← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Robert

KC "rabbi" Punches National Socialist

Thread ID: 17861 | Posts: 21 | Started: 2005-04-20

Wayback Archive


Robert [OP]

2005-04-20 00:04 | User Profile

A rabbi and a man wearing Nazi insignias were cited for disorderly conduct Sunday after an alleged fight at Kansas City International Airport.

Rabbi David S. Fine, 36, of Congregation Beth Israel Abraham & Voliner in Overland Park and Steven T. Boswell, 30, of Olathe were released at the airport on a personal recognizance bond. They are scheduled to appear June 22 in Kansas City Municipal Court.

In an interview Monday, Fine said he was arrested but was released in time to catch his flight to New York.

Boswell could not be reached for comment, but a spokesman for a neo-Nazi organization confirmed that the incident occurred as members of the group were leaving the Kansas City area after attending their national convention here. Boswell was at the airport to drop off one of the convention's speakers, the spokesman said.

The incident occurred about 5:40 p.m. in Terminal C when Fine encountered Boswell, who was wearing a red shirt with a swastika logo and a necklace with a swastika on it, according to airport police reports.

“I told him that he should be ashamed himself for wearing those symbols in public,” Fine said Monday from New York.

According to the police report, Boswell responded by calling Fine “unhuman.”

The report said Fine, who was wearing a black business suit and yarmulke, then threw a cup of coffee at Boswell and punched him in the face.

[url="http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/local/11427997.htm"]Full story[/url]


CornCod

2005-04-20 00:33 | User Profile

How typical, the Jew starts the fight and the Nazi gets arrested along with the jew. I wouldn't bet a nickel on that poor NS guy winning in court.


jay

2005-04-20 00:44 | User Profile

That was hilarious!

Yeah, throw a cup of coffee in someone's face and SEE what happens to you. I mean, did he think that by being in a public place (with cops all around), that he would somehow be spared a thrashing?

C'maaaaaaaaan...........


Bardamu

2005-04-20 01:17 | User Profile

The Jew will get off.


askel5

2005-04-20 01:23 | User Profile

How typical, the Jew starts the fight and the Nazi gets arrested along with the jew

Oh please ... just because prancing around in the uniforms and symbols of long-dead Useful Idiot homoseculars is about the extent of manly-man action one can expect from White Nationalists doesn't mean that their displays are not meant to incite reactions from others.

And -- true to form -- instead of taking the opportunity to educate the Rabbi as to why, exactly, the applied biology that was National Socialism is as much a point of pride for the Supremacist as it is George H. Bush and his fellow GOP concerned with "genetic quality", the White Supremacist lunkhead can only reply: "Unhuman"

C'mon ... is this a grad of Coulter School of Snap?

Frankly, I'd have decked the guy if I'd been there. Particularly given the extraordinarily gruesome morality play on Subhumans that was the Schiavo Starvation -- if not over 45 million, mostly "white" unborn slaughtered in utero -- those who tend to draw distinctions between human-human beings and unhuman-human beings are worthy of nothing but contempt.

They are probably the most deadly plague of Useful Idiots ever to walk the earth.


Stuka

2005-04-20 01:29 | User Profile

[QUOTE=askel5] Frankly, I'd have decked the guy if I'd been there... They are probably the most deadly plague of Useful Idiots ever to walk the earth.[/QUOTE]You're talking about Jews, right? Because it's too easy to feel self-righteous and sophisticated by making fun of swastika-wearing, Hitler-worshiping bumpkins who use the word "unhuman." Let's reserve animus for our real enemies. Which, in this case, would be the Jew Fine.


askel5

2005-04-20 01:38 | User Profile

Indeed Jews may well be the worst of the lot where Useful Idiots are concerned.

I see no reason to claim Superiority for one's PURPOSEFULLY choosing to act like a hateful moron in kind.

Frankly, I don't see anything wrong with what Fine did and I'd sure as hell like to see that sort of get-up-and-go from Whitey but Whitey's too busy only further marginalizing himself and whining about oppression on internet boards to take a swing in righteous anger where his initial gambit of shaming a person for broadcasting to one and all their GOP partisanship where the Biological Revolution's concerned has failed.


Hugh Lincoln

2005-04-20 01:46 | User Profile

[QUOTE=askel5]Frankly, I'd have decked the guy if I'd been there.[/QUOTE]

I doubt you punch anything more resistant than your tab key, askel.

Swastika guy probably isn't a towering genius, but I'll take almost any sign of white resistance. You'd prefer what on a guy's T-shirt?


TexasAnarch

2005-04-20 01:59 | User Profile

[QUOTE=askel5]Indeed Jews may well be the worst of the lot where Useful Idiots are concerned.

I see no reason to claim Superiority for one's PURPOSEFULLY choosing to act like a hateful moron in kind.

Frankly, I don't see anything wrong with what Fine did and I'd sure as hell like to see that sort of get-up-and-go from Whitey but Whitey's too busy only further marginalizing himself and whining about oppression on internet boards to take a swing in righteous anger where his initial gambit of shaming a person for broadcasting to one and all their GOP partisanship where the Biological Revolution's concerned has failed.[/QUOTE]

Wearing a yamica is as offensive to me today as showing the swastika. If Whitey took exception to being interrupted by the guy with the yamica in a volent way, I, for one, would not have intervened, nor would have allowed Fine's bodygards to intervene, either. He has no business starting something he can't finish.

They will finally spit in your face if you won't kiss Sharon's finger. I know. It happened to me. Jews will have to get used to the fact that they are the Nazis now -- by their own doing, for not standing up to the Zionist traitors of America, aka Repube schiavo Finkelstein homocons. Maybe wearing Nazi get- up helps innoculate against that disease.
.


Ponce

2005-04-20 03:39 | User Profile

[QUOTE=askel5]How typical, the Jew starts the fight and the Nazi gets arrested along with the jew

Oh please ... just because prancing around in the uniforms and symbols of long-dead Useful Idiot homoseculars is about the extent of manly-man action one can expect from White Nationalists doesn't mean that their displays are not meant to incite reactions from others.

And -- true to form -- instead of taking the opportunity to educate the Rabbi as to why, exactly, the applied biology that was National Socialism is as much a point of pride for the Supremacist as it is George H. Bush and his fellow GOP concerned with "genetic quality", the White Supremacist lunkhead can only reply: "Unhuman"

C'mon ... is this a grad of Coulter School of Snap?

Frankly, I'd have decked the guy if I'd been there. Particularly given the extraordinarily gruesome morality play on Subhumans that was the Schiavo Starvation -- if not over 45 million, mostly "white" unborn slaughtered in utero -- those who tend to draw distinctions between human-human beings and unhuman-human beings are worthy of nothing but contempt.

They are probably the most deadly plague of Useful Idiots ever to walk the earth.[/QUOTE]

Well amigo, I also would have "decked" out the Jew if he had done that to me and it would be nothing more than self defence.

Six months ago I went to the big town with my anti-Zionist-Israeli sign and a Jewish woman spat on me, I had her arrested for assault and checked out for HIV and for AID, she was clean.

I then told the cops to let her go rather than taking her to court, I had my fun with her.

Usually when Jews approaches me and they see my tape recorder they walk away.


Angler

2005-04-20 04:42 | User Profile

I am not a fan of Nazi ideology apart from its vilification of Jews, and I don't think it does the pro-White movement any good to wear Nazi symbols in public. Still, the guy who was assaulted here should have kicked the crap out of that lousy Jew. He had every right to do so, having been attacked first for doing nothing illegal.


Robert

2005-04-20 09:08 | User Profile

[img]http://www.jewishchronicle.org/images/fine_rabbi_david.jpg[/img]

Here's a picture of our fightin' joo boy. Scares me just to look at him.


Kievsky

2005-04-21 16:53 | User Profile

I would not have fought back at all. Not . . .at . . . all. Then press charges for assault, get a guilty verdict, then sue. Deep pockets in the synagogues, ya know.

Rob


Kevin_O'Keeffe

2005-04-21 18:09 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Angler]I don't think it does the pro-White movement any good to wear Nazi symbols in public. Still, the guy who was assaulted here should have kicked the crap out of that lousy Jew. He had every right to do so, having been attacked first for doing nothing illegal.[/QUOTE]

Precisely. Being a member of "the National Socialist Movement" is kind of stupid, but its OUR STUPIDITY, and we don't have any reason to tolerate Jews assaulting members of our citizenry due to their being uncomfortable with the way some of our people choose to exercise their (well-meaning) stupidity. I'm glad the National Socialist costumer restrained himself, else his life would be ruined due to a hefty prison sentence, which is probably what the Jew was trying to instigate when he provoked the altercation, i.e. a felony case against his victim. Let's just say that in any country deserving of being called "America," he would not have been considered in violation of the law, so long as he stopped pummeling the Jew once he curled up into a fetal position upon the floor and began yelling for his mama (or else was simply knocked unconscious).


Kevin_O'Keeffe

2005-04-21 18:11 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Kievsky]I would not have fought back at all. Not . . .at . . . all. Then press charges for assault, get a guilty verdict, then sue. Deep pockets in the synagogues, ya know.[/QUOTE]

Probably the wisest tactic in such an instance, yes.


Bardamu

2005-04-22 00:11 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Kievsky]I would not have fought back at all. Not . . .at . . . all. Then press charges for assault, get a guilty verdict, then sue. Deep pockets in the synagogues, ya know.

Rob[/QUOTE]

It is rather doubtful that you would win.


mwdallas

2005-04-22 01:41 | User Profile

The courts aren't that corrupt. He probably would have won a lawsuit.


Bardamu

2005-04-22 01:45 | User Profile

It is not that juries are corrupt it is that they are stupid and emotional. What happens when a Jewish DA points out to the Black jurors that the man was wearing a swastika?


Stuka

2005-04-22 03:00 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Kievsky]I would not have fought back at all. Not . . .at . . . all. Then press charges for assault, get a guilty verdict, then sue. Deep pockets in the synagogues, ya know. [/QUOTE]Good strategy. But still, there's nothing wrong with fighting back. If only more whites had the balls to do it! The trick is to avoid getting caught. :thumbsup:


Robert

2005-04-22 12:22 | User Profile

I believe that I would have fought back. How hard, though, would depend on rabbi boy. From his picture, he looks like a panzy. If I could handle him easily, I wouldn't have hurt him. Instead, I would have humiliated him. I would have picked him upside down, and pulled his pants up around his ankles.


mwdallas

2005-04-22 17:22 | User Profile

Bardamu --

There wouldn't be a DA in a civil suit. And there's a good argument that the fact that the man was wearing a swatika is inadmissible. Arguably, it's immaterial -- what element of an assault would it be relevant to? What defense? And even if relevant, what about Rule 403 or an equivalent under state law?