← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Origen

R. J. Rushdoony: Christian Nationalist

Thread ID: 19064 | Posts: 3 | Started: 2005-07-09

Wayback Archive


Origen [OP]

2005-07-09 12:49 | User Profile

God-hating, atheist excuses for WNs claim that Christian Nationalism is an oxymoron. The truth is just the opposite. Since America is a Christian nation, American nationalism is Christian nationalism by definition. Unlike heathen and atheist WNs (which are miniscule in number), Christian nationalists actually have power and influence. They run successful organizations (such as the Chalcedon Foundation), serve as political advisors in major campaigns, appear on mainstream television (such as D. James Kennedy's broadcasts), etc. Make no mistake about it, any nationalist regime that comes to America will be Christian in basis. As the vast majority of Americans are Christian, atheists and heathens are simply useless to us. Not only that, but they are a huge liability. As if it were not enough that associating with those reprobates displeases God, it also disgusts the typical white Christian who makes up our natural constituency. Here are some quotes from the late Christian nationalist R. J. Rushdoony, luminary of the Chalcedon Foundation. Tell me: what atheist WN has ever been anywhere near so eloquent? What heathen could ever resonate with the red-blooded, Christian American the way he can? I think any honest person knows the answer to these questions.

[font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular][size=3]Regarding the righteous might of our Lord, Jesus Christ:[/size]

The significance of Jesus Christ as the "faithful and true witness" is that He not only witnesses against those who are at war against God, but He also executes them.

            [/font][font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular][size=2]R.J. Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law (Nutley, NJ: Craig Press, 1973), p. 574[/size][/font][font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular].

[size=3]Regarding the need for sanctification through segregation: [/size]
[/font]
[font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]**The burden of the law is thus against inter-religious, inter-racial, and inter-cultural marriages, in that they normally go against the very community which marriage is designed to establish. **Unequal yoking means more than marriage. In society at large it means the enforced integration of various elements which are not congenial. Unequal yoking is in no realm productive of harmony; rather, it aggravates the differences and delays the growth of the different elements toward a Christian harmony and association.

            [/font][font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular][size=2]R.J. Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law (Nutley, NJ: Craig Press, 1973), p. 257[/size][/font][font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular].

[size=3]Regarding the tiresome "Holocaust" cult: 
[/size][/font]
[font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]** The false witness born during World War II with respect to Germany is especially notable and revealing. **The charge is repeatedly made that six million innocent Jews were slain by the Nazis, and the figure--and even larger figures--is now entrenched in the history books. Poncins, in summarizing the studies of the French Socialist, Paul Rassinier, himself a prisoner in Buchenwald, states: Rassinier reached the conclusion that the number of Jews who died after deportation is approximately 1,200,000 and this figure, he tells us, has finally been accepted as valid by the Centre Mondial de Documentation Juive Contemporaine. Likewise he notes that Paul Hilberg, in his study of the same problem, reached a total of 896,292 victims.

Very many of these people died of epidemics; many were executed. We will return to this matter again.... Let us examine again the mass murders of World War II, and the background of false witness during World War I and later. Life had become so cheap and meaningless to these heads of state and their camp followers that a murder or two meant nothing. Likewise, a generation schooled to violence in motion pictures, radio, literature, and press could not be expected to react to a murder or two. The result was a desperately twisted mentality which could only appreciate evil as evil on a massive scale. Did the Nazis actually execute many thousands, tens, or hundred thousands of Jews? Men to whom such murders were nothing had to blow up the figure to millions. Did the doctor perform a number of experiments on living men and women? A few sterilized women and a few castrated men and their horrified tears and grief are not enough to stir the sick and jaded tastes of modern man: make him guilty of performing 17,000 such operations. The evils were all too real: even greater is the evil of bearing false witness concerning them, because that false witness will produce an even more vicious reality in the next upheaval. Men are now "reconciled" to a world where millions are murdered, or are said to be murdered. What will be required in the way of action and propaganda next time?

            [/font][font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular][size=2]R.J. Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law (Nutley, NJ: Craig Press, 1973), pp. 586, 588[/size][/font][font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]. [/font][font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]

[size=3]Regarding the Satanic 'Civil Rights' revolution: [/size]

[/font][font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]** Non-Christian thought, when orientated to the future, faces a double penalty. **First, it is past bound. The "civil rights" revolution, for example, has only the vaguest sense of the burdens of responsibility, which any person thinking in terms of reality and the future needs to have. Instead, the "civil rights" revolutionists speak endlessly of past evils, not merely real or imagined evils of their own experiencing, but all evils which they believe their ancestors suffered. Similarly, some labor union men, and American Indians, dwell endlessly on past history rather than present reality. This inability to live in the present means a radical incapacity for coping with the future.

            [/font][font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular][size=2]R.J. Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law (Nutley, NJ: Craig Press, 1973), p. 157[/size][/font][font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular].

[size=3]Regarding the need to keep our eye on the ball: [/size]

[/font][font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular] "While all Scripture is God's law word, the heart of that law is the law of Moses."

           [/font][font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular][size=2]R.J. Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law (Nutley, NJ: Craig Press, 1973), p. 675[/size][/font][font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular].[/font]

Petr

2005-07-09 13:11 | User Profile

[COLOR=Indigo][FONT=Arial][B][I] - "The burden of the law is thus against inter-religious, inter-racial, and inter-cultural marriages, in that they normally go against the very community which marriage is designed to establish. Unequal yoking means more than marriage. In society at large it means the enforced integration of various elements which are not congenial. Unequal yoking is in no realm productive of harmony; rather, it aggravates the differences and delays the growth of the different elements toward a Christian harmony and association.

R.J. Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law (Nutley, NJ: Craig Press, 1973), p. 257."[/I][/B][/FONT][/COLOR]

Also, as the folks at the [I]Little Geneva [/I] blog have pointed out, race-mixing marriages almost always involve the breaking of the Fifth Commandment - about honoring your parents. Marrying people whom your parents disapprove of is a clear sign of fundamental disrespect.

[COLOR=Red][B]Exodus 20:12 Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee. [/B] [/COLOR]

[COLOR=DarkGreen][FONT=Book Antiqua][B]"RC Sproul Jr printed a letter of appreciation for the hateful issue of his newsletter entitled Neither Jew Nor Greek. "It bothers me that there are Christians that are racist. I have to face that issue constantly being a black woman married to a white man." [U]She recounts how hard it was for her husband’s father to get used to the "marriage," which is an admission that her husband violated the fifth commandment. There would be no miscegenation if youths married the kind of people their parents wanted them to marry[/U]. If any one out there can introduce me to a white man who has designed that his children marry outside the race, I’ll eat my shoelaces.

...

"Someone asked me how it is that [U]I interpret the fifth commandment to require the honor of not just parents but the generations preceding[/U]. The Hebrew words for father and son, [I]ab[/I] and [I]ben[/I], have broader meanings than the English translations indicate. [/B] [/FONT] [/COLOR]

[url]http://littlegeneva.com/?p=325#comments[/url]

Petr


Origen

2005-07-09 13:28 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Petr]Also, as the folks at the *Little Geneva * blog have pointed out, race-mixing marriages almost always involve the breaking of the Fifth Commandment - about honoring your parents. Marrying people whom your parents disapprove of is a clear sign of fundamental disrespect.[/QUOTE]There is no doubt this is true. This is a major source of the social disruption that results from unequal yoking via race-mixing.

Once again, the anti-Christian WNs must be insane. As if the typical Christian white man would want to see his daughter hold hands with a black male, let alone marry one.