← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Franco
Thread ID: 17619 | Posts: 1 | Started: 2005-04-03
2005-04-03 08:01 | User Profile
[I][contrary to appearances, this is not Pope-criticizing, since it acknowledges his good deeds, too][/I]
4-3-05
[B]The Pope/the Border[/B]
[B]1. The Pope[/B]
As you probably know by now, Pope John Paul II has died. He was 84.
While we admit that we are not religious, we also admit that the Pope did some good things. Specifically, he traveled to Nicaragua in 1983 and let the Soviet-backed, communist government there know that he was an opponent of their politics. His visit probably helped curb communism in Central America.
But, at the same time, the Pope could have done far more in the fight against communism than just going to Central America. For example, he was Polish, and his native Poland was literally sacked by communism. The Pope could have mentioned publicly, at some point during his long reign, that it was one ethnic group, i.e. Jewish communists, who sacked Poland (in addition to the Jewish sacking of Russia, Hungary, Romania, etc.). If the Pope had mentioned that Jewish communists/Poland matter, it would have put a stamp of legitimacy on "anti-Semitism" that is very much needed in the post-WWII world. It would have made "anti-Semitism" - i.e. telling the truth about Jews - much more respectable. It would have been an important milestone in the preservation of Western culture because, let's face it, Western culture is currently very Christian. But he never mentioned the Poland/Jewish communists matter in public [1].
The sacking of various European countries by Jewish communists is reasonably well-documented - even Winston Churchill mentioned it once [2].
Why didn't the Pope ever mention Poland/the Jewish communists matter? After all, what could the Jews have done to him -gotten him fired as the Pope? Fat chance.
We don't know why he didn't mention that Jews sacked his home country of Poland - and no one can ask him why now.
[1] Poland/communism: [url]http://wsi.matriots.com/PolishComm.html[/url]
[2] Churchill: [url]http://www.seanbryson.com/articles/churchill.html[/url]
[B]2. The U.S./Mexico Border and the Minuteman project[/B]
As you may also know, a group of Americans - called the Minutemen - are going down to the Arizona/Mexico border this week to monitor illegal border crossings into the U.S., since the U.S. government doesn't seem to be too successful in stopping the flood of illegal Mexican immigrants into America.
To the Minutemen, the issue of illegal immigration is obviously about, well, illegal immigration. It's about protecting America's borders from immigrants who illegally enter America.
However, the opponents of the Minutemen see the issue very differently. To them, the issue isn't about illegal immigration at all. Nope. Then what is the issue, according to those opponents? The issue is really two-fold to them: 1) they believe that the Minutemen are slowing the de-Whitening of America - a de-Whitening which they see as a positive thing; and 2) they think that the Minuteman project is another example of White males "oppressing" non-Whites. In short, their views are anti-White and pro-Mexican. To them the matter is entirely racial - which is rather interesting when you consider that the political Left always claims that race "doesn't matter."