← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Gabrielle
Thread ID: 18045 | Posts: 21 | Started: 2005-05-01
2005-05-01 12:45 | User Profile
"LOS ANGELES - Repaying a political ally from his failed presidential bid, U.S. Sen. John Kerry on Saturday endorsed mayoral candidate Antonio Villaraigosa in the race to lead the nation's second-largest city.
The 2004 Democratic presidential nominee said Villaraigosa had worked to put more police officers on the streets and provide health care for more residents.
"I'm not here against anybody," Kerry told hundreds of Villaraigosa supporters at Los Angeles Valley College. "I'm here for somebody who has a set of hopes and dreams."
Villaraigosa, a city councilman and one of Kerry's national campaign co-chairs last year, "will be a mayor for all the people of Los Angeles," the senator said.
Villaraigosa, who is challenging Mayor James Hahn in a May 17 runoff election, alluded in his remarks to fundraising questions that have dogged his campaign in recent days, saying politics was "too much about charges and countercharges ... too much about derision and not enough about vision."
Villaraigosa depicted Hahn as a leader of "limited horizons" and said, "If you accept mediocrity, you better be prepared to live with it. I won't accept mediocrity."
Villaraigosa announced this week he was returning $47,000 in donations from at least 20 workers of two-Florida based companies with possible interests in gaining concession contracts at Los Angeles International Airport.
The county district attorney said Friday he was launching a preliminary investigation of the donations, following reports that several of the workers appeared confused when asked about their $1,000 checks.
It is not illegal for multiple employees from a company to donate to a campaign; it is illegal, however, for anyone to reimburse employees for their contributions.
"The key thing for all of us is it appears that from these news reports, people didn't seem to know they had made a contribution to somebody running for mayor, or didn't know when they'd made it," said Hahn, who has long faced ethics questions and investigations regarding so-called pay-to-play contributions in his administration.
"The fact that an investigation has begun is going to help get these questions answered," Hahn, also a Democrat, said Saturday.
**Kerry, a Massachusetts senator, is one of several high-profile Villaraigosa supporters. The councilman has also been endorsed by basketball legend Earvin "Magic" Johnson and Rep. Maxine Waters (news, bio, voting record), a Democratic icon in the city's black community." **
[url]http://dailynews.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050501/ap_on_el_st_lo/la_mayor;_ylt=AsvtYEOlCbCm.uQl4tq3RS.s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2bW85OXIzBHNlYwNwbA--[/url]
2005-05-01 13:18 | User Profile
Of course, not a word about Villaraigosa's anti-White racism, Mexican nationalism, and separatism. Why am I not surprised? :thumbd: In the coming conflict, I hope MSM outlets will be the first to go.
2005-05-01 14:11 | User Profile
Gabrielle,
Who cares who Kerry endorses? He lost. Bush is the one to be concerned about. I'm surprised that Bush wasn't there to endorse the La Razaite for it appears that he wants to be "our first 'hispanic' president."
2005-05-01 16:39 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius]Gabrielle,
Who cares who Kerry endorses? He lost. Bush is the one to be concerned about. I'm surprised that Bush wasn't there to endorse the La Razaite for it appears that he wants to be "our first 'hispanic' president."[/QUOTE]
Sertorius, I see the significance of this article went right over your head, also. Oh, well, so much for thinking for oneââ¬â¢s self.
2005-05-01 17:17 | User Profile
Gabrielle,
Kindly enlighten me.
2005-05-01 19:29 | User Profile
ââ¬ÅKerry, a Massachusetts senator, is one of several high-profile Villaraigosa supporters. The councilman has also been endorsed by basketball legend Earvin "Magic" Johnson and Rep. Maxine Waters (news, bio, voting record), a Democratic icon in the city's black community."
Bush thinks he is doing good, whereas Kerry is a secret, sneaky enemy of our people. Kerry endorses other races not because he thinks he is being fair, but because he wants to destroy us. Notice the names of the people who also have endorsed this anti white creep.
2005-05-01 21:29 | User Profile
Gabrielle,
Just for the sakes of argument I'll accept the idea that Bush thinks he is doing good. It doesn't change the fact that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. "Conseravtives" today aren't any different than "liberals" when it comes to the noxious idea of "well, our intentions were good". Whatever his reasons once he changes the demographics and culture there is no turning back. That's it.
2005-05-01 22:22 | User Profile
The black-Hispanic coalition has also been cited in NYC, where Fernando Ferrer is watching his candidacy for mayor sink to the bottom on the East River over comments in defense of the Amadou Diallo cops.
What makes me chortle about all of it is 1) how a man, despite heavy minority cred (I think Sharpton was behind Ferrer the last time 'round), simply appearing to defend white cops will get you in big trouble and 2) how NY media, like the rest of the media, gives so much creedence to the idea of a "black-Hispanic" coalition without mention of who they're coalescing [I]against.[/I] And God forbid THAT group coalesce itself.
2005-05-02 06:59 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle] Bush thinks he is doing good[/QUOTE]The parakeet is right, it appears the traitor Bush does believe that his anti-white policies are divinely inspired:
Bush: God Told Me To Invade Iraq, Become President
[url="http://www.patridiots.com/000552.html"]http://www.patridiots.com/000552.html[/url]
Birds of a feather...
2005-05-02 10:59 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Stigmata]The parakeet is right, it appears the traitor Bush does believe that his anti-white policies are divinely inspired:
Bush: God Told Me To Invade Iraq, Become President
[url="http://www.patridiots.com/000552.html"]http://www.patridiots.com/000552.html[/url]
Birds of a feather...[/QUOTE]
Go hug a tree, you leftist jerk.
P.S. Hitler was a jerk too.
2005-05-02 12:33 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius]...Whatever his reasons once he changes the demographics and culture there is no turning back. That's it.[/QUOTE] What is happening to the US isn't inevitable, nor is it permanent. The demographics and culture can be changed back, no problem. The issue is, can whites find the will to do so?
2005-05-02 17:41 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Stuka]What is happening to the US isn't inevitable, nor is it permanent. The demographics and culture can be changed back, no problem. The issue is, can whites find the will to do so?[/QUOTE]
I don't know about "changed back," but "changed into something else" is a certainty. The only question is what place whites will take in the evolving demographic picture of America. Will we slide off into non-existence because too many whites don't care? Will we rise up and reclaim? Will there be some of both? I wonder sometimes if that won't be it: Some whites just won't care, and will float along, deracinated, until they die off. Others will try forming community for strength, and the success or failure of that will attract or repel other "follower" whites.
This is where the concept of "white" will become forged. Those European-descended Americans who reject the idea of "white" in favor of something else will simply become the walking, disconnected dead, and if they're rich and immoral enough, they won't care. Others may take on a dual identity: I am an Italian-American, culturally and immediately, and I am a white American, politically. Etc.
Within that scenario is the possibility of white co-existence with other groups wherein whites do display cohesion and racial awareness. A la the Jews. It seems to me that this is a necessary first step to recovery which will make physical and geographic separation come more easily. The change has to come from within us, and we must be unifed mentally before we can be unified physically. We cannot simply snap our fingers and expect that all the blacks will go over here and the whites over there. It won't happen that way.
2005-05-02 21:37 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle]Go hug a tree, you leftist jerk.
[/QUOTE]Tweet, tweet, tweet...
[img]http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/01/12/images/bush_flag_small.jpg[/img]
2005-05-03 11:57 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Stigmata]Tweet, tweet, tweet...[/ QUOTE]
[img]http://www.carraronan.org/images/hitler_stalin_married.jpg[/img]
Hitler destroyed Germany and more than likely was a fag. Tweet, tweet, tweet...
2005-05-04 11:42 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle]Hitler destroyed Germany and more than likely was a fag. [/QUOTE]Like your fellow neoconservative Republicans? [size=5]Gay Marriage for GOP Operative Arthur Finkelstein[/size] [size=2]by CONSPIRACY PLANET[/size]
[size=2][img]http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/images/jesse_helms.jpg[/img] Another gay bashing G.O.P. consultant has come out of the closet.
Republican "consultant" Arthur J. Finkelstein, who has made a career of promoting anti-gay Republicans like former North Carolina Senator Jesse Helms, New York Governor George E. Pataki and former New York Senator Alfonse M. D'Amato, has announced that he has married his male partner in gay-friendly Massachusetts.
Following a career path like the rabid Nixon-era queer lawyer Roy Cohn and that old queen FBI director J.Edgar Hoover, Finkelstein has taken G.O.P money while living a lifestyle abhorrent to his "clients," so-called conservatives who despise homosexuals.
As reported by the New York Times, Finkelstein said, "I believe that visitation rights, health care benefits and other human relationship contracts that are taken for granted by all married people should be available to partners." Especially if they are male political whores for the G.O.P, he should have added.
Finkelstein has worked for many years with Republican politicians like former Senator Jesse Helms of North Carolina,(see photo above) who has made a career by opposing gay rights. [url="http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=99&contentid=2072"]http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=99&contentid=2072[/url] [/size]
2005-05-05 04:12 | User Profile
Touche! :lol:
2005-05-09 19:49 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle] Bush thinks he is doing good, whereas Kerry is a secret, sneaky enemy of our people. Kerry endorses other races not because he thinks he is being fair, but because he wants to destroy us. Notice the names of the people who also have endorsed this anti white creep.[/QUOTE]
The difference between Republican and Democrat "anti-racists" is this: the Democrats adopt anti-white policies because they are doctrinaire racial egalitarians. The Republicans adopt anti-white policies because outsourcing and third world immigration is "good for business." Frankly, I don't see how being stabbed in the back in the name of venality and greed (i.e. lining the pockets of Cheney-Halliburton Inc.) is any more noble than stabbing one's constituency in the back in the name of egalitarian dogmas.
[quote=Sertorius] Just for the sakes of argument I'll accept the idea that Bush thinks he is doing good. It doesn't change the fact that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. "Conseravtives" today aren't any different than "liberals" when it comes to the noxious idea of "well, our intentions were good". Whatever his reasons once he changes the demographics and culture there is no turning back. That's it.
Bush's policies aren't motivated by "doing good," they are motivated by lining the pockets of his plutocratic constituency. Non-white immigration is good for the bottom line, so Arbusto and friends do as they are told.
I once naively thought that "conservative Republicans" could be reasoned with and that on racial and cultural issues they were basically on the same side as I was, if only misguided. A couple of years of interaction with FReeper cattle taught me otherwise. Just because we both hated Clinton doesn't mean we had anything in common. I hated Clinton for waxing rhapsodic over the day that whites become a minority in America and for bombing Yugoslavia to defend Albanian gangsters, they hated Clinton for being a Democrat and for having sex with his interns. And I especially loathe these hypocrites for praising in Bush the very policies they loudly condemned in Clinton (i.e. foreign policy, immigration policy, etc). "Conservative Republicans" are worse than useless.
2005-05-09 23:17 | User Profile
What is happening to the US isn't inevitable, nor is it permanent. The demographics and culture can be changed back, no problem. The issue is, can whites find the will to do so?
Nations are like stories, or sagas: they have beginnings, middles and ends; and while the names and dates might be altered to fit a particular rendition, the 'plots' and 'themes' are perennial. The story of the mighty power that, buckling under the weight of decadence and dissolution, begins being overrun with barbaric tribes of lesser ethnic stock is one of them. They usually end soon after that particular plot wrinkle, without last-minute cavalry charges or sudden reversals of fortune or Dorothy waking up to find she'd only been dreaming the whole thing. I hope I'm wrong and you're right, Stuka, but I just don't see how that would be possible at this point.
2005-05-10 11:49 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]Nations are like stories, or sagas: they have beginnings, middles and ends; and while the names and dates might be altered to fit a particular rendition, the 'plots' and 'themes' are perennial. The story of the mighty power that, buckling under the weight of decadence and dissolution, begins being overrun with barbaric tribes of lesser ethnic stock is one of them. They usually end soon after that particular plot wrinkle, without last-minute cavalry charges or sudden reversals of fortune or Dorothy waking up to find she'd only been dreaming the whole thing. I hope I'm wrong and you're right, Stuka, but I just don't see how that would be possible at this point.[/QUOTE]
Spain in 1492 kicked out all the Jews and Moors and then went on to conquer half the world.
It has been done in the past, and we will accomplish the same for our beloved white, Christian and English-speaking American nation.
2005-05-10 15:58 | User Profile
Did Spain condition its young for two generations to revile their own while lauding the Jew and Moor? (By the way, we've got more than half the world under our thumb right now. Does that constitute our 'comeback'?)
2005-05-10 16:20 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]Did Spain condition its young for two generations to revile their own while lauding the Jew and Moor? (By the way, we've got more than half the world under our thumb right now. Does that constitute our 'comeback'?)[/QUOTE]
Well, no. But in some ways it was worse than that. Remember that these people survived nearly 800 years under a Muslim boot with Jews as middlemen cheering them on.
Buck up, Ragman. None of this defeatist talk.
You know, if there's one recurring theme throughout history it's that Jews come in, stay a while, alienate absolutely everybody absolutely, and wind up getting run out of the place on a rail. Sometimes on flaming rails.
It will happen in America, too.