← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Gabrielle
Thread ID: 19189 | Posts: 40 | Started: 2005-07-17
2005-07-17 19:20 | User Profile
King County sheriff's detectives are investigating the owners of an Enumclaw-area farm after a Seattle man died from injuries sustained while having sex with a horse boarded on the property.
Investigators first learned of the farm after the man died at Enumclaw Community Hospital July 2. The county Medical Examiner's Office ruled that the death was accidental and the result of having sex with a horse.
A surveillance camera picked up the license plate of the car that dropped the man off at the hospital, which led detectives to the farm and other people involved, said sheriff's Sgt. John Urquhart.
Deputies don't believe a crime occurred because bestiality is not illegal in Washington state and the horse was uninjured, said Urquhart.
But because investigators found chickens, goats and sheep on the property, they are looking into whether animal cruelty ââ¬â which is a crime ââ¬â was committed by having sex with these smaller, weaker animals, he said.
The farm was talked about in Internet chat rooms as a destination for people looking to have sex with livestock, he said.
"A significant number of people, we believe, have likely visited this farm," said Urquhart.
The Humane Society of the United States intends to use the case during the next state legislative session as an example of why sex with animals should be outlawed in Washington, said Bob Reder, a Humane Society regional director in Seattle.
"This and a few other cases that we have will allow us a platform to talk about sex abuse of animals," Reder said.
Thirty-three states ban sex with animals, he said.
Susan Michaels, co-founder of local animal-rights organization Pasado's Safe Haven, said she has been fighting to have bestiality made illegal. "It's animal cruelty behind closed doors," Michaels said.
[url]http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002382718_horse15m.html?syndication=rss[/url]
**This is what we get for disobeying God's laws. **
2005-07-18 01:35 | User Profile
10 to 1 this guy voted for the chimp. Its true God didn't want Adam screwing animals, which is why women were created.
2005-07-18 02:39 | User Profile
I was told that there is no difference between having sex with a pig and a woman, I wonder.......where was that farm at? heheheheh kidding guys and Gabby, I know that you are better than a pig lolllllllll. :jester:
2005-07-18 02:56 | User Profile
Poor animals.
2005-07-18 03:44 | User Profile
King County sheriff's detectives are investigating the owners of an Enumclaw-area farm after a Seattle man died from injuries sustained while having sex with a horse boarded on the property.
Investigators first learned of the farm after the man died at Enumclaw Community Hospital July 2. The county Medical Examiner's Office ruled that the death was accidental and the result of having sex with a horse. Serves his dumb ass right. I hope it was a painful death for the freak.
I despise people who are cruel to animals. Responsible hunting isn't so bad, but people who torture animals or rape them should be shot. And I almost certainly would blow someone's kneecap off if I ever caught him doing that.
2005-07-18 10:58 | User Profile
[QUOTE=TexasAnarch]10 to 1 this guy voted for the chimp. Its true God didn't want Adam screwing animals, which is why women were created.[/QUOTE]
10 to 1 he didn't, Clever Hans. :mad:
2005-07-18 11:04 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]I was told that there is no difference between having sex with a pig and a woman, I wonder.......where was that farm at? heheheheh kidding guys and Gabby, I know that you are better than a pig lolllllllll. :jester:[/QUOTE]
LOL! Duck manââ¬Â¦ I am sure you Cubans know all about animals. :whstl::wink:
2005-07-18 12:05 | User Profile
I can't restrain my morbid curiosity: was this guy kicked to death while trying to hump the horse, or did the horse hump him to death?
Sorry, I know it's crude.
But if it's the latter, can you imagine the damage the folks at that ER saw?!
Yikes!!!!
2005-07-18 14:01 | User Profile
As absolutely disgusting and perverted as bestiality is, it is not altogether farfetched to posit that it may be legal one day in the future. Indeed, 'ethicists' such as Dr Peter Singer have already laid the philosophical foundations, and argue that it should be legal now. If one takes the prevailing wisdom as a starting point, namely that the community cannot legitimately restrict any sexual activities by consenting adults, then the debate turns solely on the issue of consent. Can animals consent? Or, can children consent, for that matter? Once society has accepted the premise, it puts morality on very shaky footing, indeed.
2005-07-18 14:17 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Angler]Serves his dumb ass right. I hope it was a painful death for the freak.
I despise people who are cruel to animals. Responsible hunting isn't so bad, but people who torture animals or rape them should be shot. And I almost certainly would blow someone's kneecap off if I ever caught him doing that.[/QUOTE] 1. Note this from the article.
*Thirty-three states ban sex with animals, he said. *
OK, so what about the other 17 (18 if you include DC)? It's OK to have sex with animals in a third of that nation's states? The mind boggles.
I guess one has to infer rape of an animal, as consent is hard to get verbally. Then again, lawyers being clever with stuff like this, in a scenario wherein the act is initiated, and no resistance is met, does silence imply consent? Not sure how the law would see that. How about cases where the animal is a demonstrably willing participant? OK, let's not apologize for bestiality, it's simply wrong. I can see points like this argued in a courtroom. :censored:
As to the kneecapping for a horse buggerer, I concur with your idea there. I prefer the horse exacting revenge, however, and the hooves to the head and trampling strikes me as a better case of "punishment fits the crime."
2005-07-18 14:51 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Angeleyes] Then again, lawyers being clever with stuff like this, in a scenario wherein the act is initiated, and no resistance is met, does silence imply consent? Not sure how the law would see that. How about cases where the animal is a demonstrably willing participant? OK, let's not apologize for bestiality, it's simply wrong. I can see points like this argued in a courtroom. [/QUOTE] Angeleyes, This is exactly the line of thinking to which I was referring. If you take the PETA position, that 'a pig is a rat is a dog is a boy,' aka that each has equal worth, then it stands to reason that an animal must be able to give meaningful consent in some way. Combine that with acceptance of the modern principle that society has no business proscribing any sexual behaviour between (or among) consenting partners, shake vigorously, and voila! you get legalization of bestiality. Disgusting.
2005-07-18 15:12 | User Profile
Sorry, folks, I couldn't resist: :punk:
[QUOTE]Sex Farm, by : Spinal Tap
Let's rock and roll!
Working on a sex farm Trying to raise some hard love Getting out my pitch fork And poking at your hay.
Scratching in your henhouse Sniffing at your feedbag Slipping out your back door I'm leaving my spray.
Sex farm woman I'm gonna mow you down Sex farm woman I'll rake and mow you down. Sex farm woman Don't you see my silo risin' high.
Working on a sex farm Hosing down your barn door Bothering your livestock They know what I need.
Working up a hot sweat I'm scratching in your pea patch Plowing through your bean field Planting my seed.
Sex farm woman I'll be your hired hand Sex farm woman I'll let my offer stand Sex farm woman Don't you feel my tractor rumbling by By - by - byyyy.
Working on a sex farm Wolfing down some cornbread I'm turning on the TV Joining the grange.[/QUOTE]
2005-07-18 15:15 | User Profile
Walt, That song (indeed, almost every song from that movie) is a classic. My wife is a vet, and that song cracks her up.
'I'm scratching in your pea patch' :thumbsup:
From the film --
DEREK: ...you know. Now, I mean a song like ââ¬ÅSex Farmââ¬Â, weââ¬â¢re taking a sophisticated view of the idea of sex, you know, and music...
MARTY: ...and put it on a farm?
DEREK: Yeah.
2005-07-18 15:24 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Quantrill]Walt, That song (indeed, almost every song from that movie) is a classic. My wife is a vet, and that song cracks her up.
'I'm scratching in your pea patch' :thumbsup:
From the film --[/QUOTE]
Yeah, that's my favorite line, too!
I like the song "Big Bottom" as well:
[QUOTE]Talk about mudflaps My baby's got 'em![/QUOTE]
2005-07-18 15:36 | User Profile
So, what's the consensus, people?
Did this guy get kicked to death or did he die of massive bleeding from a hideously ripped lower bowel?
Enquiring mind what to know! :pimp:
(I'm voting for the ripped bowel theory!) :biggrin:
2005-07-18 15:38 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle]LOL! Duck manââ¬Â¦ I am sure you Cubans know all about animals. :whstl::wink:[/QUOTE]
Ouchhhhhhhhhhhh that hurts hahahahahaah, I also love you Gabby :wink:
2005-07-18 23:59 | User Profile
[img]http://www.aceofjustice.com/graphics/cubanstruck.jpg[/img]
Ponce goes duck hunting with his Cuban buddies.
2005-07-19 22:15 | User Profile
Just for you, Walter:
Man dies after sex with horse 19/07/2005 07:54 - (SA)
San Francisco - A man died of internal injuries from sex with a stallion at a ranch used by a bestiality ring, police in the northwestern United States state of Washington said on Monday.
The man suffered fatal trauma while being sodomised by a stallion at a stud farm that catered to men who wanted sex with animals, Enumclaw Police Commander Eric Sortland told AFP.
"From the medical examiner's office to the sheriff to the police detectives, we have never seen anything remotely close to what we have in the past two weeks," Sortland said.
The shocking events at the ranch were exposed after a man's body was dropped off at a hospital southeast of the city of Seattle on July 2 after his encounter with the horse.
"Basically, his colon was ruptured, along with his lower organs in that region, and he bled out," Sortland said.
A cache of hundreds of hours of videotaped man-on-beast sex sessions was found hidden in a field, Sortland said.
The animals kept at the farm included ponies, horses, goats, sheep and dogs, according to the police commander.
Images of the flock of offerings on the bestial dude ranch were relayed over the internet and records indicate men had come from throughout the United States, according to police.
"Unfortunately, these people were very diligent in filming their activities," Sortland said of a viewing task detectives have found unpleasant.
Police were still reviewing the recordings to determine the range of activities, according to the commander.
Because sex with animals is not barred by law in Washington state, no arrests have been made, according to police who nonetheless continued to investigate on Monday to determine whether any illegal activity had taken place at the ranch.
The case is being used by state legislators backing a bill that would make it illegal to have sex with beasts, Sortland said.
:eek:
2005-07-20 03:54 | User Profile
[QUOTE=lnelson]San Francisco - A man died of internal injuries from sex with a stallion at a ranch used by a bestiality ring, police in the northwestern United States state of Washington said on Monday. The man suffered fatal trauma while being sodomised by a stallion at a stud farm that catered to men who wanted sex with animals, Enumclaw Police Commander Eric Sortland told AFP. "From the medical examiner's office to the sheriff to the police detectives, we have never seen anything remotely close to what we have in the past two weeks," Sortland said.
The shocking events at the ranch were exposed after a man's body was dropped off at a hospital southeast of the city of Seattle on July 2 after his encounter with the horse.
"Basically, his colon was ruptured, along with his lower organs in that region, and he bled out," Sortland said. :eek:[/QUOTE] Cosmic justice, or perhaps . . . "Vengeance is Mine, sayeth the horse!"
2005-07-20 06:45 | User Profile
[QUOTE=lnelson]Just for you, Walter:
The man suffered fatal trauma while being sodomised by a stallion at a stud farm that catered to men who wanted sex with animals, Enumclaw Police Commander Eric Sortland told AFP.
"From the medical examiner's office to the sheriff to the police detectives, we have never seen anything remotely close to what we have in the past two weeks," Sortland said.[/QUOTE] Thanks, Inelson!
You really made my day.
Just as I had suspected. Of course, had it been the other way around with him trying to screw the stallion, the result would have been no less traumatic.
Can you imagine being one of the folks on the ER staff that had to treat this freek? His arsehole must have looked like a gory Grand Canyon!
Ouch. I mean, just damn! :jester:
That's gotta hurt!!!
2005-07-20 08:42 | User Profile
Now that's just yucky!
2005-07-20 10:25 | User Profile
Sodomites ââ¬â filthy disgusting sodomites!
2005-07-20 10:39 | User Profile
Gabrielle,
You are most Right. The laws banning Bestiality and Sodomy were repealed in the state I live in not too long ago after lobbying by "Gay Rights" activists.
[QUOTE]Because sex with animals is not barred by law in Washington state, no arrests have been made, according to police who nonetheless continued to investigate on Monday to determine whether any illegal activity had taken place at the ranch. The case is being used by state legislators backing a bill that would make it illegal to have sex with beasts, Sortland said.[/QUOTE]
2005-07-20 10:46 | User Profile
A man died of internal injuries from sex with a stallion at a ranch used by a bestiality ring, police in the northwestern United States state of Washington said on Monday.
The man suffered fatal trauma while being sodomised by a stallion at a stud farm that catered to men who wanted sex with animals, Enumclaw Police Commander Eric Sortland told AFP. So that's how it happened. LOL. I'd assumed that the horse had just kicked his ass really badly when he tried to rape it.
Well, at least he wasn't being cruel to the horse, since he was the one getting sodomized. But this is so disgusting that it serves him right that he got screwed to death.
My earlier comments regarding anyone who rapes or otherwise tortures an animal still apply, of course. They should be shot.
2005-07-20 11:12 | User Profile
On page 1 of this thread, when it appeared the guy was doing the horse, I wondered what part of Mexico he hailed from.
But I see that on page 2, not only was the horse doing the guy, but the dateline was corrected - from King County, WA to San Francisco. So we now know he was college-educated, balding, had a neatly-trimmed beard, probably wasn't an ounce overweight, and loved musicals. Only [I]now [/I] his favorite show-tune is "Get Me To The Hearse On Time".
RIP to The Man Whom Seattle Slew. If he'd stuck to [I]baloney [/I] ponies, he'd be alive today to protest the government's AIDS policies. But he moved up from niggers to Triggers and now you can turn him over and see inside him.
And if you don't think that ratifying gay marriages will inevitably lead to the Equus-Rights Amendment in 20 years' time, you're underestimating the depth of faggot perversion. Namely, [I]bottomless[/I].
2005-07-20 11:34 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno] RIP to The Man Whom Seattle Slew. If he'd stuck to *baloney * ponies, he'd be alive today to protest the government's AIDS policies. But he moved up from niggers to Triggers and now you can turn him over and see inside him[/QUOTE] :lol:
2005-07-20 15:54 | User Profile
[B]Thirty-three states ban sex with animals, he said.[/B]
I think it's a sad commentary such laws have to be passed which prohibits sex with animals.
Having sex with a horse is obvious indication the guy was crazy, or had an overinflated image of himself. Maybe he was too cheap to hire a hooker.
On the other hand, women have supposedly been doing the same thing for years.
I would nominate him for a Darwin Award assuming he had no human offspring.
2005-07-20 16:33 | User Profile
I agree with the legal prohibition on this disgusting practice, but in cases where there is a lack of, ahem, physical evidence, then how do you prosecute the case? Do horses kiss and tell?
Mr. Ed on the stand testifying how a Mr. Wilbur Post slipped Rohypnol into his feed bag one terrible night?
2005-07-20 17:20 | User Profile
[QUOTE=MadScienceType]I agree with the legal prohibition on this disgusting practice, but in cases where there is a lack of, ahem, physical evidence, then how do you prosecute the case? Do horses kiss and tell?[/QUOTE] MST, I think the main value of such a law is its normative function, in that it lays out the guidelines of what behaviour a community considers appropriate, even though charges would likely not be brought often. Of course, the crime should be prosecuted, when there is the evidence to do so.
2005-07-20 17:22 | User Profile
[QUOTE=MadScienceType]I agree with the legal prohibition on this disgusting practice, but in cases where there is a lack of, ahem, physical evidence, then how do you prosecute the case? [u]Do horses kiss and tell?[/u] [/QUOTE] No, they apparently bugger and kill. :oh: Makes the term "love you to death" take on new meaning. Wonder if preparation H was originally designed to ease horse buggery, no hemmoroids. There is an ad campaign in that thought, somewhere. :tongue:
2005-07-20 18:07 | User Profile
Best part of the story's the 'bestiality ring'. I'm gonna have to read the personals in FEED AND GRAIN MONTHLY a lot more carefully.
Can you imagine the minutes of the next club-meeting?
"The Fowl and Livestock Society now in session: be seated, brothers. If you can. Now we're all saddened by Brother Ralph's tragic accid- [I]Brother Milton, put down that chicken and wait until the session is adjourned![/I]"
"It's not what you think - I'm going to the bathroom."
"Buckbuck BUUUUUCK!!!"
2005-07-20 18:23 | User Profile
IR, just laughed out loud reading your last post. Classic.
BTW, bad shit will always happen in a town that's named "Enumclaw". WTF? I can't even pronounce that one.
Maybe "Analclaw" may be better suited for the town being their horses are killer sodomites.
2005-07-20 18:45 | User Profile
Regarding the status of deviants as having been elevated to that of "most favored minority", the question is...
Will the horse be charged with commiting a hate crime?
2005-07-20 22:03 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Blond Knight]Regarding the status of deviants as having been elevated to that of "most favored minority", the question is...
Will the horse be charged with commiting a hate crime?[/QUOTE] Look out where you spread that idea. Some sonofabitch will, on the strength of that argument, seek a multi-million dollar federal grant to research "Emotions in Equines During Coitus," or some damned thing. Money down the old rat hole . . . as it were.
2005-07-21 10:46 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ron][B]Thirty-three states ban sex with animals, he said.[/B]
I think it's a sad commentary such laws have to be passed which prohibits sex with animals.
Having sex with a horse is obvious indication the guy was crazy, or had an overinflated image of himself. Maybe he was too cheap to hire a hooker.
On the other hand, women have supposedly been doing the same thing for years.
I would nominate him for a Darwin Award assuming he had no human offspring.[/QUOTE]
Ron, you are rather strange. :yes:
2005-07-21 11:04 | User Profile
It's Official: 'Diversity' Includes Sex With Children and Sex With Animals
Editorial Massachusetts News June 2001
People used to laugh when told that "diversity" was going to expand to include 1) sex between men and boys and 2) sex between humans and animals.
But they can't laugh anymore. No one is sure how far "diversity" will continue to go before the citizens understand.
WGBH is advocating man/boy sex in its television show about a "love affair" between a man (29-years-old) and a boy (15-years-old), complete with graphic sex scenes. A professor of ethics at Princeton University is advocating sex with animals. The president of PETA writes approvingly of his thesis. Much of this "diversity" was predicted in 1979 by two scholars, Dr. C. Everett Koop and Dr. Francis Schaeffer, who said that adult/child sex would be normalized in the 1990s. This was inevitable, they said, because we no longer had a "Judeo-Christian base." Instead, we had moved to humanism with no fixed standards of values and morality.
Sex With Animals The Ira W. DeCamp professor at Princeton's "Center for Human Values," Peter Singer, is telling the nation that sex with animals is fine as long as it does not hurt the animal.
He says that the only reason we have a taboo against this is because of the "Judeo-Christian tradition." If we can get rid of that nonsense, the taboo would fall, he believes.
The president of PETA agrees with Singer's beliefs about animals. She said the following about his article which appeared on nerve.com. "It's daring and honest, and it does not do what some people read into it, which is condone any violent acts involving an animal, sexual or otherwise."
When asked how an animal can consent to sex, she said, "It sounds like [your question] is an attempt to make this so narrow and so unintellectual in its focus. You know, Peter Singer is an intellectual, and he looks at all nuances of an issue, the whole concept of consent with animals is very different."
Singer bases his argument on the fact that bestiality has always existed in the world, and therefore it must be normal. (Alcohol and drugs have always existed. Does that mean we should encourage them also?) He cited six pictures over a 2500-year period to show that this is "normal" behavior. He cites the discredited Alfred Kinsey for the ridiculous statement that over 50% of rural boys in America had sex with animals.
It's interesting to note that he agrees with Dr. Koop and Dr. Schaeffer that only Judeo-Christian values stop us from embracing his vision. He blames our problems on that tradition that he says teaches, "Humans alone are made in the image of God." He writes that under this tradition, "Only human beings have an immortal soul. In Genesis, God gives humans dominion over the animals. In the Renaissance idea of the Great Chain of Being, humans are halfway between the beasts and the angels. We are spiritual beings as well as physical beings." He believes that all of those teachings are wrong.
Singer recounts that all the taboos about sex have fallen except for those with animals. He says that bestiality is fine as long as you do not hurt the animal. Therefore, he cautions against sex with chickens because, he says, it always results in the death of the chicken.
Many will still giggle and say that this does not mean that Singer's beliefs are mainstream ideas. But the professor has not been in a dark closet at Princeton for the last thirty years. They just hired him last year for this prominent position after all of his views were well known. In addition, those of us who were around in 1973, when homosexuality was removed from the "disorder" list by the American Psychiatric Association, can remember the many claims made at that time which have proven to be false.
The article by Prof. Singer, which is titled "Heavy Petting," may be found at [url]www.nerve.com[/url].
Man/Boy Sex Is Fine MassNews was one of the first newspapers in the country to report in 1999 that the American Psychological Association had published a study indicating that pedophilia can have a positive influence on a child.
According to the study, the use of "judgmental terms" such as "child abuse," "molestation" and "victims" must be eliminated. Instead, we should use neutral, value-free terms like "adult-child sex." We should not talk about the "severity of the abuse," but instead refer to "the level of sexual intimacy."
As a result of our efforts and a four-page report we mailed to residents in Newton, the leaders of that city responded with a rally against "hate mail." It was in reality a "hate MassNews" rally with all of the political leaders, teachers and homosexual activists attending.
We had only an Internet site at that time, but it was apparent after the Newton "hate" rally that we would be totally silenced by all the media unless we also published a print newspaper, which we have now done for two years.
In addition, we revealed at that time that the American Psychiatric Association was getting ready to support the "normalization" of sex with children. It had very quietly changed its Diagnostic Manual so that a person no longer has a "disorder" simply because he molests children. To be diagnosed as "disordered," the psychiatrists now look to the psyche of the adult. If the adult does not feel anxious about the relationship with the child or if the adult is not impaired in his work or social relationships, then he has no "disorder."
Aside from the Newton rally, which resulted from our pamphlet about pedophilia, the following events have taken place.
November 1999. A gay organization in Boston, BAGLY, offers $25, plus free dinner and subway tokens, to boys who will come to their headquarters and discuss homosexual sex and other issues. The boys are also invited to a free, three-day, lakeside, weekend retreat in New Hampshire with other "boys" up to 25-years-old who are "attracted to or have sex with other men." None of the politicians or media are interested in this story - even though the organization receives money from the state and works closely with the public schools. March-April 2000. Channel 2 airs a program about a "romance" between a 29-year-old man and a 15-year-old boy which showed in graphic detail all of the nude scenes between them. It stated that the romance thrilled all of England and caused everyone to realize the "benefits" of sex between men and boys. March 2000. The Fistgate conference gives graphic instruction to teenagers on the practice of homosexual sex. This was done in sessions which mingled youth from 12-years-old to 21-years-old. It was sponsored by the homosexual organization, GLSEN, and the Department of Education. Complaints were made to Gov. Cellucci and his staff, but they ignored it until some parents went to Massachusetts News which printed the story in May and shocked the state. May 2000. A Massachusetts judge, Allan van Gestel, is not outraged with the unlawful teachings at Fistgate but with the parents who exposed what happened there. He imposes an unconstitutional gag order against everyone, which he lifts after the national press ridicules him. But he leaves the order in place against the two parents who have no money or power. It is expected that their legal fees will be in excess of $200,000 as the result of the action of Judge van Gestel. May 2000. An Editorial in the Boston Globe says that what was discussed at Fistgate were "the sorts of things teenagers ask every day." The Globe said this even though "fisting" was discussed in detail at the conference, as well as the following: "Do lesbians rub their clits together?" "Should you spit after you suck another boy or man?" "Is oral sex better with tongue rings?" July 6, 2000. The "At Home" section of the Boston Globe publishes an article which advised mothers to teach their children "the mechanics of sex," including homosexual sex, when their children are in fifth or sixth grade. They were told to expect 10- and 11-year-olds to ask, "What do gay men/lesbians do?" The parents were advised by the Globe to respond, "There are different ways people give each other pleasure, sometimes genital to genital, sometimes hand or mouth to genital." November 2000. When the homosexuals who sponsored Fistgate had a three-day fundraiser at the Sheraton in Braintree, with people arriving from across the country, there was a "meat market auction" on Friday with "beef, pork, chicken and sausage" for sale. The Saturday night affair was "A Return to the Chicken Ranch." In homosexual circles, the term "chicken" refers to young boys. Throughout 2000. After the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Boy Scouts can refuse to allow a homosexual to be a leader of boys, much of the establishment in the state, including some schools, two of the largest United Ways and other groups, terminate their relations with the Scouts. The elite do not demand that the Girl Scouts allow heterosexual men to be leaders of teenage girls, only that homosexual men be allowed to lead boys. May 2001. Boston Magazine has a long, two-part story about the North American Man/Boy Love Association which was very empathetic. It gave the impression that man/boy love is dead and no one need worry about it anymore. The story presented the members it interviewed as very nice people who were only doing good in the world. This was written despite a "Fact Sheet" from the American Psychiatric Association which says, "Some [pedophiles] develop complicated techniques for gaining access to children. They may select a job, hobby or volunteer work that brings them into contact with children." It's difficult to understand why the elite in our state do not want to give any protection to young boys.
[url]http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/bless/diversity.htm[/url]
2005-07-21 17:03 | User Profile
[QUOTE]il ragno]But he moved up [U]from niggers to Triggers[/U][/QUOTE]
:biggrin:
[QUOTE]And if you don't think that ratifying gay marriages will inevitably lead to the Equus-Rights Amendment in 20 years' time, you're underestimating the depth of faggot perversion. Namely, [I]bottomless[/I].[/QUOTE]
Bingo.
That's the thing about fags. They're perverts by definition. They suffer from sexual addition, really no different in kind than heroin addiction or alcoholism.
Just as with the alcoholic "one is too much and a thousand never enough", so too the faggot's only choice is total chastity or total debauchery. I've known lots of fags, and I never knew one who was sexually active who did not live of life of just nauseating sexual indulgence.
This is where it ended for this freak.
I hope the horse enjoyed it.
2005-07-21 20:53 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle]Ron, you are rather strange. :yes:[/QUOTE]
And..so what else is new. :biggrin:
2005-07-21 22:44 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]...or did he die of massive bleeding from a hideously ripped lower bowel? [/QUOTE]
:blush: :oh:
That didn't even occur to me!! I gotta get out more... (or... maybe not!)
2005-07-24 14:48 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ron][B]Thirty-three states ban sex with animals, he said.[/B]
I think it's a sad commentary such laws have to be passed which prohibits sex with animals.
Having sex with a horse is obvious indication the guy was crazy, or had an overinflated image of himself. Maybe he was too cheap to hire a hooker.
On the other hand, women have supposedly been doing the same thing for years.
I would nominate him for a Darwin Award assuming he had no human offspring.[/QUOTE]
Maybe I should clairfy. I believe such laws should be unnecessary as human beings should know better, and it's a sad commentary on our times when States need to pass such laws. Sex wirh livestock should be illegal simply because it's so disgusting. Although I have met a few women who were borderline cases. :biggrin:
I don't believe there is a lot of difference between sex with animals and with negroes. Most states have eliminated negro sex laws from their books.