← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · xmetalhead
Thread ID: 18318 | Posts: 12 | Started: 2005-05-20
2005-05-20 18:17 | User Profile
The United States and Israel are ONE and the SAME.
[IMG]http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/ap/20050520/capt.bag11305201500.iraq_bag113.jpg[/IMG]
[URL=http://story.news.yahoo.com/s/ap/iraq]Related Story[/URL]
2005-05-20 19:10 | User Profile
[QUOTE=xmetalhead]The United States and Israel are ONE and the SAME.[/QUOTE]It'd be hard to argue with that.
You know how Israel calls its military the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF)? Well, there's an Israeli Offense Force (IOF) as well. It's the current US military.
2005-05-20 19:16 | User Profile
Angler, who would of ever thunk that the United States of America would become a proxy army fighting proxy wars for a foreign country? There should be no reason for Americans and Muslims to have murderous hate for each other yet that's where our entangling foreign alliance has gotten us.
George Washington was certainly right in his warning 200 years ago.
2005-05-20 19:45 | User Profile
This has to be a first in history. Never has a great power ever allowed itself to be dominated by either a lesser power or a vassal. The relationship today between the US and Israel is the latter with the US playing the vassal role.
2005-05-21 01:11 | User Profile
A picture of Saddam Hussein wearing only his underwear appeared on the front pages of the New York Post and Britain's The Sun. The papers said the pictures, taken in the former dictator's Baghdad prison cell, were provided by an unidentified U.S. military official. The U.S. military condemned the photos and launched an immediate investigation into who took them.
Hey, y'all. After all the cain the neocons have been raising about Newsweek, do you think they will show the same outrage against the New York Post for printing this photo? You know, undermining the "war effort" and all that crap they spout off about?
No doubt this was done deliberately not only by the Post, but also by the Murdoch owed Sun as well. They really are hell bent on their "war between civilizations".
2005-05-21 01:16 | User Profile
The US is the whore of the Jews......why do you think that I call it [B]USRael[/B]?
2005-05-21 01:47 | User Profile
[QUOTE=xmetalhead]Angler, who would of ever thunk that the United States of America would become a proxy army fighting proxy wars for a foreign country? There should be no reason for Americans and Muslims to have murderous hate for each other yet that's where our entangling foreign alliance has gotten us.
George Washington was certainly right in his warning 200 years ago.[/QUOTE]
The Tick is wagging the Dog. Let's tweezer the parasite off and dunk it in a jar of kerosene!
[img]http://resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image08.jpg[/img]
2005-05-21 02:41 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius]This has to be a first in history. Never has a great power ever allowed itself to be dominated by either a lesser power or a vassal.[/QUOTE]
More easily understood as Jews wagging the white dog. It's a piece of matzoh when you're organized, cohesive and verbally acute for the information age. Whites need to copy Jews or die.
2005-05-21 13:06 | User Profile
[IMG]http://billmon.org/archives/smalltrial.jpg[/IMG]
One can always hope...
2005-05-24 02:42 | User Profile
[QUOTE=xmetalhead]Angler, who would of ever thunk that the United States of America would become a proxy army fighting proxy wars for a foreign country? There should be no reason for Americans and Muslims to have murderous hate for each other yet that's where our entangling foreign alliance has gotten us. [/QUOTE] It gets curioser and curioser, says Alice.
A couple of small states in the Persian Gulf have made agreements with the US which boils down to, at least from an Emirs' point of view, the US being hired muscle (them fellas run small places) in exchange for some basing rights. Keep the Yanks on the base and away from the common folks, sort of like Indians on a reservation, and provide jobs for some of the locals and imported Pakistanis, Sri Lankans, and Phillipinos.
It's not that new a practice. America got in the habit of doing that in West Germany, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Italy, Greece, Turkey, etc.
Having gotten in the habit, see also South Korea, Japan, it is very hard to get out of that habit.
What's got me rubbing my chin on the linkage to Israel: we don't have any bases there. Fig leaf?
2005-05-24 04:10 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Angeleyes]It gets curioser and curioser, says Alice.
A couple of small states in the Persian Gulf have made agreements with the US which boils down to, at least from an Emirs' point of view, the US being hired muscle (them fellas run small places) in exchange for some basing rights. Keep the Yanks on the base and away from the common folks, sort of like Indians on a reservation, and provide jobs for some of the locals and imported Pakistanis, Sri Lankans, and Phillipinos.
It's not that new a practice. America got in the habit of doing that in West Germany, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Italy, Greece, Turkey, etc.
Having gotten in the habit, see also South Korea, Japan, it is very hard to get out of that habit.
What's got me rubbing my chin on the linkage to Israel: we don't have any bases there. Fig leaf?[/QUOTE]
You better learn more about your state of Israel Angeleyes, I was at the first one back in 63 and since then another was build (small ones both of them) and today a big one is being built.
The US has a lot of equipment over there which are supposed to be for US use but the Jews can use it if there is a war.
Also three permanent American superbases are being built in Iraq, the US will never leave Iraq and like the Palestinians fighting the Jews the Iraqis will fight the Americans.
2005-05-24 13:04 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Angeleyes]It gets curioser and curioser, says Alice.
A couple of small states in the Persian Gulf have made agreements with the US which boils down to, at least from an Emirs' point of view, the US being hired muscle (them fellas run small places) in exchange for some basing rights. Keep the Yanks on the base and away from the common folks, sort of like Indians on a reservation, and provide jobs for some of the locals and imported Pakistanis, Sri Lankans, and Phillipinos.
It's not that new a practice. America got in the habit of doing that in West Germany, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Italy, Greece, Turkey, etc.
Having gotten in the habit, see also South Korea, Japan, it is very hard to get out of that habit.
What's got me rubbing my chin on the linkage to Israel: we don't have any bases there. Fig leaf?[/QUOTE]
Why would the American Jews who run the United States blow their cover and have the US set up forward bases in Israel making it obvious to even the dumbest American that the US is an Israeli lapdog? No, our Jewish rulers simply chose to supply huge amounts of military equipment and money, directly out of the White working man's pocket. The fig leaf is that [I]Boobus Americanus[/I] doesn't see the duplicitous machinations of it's ruling elite.
The fact that the US has set up Empirical outposts on Muslim soil, in essence, to protect the oil---1st, and their corrupt despotic puppets---2nd, is a huge source of rage for the Islamic jihadists. When the US set up shop on Saudi soil, the mullahs began preaching to their faithful that "our rulers have allowed the enemies of God to enter our land". Can't say I totally blame them. Islamists have never had any redress for their grievances of such a decree and were left to express their rage through violence. The Muslim differs from the Westerner in the fact that we in the West make better slaves than the Muslim. We're still not as good a slave as the Chinaman, but we're getting there.
The other, probably bigger, force behind the Islamics hatred for the USA is, of course, our one-sided, corrupt, and subservience to the State of Israel. The Iraqis, ordinary and insurgent alike, call the American forces "the jews" and stomp on and burn both American and Israeli flag alike. To them, they see it all too clear while [I]boobus americanus [/I]still thinks he's a real free man.