← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Walter Yannis
Thread ID: 18592 | Posts: 6 | Started: 2005-06-09
2005-06-09 05:43 | User Profile
[URL=Striking Back at the Empire]Antiwar.com[/URL] June 9, 2005 Striking Back at the Empire
by William S. Lind
The recent votes in France and the Netherlands against the proposed constitution of the European Union are not merely political phenomena. They represent significant actions in the development of Fourth Generation war. Why? Because the root cause of Fourth Generation war is a crisis of legitimacy of the state, and the two referenda saw the French and Dutch people rebel against their elites' efforts to empty the state of its content.
Understanding what happened in these two votes requires a counterintuitive mindset. Normally, we would think of elites as representing the state and the common people rebelling against the state. That is not what happened here. On the contrary, the elites represent the destruction of the state and the French and Dutch people rebelled in defense of their historic, national states. In effect, the aristocracy was crying "Down with the king!" while the peasants shouted "Vive le roi!" (which happened quite frequently during both the French and Russian Revolutions).
Today's European political elites, like most of their counterparts elsewhere, do not give their primary allegiance to the state. Rather, their first loyalty goes to a New World Order that advocates world government (even the EU is just a way station on that journey), a globalized economy in which European and North American living standards are averaged with those of the Third World, and the general abolition of religions, customs, and traditions in favor of a culture based on commercialism, materialism, and sensual pleasure. Western elites, especially Europe's, add one more element: the ideology of cultural Marxism, the Marxism of the Frankfurt School, which says that the white race (especially males), the Christian religion, and Western civilization are all evils that must be repressed and, in time, eradicated. In the 1930s, the British novelist Aldous Huxley wrote a book about that kind of future; he called it Brave New World.
The Western political elites began to transfer their allegiance away from the state after World War I, in response to the horrors the state created at places like Ypres, the Somme, and Verdun. They intensified their new loyalty to the internationalist superstate after World War II, and began the slow, painstaking creation of actual superstates in the form of the United Nations, the World Court, the Common Market (now the European Union), and similar bodies. They expected that in time, the common people ââ¬â the plebs, the narod, the riah ââ¬â would follow the wise example of their betters and give their loyalty too to Brave New World.
But they were wrong. As the French and Dutch referenda showed, ordinary people would rather offer their loyalty to something real, their historic nation-state, than to an abstract scheme in which they rightly perceive totalitarian tendencies (a number of former Soviet dissidents are warning that the European Union looks increasingly like the Soviet Union). Das Volk prefers its own culture to the poison of "multiculturalism," its own neighbors to hordes of semi-barbaric immigrants and its own customs to regulations handed down by Gosplan bureaucrats in Brussels.
How will the Brave New World elites respond to this unenlightened effrontery on the part of the great unwashed? By realizing they made a mistake ââ¬â the mistake of letting ordinary people have a say about their future. They will hem and haw for a bit, slow things down for a little while and then resume their previous course, this time making sure there are no referenda. Brave New World only holds elections when they offer voters no real choice other than more Brave New World.
And so the state's legitimacy will crumble further, and Fourth Generation war will spread, including in Europe. Denied the option of giving their loyalty to their historic state and its way of life, ordinary people will indeed transfer that loyalty, not to Brave New World but to a plethora of causes, ideologies, religions, regions, ethnic groups, tribes, and gangs. And for these new loyalties, they will fight.
Like the French Bourbons, the Euro-elites forget nothing and they learn nothing. The future does not belong to them.
2005-06-09 13:45 | User Profile
As always, a thought-provoking piece from Mr. Lind. Is a "crisis of legitimacy of the state" underway in the US too, as evidenced by the growth of civilian border patrol units such as the Minuteman Project? I would think so, given the inaction & impotence of the central government on this issue.
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis][url="http://striking%20back%20at%20the%20empire/"]Antiwar.com[/url] June 9, 2005 Striking Back at the Empire
by William S. Lind
The recent votes in France and the Netherlands against the proposed constitution of the European Union are not merely political phenomena. They represent significant actions in the development of Fourth Generation war. Why? Because the root cause of Fourth Generation war is a crisis of legitimacy of the state, and the two referenda saw the French and Dutch people rebel against their elites' efforts to empty the state of its content. [/QUOTE]
2005-06-09 14:07 | User Profile
Brave New World only holds elections when they offer voters no real choice other than more Brave New World.
It's an old saw, but it cuts just as sharp today...
If voting changed anything, it would be made illegal.
2005-06-09 14:56 | User Profile
Great post Walter. Lind is teriffic.
2005-06-09 18:12 | User Profile
[QUOTE=SteamshipTime]Great post Walter. Lind is teriffic.[/QUOTE]
Thanks.
I'm a fan, too.
2005-06-11 16:29 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis]Thanks.
I'm a fan, too.[/QUOTE] I took the time to read that 400+ page document in English late last week. Small wonder the Dutch and French decided against it. I imagine Germans are for, and I heard that the Belgian government is trying to Prevent A Referendum!
While the Eurostitution is extremely Federalist, and all I can say about that last bit is:
"Bureaucracy, thy name is Belgium."