← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Esoterist
Thread ID: 18254 | Posts: 4 | Started: 2005-05-15
2005-05-15 21:07 | User Profile
UNBELIEVABLE!
When senior Stephanie Ramey tried to sign up online for Math 243 Calculus for Business and Social Science for spring term she was denied access and informed she would have to contact the class professor.
The professor asked her to contact the Office of Multicultural Academic Support about enrolling in his class.
A staff member at the office said she couldn't register for the class because she doesn't identify as a minority, Ramey said. [url="http://www.dailyemerald.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2005/05/12/4282f635b5b71"][color=#800080]http://www.dailyemerald.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2005/05/12/4282f635b5b71[/color][/url]
From the comments section:
Look at some of these raging communist Jews, literally revelling in Bolshevistic desires of white displacement and genocide! THIS COULDN'T BE MORE FRIGHTENING AND SURREAL, FOLKS!
Posted 05/15/2005 ** What many "white" people do not understand, is that "white" individuals constitute the majority of the upper socioeconomic strata because of institutional racism. Minorities in America must compete in an unfair system. When the tables are turned, they will defend their class preference at all costs, as this article demonstration. David Cohen [email="davidcohen1448@sociologist.com"]davidcohen1448@sociologist.com[/email]
Posted 05/15/2005
I think this is a good thing. White people are already too privileged in our society and sometimes equalization requires balance. Shaun Goldstein
Posted 05/15/2005
Excellent! It is long past the time for whites to have exclusive privileges in America. It is time to make sure everyone is absolutely equal in their opportunities and material conditions. Who knows whether white people even have a hegemonic role to play in the America of the future? Their time is over. If the stubborn and obsolete people have a problem with this redistribution of power, tough luck! Sidney Kahneman *Critic *
[EVERY ABLE-MINDED WHITE AMERICAN MUST READ KEVIN MACDONALD RIGHT NOW, BEFORE WE ARE TOAST!!!!]
The Jewish Century
[url="http://www.savethemales.ca/000164.html"][color=#800080]http://www.savethemales.ca/000164.html[/color][/url]
By Henry Makow Ph.D. May 27, 2003
Kevin MacDonald book "The Culture of Critique" (2002) portrays the 20th century as a Jewish century. A hundred years ago, Jews were an impoverished people living mostly in Eastern Europe surrounded by hostile populations. Today Israel is firmly established in the Middle East and Jews have become the wealthiest and most powerful elite in the United States and other Western countries.
More significantly, according to MacDonald, the Western intellectual world has become Judaized. Jewish values and attitudes now constitute the culture of the West. Because of deep-seated Jewish hostility toward traditional Western (i.e. Christian) culture, the founding peoples "have been made to feel deeply ashamed of their own history, surely the prelude to their demise as a culture and a people." (lxix)
Specifically, Jewish organizations promote policies and ideologies aimed at undermining cultural cohesion while practising the opposite policies themselves. While they promote multiculturalism and internationalism in the West, they insist that Israel remain a racially pure national enclave for Jews.
"The present immigration policy essentially places the United States and other Western societies "in play" in an evolutionary sense which does not apply to other nations of the world," MacDonald writes. "Notice that American Jews have no interest in proposing that immigration to Israel should be similarly multiethnic, or ... threaten the hegemony of the Jews." (323)
THE PARTY OF NATIONAL DECOMPOSITION
MacDonald says anti Semitism in Weimar Germany was based on a perception that "that Jewish critical analysis of gentile society was aimed at dissolving the bonds of cohesiveness within the society." One academic referred to the Jews as "the classic party of national decomposition." (163)
MacDonald speculates that Jews feel more comfortable in societies without a distinctive national character. I think there is more to this. The break-up of society into isolated individuals is also the agenda of the new world order, which wishes to remove any united resistance. The new world order is essentially the transfer of all power to international finance. The question then arises: is the new world order a Jewish phenomenon? Or are Jewish intellectuals the pawns of financiers, both Jewish and non-Jewish?
MacDonald focuses on how Jewish intellectual movements led by authoritarian figures took over modern intellectual life. He discusses Boas in Anthropology, Adorno in Sociology, Freud in Psychiatry and Derrida in Philosophy.
The "Frankfurt School," for example, was a "Marxist Jewish cult" financed by Jewish millionaire Felix Weil. Theodore Adorno's influential book "The Authoritarian Personality" (1950) was actually sponsored by the American Jewish Committee. It attributed prejudice to Christian sexual repression and portrayed gentile group affiliations (including Christian religion, patriotism, and family) as indications of psychiatric disorder. (162)
Social disintegration leads to psychological confusion. Society has accepted Adorno's view that there is no objective standard of truth, no common reality. Everyone is isolated and different. Adorno resisted attempts to "endow the world with any universality, objectivity or totality, with any single organizing principle that would homogenize society..." (164)
This kind of post-modernist philosophy has paralysed modern Western culture. Western civilization is built on the foundation that truth is spiritual, universal and knowable. Ultimately truth is God.
Universities today have given up the pursuit of truth and are devoted to Bolshevik-like social engineering and indoctrination. A liberal arts education today is not only a waste of time but toxic. Far from bearers of the Western tradition, universities are its executioners with the tacit blessing of the government.
A RARE EXCEPTION
Kevin MacDonald, a professor of Psychology at California State University is a rare exception. His courageous indispensable book unveils the subversive character of our time.
A soft-spoken man who approaches his subject with scientific detachment, MacDonald has amassed a wealth of remarkable detail. For instance, did you know that white gentiles are the most underrepresented group at Harvard? They account for approximately 25% of the student body. While Asians and Jews make up only 5% of the US population, they account for at least 50% of Harvard enrolment.
"The United States is well on the road to being dominated by an Asian technocratic elite and a Jewish business, professional and media elite," MacDonald says.
He details the Jewish role in sponsoring Communism, non-European immigration and the NAACP. He documents the stranglehold Jews have on US cultural life and shows how it is used to shape American attitudes.
"For example, All in the Family ...not only managed to portray working class Europeans as stupid and bigoted, it portrayed Jewish themes very positively. By the end of its 12-year run, even archenemy Archie Bunker has raised a Jewish child in his home, befriended a Black Jew (implication: Judaism has no ethnic connotations), gone into business with a Jewish partner, enrolled as a member of a synagogue, praised his close friend at Jewish funeral [etc].... Jewish rituals are portrayed as "pleasant and ennobling" ... There is never any rational explanation for anti Semitism...[it] is portrayed as an absolute irrational evil that must be fought at every turn." (lviii)
On the other hand, Christianity is typically portrayed as evil in the movies, and Christians are even depicted as psychopaths. MacDonald cites conservative Jewish critic Michael Medved who complains that he couldn't find one film made since 1975 where Christianity was portrayed positively. (lix)
JEWISH-CHRISTIAN RIVALRY
MacDonald sees anti Semitism as the result of legitimate conflicts-of-interest. Yet Jewish organizations demonize anyone with the temerity to address Jewish power. They suppress the fact that Jewish-Christian rivalry has very deep roots in Western society.
In my view, this rivalry boils down to the fact that Jewish Pharisees rejected Christ's gospel of universal love and human brotherhood. Ever since, Jews have been social and metaphysical outcasts, albeit ones with amazing powers of self-justification. We have been used as pawns by worldly powerbrokers bent on destroying Christian civilization. The "modernist" trend of the 20th Century can be seen in these terms.
As I have suggested elsewhere, Judaism is more a racial creed than a religion. Jews are told we have a mission to create equality and social justice. In fact, we are being used by financiers to build a totalitarian world order. The financiers hold out socialist ideals as bait to transfer more and more power to government, which they control.
Of course, not all Jews are pawns of the new world order. Most pawns are not Jews. Racism has no place in this debate. But generally I believe Jews have played a prominent role in modernism. A beacon for humanity, we have not been. Deceived ourselves, we have deceived others and purveyed personal dysfunction and societal oppression. Our role in Communism is a disgrace. Israel is a source of shame. Jews need to discover who we really are and rededicate ourselves.
We can begin by reading "The Culture of Critique" and the other books in MacDonald's trilogy about Judaism as an evolutionary stategy, "A People that Shall Dwell Alone" (1994) and "Separation and its Discontents" (1998). MacDonald's publisher sent "The Culture of Critique to 40 Jewish publications and didn't get one review. Nor has there been any mainstream coverage, a confirmation of his thesis and measure of our captivity.
MacDonald does not suggest remedies. But to combat the "new world order," Western nations must return to their Christian and national roots. The founding groups should reassert their values and traditions as the common glue. Minorities should be welcomed but they should not be able to remake society in their own image.
At birth we each enter a drama already in progress. We may sense something is very wrong but we can't define it. In fact, we are in the advanced stages of a long-term conspiracy to subvert Western civilization. "Modernism" in the 20th Century was a hoax designed to strip people of their familial, cultural and religious identity before enslaving them in a new dark age. Western societies must return to their Christian and national roots or this drama will not end well. I refer you to a must-read review of The Culture of Critique on line. (I am not endorsing this site in general.) The Culture of Critique is available from [email]gsgbooks@mindspring.com[/email]
2005-05-15 22:30 | User Profile
[url="http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/zioncom.html"]http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/zioncom.html[/url]
"The Aryans will enlarge and beautify the earth; but they will settle to enjoy the world which they created only in the tents of the Jews. These tents are communism, internationalism, the universal brotherhood of man, the emancipation of the working class and the human society - a society of free and morally autonomous rational human beings. The destiny of the Aryans is to become Jews" - Rabbi Harry Waton, A Program For The Jews, 1939, p. 102
2005-05-15 22:39 | User Profile
[url="http://www.grecoreport.com/multiculturalism_reigns_over_the_west.htm"]http://www.grecoreport.com/multicul...er_the_west.htm[/url]
Multiculturalism Reigns Over the West
by William S. Lind
The purpose of the ideology known commonly as "multiculturalism" is to destroy America. In the 21st century world of fourth-generation warfare, it is likely to succeed. To understand why, we first must understand both phenomena.
Fourth-generation warfare is the fourth major change in warfare since the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, the event that marks the beginnings of modern war. The reason that treaty, which ended the Thirty Years War, marks the beginning of the modern period is that it established a state monopoly on war. After 1648, at least in Europe, war was between states, it was fought by state armies and navies fighting other institutions very much like themselves. Indeed, our whole picture of war, armies and navies -- formal battles, uniforms, flags, saluting, etc. -- is a picture of war between states. Few people in the defense establishments of today's states can imagine it being any other way.
But through most of history, it was another way. Many different entities fought wars: Families fought wars, clans fought wars, tribes fought wars, races and ethnic groups fought wars, religions fought wars, business enterprises fought wars. They fought using many implements, not just armies and navies: bribery, assassination, piracy, massacres, slaves raids, mercenaries and tribal levies. In many of these conflicts the "army" was composed of any males physically able to wield a weapon, and the "navy" any available ship. The object was not "politics by other means," but simply to rejoice in the slaughter of an enemy, the noble deaths in battle of one's own champions, the seizure of the enemy's land, the rape of his women and the selling of his children into slavery. The Old Testament is full of it, as is the Koran.
In the fourth generation of modern war, which also marks the end of the modern period, past is prologue. The state is losing its monopoly on war, and states everywhere find themselves fighting nonstate opponents -- and usually losing, despite all the technology, special training and vast resources of state armed forces. War is fought at three levels: physical, mental and moral. The state is losing at the moral level, which is the highest and most decisive.
Around the world the state has begotten the bureaucratic state, and the bureaucratic state has begotten the New Class, or the ruling elite. That New Class has three characteristics: It can't make things work; it uses its power and position to exempt itself from the consequences of things not working (in the United States, it has ruined the public schools while sending its own children to private schools); and it really cares about only one thing -- remaining the New Class. Not surprisingly, people who are not members of the New Class find fighting for the state it dominates a less than entrancing prospect.
On the contrary, many citizens are giving their primary loyalty to entities other than the state -- religions, races, ideologies -- and are willing, even eager, to fight against the states on behalf of something they can believe in. It is not simply from fear of U.S. bombers that Osama bin Laden, a man of great wealth, chooses to live in a cave.
As war between states fades away, one of the older forms of conflict returning is war between cultures. With the death of state loyalties and identities, identification and loyalty to a culture is coming back strongly. Cultural differences are one of history's main reasons for war. Human nature being what it is, when cultures rub up against each other, the resulting friction often leads to fire.
Perhaps primary among the returning cultural loyalties is loyalty to Islam. After three centuries on the strategic defensive, Islam has during the last 50 or so years resumed the strategic offensive, expanding outward in every direction. As historian Russell Kirk wrote, culture comes from the cult, and the cult at the center of Islamic culture -- Islam itself, is very much alive (unlike Christianity in much of Christendom).
Neither the state nor secular law is legitimate from an Islamic perspective. Legitimacy adheres only to Shariah, Islamic law. Islam divides the world into the Dar al-Islam, the world of Islam, and the Dar al-Harb, the world of war; with and in the latter, there can be no peace. War against the unbeliever, the kaffir, is an Islamic duty, carrying with it the promise of martyrdom and a bevy of whores (the word is from the Arabic houri) in heaven. While there are lax Islamics, there is no such thing as tolerant or peaceful Islam.
The basic message of "multiculturalism" is that all cultures are equally good and beneficent -- except Western culture, which is violent and oppressive. That message is, of course, a lie. In reality, Western culture is one of only two cultures that has been successful over time in terms of the quality of life it provided to its adherents (the other success is Chinese culture)(1). To see real violence and oppression, one need only look at the life of non-Muslims in Islamic majority countries.
The purpose of multiculturalism is to disarm the West psychologically, to make it impossible for Western men even to consider fighting in defense of the Western, ... Christian way of life; (2) to do so, as the multiculturalists preach, is to become "another Adolph Hitler" (who was, ironically, no fan of ... Christian culture himself).
Disarmament through psychological conditioning takes place endlessly in America's public schools, colleges and universities and, most powerfully, in the products of the entertainment industry, which now is the dominant force in American culture. The result is evident: While many average Americans recognize American Muslims as a dangerous fifth column, the multiculturalist elite demands a "tolerance of diversity" that Islam itself does not know. A Republican administration invites mullahs to the White House to celebrate Islamic holidays.
That multiculturalism preaches the suicide of the West is no surprise to those who know its historic origins. Multiculturalism, also known as "political correctness," is in fact Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms, in an effort that goes back not to the 1960s but to World War I.
Before 1914, Marxist ideology had predicted that if war broke out in Europe the working class in every state would rise up in revolt, overthrow the bourgeois warmongers and create international communism. When, in August 1914, war did come to Europe, that scenario didn't happen. On the contrary, the workers in every belligerent state flocked to the colors and went off to slaughter each other by the millions.
What went wrong? In the immediate aftermath of the war, two Marxist theorists, Antonio Gramsci (3) in Italy, and Georg Lukács in Hungary, came up with the same answer. Western culture and the Christian religion had so blinded the working class to its true, Marxist, class interests that communism was impossible in the West until both had been destroyed. Asking, "Who will save us from Western civilization?," Lukács, as deputy commissar for culture in Hungary's short-lived Bolshevik regime, in 1919 introduced sex education into the Hungarian schools (4). He knew that if traditional sexual morals could be undermined, Western culture would suffer (5).
In 1923, a think tank was established at Frankfurt University in Germany that would pick up on Lukács' work. Named the Institute of Social Research and known informally as the Frankfurt School, this institution would create a new, heretical Marxism that saw culture not simply as a function of the ownership of the means of production, but as an independent and important factor on its own. In 1930, when Max Horkheimer became its director, it began the intellectually difficult task of translating Marxism from economic into cultural terms. The key was crossing Karl Marx with Sigmund Freud.
In 1933, the institute left Germany and moved to New York City. With it came a new member, Herbert Marcuse. In the 1950s, Marcuse would take the institute's abstruse intellectual work and package it for American students in works such as Eros and Civilization. During the 1960s, Marcuse became the chief guru of the New Left, and he injected the institute's cultural Marxism into the baby-boom generation. Its central theme, now as then, was "negation": undermining, with constant criticism and psychological manipulation, all the beliefs and institutions of Western society until Western culture itself was destroyed.
Thus we complete the circle. In a fourth-generation world of war between cultures, the ideology of "multiculturalism," which now dominates the American elite, has as its goal and objective the destruction of Western culture. The West is assailed not only from without by Islam, but from within as well, as the dying snake that is Marxism pumps its last poison into America. That poison is designed precisely to make the West unable, psychologically and morally, to defend itself at the very time that self-defense is most vital. Multiculturalism is, quite simply, culture treason.
President George W. Bush has presented the "war on terrorism" as a clash between good and evil. He is correct, although there is more to fourth-generation warfare than the technique of terror. What confronts the remnants of Christian civilization today is not one evil, but two, and they are on a collision course.
On the one side are the forces of fourth-generation war, led by Islam. Arrayed against them are the final dregs of the modern age, sometimes called the New World Order but more accurately named Brave New World. (6) The latter combines the anti-Western ideology of cultural Marxism with manipulative technologies: the virtual realities of the video screen, mind-altering drugs (Ritalin is soma for kids) and, most dangerous of all, genetic engineering. While each of these contenders is bitterly hostile to the other, they agree on one thing: Western culture's got to go. The 21st century promises to be an interesting time.
Source. From an article in the December 31st 2001 issue of Insight reprinted in the March 2002 issue of The Schwarz Report. pp. 6-7.
Editors notes
China's "success" story involves thousands of years of abject misery, poverty, and endless massacres. The concepts of individual rights, limited government, and democracy are totally foreign to the Chinese mentality. A recent example of their "success" has to do with the thirty to sixty-five million souls slaughtered by the communists in order to found their totalitarian state (estimates vary because China is a closed society where the leadership controls the flow of information). Moreover, a society where dogs, cats, and even aborted human fetuses are eaten, can in no way be compared to the Helleno-Christian world where such enormities are abhorred and totally rejected. This ethos of cruelty -- so incomprehensible to the Western mind -- is demonstrated by the fact that small fetuses are cynically sold by hospital staff to be used for making soup, while late-term fetuses are eaten as we in the West would eat a suckling pig. Cats and dogs are skinned alive before being prepared because of the popular belief that the more the animal suffered before dying the tastier it will be when eaten. These and many more examples having especially to do with the utter disregard for human life that the Chinese have displayed down through the ages, compel us to disagree with Mr. Lind's assertion that China has been "successful over time in terms of the quality of life it provided." Tell that to the Chinese equivalent of the Russian Kulaks whose hearts were ripped from their bodies while they were still alive and then eaten by the crazed "Red Guards" during Chairman Mao's Cultural Revolution in the 60s. We believe that Mr. Lind "fell out," so to speak, on this assertion of his about there having been two successful cultures in history; actually, there has been only one, and that one is the very same Helleno-Christian Culture that he so eloquently depicts as being under attack today.
At this point, the reader should ask himself, cui bono? (who benefits?) by making it psychologically "impossible for Western men even to consider fighting in defense of the Western, ... Christian way of life."
For more on Antonio Gramsci: the man who has been described as "the most significant Marxist thinker since Lenin."
Georg Lukács was deputy commissar of "culture" under the infamous communist dictator of Hungary, Bela Kun (Cohen). Following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, in which he took part, and using forged passports, Kun moved into Hungary. Because he was supplied with unlimited funds by the Soviets, and was aided by the pro-communist resident Jewish population, he quickly became dictator. His bloody regime lasted only three months, during which time CHRISTIANS BY THE TENS OF THOUSANDS WERE BUTCHERED, and their land and personal property taken away from them and distributed to the "peasants" (read Kun's cohorts). Some of the measures -- besides introducing sex education in the schools -- put into effect under Kun's regime included nationalizing all banks, all businesses with over 200 employees, all lands of over 1000 acres, every building in Hungary except the houses of the workers, all jewelry, all private property above the minimum, for example: two suits, four shirts, two pairs of boots, and four pairs of socks. AND TO SHOW HIS UTTER CONTEMPT FOR THE MASSES, HE ALSO NATIONALIZED ALL TOILETS IN PRIVATE HOMES ON SATURDAY NIGHTS! After three months of the murder, rape, and pillage of ONLY CHRISTIANS, Kun was deposed, and he (and it is assumed, his buddy, Lukács) returned to Russia where Kun became the head of the Red Terror organization, the dreaded Cheka, in South Russia.
WE MUST NEVER FORGET THAT IT IS IN THIS GENERAL DIRECTION THAT AMERICA'S KEYSTONE-KOPS "LEADERS" ARE TAKING THE COUNTRY AS THEY PERMIT THE U.S. TO BE DE-CHRISTIANIZED AND DE-WESTERNIZED SO THAT THEIR CORPORATE AND ZIONIST BOSSES WILL ALLOW THEM TO KEEP THEIR JOBS.
For more on the conspiratorial undermining of traditional Western culture, read the introduction to "Multiculturalism and Marxism" before linking to this important article.
We believe that the threat posed by Islam is real and warrants vigilance and readiness. As great as this threat is, we do not believe it to be equal to the internal threat confronting America and the West. Islamic fundamentalism could be (and should have been) finessed by a skillful diplomacy which reflected the true interests of the vast majority of the inhabitants of the West. Unfortunately, American diplomacy is not controlled by those who have the interests of these inhabitants at heart. America is being whipped and manipulated into a frenzy of hatred against the Muslim world by the very "cultural Marxists" Mr. Lind talks about, and they're doing it to promote their own globalist agenda. An even greater threat is the persistent war being waged from within to weaken the West "psychologically and morally" by those who are either self-serving opportunists or the traditional enemies of Western culture and the Christian religion.
2005-05-16 02:36 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Esoterist][url="http://www.grecoreport.com/multiculturalism_reigns_over_the_west.htm"]http://www.grecoreport.com/multicul...er_the_west.htm[/url]
Multiculturalism Reigns Over the West
by William S. Lind
The purpose of the ideology known commonly as "multiculturalism" is to destroy America. In the 21st century world of fourth-generation warfare, it is likely to succeed. To understand why, we first must understand both phenomena. [/QUOTE]I wonder, did this link get this article from the Free Congress Foundation. It seems similar to some articles we've had here, like [url]http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12924&highlight=lind[/url]
[url]http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16832&highlight=lind[/url]
and [url]http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15440&highlight=lind[/url]