← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · TexasAnarch
Thread ID: 18303 | Posts: 8 | Started: 2005-05-19
2005-05-19 17:41 | User Profile
[url]http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/19/politics/19judges.html?[/url] Fight on Judges and Filibusters Opens in Senate
Crisis in Communication:
Story line of ââ¬â¢05 American History: Massive splitting
of reality
as communicated
(words, pictures, images, events) is occurring;
teetering on the edge of hyper-violent ââ¬Ëcivil warââ¬â¢ of all against all.
THE SPLITTING HAS BEEN MANIPULATED along the lines the Jewish media has politically hack-sawed to death, between ââ¬Åleft vrs. rightââ¬Â.
I use the ââ¬ÅJ-ââ¬Å word here advisedly because America is confronted here, in the appointment of John Bolton and the Federal Judges, with what Josef Goebbels complained about so bitterly in ââ¬ÅWhy (We National Socialists) oppose the Jewsââ¬Â: ââ¬Å(He)ââ¬Â¦has misused the social misery of the broad masses to deepen the dreadful split between the right and left of our people, to divide Germany/America into two halves, thereby concealing the true reason for the loss of the Great/Iraq War.ââ¬Â (full text of Goebbels ââ¬ÅWHY WE ARE NATIONALISTSââ¬Â linked at [url]http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17892&page=1&pp=15[/url])
I posting this because it defines where those who call themselves Republicans, and Christians, must split, however sad and difficult it is, from those who support Zionism.
2005-05-20 03:44 | User Profile
Is it any surprise we have not heard from the ACLU? Hey, Dudes, over here!!!
Here we have had, in the past year, a number of prospective judges being challenged for being Christian, and unable to be impartial on that basis? Funny, if Ginsberg had been challenged as unable to be impartial due to being a Jew, we'd still be hearing about it.
What has been going on is blatant religious discrimination, directly contra equal protection under the law and freedom of worship. From Congressmen who allegedly uphold the Constitution?
Tex, may I borrow an airsick bag, I think I am about to hurl.
[QUOTE=TexasAnarch][url="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/19/politics/19judges.html?"]http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/19/politics/19judges.html?[/url] Fight on Judges and Filibusters Opens in Senate
Crisis in Communication:
Story line of ââ¬â¢05 American History: Massive splitting of reality as communicated (words, pictures, images, events) is occurring; teetering on the edge of hyper-violent ââ¬Ëcivil warââ¬â¢ of all against all.
THE SPLITTING HAS BEEN MANIPULATED along the lines the Jewish media has politically hack-sawed to death, between ââ¬Åleft vrs. rightââ¬Â.
I use the ââ¬ÅJ-ââ¬Å word here advisedly because America is confronted here, in the appointment of John Bolton and the Federal Judges, with what Josef Goebbels complained about so bitterly in ââ¬ÅWhy (We National Socialists) oppose the Jewsââ¬Â: ââ¬Å(He)ââ¬Â¦has misused the social misery of the broad masses to deepen the dreadful split between the right and left of our people, to divide Germany/America into two halves, thereby concealing the true reason for the loss of the Great/Iraq War.ââ¬Â (full text of Goebbels ââ¬ÅWHY WE ARE NATIONALISTSââ¬Â linked at [url="http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17892&page=1&pp=15"]http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17892&page=1&pp=15[/url])
I posting this because it defines where those who call themselves Republicans, and Christians, must split, however sad and difficult it is, from those who support Zionism.[/QUOTE]
2005-05-21 15:23 | User Profile
Its the judges who are tools of National Zionist Socialism. They are the appointees of this neocon-controlled administration. The ones Galloway could forthrightly, correctly, and unremittingly address in these terms:
[I][B]"Now, Senator, I gave my heart and soul to oppose the policy that you promoted. I gave my political life's blood to try to stop the mass killing of Iraqis by the sanctions on Iraq which killed one million Iraqis, most of them children, most of them died before they even knew that they were Iraqis, but they died for no other reason other than that they were Iraqis with the misfortune to born at that time. I gave my heart and soul to stop you committing the disaster that you did commit in invading Iraq. And I told the world that your case for the war was a pack of lies.
ââ¬ÅI told the world that Iraq, contrary to your claims did not have weapons of mass destruction. I told the world, contrary to your claims, that Iraq had no connection to al-Qaeda. I told the world, contrary to your claims, that Iraq had no connection to the atrocity on 9/11 2001. I told the world, contrary to your claims, that the Iraqi people would resist a British and American invasion of their country and that the fall of Baghdad would not be the beginning of the end, but merely the end of the beginning.
"Senator, in everything I said about Iraq, I turned out to be right and you turned out to be wrong [/B][/I] and 100,000 people paid with their lives; 1600 of them American soldiers sent to their deaths on a pack of lies; 15,000 of them wounded, many of them disabled forever on a pack of lies."
We were saying those things, too, here.
This creates a situation in which it is impossible to pick up and move on and deal with things the same way.
No true American could even consider seving such an administrartion, system or people. How could they justify their existence if they did? The fact that these people, whoever they are, are lined up, ready to serve, like the great Iraqi police force, protecting Democracy and Freedom, is objectively absurd. And the Democrats ought to keep talking and talking and saying just that, in as many way as there are to use "forever"
-- as by Goebbels, when speaking for German National Socialisms against the Jews -- ("(We oppose the Jew)...because he has misused the social misery of the broad masses to deepen the dreadful split between the right and left of our people, to divide Germany into two halves..").
But the cast of characters is reversed now from what he faced. The neocons -- and its not just Jews, though it IS (consonant with) their malificent spirit-double ('ka', in Egyptian soul-talk) or it wouldn't be as it is, which is chosen, not forced on them (Calvin) -- have put US -- refusenik Christian White Holdout Protestant cro-Magnon Liberal True Americans of the True New Age Gospel -- in the position Goebbels saw as "the Jew." In other words, the neocon/Jew, today, is the Nazi of the 1930-40's.
You can be with Bush if you want, but that is the side you are on.
2005-05-22 17:41 | User Profile
[QUOTE=TexasAnarch] You can be with Bush if you want, but that is the side you are on.[/QUOTE] Are you suggesting folks should have voted for Kerry? Hmmmm, with the "brain trust behind him?" The argument that any change would have been for the good held some water.
Either choice, which was really no choice, was just as damning.
Feel free to draw lines as you see fit, I am not bound by them.
Do you feel it appropriate to borrow from the GWB/neocon mantra of "You are with me or against me --" is that how it is?
2005-05-23 00:54 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Angeleyes]
Feel free to draw lines as you see fit, I am not bound by them. B
Do you feel it appropriate to borrow from the GWB/neocon mantra of "You are with me or against me --" is that how it is? A [/QUOTE]
Obviously one doesn't vote -- unless for Paul Tancredo, someone like that B Yes, you are. Reality doesn't change just because you deny it. A Absolutely. They are the enemy of America, Christianity, and humanity -- by this attitude itself, given what they are and have done. If you aren't against them you are with them. What don't you understand about "enemy"? They will kill anyone who opposes them.
So who is paying you? what for?
2005-05-23 03:14 | User Profile
[QUOTE=TexasAnarch]Obviously one doesn't vote -- unless for Paul Tancredo, someone like that B Yes, you are. Reality doesn't change just because you deny it. A Absolutely. They are the enemy of America, Christianity, and humanity -- by this attitude itself, given what they are and have done. If you aren't against them you are with them. What don't you understand about "enemy"? They will kill anyone who opposes them. I think you and I will tend to disagree more often than not.
Just because you repeat yourself does not mean you speak the truth, or even that you recognize it. Choosing not to vote is choosing to empower anyone and everyone else who does. Do you willingly make yourself the subject of your enemies?
From your tone, I'd guess you'd prefer not to. So, other than argue with me, what are you doing about it? The hard thing to do is put the effort forth to get someone on a ballot who can represent you, and your interests. Local first, national later.
Not voting is a good stride toward standing in self-induced impotence, while others use your system against you. That is not the path to victory for your cause, whatever it is.
Who is paying you? what for?[/QUOTE]Were you referring to my sig? It's from the movie "The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly." Early scene. Lee Van Cleef's character, Angeleyes. Is that what the last bit is about?
I will do you the courtesy of not replying to your posts.
Good day, and God bless you.
2005-05-23 17:23 | User Profile
The truth never changes. Whoever speaks it always repeats themselves. You want lies? push Bush for Full Spectrum, Kerry for Corn (cob), either to arm enemies --
..then vote for the one-party divided 50-50 (see thread) along the lines of what's good for the jews ..and attack whoever is consistent...
They'll love you at the Wailing Wall. "Contra Woman, stands for good...yeah yeah yeah ... she will do interrogation too .. yeh yeh yeh .. works under cover like an ex Saddam lover .. yeh yeh yeh" (little song paroday I made up. Think its got leggs?)
I was trying to remember which one was The Ugly at the end.
2005-05-23 22:14 | User Profile
[QUOTE=TexasAnarch]The truth never changes. Whoever speaks it always repeats themselves. You want lies? push Bush for Full Spectrum, Kerry for Corn (cob), either to arm enemies --
..then vote for the one-party divided 50-50 (see thread) along the lines of what's good for the jews ..and attack whoever is consistent...
They'll love you at the Wailing Wall. "Contra Woman, stands for good...yeah yeah yeah ... she will do interrogation too .. yeh yeh yeh .. works under cover like an ex Saddam lover .. yeh yeh yeh" (little song paroday I made up. Think its got leggs?)
I was trying to remember which one was The Ugly at the end.[/QUOTE] Tuco, aka the Rat, was the Ugly. (Eli Wallach) :whstl: