← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · TexasAnarch

Will they get him? Poddy likes John Boy

Thread ID: 18001 | Posts: 1 | Started: 2005-04-28

Wayback Archive

TexasAnarch [OP]

2005-04-28 06:48 | User Profile

[B]Who supports Bolton? [/B]

You know who – the psychokill Repubes. Right? RIGHT? [B]I DON’T HEAR YOU ! ! [/B]

Spit on ‘em for me Jane. Dedicate one drop from an old Depends to their salvation and send them to hell. (It‘s more than God would do. I channeled him (Thoth) this morning and Sho-o-o-eey! Foul mood? You wouldn’t believe. Said what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah was just prequel so Gabrielle shouldn’t waste time strokin’ up 10 righteous men. As if.)

[B]Podwhoretz[/B]

[url]http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/42983.htm[/url]

“….Meanwhile, the president's daring nomination of John Bolton as U.N. ambassador is in danger not because of media bias but because three Republican senators are evidently afraid of voting for someone who is accused (probably falsely) of being mean to his underlings. The only possible positive consequence of this preposterous objection is that it might force our U.S. senators — many of whom are absolutely monstrous bosses — to be a little nicer to their suffering staff members. "

"Daring" it is, alright. "Dead" it should be returned, with a warrant for the arrest of all who support it on charges of high treason.

One recognizes that last sentence as Poddy pootz’ contribution to confabulating the line Mary Matyln no doubt slipped old Dick Cheney – as if Bolton’s style, rather than what it was used for – to pre-emptively destroy whoever opposes ZOG -- were the issue.

[B]Townhall group-think[/B]

To: Conservative Activists From: Townhall.com RE: John Bolton nomination

Thanks to wavering Republicans, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee vote to confirm John Bolton as UN ambassador has been delayed until May 12. Liberals are taking advantage of the delay to smear Bolton, [B]who’s a bit too pro-America* to suit them.[/B] If they succeed in convincing Republicans on the Foreign Relations Committee to vote against him, they will derail his nomination. You can read more about this fight in an editorial from the Townhall.com editors.

*There is the reversal. Whoever does not oppose his nomination on grounds of true American patriotism thereby condemns themselves forever to live with John Bolton, Jewish psychokillers, traitors, Republicans, as compatriots.

As for me, I will choose life every time.

**** Added Friday am. Look at the ducks line up [url]http://www.theunionleader.com/articles_showfast.html?article=53938[/url]

Jonah Goldberg: John Bolton’s temperament is a phony issue By JONAH GOLDBERG

IF JOHN BOLTON, President Bush’s nominee for ambassador to the United Nations, had been the nicest, sweetest, let-me-help-you-with-your-groceries, you-can-sleep-on-my-couch, I’ll-get-the-thorn-out-of-your-paw teddy bear to everybody he ever worked with or met, not a single Democratic senator on the Foreign Relations Committee would change his vote from “no” to “yes.”

And, if Bolton were an H.G. Wellsian lover of one-world government who believed that the United Nations was America’s last best hope, all those “no” votes would switch to “yes” votes — even if it turned out that Bolton had a Skipper complex that compelled him to swat every wayward staffer in the head with his hat.

In other words, all of the “controversy” of the last couple weeks is bogus. It’s a kabuki dance. Whether the allegations against Bolton are true is almost entirely beside the point, because if a completely unrelated set of facts were not in play, no one would care. In short, this is borking pure and simple.

This is all about desperation. [B]John Bolton is a U.N. skeptic, as are most Americans and most conservatives. Democrats and liberals are very grumpy about this fact. They are also testy toward Mr. Bolton for a string of reasons: He’s effective. He’s an Iraq war hawk who can be punished more easily than, say, George W. Bush (who won reelection) or Condoleezza Rice (who is far more formidable politically). What makes him even more annoying is that, unlike many of his colleagues, he is not a so-called “neoconservative.” He’s an old-fashioned, do-what’s-right-for-America-and-the-rest-of-the-world-be-damned type.

Bolton was all for invading [/B]

Yep, Jew lovers. He's your man.