← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · confederate_commando
Thread ID: 19036 | Posts: 22 | Started: 2005-07-08
2005-07-08 10:53 | User Profile
WHAT IS THE LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH? Posted by : Admin on Monday, June 13, 2005 - 05:26 PM WAT
Most organizations founder because they lack self-definition and a definite goal. The League of the South is a Southern Nationalist organization whose ultimate goal is a free and independent Southern republic. To reach this goal, we intend to create the climate for a free South among our people by 1) de-legitimating the American Empire at every opportunity; 2) by proving our willingness to be servant-leaders to the Southern people; and 3) by making The League of the South a strong, viable organization that will lead us to Southern independence.
While our overall strategy--short, medium, and long range--is determined by the President, the Board, and our State Chairman, our tactical operational focus is on the local level. We intend to form active chapters in every county in every Southern State, and as many chapters as possible in non-Southern States. We also encourage individuals and families to personally secede from the corrupt and corrupting influence of post-Christian culture in America. We call this "abjuring the realm," and it's a real and dramatic first step all of us can take by simply withdrawing our support of and allegiance to a regime that has imperiled our future.
While we seek to use shame and contempt to de-legitimate the institutions controlled by the Empire, we must not stop there. We must create our own parallel institutions to which our people can attach their loyalties. A good example of this is the move out of the "public" schools and into home schooling or the establishment of our own private academies. Also, the League sponsors weekend Hedge Schools and week-long summer institutes to educate our people.
At present, the League is more concerned with resurrecting our cultural base than with entering into the political arena. Once our Southern culture is re-established, then the political issues will begin to take care of themselves. Good leaders flow naturally out of a healthy culture; however, power-hungry, self-seeking politicians are all we can expect from the debased cultural climate we have today.
The League of the South seeks leaders who have the hearts of servants. The Bible tells us clearly that no man can lead until he is willing to serve his fellowmen. When you join our organization, we expect you to begin immediately serving our cause and our people. We will show you how.
Our revised website, [url]www.dixienet.org[/url], is a cutting-edge, interactive site filled with a wealth of information. We are presently working on an operations manual for new members and local officers. New members are provided a list of State Chairmen for our organized States. We strongly advise our new recruits to contact their State or local officers, offer your talents, and make plans to attend your local and State chapter meetings. There you will be shown how to put the League's strategy into effect by means of our tactical operational plan. You also will meet our leaders, get to know other members, and become part of a real community dedicated to a noble cause. If you live in a State or locality that does not have an organized chapter, this website has a document (listed as "How to Form A County Chapter" under our Introduction on the Main Menu) that shows you how to form and run a local chapter.
All League members receive the Southern Patriot newsletter every other month. Read it closely to keep abreast of League activities and projects.
By joining The League of the South you have placed yourself among a group of men and women who are not content to sit by and allow their land, liberty, and culture be destroyed by an alien regime and ideology. You have joined an active organization that knows where it wants to go and how to go about getting there. The League is no place for the lazy or the faint-hearted. We would love to welcome you to our growing band of Brothers and Sisters. Please join us today.
For Southern independence,
Michael Hill President
[url]http://leagueofthesouth.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=21[/url]
:gunsmilie
2005-07-13 11:43 | User Profile
Although I haven't joined the LOS yet, I do support their philosophy and commitment to the Cause!
One question for any in the know, has the LOS ever considered bringing before the World Court (which has had a anti-USA history of judgements in the past I believe) a case involving the recognition of the CSA as a sovereign Nation and the illegal occupation of same by the USA? If I'm not mistaken, the World Court has ruled in favor of the sovereignity of certain Nations that were swallowed by the Soviet Union in the past.
K
2005-07-13 12:54 | User Profile
[QUOTE=311inAZ]Although I haven't joined the LOS yet, I do support their philosophy and commitment to the Cause!
One question for any in the know, has the LOS ever considered bringing before the World Court (which has had a anti-USA history of judgements in the past I believe) a case involving the recognition of the CSA as a sovereign Nation and the illegal occupation of same by the USA? If I'm not mistaken, the World Court has ruled in favor of the sovereignity of certain Nations that were swallowed by the Soviet Union in the past.
K[/QUOTE] The problem is the South and North are controlled by the same corrupt special interests. LBJohnson, Bill Clinton, the Bush duo, Newt Genrgrich and other very powerful Southerners all came from Dixie. Sam Walton was also one of your own. While I respect the Southern way of life, the idea of separation only divides the problem and distracts us from what we as Americans ultimately need to do.
2005-07-13 13:51 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Brian Hassett]The problem is the South and North are controlled by the same corrupt special interests. LBJohnson, Bill Clinton, the Bush duo, Newt Genrgrich and other very powerful Southerners all came from Dixie. Sam Walton was also one of your own. While I respect the Southern way of life, the idea of separation only divides the problem and distracts us from what we as Americans ultimately need to do.[/QUOTE]
Don't forget Jimmy Carter. The Democrats haven't elected a non-Southerner since JFK.
2005-07-13 14:47 | User Profile
Reading the first post, the so called "League Of The South" sounds like it is comprised of a bunch of deluded losers - probably on drugs. Reminder:In 1865, Lee surrendered to Grant. You lost. It's over. Live with it!
2005-07-13 16:00 | User Profile
[QUOTE=OPERA96]Reading the first post, the so called "League Of The South" sounds like it is comprised of a bunch of deluded losers - probably on drugs. Reminder:In 1865, Lee surrendered to Grant. You lost. It's over. Live with it![/QUOTE] So, you are on record as supporting the idea that once an issue is settled by violence, it should be considered justly settled forever? You may want to rethink that position.
2005-07-13 21:44 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Quantrill]So, you are on record as supporting the idea that once an issue is settled by violence, it should be considered justly settled forever? You may want to rethink that position.[/QUOTE] The violence was instigated by southern forces who fired on Fort Sumpter. As to justice, good luck finding it.
2005-07-14 13:36 | User Profile
[QUOTE=OPERA96][font=Verdana][size=2]The violence was instigated by southern forces who fired on Fort Sumpter. As to justice, good luck finding it.[/QUOTE] Lincoln promised to remove the garrison at Fort Sumter and turn the fort over to the South. Instead, he sent warships to Charleston harbor and attempted to resupply the fort with munitions. At that point, the South fired on the fort in direct response to this clear provocation. Not a single soldier was killed in this engagement, by the way.
A pertinent quote from bastard Lincoln, from a letter dated May 1, 1861 to Gustavus Fox -- [/size][/font][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#000000]"You and I both anticipated that the cause of the country would be advanced by making the attempt to provision Ft Sumter, even if it should fail; and it is no small consolation now to feel that our anticipation is justified by the result."
Lincoln engineered the events at Fort Sumter to sway Northern public opinion. It was his Pearl Harbor. [/color][/size][/font]
2005-07-15 00:41 | User Profile
Actually, one bluebelly was killed at Fort Sumter, which was designed to protect Charleston, South Carolina which was no longer a part of these united States. As for being poor deluded fools who need to get over it, but if your choice is Apathy, why bother posting? Hypocrite, or AmeriKan nationalist, or just a whiner or lastly, a Troll? Hypocrite needs no excuse, AmeriKan nationalists gave away their nation without a shot being fired to the current Corruption and equally should 'git over it': whiners are common but doers are in short supply EVERYWHERE and never having seen you post on the Southern Nationalism section before, methinks you're one of Mo Sleeze's half-jew/half-negro plants...
:yawn:
2005-07-15 01:03 | User Profile
[QUOTE=confederate_commando]Actually, one bluebelly was killed at Fort Sumter...[/QUOTE] Actually, two Yankees were killed at Fort Sumter, but it was after the shooting was over. A cannon backfired while the Yanks were lowering their flag, wounding six men, two mortally. Those deaths didn't occur during the actual engagement with the Confederates, however, and most accounts of the battle state that there were no casualties on either side.
2005-07-15 01:19 | User Profile
[QUOTE=OPERA96]The violence was instigated by southern forces who fired on Fort Sumpter. As to justice, good luck finding it.[/QUOTE]
Wrong! The shooting war was instigated by Lincoln and his radical Black Republican backers. He first attempted to instigate a firing on the Union colors at a fort on the Florida coast well before the South prevented Ft. Sumter from being reinforced and re-supplied. That earlier attempt by Lincoln was thwarted by Genl. Braxton Bragg who commanded the local military department by refusing to be drawn into conflict with the belligerent yankees who refused to evacuate illegally occuppied land belonging to a sovereign nation, in this case the CSA.
Lincoln and his backers knew the average northern citizen would never support a war on the South without a strong reason to do so (secession alone was not sufficient), hence his well thought out plan to force the South to fire the first shot thereby causing a patriotic fever to sweep over the north. There was no other way to bring U.S. citizens into his war for conquest of Southern resources.
As Lincoln, most likely a closet Jew, said early on "we cannot afford to let the Southern States secede" which was one of the few times this master politician spoke the truth. Semites and their love of money has and will cause many Whites to lose their lives.
We Southerners just would like to have justice done finally and have our independent homeland for our race and culture. However, I do agree that we in the present U.S. need to stick together for now to combat common enemies that pose a dire threat to both yankee and Southern alike! You have to admit though, if the Southern States were allowed to exercise State rights even into modern times (1960's come to mind), there would be no multiculturalism occurring therein.
K
2005-07-15 01:26 | User Profile
[QUOTE=311inAZ] As Lincoln, most likely a closet Jew, said early on "we cannot afford to let the Southern States secede" which was one of the few times this master politician spoke the truth[/QUOTE] I believe his exact words were, "What will become of my tariff?"
2005-07-15 01:44 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Quantrill]I believe his exact words were, "What will become of my tariff?"[/QUOTE]
No, but it should've been, lol. A little known fact was that the Southern States paid well over 75% of the Federal budget in tariffs and other taxes even though the South only had about 20% of the total population of the U.S. Hell, we first went to war with the most powerful nation on earth over a measely tea tax (along with a attempted gun grab by the Brits).
K
2005-07-15 02:25 | User Profile
My recollections ran along with these:
[QUOTE]As for the famous actions of April, 1861, suffice it to say, "They had defended Sumter for 34 hours, until ââ¬â¢the quarters were entirely burned, the main gates destroyed by fire, the gorge walls seriously injured, the magazines surrounded by flames.ââ¬â¢ " Unable to fight the fire and the Confederates, the Union forces surrendered. Some accounts indicate that no one was killed on either side, and some say one soldier died when a cannon misfired, during an honorary salute after the surrender. Most people think Sumterââ¬â¢s history ends there.[/QUOTE] [url]http://photodude.com/article/1659/praising-charleston-a-visit-to-fort-sumter[/url]
[QUOTE]The generous terms of surrender allowed Anderson to run up his flag for a hunderd-gun salute before he and his men evacuated the fort the next day. The salute began at 2:00 P.M. on April 14, but was cut short to 50 guns after an accidental explosion killed one of the gunners and mortally wounded another. Carrying their tattered banner, the men marched out of the fort and boarded a boat that ferried them to the Union ships outside the harbor. They were greeted as heroes on their return to the North. [/QUOTE] [url]http://www.us-civilwar.com/sumter.htm[/url]
Close enuff...
:smartass:
2005-07-15 02:32 | User Profile
[QUOTE]The problem is the South and North are controlled by the same corrupt special interests.[/QUOTE]
Correct. And the only reason the LOS is likely to fail is that there is insufficient capital to sustain it.
World Court? Bought and paid for! Hell the HOLE UN is funded (mostly) by the US. Not to say that buys us a bunch of goodwill, but it does buy corporate access to government leaders who corrupt the entire system in favor of geo-corporate expansion, which shall exclude any enterprise which does not benefit same.
No.... in order to make an enterprise like the LOS viable you need lawyers guns and MONEY. No disrespect to Randy intended.
2005-07-15 04:31 | User Profile
[QUOTE=jeffersonian] No.... in order to make an enterprise like the LOS viable you need lawyers guns and MONEY. No disrespect to Randy intended.[/QUOTE]
Well I don't know about the lawyers, but we Southerners have plenty of guns, lol. The money part I assume we can obtain easily enough once things got rolling since its basically a worthless commodity, per se, and becomes less valuable in times of extreme crisis.
You are undoutably right about the world court, however. Maybe during the Cold War years we may of had a better chance of success in that court. Just an old idea I had published on many years ago that came to mind when viewing the thread starter post.
K
2005-07-15 12:00 | User Profile
[QUOTE=jeffersonian] No.... in order to make an enterprise like the LOS viable you need lawyers guns and MONEY. No disrespect to Randy intended.[/QUOTE] Thanks for the Warren Zevon reference. I haven't heard that album in years.
2005-07-26 03:34 | User Profile
[QUOTE]No.... in order to make an enterprise like the LOS viable you need lawyers guns and MONEY. No disrespect to Randy intended.[/QUOTE]
Can't argue with the logic, or the tune. :smile:
Still, as Shakespeare said: "let's kill all the lawyers."
:gunsmilie
2005-08-07 05:40 | User Profile
I wish the south had won the civil war. At least that would mean that we would no longer be subjected to the whining of modern "southern patriots" cying in their mint juleps about a war they lost 140 years ago. No, what they would be whining about today would be that they are not getting enough foreign aid. Even now, as a part of the most prosperous and and most free nation in the the history of the world, the south resembles an emerging third world nation.
2005-08-07 12:38 | User Profile
[QUOTE=OPERA96]I wish the south had won the civil war. At least that would mean that we would no longer be subjected to the whining of modern "southern patriots" cying in their mint juleps about a war they lost 140 years ago. No, what they would be whining about today would be that they are not getting enough foreign aid. Even now, as a part of the most prosperous and and most free nation in the the history of the world, the south resembles an emerging third world nation.[/QUOTE] Your ignorance on this subject is really quite extensive. The South was completely destroyed during the War Between the States. Homes, livestock, capital invested in slaves, capital in Confederate currency, everything gone.
During Reconstruction, virtually all the cotton profits from the struggling, reemerging Southern economy went into the hands of Yankee cotton agents and other corrupt officials. All of the Reconstruction efforts were aimed at making the South a permanent economic vassal of the North, with the function of providing cheap agricultural products. There were federal economic policies, such as discriminatory rail shipping rates, in place to discourage industrial growth in the South in place until the 1950's. Then, of course, came the 60's and the Second Reconstruction.
Next time, it may behoove you to have some basic understanding of a topic before you post about it.
2005-08-07 12:54 | User Profile
Q: "Then, of course, came the 60's and the Second Reconstruction."
This Reconstrution II includes a deliberate plan to flood the South with yankee transplants. Now, in the 2000's the plan takes the shape of a 'vise of immigration', from the north (yankees), and legal and illegal immigration from south of the border (spics).
All with the intention of crushing the last vestiges of Southern Christian civilisation.
They don't hate the Confederate Battle Flag, they hate the Southern nation and its people and are commiting genocide on the South.
BTW, good comments in your post #20.
2005-08-14 00:46 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Quote: Originally Posted by OPERA96 :afro: I wish the south had won the civil war. At least that would mean that we would no longer be subjected to the whining of modern "southern patriots" cying in their mint juleps about a war they lost 140 years ago. No, what they would be whining about today would be that they are not getting enough foreign aid. Even now, as a part of the most prosperous and and most free nation in the the history of the world, the south resembles an emerging third world nation. [/QUOTE]
Civil War, what Civil War??? We were not fighting to take over y'alls gubmint, we were fighting for Southern Independence, to leave y'all to your Corruption. Hence, by definition, what you talkin' 'bout, boy???
Don't like it, don't read posts in this section. Or, are you addicted to our ""whining"" and can't git enuff of it???
As for your stinking 'most prosperous and and most free nation in the the history of the world'--y'all can keep y'alls $7 TRILLION debt and see how long a WHITES ONLY anything stays out of gubmint crosshairs...