← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Snouter
Thread ID: 19003 | Posts: 14 | Started: 2005-07-06
2005-07-06 20:51 | User Profile
Clearly some savages should get the death penalty. The liberal judges who let this monster out should be punished.
[img]http://www.nypost.com/photos/news07062005008a.jpg[/img]
'SHE HAD TO DIE' FOR BEING WHITE
By KATE MURRAY and ANDY GELLER [New York Post]
July 6, 2005 -- A racist ex-con confessed that he fatally stabbed a beloved mother of two at a White Plains mall because he wanted "to kill a white person."
"She was not innocent. She was white," convicted rapist Phillip Grant confessed in a chilling videotaped statement to cops that was played in White Plains City Court yesterday ââ¬â the same day victim Concetta Russo Carriero was laid to rest.
The 43-year-old homeless man told cops he had never laid eyes on Russo Carriero, 56, before he stabbed her in the chest twice last Wednesday on the seventh level of the Galleria mall garage.
"All I knew was she had blond hair and blue eyes, and she had to die . . . I didn't care, as long as she was white," he said.
"I wanted to kill someone who represented the white lifestyle."
Grant said he became a racist after his July 2003 release from Sing Sing, where he spent 24 years for three Bronx rapes and for attacking another inmate with a pitchfork.
People in White Plains called him "rape boy" and "n- - - - -," he said.
As a result, he said, he was fighting a race war ââ¬â and his only regret was that he didn't know anything about biological weapons.
Grant said he was prepared to die for killing Russo Carriero, a legal secretary who worked at a law firm across the street.
"It's not about the woman. It's not about rape. It's not about nothing of that," he said.
"There's a lot of white people that really need to die. I don't give a f - - - what public opinion is about that. They can go f - - - themselves. These people are sick, and they are getting away with it.
"I can't be around white people. I'm scared of white people," he added. "They forced me into a position where I'm racist.
"It was not a criminal motive. I'm really, really fighting a war on being attacked," he said.
Asked if he would kill again, Grant answered yes.
"My only regret is that I didn't have the means to do more," he said.
Judge Eric Press ordered Grant held without bail on second-degree murder charges pending a grand-jury hearing.
Westchester DA Jeanine Pirro said she would charge Grant with murder as a hate crime if the panel thought it was appropriate.
That would mean the ex-con would face a penalty of 20 years to life instead of 15 years to life.
After his parole, Grant moved to a homeless shelter at the Westchester County Airport but was kicked out last April because he wouldn't follow the rules.
Instead, he spent his nights sleeping at a drop-in shelter at the airport, being bused each morning to White Plains, where he roamed the mall.
Grant said he was walking past Carriero when she angered him by the way she opened her car door.
"This lady did that s - - - with the door," he said. "She pushed the door open, almost hit me with it. If she wouldn't have did that to me, I would have walked past her."
Grant said he grabbed her by the arm and held the knife to her throat, but she didn't scream.
A man walked nearby and he lowered the knife, which he had stolen from a department store, but the man didn't see anything.
He claimed he lowered the knife so she would think he wasn't paying attention and would try to knock the knife out of his hand, making it easier to stab her in the chest.
[URL=http://www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/49701.htm]NY Post (you have to register)[/URL]
2005-07-06 21:04 | User Profile
Keepin it real.
2005-07-06 21:32 | User Profile
I don't understand.
When a white bounces a Louisville Slugger off a nog thief's noggin, it's front-page news for three days straight!
When a Negro murders a mother of two at random, it's page 17 and [I]let's hear no more about it[/I].....or you might become a person-of-interest in a law-enforcement file cabinet.
The bottom line, kids, is that even the squishiest of racial egalitarians...even fuggin' [B]Bono[/B]....[I]expects [/I] the Negro to kill at the merest provocation. Like the buzzing of a fly, or his forty-ounce going flat. For all the whitey-demonizin' diversity claptrap we have to endure, we [U]all[/U] understand that the black man is a time bomb of stupidity, resentment and savagery, magically-empowered to do as they wish by politicians, themselves held hostage to Jewish media. It's that simple.
Why do you think the first thing a black who comes into real money does is [B]move away[/B] from his 'people' at all deliberate speed? Because "white racism" is the game they play to make the cash register sing....but "black violence" is reality.
2005-07-06 21:43 | User Profile
This negroid animal simply carried out what 90% of all negroids wish to do to White people.
2005-07-06 21:51 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Judge Eric Press ordered Grant held without bail on second-degree murder charges pending a grand-jury hearing.[/QUOTE]
Let's see...This scum openly admits to pre-meditating the murder of "just anybody so long as they be white", but gets charged with second degree murder. Any guesses what the charge would be if a white murdered just anyone as long as they was "Mexican or Black"?
[QUOTE]Westchester DA Jeanine Pirro said she would charge Grant with murder as a hate crime if the panel thought it was appropriate.[/QUOTE]
Think there would even be a question of charging it as a hate crime if the reverse did happen?
Me Neither
2005-07-06 21:53 | User Profile
[QUOTE=xmetalhead]This negroid animal simply carried out what 90% of all negroids wish to do to White people.[/QUOTE] Completely true. And it makes me sick to realize how many white people if they read this story would feel sorry for the nigger and buy into his crap about white people making him into what he is because of "racism"
2005-07-06 23:07 | User Profile
[QUOTE]And it makes me sick to realize how many white people if they read this story would feel sorry for the nigger and buy into his crap about white people making him into what he is because of "racism"[/QUOTE]
If it's any consolation, I think another dynamic is at work. White people have become adept at telling the cameras one thing while internally believing another thing entirely.
God forbid - even if you're a family member of this woman - that you slip and spit out the N-word into a camera or a reporter's notebook. Our Compassionate Defenders of Diversity (ie, the Judenpresse) will brook none of that - no white may, under any circumstances, name their tormentor or even rhetorically defend themselves from attack. And people [I]know [/I] that. They sense it when they see, time and again, politicians running campaigns invoking "James King" (but never "Colin Ferguson"); when they open their newspapers and only see criminals racially described if/when they are white; when they click on their tvs to watch the ten-thousandth wise, rational, incorruptible, perfect-English-speaking black cop or mestizo reporter or Hmong ADA browbeating a degenerate, racist, bottom-feeding working-class white savage - or trying fruitlessly to reason with a cold-blooded, inhuman old-money corporate-CEO WASP incapable of feeling any warmth or tenderness for his fellow man.
F**k, [I]it doesn't take long before you figure it out! [/I] So you learn to move your lips and make [I]one [/I] set of words come out by rote, while you try on the inside to cling to what you know is true....and hope to God science never cracks telepathy in your lifetime.
It's a different matter for the under-35 whites, the most heavily and continuously-propagandized control group in Western history. The ones who are only too proud to live their Patient Zero lives as petri slides in Team Shmuel's Great Diversity Lab....the ones who automatically shudder at white-on-black violence but shake their heads at the rough justice meted out by the Carr Brothers as a case of [I]racist chickens coming home to roost[/I]. The ones who think, secretly, that [I]they're [/I] sort of black, too, because they write internet reviews of rap albums, and their mastery of niggerslang is perfectly up to date and, really, [I]they've [/I] been kinda-sorta fighting the white power system, too.... albeit in a sotto-voce, work-Daddy-for-an-SUV, make-the-VISA-payments-on-time sort of way. I'm picturing bongos dancing and laughing in ceremonial masks and baggy FUBU shirts around two wiggers in a cannibal cookpot, and the caption reads, "Can't we all get a drumstick?" Surprise! Turns out pork isn't the other White Meat after all.
2005-07-06 23:29 | User Profile
In South Africa the Marxist PAC's motto was.
"One bullet four whites."
I remember seeing a picture in a SA paper once.
A black had written graffiti on a wall. "One bullet four whites."
and a white had written underneath it. "One bomb many Kaffers." :whstl:
Greg
"They should rule who are able to rule best." - Aristotle
2005-07-07 03:42 | User Profile
This should certainly be first degree. Saying you are going to kill white people and then doing it is premeditation. He can't get the death penalty, but if he gets life imprisonment that will be just as good (as long as they make sure he can't get parolled).
2005-07-07 13:32 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]F**k, [I]it doesn't take long before you figure it out! [/I] So you learn to move your lips and make [I]one [/I] set of words come out by rote, while you try on the inside to cling to what you know is true....and hope to God science never cracks telepathy in your lifetime.[/QUOTE]
IR, I find it amazing that most Whites in private conversations will confess their true feelings about the unleashed nigger (especially when I break the ice!). Our defense mechanisms are fine, but it's the rust of inactivity and dis-unity that lets our enemies overrun us.
2005-07-07 15:51 | User Profile
Great stuff, Ragno.
By the way, he's not charged with first-degree murder because he didn't commit first-degree murder under New York law. Here's the statute, which was extremely hard to find online:
http://wings.buffalo.edu/law/bclc/web/NewYork/ny3(a)(1)-.htm
Section 125.27 Murder in the first degree
A person is guilty of murder in the first degree when:
(a) Either:
(i) the intended victim was a police officer as defined in subdivision 34 of section 1.20 of the criminal procedure law who was at the time of the killing engaged in the course of performing his official duties, and the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the intended victim was a police officer; or
(ii) the intended victim was a peace officer as defined in paragraph a of subdivision twenty-one, subdivision twenty-three, twenty-four or sixty-two (employees of the division for youth) of section 2.10 of the criminal procedure law who was at the time of the killing engaged in the course of performing his official duties, and the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the intended victim was such a uniformed court officer, parole officer, probation officer, or employee of the division for youth; or
(iii) the intended victim was an employee of a state correctional institution or was an employee of a local correctional facility as defined in subdivision two of section forty of the correction law, who was at the time of the killing engaged in the course of performing his official duties, and the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the intended victim was an employee of a state correctional institution or a local correctional facility; or
(iv) at the time of the commission of the killing, the defendant was confined in a state correctional institution or was otherwise in custody upon a sentence for the term of his natural life, or upon a sentence commuted to one of natural life, or upon a sentence for an indeterminate term the minimum of which was at least fifteen years and the maximum of which was natural life, or at the time of the commission of the killing, the defendant had escaped from such confinement or custody while serving such a sentence and had not yet been returned to such confinement or custody; or
(v) the intended victim was a witness to a crime committed on a prior occasion and the death was caused for the purpose of preventing the intended victim's testimony in any criminal action or proceeding whether or not such action or proceeding had been commenced, or the intended victim had previously testified in a criminal action or proceeding and the killing was committed for the purpose of exacting retribution for such prior testimony, or the intended victim was an immediate family member of a witness to a crime committed on a prior occasion and the killing was committed for the purpose of preventing or influencing the testimony of such witness, or the intended victim was an immediate family member of a witness who had previously testified in a criminal action or proceeding and the killing was committed for the purpose of exacting retribution upon such witness for such prior testimony. As used in this subparagraph "immediate family member" means a husband, wife, father, mother, daughter, son, brother, sister, stepparent, grandparent, stepchild or grandchild; or
(vi) the defendant committed the killing or procured commission of the killing pursuant to an agreement with a person other than the intended victim to commit the same for the receipt, or in expectation of the receipt, of anything of pecuniary value from a party to the agreement or from a person other than the intended victim acting at the direction of a party to such agreement; or
(vii) the victim was killed while the defendant was in the course of committing or attempting to commit and in furtherance of robbery, burglary in the first degree or second degree, kidnapping in the first degree, arson in the first degree or second degree, rape in the first degree, criminal sexual act in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, aggravated sexual abuse in the first degree or escape in the first degree, or in the course of and furtherance of immediate flight after committing or attempting to commit any such crime or in the course of and furtherance of immediate flight after attempting to commit the crime of murder in the second degree; provided however, the victim is not a participant in one of the aforementioned crimes and, provided further that, unless the defendant's criminal liability under this subparagraph is based upon the defendant having commanded another person to cause the death of the victim or intended victim pursuant to section 20.00 of this chapter, this subparagraph shall not apply where the defendant's criminal liability is based upon the conduct of another pursuant to section 20.00 of this chapter; or
(viii) as part of the same criminal transaction, the defendant, with intent to cause serious physical injury to or the death of an additional person or persons, causes the death of an additional person or persons; provided, however, the victim is not a participant in the criminal transaction; or
(ix) prior to committing the killing, the defendant had been convicted of murder as defined in this section or section 125.25 of this article, or had been convicted in another jurisdiction of an offense which, if committed in this state, would constitute a violation of either of such sections; or
(x) the defendant acted in an especially cruel and wanton manner pursuant to a course of conduct intended to inflict and inflicting torture upon the victim prior to the victim's death. As used in this subparagraph, "torture" means the intentional and depraved infliction of extreme physical pain; "depraved" means the defendant relished the infliction of extreme physical pain upon the victim evidencing debasement or perversion or that the defendant evidenced a sense of pleasure in the infliction of extreme physical pain; or
(xi) the defendant intentionally caused the death of two or more additional persons within the state in separate criminal transactions within a period of twenty-four months when committed in a similar fashion or pursuant to a common scheme or plan; or
(xii) the intended victim was a judge as defined in subdivision twenty-three of section 1.20 of the criminal procedure law and the defendant killed such victim because such victim was, at the time of the killing, a judge; or
(xiii) the victim was killed in furtherance of an act of terrorism, as defined in paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 490.05 of this chapter; and
2005-07-07 17:06 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]God forbid - even if you're a family member of this woman - that you slip and spit out the N-word into a camera or a reporter's notebook. Our Compassionate Defenders of Diversity (ie, the Judenpresse) will brook none of that - no white may, under any circumstances, name their tormentor or even rhetorically defend themselves from attack. And people [I]know [/I] that. [/QUOTE]I noticed that the New York [I]Times[/I] has not labeled this attack a hate crime. Perhaps, this would have changed if the victim were a Jew.
Some things remain the same. From my book: [QUOTE] Over 30 years later the mainstream establishment press in New York City had not changed much of their mindset when reporting minority crime. A car jacker in 1994 had stolen a car with a mother and her young daughter in New Jersey. [B][I]The criminal, a 25 year-old black, had raped and stabbed a young white mother some 40 times before she died. Unrepentant and arrogant the young black called the dead woman's husband a "mother*er" for daring to call him an animal. The account in the New York Post described the criminal as having "arrogantly smirked" and showing no remorse for the murder[/I].[/B] In contrast the New York [I]Times[/I] gave a more refined account of the trial and omitted the suggestion that the criminal used the lovely word "mother*er". The New York [I]Times [/I] true to form described the facial contortions of the black criminal as "what appeared to be a smirk on his face". The dishonesty and cowardice of this newspaper when reporting crimes by blacks prevailed once more.
Crime had always been a problem in New York City, but the glorification of criminals had been of minor concern. In 1994 a taxpayer supported agency, the New York State Council on the Arts, funded an exhibit, El Grito, in Brooklyn which celebrated the killing of police officers. Violence had reached affluent whites in the city. Some did not know how to respond. In 1988 six young white males had been drinking in a bar on the West Side where they taunted a young man described as being about 5 feet 10 inches tall with a muscular chest, shoulder length blond hair, a green beret and what looked like army issued combat boots. One of these young studs had made an obscene remark about the combat boots. This infuriated the blond man who challenged all six to fight. The six men of whom four were over six feet tall decided that macho posturing was one thing, but actual fighting was another. This did not impress the young blond. From 10 feet away he started a flying karate kick which was delivered to the head and neck of Daniel Klagsbrun. Mr. Klagsbrun fell backward. His assailant then strode to the prone Mr. Klagsbrun and stood astride his chest. He picked the unconscious man up to a sitting position and shook him. After warning the friends of Mr. Klagsbrun that he could mess them up the same way, he told them to get help. The friends of Mr. Klagsbrun reacted by screaming in horror and confusion. The New York Times reported the young blond assailant made good his escape by striding to a waiting car. A friend remarked how he and Mr. Klagsbrun had never been in a fight in their lives. He considered himself and the others as intelligent people who would never pick a fight or get into one. Another friend rued the subsequent death of the young Klagsbrun to "circumstances that should strain the civilized mind". This view was one which clearly was held by the New York [I]Times[/I] as it chose to highlight this homicide out of five that happened that night. A police sketch of the assailant was printed. This practice has not been customary by that paper if the alleged perpetrator were black. A cynic might remark the six young men would not have shot their mouths off to a black. Sympathy for the abused six must have been overwhelming in the newsroom for many reporters must have thought of themselves as being one of the six. Yet what may have been perceived as a class issue in other parts of the United States was not so perceived by those who decide what is "fit to print". Nor did the New York [I]Times[/I] concern itself with the thought that if people in bars are going to shoot their mouths off, they should be prepared to fight.[/QUOTE]As long as the big media are controlled by Jews, civility and decency will not reappear in America.
2005-07-08 02:19 | User Profile
Reading the Charlotte Observer (second only to the Atlanta Journal in reporting on everything that is not important) yesterday (a free copy, since I won't buy it), there was a story on a white girl, Christy Ann Galvin, a former volleyball star in college and a grad of "International Studies", who was murdered in her apartment. The police are looking for her black male, live-in, Seyi Tayo Odueso. I'd say Christy's "studies" didn't include reality.
The article also stated murders were up 30% in Charlotte since a year ago. 30%. Wow. --- ### mwdallas *2005-07-08 15:11* | [User Profile](/od/user/81) Too bad Ms Galvin's daddy wasn't Danny Ford. ---