← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Kevin_O'Keeffe
Thread ID: 18119 | Posts: 11 | Started: 2005-05-06
2005-05-06 13:06 | User Profile
[url=http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=5008]Link to original National Vanguard article[/url]
Strong Showing for BNP: Election results offers hope for the future for White Britons.
Last night was a monumental night in the history of British Nationalist politics as the BNP increased it's number of votes in the British General election to almost 200,000, a record for any Nationalist party in such an election. Such an impact was made that the party received notable mentions, even in the strongly Jewish-controlled mainstream media.
It was a night for breaking records with the BNP more than doubling it's vote in some areas, and the National Front also showing strongly in the areas where they stood.
Highlights of the night included the performance of party leader, Nick Griffin, who stood in Keighley, where he attracted more than 9% of the vote, despite the handicap of recent legal shenanigans and death threats against him.
Mr Griffin told ITV News he had needed to wear a bullet-proof vest during the campaign, after receiving the death threats from Muslim extremists.
But the BNP's best result was in Barking in east London, where Richard Barnbrook won 16.89% of the vote.
Mr Barnbrook polled 4,916 votes, coming a close third behind the Tories.
In total the BNP stood in almost 120 constituencies and gained 191,573, considerably up on their performances of 2001, and showing that they were capable of building on their successes achieved during last years local and European elections.
As one television pundit said, during the live coverage, the surprise success story of these results is the strong showing of the Nationalist parties.
British Nationalism took another giant step last night, out of the darkness and into the main arena, mirroring the rising trend of racial consciousness around the country.
2005-05-06 15:25 | User Profile
[url=http://www.bnp.org.uk/candidates2005/results.php]Link to the same chart as posted on the British National Party's official website (where it is much easier to read in the original formatting, for whatever reason).[/url]
While there were apparently some other races yesterday as well, this list is of all the BNP candidates for the actual House of Commons:
BNP Candidate Constituency BNP vote 2005 BNP % 2005 Position BNP vote 2001 BNP % 2001
William Vaughan Aldridge & Brownhills 1,620 4.1 4th na na
Peter Snell Amber Valley 1,243 2.6 4th na na
Anthony Jones Ashton under Lyne 2,051 5.5 4th 1,617 4.5
Richard Barnbrook Barking 4,916 16.9 3rd 1,606 6.4
Geoff Broadley Barnsley Central 1,403 4.9 4th na na
Emma Colgate Basildon and East Thurrock 2,055 4.8 4th na na
Roger Robertson Basingstoke 821 1.7 6th na na
Colin Auty Batley & Spen 2,668 6.8 4th na na
Jay Lee Bexleyheath and Crayford 1,245 2.9 5th 1,408 3.5
Bryn Robinson Billericay 1,435 2.9 4th na na
Sharon Ebanks Birmingham Erdington 1,512 4.8 4th na na
Denis Adams Birmingham Hodge Hill 1,445 5.1 4th 889 3.4
Mark Cattell Birmingham Northfield 1,278 4.1 4th na na
Robert Purcell Birmingham Yardley 1,523 5.2 4th na na
Michael Robinson Blaby 1,704 3.5 4th 1,357 2.8
Nicholas Holt Blackburn 2,263 5.4 4th na na
Ray Goodwin Blackpool South 1,113 2.9 4th na na
Wendy Russell Boston and Skegness 1,025 2.4 5th na na
Lynda Cromie Bradford North 2,061 6.0 4th 1,613 4.6
Clr. James Lewthwaite Bradford South 2,862 7.8 4th na na
Paul Cromie Bradford West 2,525 6.9 4th na na
Andrew Emerson Broxbourne 1,929 4.7 4th 848 2.2
Len Starr Burnley 4,003 10.3 5th 4,151 11.3
Julie Russell Burton 1,840 3.8 4th na na
Stewart Clough Bury North 1,790 4.0 4th na na
John Gregory Calder Valley 1,887 4.0 4th na na
Andrew Holders Charnwood 1,737 3.4 4th na na
Richard Chadfield Cheadle 421 0.9 5th na na
Barry Fowler Colne Valley 1,430 2.9 4th na na
David Clarke Coventry NW 1,556 3.6 4th na na
Richard Trower Crawley 1,277 3.0 4th na na
Lawrence Rustem Dagenham 2,870 9.3 4th 1,378 5.0
John Edgar Denton and Reddish 1,326 3.7 4th na na
David Joines Derbyshire South 1,797 3.2 4th na na
David Exley Dewsbury 5,066 13.1 4th 1,632 4.5
John Wilkinson Doncaster Central 1,239 3.6 4th na na
Lee Haggan Doncaster North 1,506 4.8 5th na na
Simon Darby Dudley North 4,022 9.7 4th 1,822 4.7
John Salvage Dudley South 1,841 4.7 4th na na
Ian McDonald Easington 1,042 3.3 4th na na
Tracy Andrews Elmet 1,231 2.6 4th na na
Barry Roberts Eltham 979 2.8 5th na na
Terry Farr Enfield North 1,004 2.5 4th 605 1.6
Julian Leppert Epping 1,728 3.9 4th na na
Sadie Graham Erewash 1,319 2.6 5th 591 1.2
Brian Ravenscroft Erith and Thamesmead 1,620 4.3 4th na na
Walter Hamilton Glasgow Central 671 2.4 7th na na
Scott McLean Glasgow North East 920 3.2 6th na na
Stephen Fyfe Great Grimsby 1,338 4.1 4th na na
Geoff Wallace Halifax 2,627 6.6 4th na na
John Mainprize Haltemprice & Howden 978 1.7 4th na na
Colin Banner Harrogate & Knaresborough 466 1.1 5th na na
Ian Johnson Havant 562 1.4 6th na na
Tony Hazel Hayes and Harlington 830 2.6 4th 705 2.2
Gary Aronsson Heywood and Middleton 1,855 4.7 4th na na
Ian Moore Hornchurch 1,313 3.4 4th na na
John Richardson Houghton & Washington East 1,367 3.9 4th na na
Christian Jackson Hyndburn 2,444 6.2 4th na na
Nick Griffin Keighley 4,240 9.2 4th na na
Alan Siddle Kingston-upon-Hull East 1,022 3.3 4th na na
Brian Wainwright Kingston-upon-Hull North 766 2.6 5th na na
Michael McDermott Knowsley North & Sefton East 872 2.4 4th na na
Mark Collett Leeds Central 1,201 4.1 4th na na
Julie Day Leeds West 1,167 3.5 5th na na
Clive Potter Leicestershire North West 1,474 3.1 5th na na
Tim Rait Maidenhead 704 1.5 4th na na
Dennis Shambley Makerfield 1,221 3.4 5th na na
Ron Armes Middlesbrough 819 2.5 4th na na
Geoffrey Groves Middlesbrough South & Cleveland East 1,099 2.5 4th na na
Chris Beverley Morley & Rothwell 2,271 5.3 5th na na
John Dawson Newcastle under Lyme 1,390 3.5 5th na na
John Aveyard Normanton 1,967 5.3 4th na na
Michaela Mackenzie North Warwickshire 1,910 4.1 4th na na
Claire Sayers Old Bexley & Sidcup 1,227 2.8 5th na na
Michael Treacy Oldham East & Saddleworth 2,109 4.9 4th 5,091 11.2
Anita Corbett Oldham West & Royton 2,606 6.9 4th 6,552 16.4
Thomas Boocock Pendle 2,547 6.2 4th 1,976 5.0
Suzy Cass Pontefract & Castleford 1,835 5.6 4th na na
Peter Pirnie Poole 547 1.4 5th na na
Andrew Harris Redcar 985 2.5 5th na na
Derek Adams Rochdale 1,773 4.3 4th na na
John McCaffrey Romford 1,088 3.0 4th 414 1.2
Anthony Wentworth Rossendale & Darwen 1,736 3.9 4th na na
Nick Cass Rother Valley 2,020 5.1 4th na na
Marlene Guest Rotherham 1,986 6.6 4th na na
Bev Jones Sheffield Attercliffe 1,477 4.0 5th na na
Christopher Hartigan Sheffield Brightside 1,537 6.2 4th na na
Mark Payne Sheffield Central 539 1.8 6th na na
Ian Senior Sheffield Hallam 469 1.2 5th na na
John Beatson Sheffield Heeley 1,314 3.9 4th na na
David Wright Sheffield Hillsborough 2,010 4.4 4th na na
Tom Linden Shipley 2,000 4.2 4th na na
Dianne Carr Solihull 1,752 3.3 4th na na
Nigel Byrne Stalybridge & Hyde 1,399 3.5 5th na na
Kevin Hughes Stockton North 987 2.7 4th= na na
Michael Coleman Stoke Central 2,178 7.8 4th na na
Spencer Cartlidge Stoke North 2,132 6.9 4th na na
Cllr Mark Leat Stoke South 3,305 8.7 4th 1,358 3.8
Debie Hiles Sunderland North 1,136 3.9 5th 687 2.3
David Guynan Sunderland South 1,166 3.8 4th 576 1.8
Kevin Holloway Swansea East 770 2.5 5th na na
Nick Geri Thurrock 2,526 5.8 4th na na
Kevin Scott Tyne Bridge 1,072 4.1 4th na na
Chris Roberts Upminster 1,173 3.4 5th na na
Cliff LeMay Uxbridge 763 2.2 4th na na
Grant Rowe Wakefield 1,328 3.1 4th na na
William Locke Walsall North 1,992 6.0 4th na na
Kevin Smith Walsall South 1,776 5.0 5th na na
Simon Smith Warley 1,761 5.5 4th na na
Jonathan Pygott Wentworth 1,798 5.1 4th na na
Carl Butler West Bromwich East 2,329 6.6 4th na na
Cllr James Lloyd West Bromwich West 3,456 9.9 4th 1,428 4.5
Clive Courtney Weston Super Mare 778 1.6 5th na na
Richard Colborne Wokingham 376 0.8 6th na na
Peter Mullins Wolverhampton SW 983 2.3 5th na na
Michael Howson Woodspring 633 1.2 6th na na
Martin Roberts Worcester 980 2.1 5th na na
John Walker Wrexham 919 3.0 5th na na
2005-05-06 15:47 | User Profile
[url]http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=299[/url]
The Tide of History Is Turning: A post-election analysis of the BNP results.
When the tide of history turns the shifting of the social consensus is first felt in the undercurrents and margins of politics long before the breaking wave of change appears in the public consciousness or manifests itself as political regime change. Such a turning of the political tide can now be understood to be underway today as a result of last nightââ¬â¢s General Election. The BNP is now part of the mainstream of British politics. We have not just sustained the level of voting that gave us nearly a million votes in the European Elections but we have built on those gains. We have now moved from a single figure voting base to double figures in many areas.
Loyal base
The fact is that we have now built a growing electoral base with voters loyal only to us and who are now immune to the lies and promises of the three headed hydra of the Lib/Lab/Con System Parties. Whilst the Conservatives tried to steal our voter base with an election campaign concentrating specifically on immigration, our supporters stayed loyal to us and saw through their shallow lies and false promises. All the Conservative campaign has done by concentrating on immigration has moved our ideological position on immigration into the mainstream of political debate and proved that we had always been right on the issue.
We also demolished the last twitching remnants of the UKIP rump virtually wherever we stood, whilst the vanity project of Kilroy's Veritas made as much impact as a marshmallow mallet. The Greens could not even beat our vote in most places where we stood against them, and UKIP and the Greens both benefit from the funding for their campaigns (and the right to present their ideas in the media) that having puppets in the European Parliament provides.
The death of UKIP is now almost certain. It still has our taxes being pumped into it via its representatives in the European Parliament but it is fading fast. The logical absurdity of being a political party that wants to cut its own throat politically by withdrawing from the European Union, and thereby depriving it of the hundreds of thousands of British tax payers money paid by British citizens into the European Union that is then diverted to its MEPs in the form of wages and expenses that are then used to help fund its election campaigns, must soon register in the minds of its supporters. Its success merely accelerates its death. The fact that UKIP are nothing more than a protest group against the European Union and repudiate totally the concept of being a political party that represents solely the indigenous white British people means it is an ideological dinosaur of a party. It wants us to withdraw from Europe but has no Nationalist and Autarchic vision to change the nation. Its vision is of subservience to the dollar and the dying Global American Oil Empire. UKIP are now revealed as nothing more than a media manufactured fad, the political version of teeny boppers and pop socks. The true patriots in UKIP now have a clear choice - they can carry on trying to resurrect its decaying corpse or they can join with us and work with us on a shared platform.
Reality of English nationalists
The BNP is the future of nationalist politics in Britain. This election should also wake up many amongst the English Nationalist community as well. They cannot ever win any election so why do they carry on pretending they can? The only way they will ever get an English Parliament is to get a nationalist party with a clear majority in the British Parliament who will withdraw Britain from Europe and then form an English Parliament. The BNP manifesto states that we will set up an English Parliament for the indigenous Anglo-Saxon people. But this will be an English Parliament of the English People as opposed to an imaginary pseudo-English parliament composed of asylum seekers, illegal immigrants, Zulus, Kurds, Innuit, Iraqis, Tutsis, Somalis etc etc.
If the English nationalist movement is so afraid of an English Parliament composed solely of Ango-Saxons then why call themselves English Nationalist? In reality they are nothing more than Multi-Culturalists trembling at the word ' racist ' whilst the power of political bodies like the Muslim Parliament of Britain grows and ethno-specific political parties like Respect work for real political power for the Asian Muslim community. Are they so cowardly that you would rather betray the English people so that they can evade the threat of being called a racist by an idiot white leftist? The era of cowardice, compromise and vacillation has to end. The time has come for the patriots of UKIP, the supporters of English Nationalism, and the white working class leftists abandoned by New Labour to join the BNP in order to promote and build a mass political movement that can change this country.
Race and religious based parties
The future for British politics is the growth in support and power of the ethno-specific political parties like the BNP, the Peoplesââ¬â¢ Justice Party and Respect. As parties like Respect grow in power and influence and further radicalise the ethnic communities they represent, then the indigenous British White community of Britain will come to understand that they can no longer avoid the politics of Identity Politics for themselves. The White middle class Liberal Fascists that only ever attack the BNP for defending the interests of the indigenous White community of Britain can now no longer attack us for doing so as the Asian Muslim community is doing the exact same thing in its community. The success of Respect is the end of the White Liberal Consensus on Multi-Culturalism. It is an irony of history that the first ethnic community to throw off the yoke of Multi-Culturalism and openly embrace Identity Politics by getting an elected representative in Parliament are the Asian Muslim immigrants themselves and their white, self hating, communist collaborators.
The victory of George Galloway and his Soviet/ Islamic Front Group ' Respect ' which is run by an Islamic/Socialist Workers Party alliance is a welcome victory. It reveals the lie that the media and the Liberal Fascist Elite have hidden from the eyes of the British people for decades. It shows that Multi-Culturalism is a lie. This victory demonstrates very clearly to the British voters that the Muslim community, when it forms an ethnic bloc in an area, chooses to vote only for those political parties that explicitly promote the interests of the Muslim Community itself. The concept of Multi-Culturalism as an ideology is imposed only on the indigenous people of Britain and never the ethnic groups that have imposed themselves upon us. The victory of Respect should awaken a lot of British people, not only to the double standards of the media (which never called George Galloway or Respect ââ¬Åracistââ¬Â for campaigning on an ethno-specific Asian Muslim platform), but also to the double standards of the British Liberal Elite who attacked Nick Griffin for standing in Keighley as 'divisive' but who never called George Galloway's campaign in East London ââ¬Ëdivisive', even though it has caused mass social division based on race and religion in that area. We in the BNP wonder how the few remaining elderly white people left in George Gallowayââ¬â¢s new constituency will feel now that the area has become an autonomous Muslim/Soviet republic in the midst of London. Just how much will their voices matter to George Galloway whose vote came from Asian Muslims voting as Asian Muslims.
The growth of Identity Politics amongst the Asian Muslim community is a welcome sign of the disintegration of the Liberal Consensus on Multi-Culturalism. When the Asian Muslims themselves reject the multi-cultural social model and embrace political parties that link politics with ethnicity then it becomes increasingly ridiculous and hypocritical for the media to attack the BNP for defending the interests of our community; the White indigenous British National Community. The fact that the BNP is called 'racist' for politically representing the interests of the indigenous White community whilst Respect is not is a sign of the inherent anti-white racism of the media against indigenous whites. The next time the media call the BNP racist we will respond by calling them the real racists. Why should the indigenous white people of Britain be the only ethnic group denied a political party to represent their specific ethnic interests as a community? To do so is racist. This election is a triumph for the BNP. Even the mainstream media have to report that this election has shown the growing power of the BNP, as is seen here on the BBC website and in the Guardian.
Disarray of conservatism
Michael Howard has been shown to be unable to win an election even when fighting a Labour government composed of crooks and war criminals. This means the left wing of the Conservative Party will now start to demand a drift to the left for the party and this will mean the right wing, nationalist section of the party will be further alienated and cut adrift from forming policy in the party. When Tony Blair resigns in the next couple of years and Gordon Brown becomes leader of the Labour Party his victory will be pyrrhic, as by then the global economy will be about to fall apart due to the impact of Peak Oil and rising energy costs. The Labour Party will once again tear itself apart into petty squabbling factions and, in order to hold itself together, come to depend ever more on the immigrant bloc vote and thereby further alienate the white indigenous working class from its ranks. Though the Liberal consensus has been further strengthened by the limited success of the LibDems in this election this has allowed a vacuum to develop on the right of British politics regarding the issues of race and culture. The demise of UKIP and Veritas, the drift to the left of the Conservative Party and the abandonment of the white working class by the Liberals and New Labour means that only the BNP is now placed to move into the mainstream as the party of the indigenous British people.
2005-05-06 16:09 | User Profile
[url=http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=298]Link to original article at British National Party official website[/url]
The BNP has emerged from four weeks of hard campaigning and an interesting night at the count as Britainââ¬â¢s fourth largest party.
Despite a national media silence on the presence of the BNP and a few nasty smear campaigns conducted by the institutionally hostile press at a regional level, the people of Britain made up their own minds. Based on what they know to be true with their own eyes, voters from Somerset to Sunderland and Glasgow to Kent gave the thumbs up to the BNP. Our progress is measured and steady, rather than euphoric and erratic, deep rooted and growing.
Seat after seat saw BNP candidates increase their share of the vote with some excellent results in seats being contested for the very first time.
In only a handful of seats (11) did UKIP candidates get marginally more votes that a BNP candidate, whereas our candidates beat UKIP in 65. There was no spectacular support for the chameleon of Robert Kilroy-Silkââ¬â¢s Veritas Party who had stolen the BNPââ¬â¢s clothing on immigration and Europe. Only in Veritas's showcase seat of Erewash where Kilroy-Silk was standing, did any of their candidates beat BNP. In addition BNP candidates beat Greens in 25 seats, while Greens beat BNP in just 6 seats. We are not just an ephemeral pressure group ready to be used by the establishment and dumped when we no longer fit their agenda; we are the real voice of patriotic nationalism.
Highlights
ââ¬Â¢ Best result ââ¬â Richard Barnbrook Barking ââ¬â 16.9% ââ¬Â¢ Highest number of votes ââ¬â David Exley, Dewsbury -5,066 ââ¬Â¢ Highest vote ever in Scotland ââ¬â Scott McLean, Glasgow North East ââ¬â 3.2% ââ¬Â¢ Largest increase - Richard Barnbrook Barking ââ¬â up 10.5% ââ¬Â¢ 34 deposits saved. ââ¬Â¢ Total no. of votes across 119 seats: 194,685
Tangible rewards The election effort has seen some solid gains above and beyond numbers voting for our candidates. We have purchased broadcast quality camera equipment which helped produce a party election broadcast which is still being avidly discussed on music bulletin boards around the Internet, radio broadcasting equipment and over ã50,000 of printing equipment, all bought and paid for which we will be using to print our own material in forthcoming campaigns.
All activists, candidates and campaign workers can be rightly pleased with their efforts across the country. Despite months of Police repression against our members at the behest of the New Labour regime, despite the seizure of computers, dawn raids and intimidation, we have survived, we have grown and we are here to stay.
Thanks to all party workers, supporters and of course the near 200,000 Britons who gave their support to our candidates.
2005-05-06 16:25 | User Profile
It should be really simple: whites first determine which party promotes their interests, then vote for it. Hardly rocket science.
2005-05-07 02:17 | User Profile
Kev the BNP's share of the vote is 0.7%, they're no Front National, Freedom Party or the artist formally know as the Vlaams Block. What they are is a useful gladly. Nor can they ever hope to be anymore in their present state, no middle class English will even join the BNP in significant numbers. They represent a subsection of a subsection of a class and in English politics that's fatal no matter what the policies. If Nick Griffin had better material to work with his efforts would show more fruit but in reality the BNP only punch above their weight due to the vanity and stupidity of the English left in ââ¬Ëadvertisingââ¬â¢ them.
2005-05-07 12:10 | User Profile
[QUOTE=na Gaeil is gile]Kev the BNP's share of the vote is 0.7%, they're no Front National, Freedom Party or the artist formally know as the Vlaams Block. What they are is a useful gladly. Nor can they ever hope to be anymore in their present state, no middle class English will even join the BNP in significant numbers.
It remains to be seen. The BNP is about where the NF was 30 years ago. Its long been understood that the Anglospheric a nations are years behind continental Europe in developing various healthy attitudes (particularly towards the role of world Jewry in human affairs, but I don't suppose you need me to draw you up a list of such attitudes). They only got 200,000 votes this time, but less than a year ago, they got over 800,000 votes in the European Parliamentary elections in Britain, and received 4.9% if the total vote (about twice that in some of the around a dozen or so British-Euro regional districts).
The winner-take-all thing (which doesn't apply to European parliamentary elections; we nearly won 2-3 seats in the European Parliament within the last year) is a huge obstacle, of course.
2005-05-07 13:00 | User Profile
Just checked out the BNP site: [url]http://www.bnp.org.uk/[/url] Plenty of good background information.
Their "Corporal Fox" song/music video is a cracker. Give it a look if you haven't already.
[url]http://www.bnp.org.uk/bnptv/bnptv_ppb05.htm[/url]
2005-05-07 22:42 | User Profile
[QUOTE=na Gaeil is gile]Kev the BNP's share of the vote is 0.7%, they're no Front National, Freedom Party or the artist formally know as the Vlaams Block. What they are is a useful gladly. Nor can they ever hope to be anymore in their present state, no middle class English will even join the BNP in significant numbers. They represent a subsection of a subsection of a class and in English politics that's fatal no matter what the policies. If Nick Griffin had better material to work with his efforts would show more fruit but in reality the BNP only punch above their weight due to the vanity and stupidity of the English left in ââ¬Ëadvertisingââ¬â¢ them.[/QUOTE] Good points. I admit that I was disappointed with the results that only saw a marginal increase in support for the BNP. I'm not sure how the situation can get much worse in the UK with cities like Leicester, Bradford and London ready to fall to the coloured hordes. As for the middle class they always leave me wondering.
2005-05-14 03:22 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Julian the Apostate]Good points. I admit that I was disappointed with the results that only saw a marginal increase in support for the BNP. I'm not sure how the situation can get much worse in the UK with cities like Leicester, Bradford and London ready to fall to the coloured hordes.[/QUOTE] Watching UK nationalist politics is an extremely frustrating observer sport :( The Welsh and Scottish nationalist parties are dumber than a retarded ant, the less said about Northern Ireland politics the better, and in England well... Nick Griffin has many of the right ideas but the wrong membership. There was real potential in the UKIP if married with Euro Nationalist tactics Griffin has been advocating, but that opportunity seems to have passed for nowââ¬Â¦
[QUOTE=Julian the Apostate]As for the middle class they always leave me wondering.[/QUOTE] Me too, but they're key to any real 'revolutionary' change, perhaps if we offered discounts for DIY centres and golf courses?
2005-05-14 03:30 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kevin_O'Keeffe]The winner-take-all thing (which doesn't apply to European parliamentary elections; we nearly won 2-3 seats in the European Parliament within the last year) is a huge obstacle, of course.[/QUOTE] The UK system is very similar to the US system in that it lends itself to two party (which eventually becomes one party) politics. The PR-STV system we have here is far superior. There's many things I admire about America -- your constitution is much better than ours for example -- but your electoral system sucks anaemic donkeyââ¬â¢s genitals in hell.