← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Franco
Thread ID: 18664 | Posts: 39 | Started: 2005-06-14
2005-06-14 17:38 | User Profile
6-13-05
[B]The Infamous 1964 Mississippi Civil-Rights Case...Again[/B]
Nevermind that the legal concept of "civil rights" is questionable and was never mentioned by America's founders or their immediate followers [1]. And nevermind that the entire civil-rights movement in America was created and steered not by Blacks but by Jews who wanted to reshape America's political and social atmosphere for their own ethnic benefit - whether the majority of Americans wanted that reshaping or not. The infamous 1964 civil-rights crime case in Mississippi - in which 3 civil-rights workers were killed - is being re-tried, this time [apparently] by the Mississippi state government, with jury selection just beginning [2] [3].
[1] [url]http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2004b/51104dunlapcrswindle.htm[/url]
[2] a news article about the re-trial of the 1964 case: [url]http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/13/miss.killings/index.html[/url]
[3] in fact, of the 3 civil-rights workers killed in Mississippi in the 1964 crime case mentioned above, 2 were Jewish
[edited]
2005-06-14 17:50 | User Profile
They're digging up dead negroes just to prosecute Whites!! Well that's so the Whites won't forget that they're the cause of every negroid failure in history. Hopefully more Whites will wake up and see that "trials" such as these are only carried to remind Whites that they ain't in control any longer of this country. The whole thing is sickening.
2005-06-14 18:09 | User Profile
How could you possibly expect to get an unbiased jury in this case?
If tried, the 80 yr old man is as good as convicted and it doesn't matter if he's innocent or not.
2005-06-15 00:32 | User Profile
[QUOTE=xmetalhead]They're digging up dead negroes just to prosecute Whites!! Well that's so the Whites won't forget that they're the cause of every negroid failure in history. Hopefully more Whites will wake up and see that "trials" such as these are only carried to remind Whites that they ain't in control any longer of this country. The whole thing is sickening.[/QUOTE] I thought the case was three dead Jews from up North messing around in the South. Movie Mississippi Burning had this case as a plot. Or am I thinking of the wrong case?
In 1964, some 60,000 people died from car accidents. What did those three New York, busybody jackoffs count in the bigger scheme of things?
Nothing, really.
2005-06-15 13:21 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Angeleyes]I thought the case was three dead Jews from up North messing around in the South. Movie Mississippi Burning had this case as a plot. Or am I thinking of the wrong case?
In 1964, some 60,000 people died from car accidents. What did those three New York, busybody jackoffs count in the bigger scheme of things?
Nothing, really.[/QUOTE]
Oh, my bad, I confused this case with the Emmitt Till guy that they dug up recently to prosecute something or somebody somewhere. Anyway, it's all sham, beating the White race to a bloody pulp over isolated and singled-out cases.
Let me go back to sleep now.
2005-06-15 13:30 | User Profile
The have to keep holding trials until the right verdict is reached.
[QUOTE=Franco]6-13-05 The Infamous 1964 Mississippi Civil-Rights Case...Again
The infamous 1964 civil-rights crime case in Mississippi - in which 3 civil-rights workers were killed - is being re-tried, this time [apparently] by the Mississippi state government, with jury selection just beginning [2] [3]. [/QUOTE]
2005-06-15 18:08 | User Profile
I see the fact that they're digging up, literally, 40+ year-old cases as a sign that the guilt account is getting seriously overdrawn. Maybe Whites are starting to get tired of being blamed for every single thing that's wrong? These cases are almost laughable in their antiquity, yet newscasters will affect that air of gravity they're so good at and read the copy as if it's a breaking news story. Compare that with the coverage of the Carr Brothers and the Wichita Massacre. Oh wait, you can't, because there was no coverage...
[url]http://www.whitecivilrights.com/commentaries/viewnews.cgi?newsid1037424021,95800,[/url]
2005-06-16 22:01 | User Profile
Whoever ended these two Jews and a black committed an act of racial defense, plain and simple. No, not technically lawful. But ultimately morally justified. None of the three came south (the Jews from New York, the black from elsewhere in the South) for "civil rights". They came in order to perpetuate nothing less than an assault on the white race. So the response was entirely proportional.
Meanwhile, a white gentile who skips over to Israel and gets mowed down by a bulldozer does not inspire never-ending demonization and prosecution of the Jews who committed the act. There will be no publicity, no endless specials on the Talmudvision, no decades-later prosecutions of Moshe the Bulldozer driver, no nothing.
I am not suggesting we start killing yet. I am saying that we should adopt a resistence mindset and persuade our fellow white men where we can.
2005-06-16 22:38 | User Profile
1960s, eh?
Since we're dredging up old murders, why not remind white folks today of the bloody events that were taking place back then in the Congo, Algeria, Rhodesia and elsewhere?
To take a random example from 1964, who today remembers [URL=http://www.covchurch.org/cov/pcp/carlson.html]Dr. Paul Carlson[/URL]?
2005-06-16 23:54 | User Profile
[QUOTE=xmetalhead]They're digging up dead negroes just to prosecute Whites!! Well that's so the Whites won't forget that they're the cause of every negroid failure in history. Hopefully more Whites will wake up and see that "trials" such as these are only carried to remind Whites that they ain't in control any longer of this country. The whole thing is sickening.[/QUOTE] You are right. We just have to be reminded every now and again of just how guilty we need to feel about the poor oppressed negroes, and also just how heroic the "civil rights" movement was and is. And why is so much of this type of thing happening lately, 80 year old former Klansmen being prosecuted, the whole Emmitt till story coming up, and how this? Is it to keep the guilt mentality alive, or are some starting to worry that this guilt "complex" may be starting to fade a little? The latter is probably just wishful thinking.
2005-06-17 01:06 | User Profile
I was watching Court TV's coverage of the opening statements yesterday. The standard format for these debates is to have a prosecutor and a defense attorney go head-to-head over the trial in question. The defense attorney was a jew named Ivan Golde. Did he fulfill the his appointed role as advocate for the accused? Shit no. The dirty kike shyster roared "Killen must be convicted! Blacks & jews both were persecuted by Southern bigots like him. Jews have a big stake in his conviction, since it's necessary to let today's bigots know 'never again'!" Of course the prosecutor prick said "I agree wholeheartedly with Ivan."
2005-06-17 01:09 | User Profile
[QUOTE=starr]Is it to keep the guilt mentality alive, or are some starting to worry that this guilt "complex" may be starting to fade a little?[/QUOTE] Both. The fires of anti-White hatred are stoked in order to keep alive Afro-Racism, the civil rights industry, and the reparations agenda. It helps oppress Whitey. It's the same reason the Holocau$t is constantly thrown in our faces and shoved down our students' throats: to keep the hate alive and to put white Christians in their place. :cool:
2005-06-21 16:51 | User Profile
Just heard on the news - jury came back with guilty verdict on charge of manslaughter. Meanwhile, a negro pedophile freak slithers back to never-never land while playing "beat it" in his limo.
Personally, i think he deserves a medal :)
2005-06-21 17:45 | User Profile
[QUOTE=starr]Is it to keep the guilt mentality alive, or are some starting to worry that this guilt "complex" may be starting to fade a little? The latter is probably just wishful thinking.[/QUOTE]
Starr, it's not wishful thinking. Since 1964, millions of White Americans have been a victim, or related to a victim, of black on White crime whether assault, murder, robbery, rape, or simply harrassed in some way shape or form. Millions of White Americans, since 1964, have been victims, or related to victims, of "affirmative action" suffering loss of income, humiliation, and injustice. Millions upon millions of White Americans have witnessed first hand the ablsolute destruction of their former neighborhoods after blacks have effectively taken it over. Millions upon milions of White Americans who had not one single iota of responsibility for the enslavement of black africans have paid a heavy, debilitating, grievous price in a viscious collective punishment campaign waged by it's own government against them. Millions of White Americans are picking up on such farces as trying 80 year old men for 40 year old crimes against blacks and jews, yet nothing's said about Witichita, KS or everyday black crimes. More and more Whites are feeling less guilty, excluding of course the Bill Moyer liberals who live in gated White communities far from the "wonders of diversity" they love to tout so much.
So, I wouldn't discount your wishful thinking just yet.
2005-06-21 18:16 | User Profile
There does seem to be pattern with the prosecutions of judeojustice: shriveled, saliva-dribbling white men over 80 are hunted to the corners of the Earth for mere association with racial resistance half a century and more ago. It's such a spectacle. Nothing to do with justice or safety or vindication of the law --- everything to do with showing America who's boss.
Hint: It ain't whites.
2005-06-21 19:02 | User Profile
This is an example of elderly abuse by vengeful weaklings.
It is the revenge of the chattering accusers and blamers - the defective and the stupid.
They are not men. They are not women. They resemble the filthy pack-rat from the sewers of evil that feed off the wounded, the dying and the dead.
It is not uncommon and it is not surprising.
For the rat breeds as it squeaks.
Mentzer
2005-06-21 19:32 | User Profile
[QUOTE]
Just heard on the news - jury came back with guilty verdict on charge of manslaughter
[/QUOTE]How shocking. LOL. I don't know about the rest of you, but I personally feel much safer knowing that evil old white guy is off the streets. What a danger to society this old man was.
Good post,btw, xmetalhead.
2005-06-21 19:52 | User Profile
[QUOTE=starr]How shocking. LOL. I don't know about the rest of you, but I personally feel much safer knowing that evil old white guy is off the streets. What a danger to society this old man was.[/QUOTE] Starr, It is ironic you wrote this. Here is an actual quote from CNN story today --
From her Manhattan home Goodman's mother, Carolyn Goodman, 89, told CNN she had waited a long time for a guilty verdict, but it was "nothing to be happy about."
"I'm just overcome. ... But you know I had a feeling it was going to happen," she said.
"I just hope he's off the streets," she said of Killen. "I don't want anything more terrible than that. I don't want anything violent. I'm against capital punishment. [url="http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/21/mississippi.killings/index.html"]http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/21/mississippi.killings/index.html[/url]
2005-06-21 19:52 | User Profile
[QUOTE=starr]How shocking. LOL. I don't know about the rest of you, but I personally feel much safer knowing that evil old white guy is off the streets. What a danger to society this old man was.
Good post,btw, xmetalhead.[/QUOTE]
Thanks, Starr. Of course, no one is shocked by the predictable verdict. Oh well, the media will croon it's tired old song about how evil America was, but at least today, black men are allowed to ogle and date White women freely without worry in places all over the South.
This isn't the country our fathers died for anymore.
2005-06-21 20:03 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Quantrill]Starr, It is ironic you wrote this. Here is an actual quote from CNN story today -- [url="http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/21/mississippi.killings/index.html"]http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/21/mississippi.killings/index.html[/url][/QUOTE]LOL. that is funny. People are so predictible. Cnn and all the other jewsnetworks are going to love that quote. Even though this evil former klansman has been convicted for the murder of her son, she still doesn't want to see any harm come to him. How touching. That should guarantee her an upcoming appearance on oprah, I am sure.
2005-06-21 20:04 | User Profile
When i caught the news about the guilty verdict, i seen a negro involved with the case get up to the microphone. He started rattling off about how there werent enough black businesses in the downtown area and blacks werent lined up to get into the courthouse to view the trial.
2005-06-21 20:18 | User Profile
[QUOTE=starr]LOL. that is funny. People are so predictible. Cnn and all the other jewsnetworks are going to love that quote. Even though this evil former klansman has been convicted for the murder of her son, she still doesn't want to see any harm come to him. How touching. That should guarantee her an upcoming appearance on oprah, I am sure.[/QUOTE] I think the whole 'I just want him off the streets' thing is pretty funny. The imagery of this octagenarian rolling his wheelchair around, oxygen tube and tank in tow, terrorizing helpless black folks is quite amusing.
2005-06-21 22:18 | User Profile
[QUOTE=xmetalhead]Thanks, Starr. Of course, no one is shocked by the predictable verdict. Oh well, the media will croon it's tired old song about how evil America was, but at least today, black men are allowed to ogle and date White women freely without worry in places all over the South.
This isn't the country our fathers died for anymore.[/QUOTE]
Perhaps you should instruct your women as to what is correct and what is not. What is acceptable and what is not.
If you allow it - you are part of it.
However, there is an inborn law that directs the behaviour and thought of most.
Those that deny it are not worth a second of thought. And not deserving of any coin of expense.
Mentzer
2005-06-22 01:51 | User Profile
What I don't get, is how you can convict a man of manslaughter, without any witnesses to the crime, and without any forensic evidence that places the accused anywhere near the scene of the crime.
This trial was purely a political show trial...and the Jackson newspaper (jewspaper?) was the prosecutor...
2005-06-22 02:26 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Mentzer]This is an example of elderly abuse by vengeful weaklings.
It is the revenge of the chattering accusers and blamers - the defective and the stupid.
They are not men. They are not women. They resemble the filthy pack-rat from the sewers of evil that feed off the wounded, the dying and the dead.
It is not uncommon and it is not surprising.
For the rat breeds as it squeaks.
Mentzer[/QUOTE]That's almost poetic! :thumbsup:
2005-06-22 02:28 | User Profile
Dutch
Political? Of course. It serves no other purpose.
A judgement of fear and hatred. And there is no hatred like that of the liberal.
And they hate. For they are the meek-and-the-weak in normal means of living among your people.
They are the effete book-readers. They are soft and fearful. They suffer from nightmares and mental delusion. They are allowed to attend local colleges and obtain false certificate in false knowledge. And thus spread their nonsense, their ignorance, their idiot opinions.
Their word is their sword. Their shield is liberal, placid law designed for political expedience and prejudicial opinion.
But they read wrongly. They are erroneous in thought. They are backward in intelligent decision.
They are of no worth and to be despised.
Mentzer
2005-06-22 04:52 | User Profile
Yes, the judenpresse scum are having a real jubilee. I watched the "coverage" of both Court TV and CNN: on the former, they had Morris Seligman Dees, Spittin' Jesse, the top Mississippi NAACP revvun and jewess Lisa Bloom handling the commentary - so you see it was perfectly balanced. Mr. Seligman was in fine form, prying open jew wallets by calling the CofCC a White Supremacist Group; the anonymous revvun bitched about nigger separatists being included in Moe's Big List o' Hate; Jesse said that the huge number of coons in da joint was proof of Systemic Racism (or so I think - hard to tell by his nearly indecipherable flubber-lippings).
But the hook-snouted hag Bloom took the cake: "The fact that these jurors only convicted Killen of manslaughter rather than first-degree murder is proof that racism is still rife in Mississippi!"
The day that kikes like that filthy jew whore are mineshafted en masse can't come soon enough.
2005-06-22 05:01 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Mentzer]This is an example of elderly abuse by vengeful weaklings.[/QUOTE]Well said!
Now what are they going to do? Put that helpless senior citizen into prison? That's like throwing a sheep into a den of lions. The n!ggers will tear him apart.
Anyone involved in prosecuting that poor old man deserves death. F_ck the laws, those who write them, and those who enforce them! :furious:
2005-06-22 05:07 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Angler] Anyone involved in prosecuting that poor old man deserves death. F_ck the laws, those who write them, and those who enforce them! :furious:[/QUOTE]
You ain't talkin' trash, brother.
2005-06-22 05:43 | User Profile
Don't name yourself after Nathan Bedsheets Forrest and expect to be taken seriously, just some friendly advice.
2005-06-22 05:51 | User Profile
So a manslaughter charge for a 40+ year old "crime" is not good enough for this Jew? I guess being convicted of a lesser charge doesn't send a strong enough message for her likeing. the most henious, evil crime possible, the dreaded "hate crime" deserves the ultimate charge. Nothing else is nearly good enough.
[QUOTE]But the hook-snouted hag Bloom took the cake: "The fact that these jurors only convicted Killen of manslaughter rather than first-degree murder is proof that racism is still rife in Mississippi!"[/QUOTE]Wrong again, if racism was still alive in the degree it should be, as in the "good old days" the guy wouldn't have been convicted or even charged with anything.
2005-06-22 07:04 | User Profile
[QUOTE=obadiah]Don't name yourself after Nathan Bedsheets Forrest and expect to be taken seriously, just some friendly advice.[/QUOTE]
:censored: ME? NEVER!
2005-06-22 07:04 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Pennsylvania_Dutch]What I don't get, is how you can convict a man of manslaughter, without any witnesses to the crime, and without any forensic evidence that places the accused anywhere near the scene of the crime.[/QUOTE]
The same way that a man can be given 40 years of prison time for attempting to have a judge murdered by this line "You do what you want, I want to stay legal." (Why don't these secretly recorded tapes violate the 5th Amendment when used in the courtroom? Isn't such a thing forcing someone to be a witness against himself?)
2005-06-22 07:10 | User Profile
There's no statute of limitations on murder. btw, two of the victims were caucasian. If it had been a Black man who killed three white racists in 1964, and might be getting justice now,some here would be cheering and hootin' and hollerin' "negro" this and "negro" that. Justice is not about color, and it's not about politics. Murder is murder.
2005-06-24 06:03 | User Profile
[QUOTE=obadiah]There's no statute of limitations on murder. btw, two of the victims were caucasian. [/QUOTE]
Yeah, "caucasian"..... :caiphas:
2005-06-24 15:33 | User Profile
Is it just me or does anyone else notice a similarity of method between prosecuting this man, and the prosecuting of alleged Nazi prison guards. For example, some headline grabbing prosecutor finds an old person, swiftly identifies him as the culprit, brings in more old people with faulty memories as witnesses, and gives passionate summation on the lives of the victims. Finally, find some stupid judge or jury to find the person guilty.
2005-06-24 21:01 | User Profile
Very similar, Ron.
2005-06-25 02:28 | User Profile
Reminds one of the show trials in the former Soviet Union. The "guilty party'" would be denounced in the press before any "legal procedings" took place. the "trial" would just be a fomality, as everyone "knew" that the accused was guilty.
2005-06-25 03:51 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Blond Knight]Reminds one of the show trials in the former Soviet Union. The "guilty party'" would be denounced in the press before any "legal procedings" took place. the "trial" would just be a fomality, as everyone "knew" that the accused was guilty.[/QUOTE]
Correct.
Note the stern and ââ¬Ëconsideredââ¬â¢ judge. The ââ¬Ëexample-makerââ¬Ë. The arbiter and pretender of ââ¬Ëopinionââ¬â¢.
The protected liberal fool behind the skirt of female law that determines an elderly and unwell man to a sentence of 60 years. A death sentence.
The vindictiveness is staggering. The evil of this ââ¬Ëjudgementââ¬â¢ is apparent. The expressed hatred of debased law-making is clear.
And for what purpose? None - apart from the appeasement of the weak, the tweeters and squeakers, the little birdies that all flock together in hope of safety. And how they fear. For they are terrified. For they are unchristian in their errors. For they are evil in their intent.
And their fear will be realized - for it is not the weak and the queer that will continue to decide. It will be a strong and manly assertion of what is correct and what is not.
And like the filthy Soviet Communist it will be reduced to ridicule and defeat.
Mentzer