it to America's youth? Why did GLSEN distribute an obscenely pornographic booklet called, "The Little Black Book...Queer in the 21st Century" to Brookline, Massachusetts middle and high school students this past April? This booklet is beyond obscene. It opens with, "Hey Queer Boys...is this a great time to be gay or what?" Following this are extremely vile descriptions of various oral and anal sex acts, among which were sadomasochistic fisting and rimming. Then there was this, "Watersports_or pee play", which was said to have "little risk of STD infection and no risk of HIV from playing with pee". Towards the back of the booklet is a list of Boston area gay bars for the "discerning queer boy".
Apparently sadomasochism and depravity are only morally wrong with regards to America's enemies but not so with regards to American culture and our youth?
The New Left radicals of the 1960's were authoritarian ideologues who not only sneered at the World War II generations morality, but they likewise disdained America's system of government and way of life. They were a dictatorial neo-fascist movement that shouted down opponents, seized office buildings and campuses, spit on our troops and called them baby killers, posed for pictures with the Viet Cong, and conspired with revolutionary Marxists. They committed sedition and acts of treason and got away with it. Furthermore, their acts of betrayal caused untold numbers of American military casualties as well as the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese when our military had to pull out of Viet Nam.
Today, these same communist revolutionaries and their created clones are posing as Congressmen, teachers, professors, judges and the like and are dumbing down and depraving our youth, subverting our Rule of Law, trashing our Constitution, and turning our culture into a cesspool. They are brazenly obstructing the appointment of Constitutionalist judges, enacting communistic hate crime laws against Americans, and using a fully compliant mainstream media to broadcast treasonous statements to our enemies. And just as with the Viet Nam war, Americans are left wondering how many of our troops will die as a result?
The socialist revolution they were unable to pull off back in the 1960's is being fiercely waged in America today. Marxist revolutionaries are determined to destroy America as we have always known her and to build a communist hell-hole instead. They may look and sound like average Americans and some of them may even be your neighbors...but they are not our friends. They are America's treacherous enemy within the gates.
[url]http://www.theconservativevoice.com/articles/article.html?id=7267[/url]
2005-08-03 02:03 | User Profile
[QUOTE]In short order, horrified gasps of moral outrage were heard from leftist mainstream media as their headlines blared, "House of Horrors...sadism at Abu Ghraib prison!" (U.S. News and World Report) and "sexual depravity, sadism and violence orchestrated by US soldiers" (Chicago Tribune).[/QUOTE] I dpn't know about the Tribune, but I do know that the senior editor of U.S. News and World Report is none other than Neocon Michael Barone.
This piece is either written by your typical neocon talk radio listener or a Neocon attempting to divert people's attention from the real problem- both major parties.
2005-08-04 12:28 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius]I dpn't know about the Tribune, but I do know that the senior editor of U.S. News and World Report is none other than Neocon Michael Barone.
This piece is either written by your typical neocon talk radio listener or a Neocon attempting to divert people's attention from the real problem- both major parties.[/QUOTE]
Sertorius, just ignore the left and all their lies, and constantly go on about Neocons. :thumbsup:
2005-08-04 13:54 | User Profile
[B][QUOTE]American Liberals: Enemies Within the Gates[/QUOTE][/B]
Lions and Tigers and Bears, oh my!! Lions and Tigers and Bears, oh MY!!
One of my brainwashed co-workers had a book by neocon hack Bernard Goldberg called something like "100 People Who Are Wrecking America".
I flipped through it and proclaimed it RUBBISH. Along with obvious characters Michael Moore, Noam Chomsky, Jane Fonda and Ted Kennedy, David Duke was also featured as one of the infamous "100".
That tells me that the neocons are sick and twisted individuals and Gabrielle is one of them.
2005-08-04 14:00 | User Profile
Duke made the top 100 of that book huh ? I was wondering about that list. Interesting, but not suprising.
2005-08-04 14:44 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle]Sertorius, just ignore the left and all their lies, and constantly go on about Neocons. :thumbsup:[/QUOTE] Wasn't the political Left and neoconservatism [I]both[/I] built by Jews?
Or did the Irish build those movements instead? Or maybe the Swedes?....or the Mexicans?...or the...
:holiday:
2005-08-04 14:46 | User Profile
Gabby a Neocon??????
Gabby?
2005-08-04 15:56 | User Profile
Marxist revolutionaries are determined to destroy America as we have always known her and to build a communist hell-hole instead. They may look and sound like average Americans and some of them may even be your neighbors...but they are not our friends. They are America's treacherous enemy within the gates.
Paranoid-schizophrenic gold. Worthy of Comrade Sandalio himself. The only thing missing is a tear-off coupon to include with your check (made payable to David Horowitz).
Gaby, so long as you're out there, vigilantly "defending" America, the Europeans will continue to snicker at us. And they'll be right.
2005-08-04 17:08 | User Profile
Like a frenzied pack of howling curs, America's malignant Left ravenously feasted upon the Abu Ghraib scandal when it broke. The opportunity it provided for them to engage in a wholesale orgy of America bashing was an allure they could not resist. In short order, horrified gasps of moral outrage were heard from leftist mainstream media as their headlines blared, "House of Horrors...sadism at Abu Ghraib prison!" (U.S. News and World Report) and "sexual depravity, sadism and violence orchestrated by US soldiers" (Chicago Tribune). Soon, pictures of Iraqi prisoners were being gleefully brandished by them as evidence that American soldiers were indeed, sexual sadists...not baby killers this time, but sexual sadists. By the time their virulent hate-fest finally subsided, they had managed to maliciously smear and hold up to shame America, our president, and our military while simultaneously causing as much trouble for our troops as possible by stirring up Islamic jihadists. This is such crap. Did the "liberals" force American soldiers and intelligence agents to mistreat prisoners?
"Our" president shamed himself and shamed America by starting a war based on the lies of a bunch of Jewish hawks. And "our" troops (some of them, at least) stirred up trouble for themselves by their sick antics at Abu Ghraib. The fault lies with the guilty parties: everyone from idiot-faced a--holes like Charles Graner and his stupid dwarf b!tch Sabrina Harman right up to Bush, Rumsfeld, and all other leaders who condoned (or even ordered) such dishonorable, vile acts.
If neocons like the author of the above don't like America being shamed, maybe they should shift their blame to those who did the actual shameful acts. Those Americans (of all political persuasions) who've been speaking out angrily against American abuses and the whole illegal war in general are the ones who are helping to undo the damage done to America's image in the eyes of the world.
2005-08-04 22:00 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle]Sertorius, just ignore the left and all their lies, and constantly go on about Neocons. :thumbsup:[/QUOTE] Gabrielle,
I am not ignoring the Left. It is that at this time they are not the threat they were in the past. It is the Neocons and the idiots on the Right that have the mistaken belief that they are "conservative." "Liberals" can't take us into war. Neocons and their deluded followers can. [IMG]http://www.antiwar.com/photos/perm/bush-jail.jpg[/IMG] I hope this comes to pass.
2005-08-04 22:33 | User Profile
That leftist cur, Thomas Fleming, feasting on the Abu Ghraib scandal:
[url=http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/cgi-bin/hardright.cgi/THE_FACE_OF_AMERICA.writeback]The New Face of America[/url]> When we decided to invade Iraq—instead of any of the countries known to be fomenting terrorism against the United States (Saudi Arabia and Pakistan)—the President told us solemnly it was “about our values.” What he seems to have meant is that Muslims have preserved a sense of sexual modesty that we are in the process of destroying and that we are determined to use their modesty and shame as a weapon against them. Almost a year ago, a young officer came up to be at a lecture and told me that he was just back from Iraq. What pained him the most, he said, was that, as a conservative Christian, he had to admit that the Iraqis were by and large morally superior to the Americans he had observed in an out of the Army.
2005-08-04 23:00 | User Profile
[QUOTE]"Liberals" can't take us into war.[/QUOTE]
I disagree. They CAN take us to war and have in the past, they simply lack the will to do so. Their agenda is mostly internal at this point; Homo marriage, Increased Taxes, Wealth Re-distribution, Bigger Government, Blame America First, etc. etc. etc.
I agree with Gabby on this one. Liberals are every bit as destructive to the country and our traditional freedoms as the neocons the damage is mostly internal at this point and the neocons are focused outside. Not that they don't have designs but screwing up 220 years of foreign policy takes a lot of time and effort.
Both agenda's suck, both will end in a third world America, overrun and ruined.
2005-08-04 23:00 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]Paranoid-schizophrenic gold. Worthy of Comrade Sandalio himself. The only thing missing is a tear-off coupon to include with your check (made payable to David Horowitz).
Gaby, so long as you're out there, vigilantly "defending" America, the Europeans will continue to snicker at us. And they'll be right.[/QUOTE]
LOL! And the jews don't control the media! :clown: :jester:
2005-08-04 23:11 | User Profile
[QUOTE=jeffersonian]Liberals are every bit as destructive to the country and our traditional freedoms as the neocons[/QUOTE]Agreed. They are slightly less prone to foreign intervention, but remember the Rape of Serbia. And at least some of the neocons are genuinely appalled at the cultural sewer this country has become, unlike the liberals who are determined to degrade it even more.
2005-08-04 23:34 | User Profile
Jefferson,
My comment is to be understood in the narrow sense that they do not rule at this time. At best, they can aid and abet the ruling party, just as a number of Republicans went along with Kosovo.