← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Blond Knight
Thread ID: 17507 | Posts: 9 | Started: 2005-03-25
2005-03-25 02:04 | User Profile
An interesting article from National Vanguard.
[url]http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4740[/url]
Do Blacks Deserve Billions for Slavery?
Opinion; Posted on: 2005-03-24 14:57:14
Editor's note: The author of this mildly sarcastic editorial sure gets a lot off his chest. His words will resonate with any White person who reads this no-holds-barred treatment of an issue that keeps popping-up. A highly illustrated must-read that gets better as it progresses.
No Black Reparations without Black Repatriation
by Gregory Krupey
Reparations have already been paid to blacks in the blood of White soldiers, both Union and Confederate, killed in the Civil War, and an entire section of our country devastated and uprooted in that unnecessary war. No other country ever went to war with itself to free slaves of an alien race. None in Africa ever will.
Reparations have been repeatedly paid since the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that essentially made negroes wards of the state, a Federally-protected and favored minority, through such anti-White programs as welfare/workfare, affirmative action and set-asides, quotas, Headstart, school integration, housing laws, and innumerable other grants, loans, subsidies, perks, and preferential treatments aimed at moving negroes en masse (instead of as individuals, as was expected and demanded of Whites) into "equality" and prosperity. That the vast majority of negroes have failed is proof that even with an unfair advantage they are incapable of succeeding in a White society, and the reparations now being proposed would be a colossal waste of money.
More African slaves were imported into, and died on plantations in Brazil than in the United States. There is no attempt to sue Brazil for reparations because the people directing this hoax know that you can't squeeze blood from a turnip, only a golden goose.
Most African slaves were literally sold down the river by other Africans, if not enemy tribesmen, then their own tribal chiefs and relatives. (Slavery is still practiced in many parts of Africa.) They were then sold to Europeans and Americans directly or through Arab intermediaries. Most slaves that were brought to the American colonies, and later the United States, came under the British, Dutch, or Portuguese flags. A significant number of the slave traders were Jews. Similarly, most White Americans did not own slaves, and the ancestors of many current White citizens of the USA were not even resident in the country until after the Civil War and the end of slavery. Why should the latter pay for the former's actions?
Similarly, those White Americans who did own slaves were a small number concentrated in one section of the country, and augmented by both "Native American" and "free men of color" (mulattoes) who also owned African slaves. There were also, contrary to conventional wisdom, Whites who were slaves. Why not focus the demand for reparations on the heirs and descendants of the former group and include the heirs and descendants of the latter group in the share of the proposed booty?
Contrary to negro mythology and the claims of reparations activists, America was not built on the whip-lashed back of African slave labor. The overwhelming majority of black slaves labored in the fields. They did not pioneer the land from wilderness into farms and towns, they did not build the roads, bridges, canals, railroads, and skyscrapers of our great cities. They did not mine the coal, gold, silver, copper, and other minerals. They did not smelt the ore and stoke the furnaces and pour the molten steel to create the infrastructure of America's industrial base. They did not work in the factories and turn out the abundance of products that made this country's economy the envy of the world. They did not invent the automobile, the electric light, the camera, the radio, the airplane, the television, the microscope, the computer, the rifle, the sewing machine, or anything else you care to mention with the exception of peanut butter. They did not win this country by blood and arms, striving with and defeating the British, the Indians, the Mexicans, and anyone else who stood in our way. They picked cotton! And where you can cite exceptions, this insignificant minority was paid for their time and trouble just like their White compatriots. White men built this country, not African slaves.
Those negroes who have managed to become millionaires through their dubious "talents" would also receive reparations, making fat cats like Michael Jordan, Michael Jackson, Ophra Winfrey, Bill Cosby, Prince, Aretha Franklin, Whitney Houston, Colin Powell, Spike Lee, and any hip-hop thug you could mention even richer than the free enterprise system and the bad taste of millions of people, White as well as black, have already done.
Blacks should actually pay reparations to Whites for all the damage their very presence in this country has caused. Black athletes, with their trashtalk, smashmouth, jiveass dancing fits have destroyed White standards of sportsmanship. Black styles of attire, deportment and "music" has caused a degeneration in the morals, taste, and self-identity of White youth, resulting in the pathetic creature known as the 'wigger". Black crime rates have sent the US crime rate above the national average of any other civilized (i.e., White) society, with the exception of South Africa (same problem, more of it). Interracial rape is almost entirely black male on white female, and contrary to the liberal media's propaganda, interracial "hate crimes" are overwhelmingly a black-on-white phenomenon.
Negroes have turned our once great cities into unlivable hellholes of poverty, crime, and decay. Example: downtown Detroit looks like downtown Beirut. No conventional war produced that disaster area, only the slow-motion guerilla race war that occurs wherever negroes move into any area. It is no coincidence that the gradual and general decay of American society in all areas, from manners to sexual morality to drug addiction to welfare statism to street violence to sadistic crimes to ever more vulgar "entertainment" and ever more cacophonous "music" has risen (rather, fallen) in tandem with the progress of civil rights legislation and the increasing negroization of American culture. If you think a civilization can be built and sustained on jazz, blues, bas'etball, and drive-by shootings, you can support reparations. If not, you must oppose them.
Reparations are not a moral or ethical issue, they are power politics. Most White people sense this even if they haven't given it much thought. Do you really think that those influential interests pushing for this legalized blackmail of White America don't have an ulterior motive? Even Jesse Jackson knows that putting this vast amount of money in the hands of the black masses would be worse than useless if they are allowed to spend it without direction.
The negro elite and their White liberal traitor allies have every intention of making sure this money will be directed into a specific agenda, to dispossess and undermine what remains of the White political base in this country. Reparations are but one weapon in the arsenal of that force that has long desired to transform the United States into a multiracial melting pot and Whites into a powerless, dwindling minority in their own country. This force, that controls the black elite and the White liberals, happily uses the negroes as the club with which to beat Whites senseless. Reparations are theft! Reparations are war!
At least 80% of White Americans oppose reparations. How much longer do you think Whites will tolerate this madness? More and more of us are becoming fed up with negrophile politics. While Negro thugs kidnap, rape, rob, and murder Whites out of their own homes (Wichita), attacking Whites at random, just for fun (Seattle), or rampaging and looting an entire city as a form of "protest" (Cincinnati), fools have the audacity to prattle on about reparations.
No justice, no peace? It cuts both ways. The attempt to enforce reparations for negroes could well prove the spark that finally ignites a race war, or an armed uprising. If reparations will be paid, we Whites will be compensated in return: all negroes who accept reparations must be required to surrender their American citizenship, and repatriated to the lands of their origin, without possibility of return. It is, after all, the logical outcome of African-American pride and the demands for reparations.
If being torn away from Mother Africa to serve as slaves in a foreign land was the primal catastrophe that has crippled the black psyche for so long, as many Afrocentrics have claimed, then the only solution, the only possible healing is to return to the womb land. Marcus Garvey certainly thought so. A negro-free America will be the first giant step to reclaim our stolen heritage and the resumption of our interrupted journey to greatness. As the first American Revolution was sparked by the battle cry of "No taxation without representation!", for these reasons I say, No Black Reparations without Black Repatriation.
See also ReparationsCentral.com's excellent page Show Me Da Money.
The White Supporters of Black Reparations held a Special Conference. Make sure you see the packed audience photos!
Source: Michael A. Hoffman II ââ¬Â¢ Printed from National Vanguard ( [url]http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4740[/url] ) National Alliance ââ¬Â¢ Box 90 ââ¬Â¢ Hillsboro ââ¬Â¢ WV 24946 ââ¬Â¢ USA NationalVanguard.org
2005-03-25 02:18 | User Profile
Let's see -- if some segments of this nation had not practiced negro chattel slavery, none of the descendants of those slaves would exist. The contention that they are entitled to be paid damages implies that the harm they have suffered from the institition of slavery in the United States (and their predecesor colonies) exceeds the benefits they have received, including their very life. Rather strange, then, that suicide is not rampant among the negroes.
2005-03-25 02:55 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Contrary to negro mythology and the claims of reparations activists, America was not built on the whip-lashed back of African slave labor. The overwhelming majority of black slaves labored in the fields. They did not pioneer the land from wilderness into farms and towns, they did not build the roads, bridges, canals, railroads, and skyscrapers of our great cities. They did not mine the coal, gold, silver, copper, and other minerals. They did not smelt the ore and stoke the furnaces and pour the molten steel to create the infrastructure of America's industrial base. They did not work in the factories and turn out the abundance of products that made this country's economy the envy of the world. They did not invent the automobile, the electric light, the camera, the radio, the airplane, the television, the microscope, the computer, the rifle, the sewing machine, or anything else you care to mention with the exception of peanut butter. They did not win this country by blood and arms, striving with and defeating the British, the Indians, the Mexicans, and anyone else who stood in our way. They picked cotton! And where you can cite exceptions, this insignificant minority was paid for their time and trouble just like their White compatriots. White men built this country, not African slaves.[/QUOTE]
Most blacks in our nation today are nothing more than obsolete farm machinery.
2005-03-25 03:04 | User Profile
Should give money to blacks no more than we should give maney to Jews for the 1/2 million Jews killed by Herr Hitler.
Like, how far should ge go? should the Catholics sue the Romans for all the dead Christians? .....If anything the American Natives are the ones that should sue the US government for their stolen lands.
2005-03-26 03:36 | User Profile
The notion that Blacks are due some sort of compensation for the plight of their great-great-great grandparents was totally demolished by Prof. Michael Levin at the 2002 American Renaissance conference. I believe his speech was printed in a later issue of AR magazine, but I don't remember which one. For anyone interested, you can purchase a video of Levin's speech.
[url]http://www.amren.com/store/video.htm[/url]
2005-03-26 09:16 | User Profile
Blacks should actually pay reparations to Whites for all the damage their very presence in this country has caused.
That is true. Also, Western slavery was the best think to happen to Negro Africans. No where else were the treated better and had more opportunity to become civilized. As the Liberia experience proves, the uncivilized Negros of Africa could not stand the Americanized, civilized Negros.
2005-03-29 02:21 | User Profile
Solid as the argument may be that we don't owe blacks a damn thing, a few facts remain:
Most blacks in the U.S. are descendants of slaves.
As slaves, they were forced to labor for generations for free.
One and two have a powerful hold on the black mind which cannot be broken.
What I draw from the above, in concert with the overall genetic inferiority of blacks in general, is that blacks and whites simply cannot co-exist in America without whites paying a high price for the co-existence. I don't think that we white nationalists and other assorteds can dismiss slavery too quickly. We must first denounce it as wrong --- it surely is, even if our reasons for the denunciation differ from others' --- but we must also acknowledge it as a legitimate grievance. I'm serious here. Blacks may be dumb, but they get slavery and its implications. I also think the whole "nobody alive was ever a slave or a slave owner" thing, while funny, puts too deep a discount on the idea of collective racial guilt, an idea I'm into.
I believe Jews are collectively racially guilty of murdering white America, and so I think it's consistent to state that whites are guilty of collectively enslaving blacks in America for a time. As for my notion of reparations, they involve a shipment back to Africa, or some start-up money for a black homeland in the U.S. Sure, it'll slide into barbarism quickly, but not without peace of mind that the score was settled. We've spent trillions on these stone-age human packages of big-lipped, brillo-headed trouble for decades. We can painlesslessly spend a little more in order to extricate ourselves from the mess.
2005-03-30 01:10 | User Profile
Hugh,
I don't believe those things would have a powerful hold on the negro mind if they weren't constantly reminded in public schools, TV shows, movies, and by racist demagogues about them. The Irish and Chinese have gotten over their exploitation in early America, and the blacks should too.
Maintaining an attitude of "never forget, never forgive, never again" has made Jews and blacks quite a wretched couple of peoples, and fighting that attitude helps everybody including ourselves.
2005-03-30 20:34 | User Profile
I think that's true. I also think that what exacerbates whatever claims of past victimhood they have is their own plain inferiority. It is much more satisfying to channel anger over a lower standard of living toward the wrongdoing of whites than your own genetic maladaption. This in turn is very dangerous for whites because we're put in literal physical danger over misunderstandings about racial difference.
I am sympathetic to the mainstream conservative idea that we could do a lot simply by eliminating the racial bitching, especially of blacks and Hispanics. Some, though, say you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. In a sense, putting the crimper on their lips would be a healthy exercise of white power, and a vigorous but non-violent one at that. Achieving this, however, would require deep-rooted social power that we whites have not yet mustered. The liberal/Jewish media/academic establishment/court system etc. continues to give them a gilded platform, and we are powerless to stop that. We can't counter with the facts on race because we are shut out of the debate. So we as whites are essentially punching bags for angry blacks while Jews hold our hands behind our backs.