← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Hilaire Belloc
Thread ID: 18366 | Posts: 11 | Started: 2005-05-23
2005-05-23 19:30 | User Profile
[url]http://www.lewrockwell.com/woods/woods40.html[/url]
How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization by Thomas E. Woods, Jr.
Today is the official release date for my new book, How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization. From the role of the monks (they did much more than just copy manuscripts) to art and architecture, from the university to Western law, from science to charitable work, from international law to economics, the book delves into just how indebted we are as a civilization to the Catholic Church, whether we realize it or not.
By far the bookââ¬â¢s longest chapter is "The Church and Science." We have all heard a great deal about the Churchââ¬â¢s alleged hostility toward science. What most people fail to realize is that historians of science have spent the past half-century drastically revising this conventional wisdom, arguing that the Churchââ¬â¢s role in the development of Western science was far more salutary than previously thought. I am speaking not about Catholic apologists but about serious and important scholars of the history of science such as J.L. Heilbron, A.C. Crombie, David Lindberg, Edward Grant, and Thomas Goldstein.
It is all very well to point out that important scientists, like Louis Pasteur, have been Catholic. More revealing is how many priests have distinguished themselves in the sciences. It turns out, for instance, that the first person to measure the rate of acceleration of a freely falling body was Fr. Giambattista Riccioli. The man who has been called the father of Egyptology was Fr. Athanasius Kircher (also called "master of a hundred arts" for the breadth of his knowledge). Fr. Roger Boscovich, who has been described as "the greatest genius that Yugoslavia ever produced," has often been called the father of modern atomic theory.
In the sciences it was the Jesuits in particular who distinguished themselves; some 35 craters on the moon, in fact, are named after Jesuit scientists and mathematicians.
By the eighteenth century, the Jesuits
had contributed to the development of pendulum clocks, pantographs, barometers, reflecting telescopes and microscopes, to scientific fields as various as magnetism, optics and electricity. They observed, in some cases before anyone else, the colored bands on Jupiterââ¬â¢s surface, the Andromeda nebula and Saturnââ¬â¢s rings. They theorized about the circulation of the blood (independently of Harvey), the theoretical possibility of flight, the way the moon effected the tides, and the wave-like nature of light. Star maps of the southern hemisphere, symbolic logic, flood-control measures on the Po and Adige rivers, introducing plus and minus signs into Italian mathematics ââ¬â all were typical Jesuit achievements, and scientists as influential as Fermat, Huygens, Leibniz and Newton were not alone in counting Jesuits among their most prized correspondents [Jonathan Wright, The Jesuits, 2004, p. 189].
Seismology, the study of earthquakes, has been so dominated by Jesuits that it has become known as "the Jesuit science." It was a Jesuit, Fr. J.B. Macelwane, who wrote Introduction to Theoretical Seismology, the first seismology textbook in America, in 1936. To this day, the American Geophysical Union, which Fr. Macelwane once headed, gives an annual medal named after this brilliant priest to a promising young geophysicist.
The Jesuits were also the first to introduce Western science into such far-off places as China and India. In seventeenth-century China in particular, Jesuits introduced a substantial body of scientific knowledge and a vast array of mental tools for understanding the physical universe, including the Euclidean geometry that made planetary motion comprehensible. Jesuits made important contributions to the scientific knowledge and infrastructure of other less developed nations not only in Asia but also in Africa and Central and South America. Beginning in the nineteenth century, these continents saw the opening of Jesuit observatories that studied such fields as astronomy, geomagnetism, meteorology, seismology, and solar physics. Such observatories provided these places with accurate time keeping, weather forecasts (particularly important in the cases of hurricanes and typhoons), earthquake risk assessments, and cartography. In Central and South America the Jesuits worked primarily in meteorology and seismology, essentially laying the foundations of those disciplines there. The scientific development of these countries, ranging from Ecuador to Lebanon to the Philippines, is indebted to Jesuit efforts.
The Galileo case is often cited as evidence of Catholic hostility toward science, and How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization accordingly takes a closer look at the Galileo matter. For now, just one little-known fact: Catholic cathedrals in Bologna, Florence, Paris, and Rome were constructed to function as solar observatories. No more precise instruments for observing the sunââ¬â¢s apparent motion could be found anywhere in the world. When Johannes Kepler posited that planetary orbits were elliptical rather than circular, Catholic astronomer Giovanni Cassini verified Keplerââ¬â¢s position through observations he made in the Basilica of San Petronio in the heart of the Papal States. Cassini, incidentally, was a student of Fr. Riccioli and Fr. Francesco Grimaldi, the great astronomer who also discovered the diffraction of light, and even gave the phenomenon its name.
Iââ¬â¢ve tried to fill the book with little-known facts like these.
To say that the Church played a positive role in the development of science has now become absolutely mainstream, even if this new consensus has not yet managed to trickle down to the general public. In fact, Stanley Jaki, over the course of an extraordinary scholarly career, has developed a compelling argument that in fact it was important aspects of the Christian worldview that accounted for why it was in the West that science enjoyed the success it did as a self-sustaining enterprise. Non-Christian cultures did not possess the same philosophical tools, and in fact were burdened by conceptual frameworks that hindered the development of science. Jaki extends this thesis to seven great cultures: Arabic, Babylonian, Chinese, Egyptian, Greek, Hindu, and Maya. In these cultures, Jaki explains, science suffered a "stillbirth." My book gives ample attention to Jakiââ¬â¢s work.
Economic thought is another area in which more and more scholars have begun to acknowledge the previously overlooked role of Catholic thinkers. Joseph Schumpeter, one of the great economists of the twentieth century, paid tribute to the overlooked contributions of the late Scholastics ââ¬â mainly sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Spanish theologians ââ¬â in his magisterial History of Economic Analysis (1954). "It is they," he wrote, "who come nearer than does any other group to having been the ââ¬Ëfoundersââ¬â¢ of scientific economics." In devoting scholarly attention to this unfortunately neglected chapter in the history of economic thought, Schumpeter would be joined by other accomplished scholars over the course of the twentieth century, including Professors Raymond de Roover, Marjorie Grice-Hutchinson, and Alejandro Chafuen.
The Church also played an indispensable role in another essential development in Western civilization: the creation of the university. The university was an utterly new phenomenon in European history. Nothing like it had existed in ancient Greece or Rome. The institution that we recognize today, with its faculties, courses of study, examinations, and degrees, as well as the familiar distinction between undergraduate and graduate study, come to us directly from the medieval world. And it is no surprise that the Church should have done so much to foster the nascent university system, since the Church, according to historian Lowrie Daly, "was the only institution in Europe that showed consistent interest in the preservation and cultivation of knowledge."
The popes and other churchmen ranked the universities among the great jewels of Christian civilization. It was typical to hear the University of Paris described as the "new Athens" ââ¬â a designation that calls to mind the ambitions of the great Alcuin from the Carolingian period of several centuries earlier, who sought through his own educational efforts to establish a new Athens in the kingdom of the Franks. Pope Innocent IV (1243ââ¬â54) described the universities as "rivers of science which water and make fertile the soil of the universal Church," and Pope Alexander IV (1254ââ¬â61) called them "lanterns shining in the house of God." And the popes deserved no small share of the credit for the growth and success of the university system. "Thanks to the repeated intervention of the papacy," writes historian Henri Daniel-Rops, "higher education was enabled to extend its boundaries; the Church, in fact, was the matrix that produced the university, the nest whence it took flight."
As a matter of fact, among the most important medieval contributions to modern science was the essentially free inquiry of the university system, where scholars could debate and discuss propositions, and in which the utility of human reason was taken for granted. Contrary to the grossly inaccurate picture of the Middle Ages that passes for common knowledge today, medieval intellectual life made indispensable contributions to Western civilization. In The Beginnings of Western Science (1992), David Lindberg writes:
It must be emphatically stated that within this educational system the medieval master had a great deal of freedom. The stereotype of the Middle Ages pictures the professor as spineless and subservient, a slavish follower of Aristotle and the Church fathers (exactly how one could be a slavish follower of both, the stereotype does not explain), fearful of departing one iota from the demands of authority. There were broad theological limits, of course, but within those limits the medieval master had remarkable freedom of thought and expression; there was almost no doctrine, philosophical or theological, that was not submitted to minute scrutiny and criticism by scholars in the medieval university.
"[S]cholars of the later Middle Ages," concludes Lindberg, "created a broad intellectual tradition, in the absence of which subsequent progress in natural philosophy would have been inconceivable."
Historian of science Edward Grant concurs with this judgment:
What made it possible for Western civilization to develop science and the social sciences in a way that no other civilization had ever done before? The answer, I am convinced, lies in a pervasive and deep-seated spirit of inquiry that was a natural consequence of the emphasis on reason that began in the Middle Ages. With the exception of revealed truths, reason was enthroned in medieval universities as the ultimate arbiter for most intellectual arguments and controversies. It was quite natural for scholars immersed in a university environment to employ reason to probe into subject areas that had not been explored before, as well as to discuss possibilities that had not previously been seriously entertained.
The creation of the university, the commitment to reason and rational argument, and the overall spirit of inquiry that characterized medieval intellectual life amounted to "a gift from the Latin Middle Ages to the modern worldââ¬Â¦though it is a gift that may never be acknowledged. Perhaps it will always retain the status it has had for the past four centuries as the best-kept secret of Western civilization."
Here, then, are just a few of the topics to be found in How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization. Iââ¬â¢ve been asked quite a few times in recent weeks what my next project will be. For now, itââ¬â¢ll be getting some rest.
May 2, 2005 * Professor Thomas E. Woods, Jr. [send him mail] holds a bachelorââ¬â¢s degree in history from Harvard and his Ph.D. from Columbia. His books include the New York Times (and LRC) bestseller The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History, The Church and the Market: A Catholic Defense of the Free Economy, and the just-released How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization.*
2005-05-23 19:30 | User Profile
My blog entry:
[url]http://thirdpositionreview.blogspot.com/2005/05/catholicism-and-western-civilization.html[/url]
**Catholicism and Western Civilization **
Thomas E. Woods, Jr. gives an interesting outline of his new and exciting book [url=http://www.lewrockwell.com/woods/woods40.html]How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization[/url] over at LewRockwell.com. The main thesis of his book, as its title suggests, is about how the Catholic faith was the driving force behind the development of what we consider today Western Civilization. As he states, "From the role of the monks (they did much more than just copy manuscripts) to art and architecture, from the university to Western law, from science to charitable work, from international law to economics, the book delves into just how indebted we are as a civilization to the Catholic Church, whether we realize it or not."
Yet sadly, as he explains in the beginning of his book, the contributions of the faith to our civilization are often ignored in the popular imagination and even among many Catholics. Hopefully this book will bring to light this neglected aspect of historical truth.
Not only does he explain the great contributions of Catholicism to Western civilization, Woods goes to great length to refute the many myths about how the faith supposedly hindered its development. In particular, he takes on the age-old myths concerning the relationship between Catholicism and science. Contrary to popular view, according to Woods, Catholicism was a not an enemy of science but rather its greatest patron. All this despite the whole Galileo incident, which is so often cited as proof that the Catholic Church hindered scientific advancement(and indeed Woods deals with the many myths concerning this as well).
One possible problem I have found with Woods' book is how he tries to connect the development of modern-day theories of free-market economics(particularly the theories of the Austrian School) to the teachings of the Scholastics of the Middle Ages. Ray Moore of [url=http://distributism.blogspot.com/2005/05/heretical-roots-of-libertarianism.html] the Distributist Review[/url] took a critical view of this notion.
However, despite this flaw, Woods' book certainly is of great value to us Catholics who wish to learn about and take pride in their rich cultural heritage. It really is worthwhile reading material.
2005-05-29 14:16 | User Profile
I've wanted to pick that one up for sometime.
2005-05-30 06:41 | User Profile
The churchmen of the 40 years have not done much good for "Western Civilization." They have been doing their best to destroy it.
2005-06-03 05:27 | User Profile
this organization greatly offends me as a Christian. First, they mix Euro-Pagan garbage with Christianity, then attempt to convince the world that Yeshua was a Caucasian, then, through Bartolhomo de las Casas and the papacy of his time, sanction African slavery, and today, of course, baby-raping homos proclaiming themselves men of God, and an "ex"-Nazi pope.
2005-06-03 18:37 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ked McFarlane]this organization greatly offends me as a Christian. First, they mix Euro-Pagan garbage with Christianity, then attempt to convince the world that Yeshua was a Caucasian, then, through Bartolhomo de las Casas and the papacy of his time, sanction African slavery, and today, of course, baby-raping homos proclaiming themselves men of God, and an "ex"-Nazi pope.[/QUOTE] For an organization that is between 2000 and 1200 years old (you pick who was right during the Great Schism with the Greek Christian Church) I'd say that for all the harm done, the good has been greater:
Kept Islam out of Europe (Ever heard of Tours, Lepanto, Vienna?) Spread literacy Created the foundation of order and law for European post Dark Ages
The great Christian tragedy, in my opinion, is that the fathers of the Greek and Latin Churches could not reach or maintain an accord. Christianity's biggest self inflicted wound.
Beyond that, I find it strange that the Pope did not excommunicate those who betrayed the trust of their congregations/laity so egregiously. Since he does not consult me . . .
2005-06-03 21:06 | User Profile
It's fine and dandy that they did good for Europe, but I was discussing their crimes against Africa.
2005-06-03 21:23 | User Profile
[QUOTE=horatio]It's fine and dandy that they did good for Europe, but I was discussing their crimes against Africa.[/QUOTE] horatio:
Is it monotheism that so upsets you?
OK, if that is the gripe, do you want to embark on the propagation of the slave trade in East Africa for about 12 centuries by the various nations spreading Islam? Are you very familiar with the slave trade still extant in East Africa? I read bits and pieces here and there, I admit I don't have a very good big picture of it.
For every "crime against Africa," someone built a school, provided a doctor, helped a young man attend a university, and so on. If attempting to spread the word is a sin, I guess we will all find out from St Peter soon enough.
I hear that Catholic doctrine is running into reality over the condom/sex/AIDS transmission problem, but won't comment beyond that.
Feel free to curse the darkness, horatio. Lighting candle is part of another solution set.
2005-06-06 20:11 | User Profile
I am not opposed to monotheism, in fact I'm a Christian-which is why Catholicism upsets me so. I am well aware of slavery under Islam-and Blacks enslaving Blacks in the Sudan, thanks to the sand-crackers having polluted North Africa with the Islamic caste system in which every non-muslim was deemed suitable for enslavement, in the early centuries of Islam. I do appreciate any help offered to Africa by catlick missionaries, but I recognize that the Catlick church did its share of harm as well. Don't forget Mussolini's pope "blessing" the bombs that were to be dropped on the Christian nation of Ethiopia, calling the attack a "Catholic crusade."
2005-06-06 21:21 | User Profile
hmm. " Ked McFarlane " appears as soon as " who'sbobbarr ? " dissapears. One and the same, are they not ?
2005-06-06 21:34 | User Profile
I know not of what you speak. :dung: