← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · TexasAnarch
Thread ID: 17727 | Posts: 7 | Started: 2005-04-11
2005-04-11 16:49 | User Profile
Could this be a double meaning? Bolton vowing to "Work With All"?
(he probably calls his dog "all" - get it?)
If they lose this appointment, it might -- just might -- start rolling downhill right on their shiney headbones. But it wouldn't get far.
[url]http://story.news.yahoo.com/fc?cid=34&tmpl=fc&in=US&cat=Bush_Administration[/url]
2005-04-11 17:53 | User Profile
Is Bolton Jewish?
(According to Jewhoo, a pathetic singer known as Michael Bolton is Jewish, originally "Bolotin")
Petr
2005-04-12 01:27 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Petr]Is Bolton Jewish? [/QUOTE][img]http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/images/title.gif[/img]
Jews in the Bush Administration
| Josh Bolten | Deputy Chief of Staff |
many, many more:
[url="http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/bushjews.html"]http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/bushjews.html[/url]
2005-04-13 05:45 | User Profile
Jewish or not, the Israeli agents at the Republican Jewish Coalition were happy enough about his confirmation as the Ambassador to the UN:
[url]http://www.rjchq.org/news.asp?FormMode=Detail&id=826[/url]
Jewish supremacists dislike the UN because it tends to delegitimize unilateral action by Israel and her proxy, the US.
2005-05-01 23:02 | User Profile
Bolton will be replaced with another pro-Israeli poddle. The first qualification for any nominee for ambassador to the UN is that a nominee must know without being told that they will act as a proxy for Israel and our interests come after Israel's.
2005-05-01 23:17 | User Profile
As I said before, the UN made 63 resolution against the state of Israel and has never taken any action, if it was some out of the way country the UN would be like a bullet, like the Dominican Republic?
The day that I see the UN take action against the Zionist state of Israel that will be the day that I will believe in the UN.
2005-05-03 23:14 | User Profile
fabricated?
[url]http://www.pressconnects.com/friday/opinion/stories/op042905s163354.shtml[/url]
Friday, April 29, 2005
Letter: New Yorkers have spoken
Find similar archived stories..
A recent poll shows that 86 percent of New York voters are against filibusters of judicial nominees. A second poll shows that 87 percent of New York voters are in favor of John Bolton being named ambassador to the United Nations. I wonder if our liberal elitist Sens. Schumer and Clinton will vote for what their constituency favors, or will vote for what the liberals in the Democratic Party want.
MATTHEW J. MILICIC
NEWARK VALLEY
A phone call to the author said he got it from vote.com, Dick Morris's outfit. These would be the Gukert-Schiavo-Rove repubes.
Milicic (Newark Valley, NY, is always spoken of as "very conservative", but that is only because of the history -- and manipulation by right-wing ex-military people) said the e-mail "votes " was broken down into states, but I couldn't find it. Or, get them to respond.
So a rump poll of Dick Morris fans gets reported as "New Yorkers" opinion. With the help of the friendly editor's glop.
Does this show "desparation", or what? ("Desparate" is also the term used by a US military spokesman commenting on the terrible recent insurgent attacks. Also, used by Lowry, I think -- or someone at NR -- for [I]opponents [/I] of Bolton's nomination! And, of course, in the First Lady's recent speech.
A spectacle for all time to see.