← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · xmetalhead

London Attacked Again?

Thread ID: 19240 | Posts: 23 | Started: 2005-07-21

Wayback Archive


xmetalhead [OP]

2005-07-21 14:26 | User Profile

[I]Is this for real? If so, start counting the days towards racial holy war.[/I]

[SIZE=3][COLOR=DarkRed]Police chief: 'Very serious incident' in London[/COLOR][/SIZE] [B]Four explosions or attempted explosions confirmed at subway stations, bus[/B]

[B]BREAKING NEWS MSNBC News Services[/B]

Updated: 9:58 a.m. ET July 21, 2005 LONDON - London's police chief Ian Blair described explosions on the city's transport network on Thursday as the result of clearly "a very serious incident."

He told reporters there were four explosions or attempted explosions but that they appeared to be smaller than the ones which killed at least 50 people in the city two weeks' ago.

The explosions were reported at three subway stations and a bus.

Sky TV showed live footage of a double-decker bus parked by the side of the road in Hackney. In the footage, there was nobody on board or nearby and the streets appeared to have been cordoned off.

[B]Emergency teams dispatched[/B]

Police announced they were sending emergency teams to the Warren Street, Shepherds Bush and Oval stations after reports at lunch time of unspecified incidents. One witness told Sky TV that another subway passenger told him a backpack exploded at the Warren Street station and there were reports of smoke.

Sky TV, quoting a police source, said the reported explosions were detonators rather than bombs themselves. However, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair later referred to the explosions as bombs smaller than those used on July 7.

Prime Minister Tony Blair canceled his afternoon appointments as the developments unfolded.

[url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8655541/[/url]


Angeleyes

2005-07-21 15:18 | User Profile

Reuters picked it up as well. [url="http://today.reuters.com/business"]http://today.reuters.com/business[/url]

Looks like whoever is behind this has undertaken the "if at first you don't succeed, try try again.

I wonder when the Chunnel will be targeted?

[QUOTE=xmetalhead]Is this for real? If so, start counting the days towards racial holy war.

[size=3][color=darkred]Police chief: 'Very serious incident' in London[/color][/size] Four explosions or attempted explosions confirmed at subway stations, bus

BREAKING NEWS MSNBC News Services

Updated: 9:58 a.m. ET July 21, 2005 LONDON - London's police chief Ian Blair described explosions on the city's transport network on Thursday as the result of clearly "a very serious incident."

He told reporters there were four explosions or attempted explosions but that they appeared to be smaller than the ones which killed at least 50 people in the city two weeks' ago.

The explosions were reported at three subway stations and a bus.

Sky TV showed live footage of a double-decker bus parked by the side of the road in Hackney. In the footage, there was nobody on board or nearby and the streets appeared to have been cordoned off.

Emergency teams dispatched

Police announced they were sending emergency teams to the Warren Street, Shepherds Bush and Oval stations after reports at lunch time of unspecified incidents. One witness told Sky TV that another subway passenger told him a backpack exploded at the Warren Street station and there were reports of smoke.

Sky TV, quoting a police source, said the reported explosions were detonators rather than bombs themselves. However, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair later referred to the explosions as bombs smaller than those used on July 7.

Prime Minister Tony Blair canceled his afternoon appointments as the developments unfolded.

[url="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8655541/"]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8655541/[/url][/QUOTE]


Ron

2005-07-22 14:19 | User Profile

Just another example of an open door immigration policy to allow foreigners who neither respect nor appreciate the culture they live in. Britain has imported their enemies who have held long grudges and seek revenge.
Britain needs to act now if it's going to survive.


madrussian

2005-07-22 15:37 | User Profile

I'd prefer openly hostile aliens to the kind in the US: deporting messicans would have been accomplished so much easier then. Maybe Europe is lucky to have THAT kind -- there's still a chance they will tackle the problem.


Howard Campbell, Jr.

2005-07-22 15:55 | User Profile

[QUOTE=madrussian]I'd prefer openly hostile aliens to the kind in the US: deporting messicans would have been accomplished so much easier then. Maybe Europe is lucky to have THAT kind -- there's still a chance they will tackle the problem.[/QUOTE]

The Mestizos are becoming more arrogant and hostile as they grow in numbers and political strength--and they are even more racially alien than the Muslims in Europe.

By 2020 we will witness either Aztlan II or Operation Wetback II...


madrussian

2005-07-22 16:07 | User Profile

The media will take care of convincing whitey it's only restoring justice to poor messicans. They are all catholic family-oriented people, and it's only fair to welcome this wonderful breed of "new Americans".


TexasAnarch

2005-07-22 16:26 | User Profile

You are right, xm. This is sort of an all-out pre-war war, forget motivations, blame or outlook.

--followed up by announced random searches in NYC. Some make a show of "not consenting". "Mayor Bloomberg Defends Peeks as 'Right Balance'" says Drudge 7.22 11am

Just as Londoners had to pay the price for supporting Blair (backseat passenger on Bush's hawg, the wags had it), so New Yorker's fork over their liberty to pay for George W. Bush (Karl Rove, Bill Frist, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfelt, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Elliot Abrams, John Negroponte, John Bolton and the supporting cast of Israel-First neocon traitors who have made war on the basis of lies: AIPAC, JINSA, AEI, and assorted other infected cells that have brought -- and ARE -- the disease.)

Is this not connected as payoff? "Give my your liberty, and I'll give you hell."

[url]http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Patriot-Act.html?[/url]

July 22, 2005 House Votes to Extend Patriot Act " By a 257-171 margin, lawmakers who earlier Thursday had watched reports of attempted terrorist bombings in London, agreed to renew key provisions of the Patriot Act that were set to expire at the end of this year.

Forty-three Democrats joined 214 Republicans in passing the bill, which dropped 14 of 16 expiration dates on provisions initially drafted into the law shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks"


How can one not wonder whether this result, locking hard-core police state provisions into place, might not have been the motive for the London terror. Freud said an unconsciously desired outcome will drive events to bring it about. Passage of the Patiot Act is just about the Holy Grail of Zionists, I'd judge.

New Yorkers have already "consented": not just to give Bloomberg the "peek" he wants his policepersons to have at your whatevers, but: to be interrogated if you show bad attitude, resist or otherwise irritate one of the Finest; without a lawyer. No telling what your past might turn up if the Feds got interested in your case, which might be arranged by planting evidence. Let every man be a patsy.

Ultimately, you, New Yorkers, have consented to be raped, tortured and killed. In the name of liberty.


Q. How can 4 detonator devices fail to go off? -- if the Militant Islamic perps are supposed to be so smart. ("When are they going to find the Koran in the van," quipped the ragno.) Couldn't it be because this was a fake attack, designed to instill terror for political reasons, but trying to hurt as few as possible? -- like the fake Arab anthrax attack was used to call out planetary war on bio-chemical poisoners. If more people had actually got killed; Bair would be begonst. As it is, his hand is strengthened by demands for panic-control action, and he's de man.


xmetalhead

2005-07-22 16:53 | User Profile

TexasAnarch, it's simply called the "tail wagging the dog". The government creates the problems then offers their own solutions.


Howard Campbell, Jr.

2005-07-22 17:00 | User Profile

[QUOTE=xmetalhead]TexasAnarch, it's simply called the "tail wagging the dog". The government creates the problems then offers their own solutions.[/QUOTE]

Yep...that Hegelian Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis thang--with Uncle Leviathan serving up syntheses unremittingly hostile to White interests.


Ponce

2005-07-22 17:00 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Howard Campbell, Jr.]The Mestizos are becoming more arrogant and hostile as they grow in numbers and political strength--and they are even more racially alien than the Muslims in Europe.

By 2020 we will witness either Aztlan II or Operation Wetback II...[/QUOTE]

Your got it Howard, what the Muslims wants by using bombs those south of the border will get with votes and witout firing a shot....thats also what the Zionists are afraid will happen with the Palestinians.


Howard Campbell, Jr.

2005-07-22 17:11 | User Profile

Whoever is setting off those bombs wants to effect the situation in Palestine and Iraq--not the living standards of Muslims in the West.

The Meskins are irredentists...


Ron

2005-07-22 18:07 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Ponce]Your got it Howard, what the Muslims wants by using bombs those south of the border will get with votes and witout firing a shot....thats also what the Zionists are afraid will happen with the Palestinians.[/QUOTE] I think putting bombs on subways and busses as being a rather arrogant, if not downright psychotic, act.


Ron

2005-07-22 18:21 | User Profile

[QUOTE=madrussian]The media will take care of convincing whitey it's only restoring justice to poor messicans. They are all catholic family-oriented people, and it's only fair to welcome this wonderful breed of "new Americans".[/QUOTE]

We Americans have nobody to blame, but ourselves. The fact the Mexicans can come into this country, and be able to kick Americans out of their jobs doesn't say much for the American worker, or his work ethic. The Mexicans I have encountered believe Americans are fat and lazy. They may have a point. Too many US workers want too much money for little work, or believe they are too good for certain jobs. I see Mexicans working at Mickey Dees, department stores, auto repair shops, and the American sitting home playing EverQuest on his computer.


Quantrill

2005-07-22 18:29 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Ron]We Americans have nobody to blame, but ourselves. The fact the Mexicans can come into this country, and be able to kick Americans out of their jobs doesn't say much for the American working, or his work ethic. The Mexicans I have encountered believe Americans are fat and lazy. They may have a point. Too many US workers want too much money for little work, or believe they are too good for certain jobs. I see Mexicans working at Mickey Dees, department stores, auto repair shops, and the American sitting home playing EverQuest on his computer.[/QUOTE] I also see Mexicans living thirty to a shack, receiving welfare, and getting their medical care tax-funded at the emergency room. Is this the standard of living to which we should aspire for Americans?


Ron

2005-07-22 18:36 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Quantrill]I also see Mexicans living thirty to a shack, receiving welfare, and getting their medical care tax-funded at the emergency room. Is this the standard of living to which we should aspire for Americans?[/QUOTE]

I agee. However, we Americans provide these State supported services so the American businessman won't have to pay them. In effect, our taxes are going toward paying the medical benefits package for the businessmen who hire the illegals.
However, my point is the Mexicans are outworking the Americans. Mexicans will work longer, harder and probably better for a lower wage. The American worker is spoiled, and many simply won't work as hard as their fathers and grandfathers who built this country.


il ragno

2005-07-23 01:46 | User Profile

Ultimately, you, New Yorkers, have consented to be raped, tortured and killed. In the name of liberty.

Let me clue you in on something: there's a reason these things get signed into law minus any public referendum, or even hearings, on non-election years. That's so none of these cocksuckers ever has to be publicly embarrassed with questions like "YOU'RE the traitors who decided to take in every piece of human jetsam no questions asked, and tax US for the privilege of having our earnings and now our safety undermined. And you did it so you'd never again need be bothered with nuisances like collective bargaining, or paying white men a living wage, or worrying about being dragged out of your beds and loaded onto cattle cars and paid back with interest. If this shit doesn't end you won't need a 24-hour security detail - you'll need your own ICBMs to keep your heads from going up on poles to warn the next con-man thinking about campaigning for public office that this is what happens to traitors around here."


Sertorius

2005-07-23 02:49 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Ron]We Americans have nobody to blame, but ourselves. The fact the Mexicans can come into this country, and be able to kick Americans out of their jobs doesn't say much for the American worker, or his work ethic. The Mexicans I have encountered believe Americans are fat and lazy. They may have a point. Too many US workers want too much money for little work, or believe they are too good for certain jobs. I see Mexicans working at Mickey Dees, department stores, auto repair shops, and the American sitting home playing EverQuest on his computer.[/QUOTE] No, Ron, I don' think that is the case. It is up to the feds to enforce immigration laws. If the American worker is guilty of anything it is not voting these NWO whores out of office. If it were left up to some of my former co-workers in construction to enforce these laws there would be a number of dead people.

While I acknowlege there are some Americans that think they are too good to preform certain tasks I also know they are far and few in between. I have fired people like that. As for work habits go, I have seen Mexicans run with the sheetrock, slap it on the wall and I, having to go through there and fix all the stuff they screwed up. Give me an American any day over those folks. While it might seem slower, it is being done correctly and that saves money over time.

If you see Mexicans in all these places it only because the Americans that did this work previously got disgusted with long hours, being expected to be on call at all hours, no benefits or compensating pay for no benefits, and no overtime. There is no way in hell I would layout, frame and hang an office lease space for what they want to pay today with all the bullshit that you have to put up with.

To quote Ayn Rand, "value for value."


Angler

2005-07-23 03:39 | User Profile

This latest attack, which probably failed due to flawed explosives but could potentially have been as bad as the one a few weeks ago, only shows that you can't stop terrorism through increased security. London was still on high alert after those first attacks, yet the bombers had no trouble planting new ones.

As for kicking out all the Arab Muslims...well, that should be done, but not because of the bombings. After all, only a tiny number of those people were responsible. The reason the Arab Muslims should be deported is simply because they don't belong in Europe, just as Jews don't belong there.

On the other hand, no mass deportation will ever actually happen, either in England or (especially) in America. The alien population in both cases is just too large. And few people will want to get rid of the "good" Arabs with the "bad" -- e.g., no one wants to deport productive doctors, professors, etc.

In the end, it is the West that is inciting terrorism through its Zionist Middle East policies. So, Americans and other Westerners need to wake up and realize that the ONLY realistic solution to terrorist threats is to butt out of the Middle East -- to stop sending money to Israel, to stop vetoing UN resolutions critical of Israel, to stop playing "puppeteer" with Arab governments, etc.


Brian Foley

2005-07-23 03:42 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Ron] However, my point is the Mexicans are outworking the Americans. Mexicans will work longer, harder and probably better for a lower wage.[/QUOTE] I dont think Mexicans , like their other Third World counterparts , have much of a say on what conditions they will work under . [QUOTE=Ron]The American worker is spoiled, and many simply won't work as hard as their fathers and grandfathers who built this country.[/QUOTE] The US economy is what absorbs these products from these Third World cheap labour zones . That is the strength of the US worker is that America along with other OECD nations have gone from manufacturing and service based economies to the advanced sophisticated consumer societies which dominate the globes economy .


il ragno

2005-07-23 04:23 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Angler]As for kicking out all the Arab Muslims...well, that should be done, but not because of the bombings. After all, only a tiny number of those people were responsible. The reason the Arab Muslims should be deported is simply because they don't belong in Europe, just as Jews don't belong there.

On the other hand, no mass deportation will ever actually happen, either in England or (especially) in America. The alien population in both cases is just too large. And few people will want to get rid of the "good" Arabs with the "bad" -- e.g., no one wants to deport productive doctors, professors, etc.[/QUOTE]

The dynamic at work that no one will utter aloud or otherwise allude to:

If and when aliens are expelled, the Arabs/Mexicans/whoever will go and the Jews will stay in place, with neocons huffing and puffing like WOGS OUT was a Jewish idea all along.

Were it the other way around - if just once we decided to see what might happen if we kept the wogs but expelled the Jews - nuclear war would happen. Within a matter of weeks. False flag, real flag: unimportant. The first mass-expulsion of Jews would send up the signal-flare to Tel Aviv that the control mechanisms had shorted out and the sleeping dogs were now awake.....time to employ the Van Creveld Option before the inevitable accounting.

That every Western government [I]knows that [/I] is the reason it will never be the "other way around".


madrussian

2005-07-23 05:01 | User Profile

One way to avoid that is erasing the shitstain of humanity in an overwhelming first strike. Now you see it, and now you don't.


grep14w

2005-07-23 06:13 | User Profile

[QUOTE=il ragno]The dynamic at work that no one will utter aloud or otherwise allude to:

If and when aliens are expelled, the Arabs/Mexicans/whoever will go and the Jews will stay in place, with neocons huffing and puffing like WOGS OUT was a Jewish idea all along. Jews worked too hard to create this multiracial cesspool. They would only support its dismantling as a desperation move, where their normal paranoia would expect that they would be next to be deported, sooner or later. Note that "diversity" and open borders are supported by all Jews of all political persuasions. I think it would go against their basic tribal instincts to support a return to a monoracial West; they literally couldn't do it, even if it was in their best long term interests.

Were it the other way around - if just once we decided to see what might happen if we kept the wogs but expelled the Jews - nuclear war would happen. Within a matter of weeks. False flag, real flag: unimportant. The first mass-expulsion of Jews would send up the signal-flare to Tel Aviv that the control mechanisms had shorted out and the sleeping dogs were now awake.....time to employ the Van Creveld Option before the inevitable accounting.

That every Western government [I]knows that [/I] is the reason it will never be the "other way around".[/QUOTE]I doubt that the Israelis really have as many nukes as they claim; moreover they really don't have the delivery mechanisms, and as for passing them off as "terrorists" attacks, a Jew-wise West smart enough to deport the Jews would not fall for such tricks (again) and would, as previously noted, simply wipe out "that shitty little country" before taking care of the internal Jewish problem, as a necessary and inevitable first step - defanging and declawing the tiger before you attempt to shave it, in other words.


il ragno

2005-07-23 07:19 | User Profile

[QUOTE]I doubt that the Israelis really have as many nukes as they claim; moreover they really don't have the delivery mechanisms[/QUOTE]

Perhaps. The various governments who've sold them the weapons and the knowhow (for money they'd lent Israel to begin with, or for classified info Israel's stolen from other countries who'd lent them money and/or given them arms) could tell you best. One of the first signposts that America had lost her way was the manner in which these godawful weapons became treated as poker chips and party favors in the first place in the 70s and 80s, handed out this way and that, the repercussions left for the next guy, the next generation, to deal with - and AIPAC always there, a bag of cash in one hand and a flash card with Hitler's face on it in the other, never needing to ask directions to the bathroom or permission to raid the fridge once inside State Department HQ.