← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Okiereddust

Observations About Hannity Forum Access

Thread ID: 17379 | Posts: 15 | Started: 2005-03-18

Wayback Archive


Okiereddust [OP]

2005-03-18 05:44 | User Profile

I know Hannity is not the favorite here, but considering he is a genuinely national media figure (his own TV show) I thought it might be interesting testing the waters at his forum to see what he's doing and what people are saying. With my forum experience, a little browsing can equal 100 hours of boring TV listening to determine what his true attitudes are.

I've noticed however, that his forum is a member only forum. You have to register and login to see anything on the forum. Banning is obviously rather serious.

But that's not the only thing that really spooks me. As is my occasional practice when surfing unfriendly cyberspace (people tell me that I should do this all the time, but whatever) I turned on my anonymizer ([url]www.the-cloak.com[/url]) when I first checked on the site. Here I got a somewhat different message [QUOTE]You have been banned from the site [/QUOTE] So Hannity.com uses IP screening (and who knows what else) software. Well we can track it too of course, but restricting viewing to only known IP addresses - that reminds me of the early Liberty Post practice, but obviously going far beyond. Together with the members-only access - I don't know. :ph34r:

Clearly this guy isn't trying to masquerade as another Free Speech site, I'll go out on a limb and say that right now :lol:


Hugh Lincoln

2005-03-18 22:48 | User Profile

Oh, man, I was banned from Hannity some three or four times. I probably prompted the tougher measures. It was usually for pretty straightforward statements about the real reasons for the war and racial difference. With ABC (?) as the corporate daddy and other Disney tie-ins*, I'm sure it's got the ways and mean for super-duper political incorrectness patrol.

Funny, sometimes I'd see board "members" writing really glowing reviews of Disney movies and posting them. Hmmmmmmmmm.


Buster

2005-03-18 23:09 | User Profile

I consider Hannity an embarrassment to gentiles everywhere, and to Irish Catholics in particular. He is a transparent butt-munch who spends his life searching for the nearest Jewish anus in which to insert his nose. I can't stand listening to him.

Otherwise, he's ok.


travis

2005-03-19 00:45 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Buster]I consider Hannity an embarrassment to gentiles everywhere, and to Irish Catholics in particular.[/QUOTE]Do you think he is not Jewish just because he pretends to be an Irish Catholic? thousands of Jews have Irish names and ostensibly become Catholics.


Ponce

2005-03-19 02:33 | User Profile

[QUOTE=travis]Do you think he is not Jewish just because he pretends to be an Irish Catholic? thousands of Jews have Irish names and ostensibly become Catholics.[/QUOTE]

How does the old Jewish saying goes? "By deception we shall rule"?

You must remember that in Russia about 80% of those people did change their names in order to hide the fact that they were Jews.


madrussian

2005-03-19 03:47 | User Profile

Do they require a kosher certification over there?


Howard Campbell, Jr.

2005-03-19 05:03 | User Profile

[QUOTE=madrussian]Do they require a kosher certification over there?[/QUOTE]

His "liberal" sidekick, Alan Colmes, is Jewish--but always gets bullied into submission by fatheaded Sean...


madrussian

2005-03-19 05:54 | User Profile

I always thought he looked funny: being inbred does it to you.


Howard Campbell, Jr.

2005-03-19 06:05 | User Profile

[QUOTE=madrussian]I always thought he looked funny: being inbred does it to you.[/QUOTE]

Da, Zhids would exert an even stronger domination of Western Host populations if they weren't so physically unattractive a race...


Sertorius

2005-03-20 15:24 | User Profile

Buster,

Isn't that the truth. During the time the looting was going on during the "liberation" of Baghdad Sean was arguing with callers trying to justify the failure to deal with the looters. He came up with a number of reasons, none worth a damn, but my favorite was one he added almost as an afterthought.

"... and we were busy defending Israel!"

Ah, yes, this is the ultimate in justifications. That makes everything all right and it shows that Sean has his priorities straight. He also said we shouldn't be concerned about a few pots being broken in reference to the museum lootings.

At least he has quit whinning about the Inquisistion. :alucard:


Howard Campbell, Jr.

2005-03-20 19:45 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Sertorius]Buster,

Isn't that the truth. During the time the looting was going on during the "liberation" of Baghdad Sean was arguing with callers trying to justify the failure to deal with the looters. He came up with a number of reasons, none worth a damn, but my favorite was one he added almost as an afterthought.

"... and we were busy defending Israel!"

Ah, yes, this is the ultimate in justifications. That makes everything all right and it shows that Sean has his priorities straight. He also said we shouldn't be concerned about a few pots being broken in reference to the museum lootings.

At least he has quit whinning about the Inquisistion. :alucard:[/QUOTE]

Those museums held our ancient heritage--Mesopotamia was where Western Man first tamed crops; wrote laws and built major cities. Say what you will about Hussein, he was a good steward of those cultural treasures. :saddam:

"A few pots being broken", indeed...I'd love to bounce a few modern iron ones off that shabbos ape's skull of Hannity's...


Sertorius

2005-03-20 20:39 | User Profile

Howard,

It wouldn't do any good. To borrow an expression from Solzhenitsyn they haven't invented armored piercing rounds for bullet heads like that. Hannity's idea of civilization must be along the lines of National Review and the CPAC convention. Nothing else matters. His comments about "broken pots" simply show his ignorance. In fact it wasn't pots people were raising hell about, but cuniform tablets. IR has him named well. "Melon head" fits him like a glove.

That's true about Hussein and preserving antiquity. Some Iraqis cut the head off a statue with the idea of smuggling it out and selling it in the West. Hussein's police caught them and Hussein had their heads cut off.


Howard Campbell, Jr.

2005-03-21 01:58 | User Profile

That's true about Hussein and preserving antiquity. Some Iraqis cut the head off a statue with the idea of smuggling it out and selling it in the West. Hussein's police caught them and Hussein had their heads cut off.

"To let the punishment fit the crime, the punishment fit the crime..."


Sertorius

2005-03-21 02:48 | User Profile

Gilbert and Sullivan! :saddam:


Howard Campbell, Jr.

2005-03-21 02:54 | User Profile

:thumbsup:

[QUOTE=Sertorius]Gilbert and Sullivan! :saddam:[/QUOTE]

You get the Mercuria Award for allusion uptake, Brother...