← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · friedrich braun
Thread ID: 17971 | Posts: 39 | Started: 2005-04-26
2005-04-26 12:37 | User Profile
It's time to pull the plug again on Raina's old schtick.
2005-04-26 13:25 | User Profile
I second the motion. Ban Raina/Stigmata.
2005-04-26 17:43 | User Profile
I'm afraid I must agree. Stigmata has made it perfectly clear that he/she/it is only interested in disruption, not discussion.
2005-04-27 08:26 | User Profile
I'll admit it, personally I'm the closet libertarian around here, and have never voted to ban anyone. Should we have a poll?
2005-04-27 11:52 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Okiereddust]Should we have a poll?[/QUOTE]
Sure.
2005-04-27 12:28 | User Profile
Stigmata should be banned from starting threads at the very least. And made to say 10 Hail Marys and a couple of Our Fathers.
And while we're griping, can we impose a limit on supersized signatures, or at least start frowning on them a little bit? It's kind of frustrating when a 1 line post (with a gargantuan sig hanging off of it) takes up almost your entire screen's real estate space. Makes it harder to follow threads.
2005-04-27 13:41 | User Profile
I have no doubt that Stigmata is Raina the Jewish lesbian troll with a shit fetish and who works in the porn industry according to what she has said on The Phora.
[QUOTE]The only one who's engaging in insulting behaviour is you.
Everyone knows that today's Churches go out of there way to sound extremely peecee and left-liberal on all sorts of issues. You're not telling anyone anything new. You're just being being repetitive, provocative, and offensive without trying to achieve anything constructive and that's precisely what the Jewish lesbian troll with a scat fetish (Raina) regularly does on these types of boards. When she's not playing a Nazi-hating Christian, she's pretending to be a wack Christian-hating Nazi. YAWN. We've seen it before.
[url]http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17947[/url][/QUOTE]
2005-04-30 07:59 | User Profile
Well by forum rules I think its pretty clear cut, but in the interests of board harmony and clarity I thought I would just take a poll. Stigmata has proven beyond a doubt he/she is only interested in one thing, attacking Christianity incessently. He/she maintains it is in the interest of WN doctrine, but I think any point he might have needed to have brought up has been made, and his/her's continued presence on the board is now completely repetitive, as we have other things more important to discuss. I suggest he/she move on, but that's my personal suggestion. Feel free to add yours.
2005-05-01 02:23 | User Profile
I have no idea who Stigmata is. If Stigmata is Raina, a nut, or loon but I vote no for now. They may be interested in disruption but too much of what Stigmata said is true. I fear the Romish Church is full of perverts and marxists. If a church becomes marxist it needs to be attacked.
2005-05-01 03:47 | User Profile
IMHO, people shouldn't be banned just for posting unpopular viewpoints. My only issue with Stigmata is the way he/she keeps starting threads on the same topic repeatedly. What he/she should do instead is post all those articles about Christianity and its support of immigration on one thread. There's no need to have all these new threads about the same topic.
2005-05-01 05:03 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Angler]IMHO, people shouldn't be banned just for posting unpopular viewpoints. My only issue with Stigmata is the way he/she keeps starting threads on the same topic repeatedly. What he/she should do instead is post all those articles about Christianity and its support of immigration on one thread. There's no need to have all these new threads about the same topic.[/QUOTE] The Lindstedt solution? :lol: Keep him all on one thread? Not a bad idea to combine things, although he does get a lot of interesting articles, whatever his one-track bias.
2005-05-01 06:46 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Okiereddust]The Lindstedt solution? :lol: Keep him all on one thread? Not a bad idea to combine things, although he does get a lot of interesting articles, whatever his one-track bias.[/QUOTE]LOL, nah, I don't mean to suggest that all of Stigmata's stuff should be on one thread, but one thread should be enough for one topic, at least until that thread runs its course. No one should start five threads per day on the same topic.
BTW, I agree that a lot of Stigmata's articles are interesting, although I know they rub many folks here the wrong way.
2005-05-01 16:29 | User Profile
Okie? as you know 80% of all my postings are anti-Zionist, should I be banned for that?
However, you guys gave me an idea........ according to what I read is cost the administration of this site $1,200 a year to keep it up so I propose the following.
If you give me a thread of my own where [B]only I can open new subjects[/B] but anyone can answer me I will pay the full ammount of $1,200 per year in advanced, how about [B]"Ponce's Corner"[/B] ?????? let me know.
I will obey the two rules of this site 1) no cursing and 2) will not insult any one individual, as you know I never do neither one anyway.
2005-05-01 22:20 | User Profile
[QUOTE=friedrich braun]I have no doubt that Stigmata is Raina the Jewish lesbian troll with a shit fetish and who works in the porn industry according to what she has said on The Phora.[/QUOTE] You forgot her newest pseudonym: ââ¬ÅErzsébet Báthory.ââ¬Â :tongue:
I voted to ban Stigmata... even though she'll be back as someone else. I would agree that Stigmata's babble is identical to Raina's... but who knows? In any event... Stigmata has all the characteristics of a ââ¬Åtroll.ââ¬Â Instead of engaging in constructive dialogue... ââ¬Åitââ¬Â chooses to promote disruption.
I don't mind that we disagree... but she's just wasting everyone's time.
:smoke:
2005-05-01 22:54 | User Profile
[QUOTE=RowdyRoddyPiper]Stigmata should be banned from starting threads at the very least.[/QUOTE] I think this might be a good compromise.
2005-05-01 23:09 | User Profile
[QUOTE]... You're not telling anyone anything new. You're just being being repetitive, provocative, and offensive without trying to achieve anything constructive and that's precisely what the Jewish lesbian troll with a scat fetish (Raina) regularly does on these types of boards. When she's not playing a Nazi-hating Christian, she's pretending to be a wack Christian-hating Nazi. YAWN. We've seen it before. ...[/QUOTE] How true! And talk about audacity! She now adopts the pseudonym of Erzsébet Báthory! :eek:
[In 1610, Countess Erzsébet Báthory, widow of the Hungarian war hero Ferencz Nádasdy, lost a ââ¬Åpower struggleââ¬Â to György Thurzó, Count Palatine of Hungary. Thurzó wanted the Báthory lands for himself and incarcerated the countess for murder without a legitimate trial. She was found guilty 'in absentia' and stripped of her privileges and her freedom. Subsequently, she was shunned by her family who believed that she had brought shame to the family name. Within four years of her incarceration she was dead.]
2005-05-01 23:45 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Angler]LOL, nah, I don't mean to suggest that all of Stigmata's stuff should be on one thread, but one thread should be enough for one topic, at least until that thread runs its course. No one should start five threads per day on the same topic. That might be a good solution, although I don't think we can really do that technically, although I do the same thing manually by merge his/her duplicate threads, like on clefy child molestation.
BTW, I agree that a lot of Stigmata's articles are interesting, although I know they rub many folks here the wrong way.[/QUOTE]Well he gives clergy a hard time, but there's no doubt that there are a significant proportion of real scumbucket clergy, etc out there. I wish he'd had a little better perspective on things, and could recognize that there are a lot of good ones out there too, but that's his call. I just don't like it when all those threads start monopolizing our forum space, but if I can handle this manually, albeit its a little work. It would be nice if he/she could post in the proper forum (not just "current events") combine threads himself when they're duplicates in the same category. It would be real nice if he could occasionally show interest in other topics and other parts of the forum, but every man has a right to his own opinion.
2005-05-02 21:10 | User Profile
[QUOTE=friedrich braun]It's time to pull the plug again on Raina's old schtick.[/QUOTE]
Agreed. I wrote a long message explaing why Raina should be banned, but my system inexlicably crashed before I could post it. In summary: She contributes little, or nothing of value. Perhaps she even detracts value fromthe Forum. She made a credible (if highly unsuccessful) attempt to get AntiYuppie fired from his job. In today's PC world, the tactics she used COULD have worked, and WOULD have worked against some of us, I don't doubt. She has lied to me personally, in order to reveal a minor and inconsequential aspect of my personal life she falsely (and somewhat laughably) believed would humiliate me, i.e. the fact that I find fat women more sexually appealing than thin women, as a general rule (I'm no fetishist who only can appreciate one type, but all other factors being equal, fat women are the ones I look at when they walk by, but enough of this explanatory digression; back to Raina). If Raina knew she could do it with minimal effort and expense, and no risk to her health, safety & freedom , she'd have us all murdered tomorrow. That's a good enough reason to exclude just about anyone you'd care to mention. [B]BAN** the lying, miserable kike bitch once and for all!
2005-05-02 22:07 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]Okie? as you know 80% of all my postings are anti-Zionist, should I be banned for that?
That leaves room for 20% pro-zionist.
If you give me a thread of my own where [B]only I can open new subjects[/B]
You mean you want a subforum where only you can start new threads.
2005-05-02 22:18 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kevin_O'Keeffe]Agreed. I wrote a long message explaing why Raina should be banned, but my system inexlicably crashed before I could post it.
I think talking about other posters is one of the most distracting activities. Ignore those who don't like and leave the rest to the moderators.
i.e. the fact that I find fat women more sexually appealing than thin women,
What do you mean "fat"? Do you mean 10 or 20 pounds overweight? Do you mean those who weigh 200+ pounds? Or, are you really sick and think that a woman so fat that she can't fall over is the perfect woman?
Typical fashion models are too skinny for my tastes.
2005-05-02 22:23 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kevin_O'Keeffe]If Raina knew she could do it with minimal effort and expense, and no risk to her health, safety & freedom , she'd have us all murdered tomorrow. That's a good enough reason to exclude just about anyone you'd care to mention. [B]BAN** the lying, miserable kike bitch once and for all![/QUOTE] Well she still posts at Phora, but she s certainly banned on clear and compelling evidence here, be it Stigmata or any other name. But she's pretty clever. Getting us to ban half the board on the suspicion they're Raina's in disguise could be another of her little traps which I'd like to avoid, and detecting and evaluating Raina incarnations is not my personal strong point.
2005-05-03 00:19 | User Profile
I save the other 20% for the US government.
And yes happy that's what I mean, I wrote a private message to someone and now am awaiting for an answer.
Okie? I would like to see Reina trying to imitate me, only Ponce writes like Ponce lol.
2005-05-03 00:48 | User Profile
Raina and anyone resembling her should be banned.
2005-05-03 03:12 | User Profile
I don't think Stigmata is enough of a nuisance to ban, especially since his/her/its posts aren't -completely- devoid of content like Raina's usually were. A restriction from starting new threads sounds like an agreeable compromise to me as well.
2005-05-03 13:49 | User Profile
Nah, leave the jerk alone. Laugh at him, mock him...
2005-05-03 16:20 | User Profile
Hey guys? if we have to put up with Gabrielle then why not with Stigmata? hahahahahaah :thumbsup:
2005-05-03 18:20 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]Hey guys? if we have to put up with Gabrielle then why not with Stigmata? hahahahahaah :thumbsup:[/QUOTE]
We even put up with Ponce! :lol:
2005-05-03 20:24 | User Profile
I was waiting for that one hahahahahahaha, love you guys.
2005-05-06 11:31 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]I was waiting for that one hahahahahahaha, love you guys.[/QUOTE]
So 'happy'...:wink:
2005-06-04 16:49 | User Profile
I first wrote about banning Stigmata ( at least i think I was ) and talked to mod about it, haven't seen mucha Stig the Pig lately.. still, I wish I noticed the Poll sooner, I coulda got that majority up by one more tick !! My prob with Stigmata was only that he/she would post articles ( all anti-Catholic, which is ok for discussion ) all over various thread subjects, long and windy ( and not written but pasted ) having nothing at all to do with the subject matter, therefore leading the thread into a different direction, disrupting its flow sometimes to the point where the original thread subject was forgotten. That's a successful troll. Stigmata was an intellectually defunct or lazy one too..
2005-06-04 19:53 | User Profile
Yeah! Ban the kike. :caiphas:
2005-06-04 20:37 | User Profile
Testing 1234
2005-06-05 06:10 | User Profile
Stigmata's hatred for Catholics goes too far. Believe me, I have a awful lot of bones to pick with the Church of Rome, but all that anger! Some of my best pals are Catholic and none, as far as I can tell, is a child molester or criminal.
2005-06-05 13:57 | User Profile
[QUOTE=CornCod]Stigmata's hatred for Catholics goes too far. Believe me, I have a awful lot of bones to pick with the Church of Rome, but all that anger! Some of my best pals are Catholic and none, as far as I can tell, is a child molester or criminal.[/QUOTE]
The Catholic Church is a breeding ground for sodomites. The problem will never go away until the Catholic Church allows its priests to marry.
2005-06-05 13:58 | User Profile
[QUOTE=6KILLER]Yeah! Ban the kike. :caiphas:[/QUOTE]
Why?
2005-06-05 23:10 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle]Why?[/QUOTE] Really Gabrielle...
This is reminiscent of your defense of Benedict Arnold.
Remember?
:smoke:
2005-06-06 02:54 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Phantasm]Really Gabrielle...
This is reminiscent of your defense of Benedict Arnold.
Remember?
:smoke:[/QUOTE]
Since when are you the spokeman for 666Killer? And leave Benedict Arnold out of this. :tnguess:
Please don't tell me you are that sissy Northern Bastion? :wacko:
2005-06-07 00:10 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabrielle]Since when are you the spokeman for 666Killer? And leave Benedict Arnold out of this. :tnguess:
Please don't tell me you are that sissy Northern Bastion? :wacko:[/QUOTE] I just don't see how you can be so tolerant of a venomous troll like Stigmata.
BTW... I'm Spectre on SF.
:wink:
2005-06-07 02:29 | User Profile
[quote=Phantasm]I just don't see how you can be so tolerant of a venomous troll like Stigmata.
Yes, but he is a comical venomous trollââ¬Â¦ I find him to be rather amusing. Just donââ¬â¢t take the man seriously.
BTW... I'm Spectre on SF.
Oh! Thank goodnessââ¬Â¦for a second there I thought you were that sissified Northern Bastion; that guy is sooo happy. :)