← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · RowdyRoddyPiper
Thread ID: 18561 | Posts: 7 | Started: 2005-06-07
2005-06-07 12:51 | User Profile
This story is almost like a parody of the new "global" economy - a business venture based around ripping off the rubes by fleecing them in a rigged electronic money game, funded by a pornographer, implemented by a multicultural cast of characters and trading across national borders to circumvent the laws and moral standards of individual nations. And of course they all make out like bandits. You just can't make this stuff up! :lol: - RRP
**The porn princess, the Indian computer whizz and the poker bet that made $10bn **
[url]http://www.guardian.co.uk/online/news/0,12597,1498367,00.html?gusrc=rss[/url]
Online gambling firm to float, turning founders into billionaires
Nils Pratley Friday June 3, 2005 The Guardian
In 1998 a California porn princess commissioned a 25-year-old Indian computer wiz to write a piece of software. Trained as a lawyer, Ruth Parasol had made a small fortune in online pornography after starting, according to legend, with a couple of sex phone lines given to her by her father as an unorthodox teenage birthday present.
She had sold all her porn interests and it was time to invest the proceeds. Online gambling was the new buzz and she found a friend of a friend, Anurag Dikshit, a computer engineering graduate from the Indian Institute of Technology, to create a programme for casino games such as roulette.
The extraordinary result of that meeting was seen yesterday when PartyGaming, the company they created, announced plans to float on the London stock market. Its PartyPoker website is the dominant force in the explosive online poker market and the business will be valued at up to $10bn, or a shade over ã5bn - only a little less than Marks & Spencer, or the combined value of British Airways and EMI.
At the top price, Mr Dikshit, who owns 42%, will be worth ã2.1bn at the age of 33. Ms Parasol, in her late 30s, and her husband, Russ DeLeon, each own 20%, worth ã1bn apiece. Billionaire status has rarely been achieved so young or so quickly.
If the valuation seems implausible, look at the numbers. In three years PartyGaming's pre-tax profits have jumped from $5.8m to $89.2m to $372m. In the first three months of this year it made $125m, or $1.4m a day. That works out at $58,000 an hour, or about ã500 a minute.
Those statistics illustrate how poker, a game which grew on the 19th-century Mississippi steamboats, is now a 24-hour global phenomenon. When players are logging off in San Francisco, they're logging on Singapore and Sydney, and then everywhere from Stockholm to Sidcup. PartyGaming and its rivals make their money by taking a small slice - the "rake" - from each hand of poker they host for real money. The rake is typically only 1% or 2% of the pot, but a dollar here and a dollar there add up. More than 70,000 people regularly play simultaneously at PartyPoker and the site has captured half the market.
Perhaps the most extraordinary part of the story is that Ms Parasol and Mr Dikshit, pronounced Dixit, were latecomers to poker. It was only in 2000, after seeing the success of the rival Paradise Poker, that they switched their focus from roulette and blackjack to poker.
PartyPoker launched with a stunt that will become a marketing legend. It announced a poker tournament with a first prize of $1m, bigger than anything seen on the internet. Players would battle to qualify in small-stakes online tournaments, with the finalists competing for the cash on board a cruise ship in the Caribbean. "We put 100 people with their partners on board to play in a live final," says Vikrant Bhargava, Mr Dikshit's college chum from Delhi who joined as marketing director. "We said live, even though we were an online site, because that was the only way people could believe that a new company had paid out $1m. It was good PR."
From 2003 American TV has fed the frenzy, showing tournaments played for multimillion prizes. PartyPoker's coup was to sign as its public face Mike Sexton, an old-time Vegas pro enjoying a second career as the Gary Lineker of US televised poker. Hollywood climbed aboard, with the likes of Nicole Kidman and Ben Affleck playing in celebrity games. The number of online players mushroomed. It has enraged a fringe of moral-minded US senators who would like to see the industry legislated out of existence. Stopping PartyGaming and its peers, though, looks an impossible mission - these are 21st-century internet businesses that simply bypass problems of geography.
PartyGaming's head office is in Gibraltar; its computer servers run from there and from Kahnawake, a Mohawk Indian reserve within Canada; its marketing office is in London but most of its 1,000 staff work in a call centre and software development site in Hyderabad, southern India. The appeal of Gibraltar is its low taxes and gambling-friendly regulators. The online casino 888.com operates from the same building as PartyGaming, as does the online business of Ladbrokes. Kahnawake keeps the hardware out of reach of irate politicians.
Investors in London are more relaxed about investing in gambling. British company Sportingbet bought Paradise Poker last year and saw its share price treble; poker is also the fastest growing part of the online operations of William Hill and Ladbrokes. By contrast, old-fashioned Vegas casinos, fearful of the politicians, left the internet wide open for newcomers.
PartyGaming's flotation is not yet a done deal, and its biggest problem is the virtual refusal of its main owners to talk about themselves. Mr Dikshit, says his friend Vikrant Bhargava, is simply a shy, modest workaholic who still wears sandals to work. "He prefers to stay away from the media," he says.
The reason for Ms Parasol's and Mr DeLeon's invisibility is their lack of day-to-day management involvement, according to the company, not her previous involvement in "adult entertainment." Instead, highly regarded outside directors are now in place, led by the chief executive, Richard Segal, a former boss of Odeon Cinemas, and the non-executive chairman, Michael Jackson, the chairman of the software group Sage.
But the original shareholders will be allowed to sell only 23% of their shares in the flotation, which means all will still be substantial investors in a large publicly traded company. Whether Mr Dikshit, as operations director, can sustain his subterranean profile is questionable.
Mr Bhargava, who has a stake of almost 15%, hints at the way in which the ride has left them breathless. "When we left university in 1994 - and you have to remember that the Indian Institute of Technology was one of the best schools in all of India - quite a lot of people went off to the US and got involved with dotcoms," he says. "So many people wanted to do something big, but I don't think we ever thought it would be this big. But the motivation was not money. We have done well at something we enjoy doing."
To their credit, the founders are recognising the efforts of their employees to a degree many other self-made tycoons would not. Some 5.6% of PartyGaming, worth $560m or about ã300m at the top end of the flotation price range, will be gifted to an employee trust. All staff, from call centre staff in Hyderabad to London techies, will get the chance to earn two or three times their salary in free share options over the next four years.
By then, this borderless company plans to be conquering new territories. A wired-up China, home of the world's most enthusiastic gamblers, is the view on the horizon.
2005-06-07 17:44 | User Profile
This article sounds like very true to me because when I started to play Texas Holdem ,back is 2000, there was only one open table at the Seven Feathers Casino where I go to and now there are about seven of them and with a waiting list.
I wish that everyone could control their gambling like I do, I have a simple rule and that is "loose $100,00 and leave, win $100,00 and leave" thanks to this simple rule I am in the hole for only about $700,00 in my five years of gambing and I am sorry to say that I am a poor player but at the same time I am having a good time and to me that's what it is all about.
My feeling about those that I have seen gambling is that most of them don't have the money for the rent, food, car payment and so on but they will always have the money to play Texas Hold Them.
That's one stock that I would buy.
2005-06-08 03:03 | User Profile
Hi Ponce
"That's one stock that I would buy."
PartyPoker's be on late night TV here in the UK for a few years now on and off. Their's always been a lot of money to be made in gaming "money laundering". I know that my own family refuses to invest in gaming stocks. It's a pity more people don't have our ethics.
2005-06-08 06:47 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gregz]I know that my own family refuses to invest in gaming stocks. It's a pity more people don't have our ethics.[/QUOTE]
Indeed. For what it's worth, and admittedly it's not much, here's one man in Texas that commends you.
2005-06-08 11:07 | User Profile
The programmer's name is "Dikshit." Sounds like the name of a gay porn star. :lol:
2005-06-10 06:05 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Angler]The programmer's name is "Dikshit." Sounds like the name of a gay porn star. :lol:[/QUOTE]
For your information, Dikshit is actually a good Indian name. Let me give you an example. Over here, in East Greenwich, R.I. , there was a prominent veterinarian named Bipin B. Dikshit. He has changed his name but still practices.It's a primo vet joint where you can rest assured that your pet is taken care of the best. Bipin is good at this. Now he has a new name ( I cant blame him for that ) and I'm not even going to tell you what it is, but I know where to find him. lol Dikshit just doesn't get around like it should. Another thing that doesn';t get around is this new Original Dissent.To speak exactly, I do not have access to my own posts. I hope Okie or others can rectify this. I wanted top respond to a poster, because back in post 200 or whatever, I made a statement and proved that evolution is a fake. I want access to that. Right now it only lets me go back 50 posts, but I have 660 or so. As far as I'm concerned, Jay started this, and has rights. I think Jay still thinks I am quality and Sertorius and Okie too. So Im asking why I cannot access my old posts ?
2005-06-10 06:12 | User Profile
Tell me how I can access and paste forth my previous posts ?
I recently saw a sentiment which made me want to go back, into my strongest posts about anti-evolution. I feel that these posts are my intellectual right, as much as when I tell you that you are my friend, I take that for real. So how can I have access to my lost posts ? Are they now your property and not mine ?