← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · JoseyWales

timeframe for US white majority to end ?

Thread ID: 19122 | Posts: 11 | Started: 2005-07-12

Wayback Archive


JoseyWales [OP]

2005-07-12 22:43 | User Profile

Some "experts" have predicted 2050, but at the rate we are going it seems like it will be here sooner than that. Anyone got a link to a decent article ?


Happy Hacker

2005-07-12 23:49 | User Profile

In the age range under 35, whites are probably already a minority.


Knekkeben

2005-07-12 23:58 | User Profile

Here's a better question. Why is this important? Is it feared that political representation for whites as whites will be lost when this takes place? I don't need to tell anyone here that whites as whites aren't represented politically in the least anyway. So, why is this so terrible?


mwdallas

2005-07-13 01:13 | User Profile

Whites are only 65% in the US, and under 50% in Texas and CA already.


kane123123

2005-07-13 01:15 | User Profile

It is important because next thing they are going to say "get your white butt out."


Snouter

2005-07-13 02:57 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Knekkeben]...I don't need to tell anyone here that whites as whites aren't represented politically in the least anyway. So, why is this so terrible?[/QUOTE]

The lack of political representation is a problem, but that is not as bad as becoming a full blown third world sesspool which is where America is heading with the current trends.


madrussian

2005-07-13 03:17 | User Profile

The key is for the whites to start feeling and acting as a minority, while we are still a majority.


Happy Hacker

2005-07-13 14:23 | User Profile

Mad Russian is right on the money.

But, whites don't feel anything close to a minority. They look at Congress and see a sea of white faces. They look at the whitehouse and see a white face. They look at the Supreme Court and see all but one white face. It doesn't compute to the average white that these people are not representing their interests. They've been taught that the color of a leader's face represents who is represented.

Whites, mostly by the segregationist efforts of non-whites, live in their own little white worlds. They go to white churches. If they're not going to WalMart, they're going to white stores. Even going to a sporting event, the faces in the field may be heavily nonwhite, but the crowd is a sea of white faces. When you're with your friends and family, you're surrounded by white faces. Indeed, most whites live in heavily white neighborhoods and few whites leave in areas where nonwhites have overrun.

I bet most whites in South Africa almost feel like they live in a majority white state, as long as they don't turn on the TV. And, thoughts the contrary are probably met with the social equivalent of electroshock aversion therapy.


xmetalhead

2005-07-13 14:34 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Knekkeben]I don't need to tell anyone here that whites as whites aren't represented politically in the least anyway. So, why is this so terrible?[/QUOTE]

Because the quality of life is going to drastically and dramatically change for White people in the very near future when the savages revert to their natural jungle instincts.

I can't wait to see the look on the effete-White-liberal-diversity-monger's face when he's being cooked in the savages' caldron to be eaten.


madrussian

2005-07-13 16:49 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Happy Hacker] But, whites don't feel anything close to a minority. They look at Congress and see a sea of white faces. They look at the whitehouse and see a white face. They look at the Supreme Court and see all but one white face. It doesn't compute to the average white that these people are not representing their interests. They've been taught that the color of a leader's face represents who is represented. [/QUOTE] I live in a relatively white town, compared to the either hindoo-chink-infested end of the local housing spectrum or messican-black-infested kind. Even when there are still relatively few turd-worlders, you can see them congregating together, and in the case of hindoomonkeys wearing the disgusting clothes of their native shitholes. And when you go to a child playground, it goes double and triple: they are breeding more than whites. And while some groups are exception, the same can be said of work environment, where it's often the above-mentioned two camps dividing the spoils, with an occasional pale-face not belonging. There are literally hindoo and chink groups, from rank-and-file to management. Officec politics is often framed into ethnic terms. One has to live somewhere in the Midwest to not really see the infestation.


Mentzer

2005-07-15 04:07 | User Profile

[QUOTE=madrussian]The key is for the whites to start feeling and acting as a minority, while we are still a majority.[/QUOTE]

A clever comment.

I have noted the words of mostly white women in England after the London bombings.

They squeak of "coming together", "embracing other faiths", "understanding other races" and the installed and obligatory "we are all the same". While they continue to search for the pieces of the murdered. And their stupidity of arrogant thought is quite stunning. For they still consider themselves people of a country that is a world power. But England is no longer a military force. It has a small army and navy. It has been overpopulated with Africans and Muslims that hate them.

England is the most violent country in Europe. It is more violent than the cities of multi-racial America.

And they have been lied to by queer government that insist immigrants comprise 6-7 per cent of the population. Yet the eye does not decieve. Every town and city in England is full of them. The schools of England are full of them - they pack the schools with them. The hospitals are full of white men and women attacked by the knife-wielding Muslim and machete-African, each and every weekend.

And the police do nothing. For they are not allowed - but would like to.

The English are reaping what they have sowed. They are now the product of experimental creatures. It is what is called Evil.

Mentzer