← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Valley Forge
Thread ID: 17297 | Posts: 20 | Started: 2005-03-13
2005-03-13 21:29 | User Profile
Crazed Black Kills Four, Spares Black Female Guard by James Buchanan
Brian Nichols, a Black man accused of raping his ex-girlfriend and threatening her with a SUBMACHINEGUN, was not restrained or even carefully watched as he walked inside a Georgia courtroom. He easily overpowered a female courtroom guard, took her gun, killed the judge, killed the stenographer, killed a guard outside the building and killed another person while on the run.
Curiously, the five foot one inch tall Black female courtroom guard, who failed to stop Nichols, was not killed by him. She suffered only a scrape to her head when she was pushed down, which initial reports claimed was a gunshot wound. Why did Nichols spare the Black female guard while not hesitating to kill White people in his shooting spree?
White Southerners wanted a segregated society for their protection and the South was segregated for much of the 20th century. The Jews of course denied any racial differences between Blacks and Whites and endlessly claimed that segregation was an expression of hatred, not a necessary safety precaution. Jewish lawyers and political activists won the battle to end segregation. As a direct result thousands of Whites have been killed and millions of White women have been raped.
Most -if not all- of the victims of this crazed Black killer were White, but don't expect the Jewish media to make any observations about the race issue in this case. Why was this Black allowed out on bail for a crime as serious as rape or the even more alarming incident in which he threatened his ex-girlfriend with a submachinegun? Once again the legal system was far too lenient with a dangerous Black criminal and this time four people died.
An Associated Press article (Ref. 1) reports "Nichols got the semiautomatic pistol by overpowering the female deputy while he was being led down a corridor in the Fulton County Courthouse, Assistant Police Chief Alan Dreher said. After shooting the deputy in the face, the suspect then went to the courtroom, held about a dozen people at bay for a short time and shot and killed Superior Court Judge Rowland Barnes and court reporter Julie Brandau, authorities said. Another deputy, identified as Sgt. Hoyt Teasley, was later killed outside the courthouse when he confronted the suspect..."
[url]http://www.whitecivilrights.com/commentaries/viewnews.cgi?newsid1110615255,64092[/url],
2005-03-14 05:17 | User Profile
Teasley was black. Nichols saw his life spiraling downward and snapped. There, but for the grace of God, go I. I think when a person reaches this state-- of utter bleakness and madness-- there is an immediacy to how this person now sees the world (a sort of mental tunnel vision) which precludes focusing on things like race.
Initially I had hoped the authorities had ordered a flame-thrower be brought in case Nichols didn't surrender, or in case he did (fry him either way). I now view him and his case as tragic.
2005-03-14 06:11 | User Profile
Yes, the ape killed a black officer outside the courthouse.
2005-03-14 06:29 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jack Cassidy]Teasley was black. Nichols saw his life spiraling downward and snapped. There, but for the grace of God, go I. I think when a person reaches this state-- of utter bleakness and madness-- there is an immediacy to how this person now sees the world (a sort of mental tunnel vision) which precludes focusing on things like race.
Initially I had hoped the authorities had ordered a flame-thrower be brought in case Nichols didn't surrender, or in case he did (fry him either way). I now view him and his case as tragic.[/QUOTE]
He was one bold Muvv, at that.
Though the deaths were terrible, if he had been a White guy pulling off such a dramatic escape many here would put him in the ranks of Dillinger for his daring...
2005-03-14 06:37 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Howard Campbell, Jr.]He was one bold Muvv, at that.
Though the deaths were terrible, if he had been a White guy pulling off such a dramatic escape many here would put him in the ranks of Dillinger for his daring...[/QUOTE] Not me! I'd still consider him a murdering scumbag. As a matter of fact, he would be worse since, being White, he'd know better.
2005-03-14 06:41 | User Profile
[QUOTE=OPERA96]Not me! I'd still consider him a murdering scumbag. As a matter of fact, he would be worse since, being White, he'd know better.[/QUOTE]
What if he'd been a Political Prisoner imprisoned for a positive cause?
2005-03-14 16:31 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Howard Campbell, Jr.]What if he'd been a Political Prisoner imprisoned for a positive cause?[/QUOTE]
What if his name was Frank N. Beans and he escaped using his incredible FartRocket?
The guy was a murdering psycho who killed a woman, a judge and a law officer. His escape was due to some basic facts:
Finding anything admirable about murders of women and law enforcement personnel- no matter what your thoughts are about their profession- is in my opinion an indicator of some messed up values.
And Dillinger was a punk who deserved worse than he got.
2005-03-14 16:36 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Howard Campbell, Jr.]What if he'd been a Political Prisoner imprisoned for a positive cause?[/QUOTE]
What if his name was Frank N. Beans and he escaped using his incredible FartRocket?
The guy was a murdering psycho who killed a woman, a judge and a law officer. His escape was due to some basic facts:
Finding anything admirable about murders of women and law enforcement personnel- no matter what your thoughts are about their profession- is in my opinion an indicator of some messed up values.
And Dillinger was a punk who deserved worse than he got.
2005-03-14 16:42 | User Profile
I would say that the main reason he escaped was that he didn't get the memo about how 'we all be equal', and was able to easily overpower the female guard. If only he were a little more enlightened, he would have known that a 5'1" woman is exactly as able to kick ass as any man (as Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Xena, X-Men, etc. etc. etc. demonstrate) and that it is just HATE to think otherwise. His escape shows what a terrible sexist he is. :wink:
2005-03-14 17:00 | User Profile
The one hostage he spared, who talked him into turning himself in, was white.
And the guy who went apeshit in Wisconsin and killed 7 was white. Hey, he had even [I]less [/I] provocation than Nichols orr the Lefkow killer....
2005-03-14 20:49 | User Profile
[QUOTE=OPERA96]Not me! I'd still consider him a murdering scumbag. As a matter of fact, he would be worse since, being White, he'd know better.[/QUOTE] Maybe I'm slowly going insane, because when I heard the term "murder" ("murderer") used in reference to the killing of the judge, court reporter, and/or deputy, I thought it was odd (kind of like "terrorists" used to describe Iraqis attacking U.S. troops). I know murder is merely a legal term and I am against anyone being killed, especially judges, who perform a valuable function in orderly society. But, I kind of view the justice system as a sort of victor over vanquished type situation, and if you are are going down for the rest of your life are you going to be like some docile little lamb or go down swinging? And I view anyone connected with the law and order side of this criminal justice system fair game for someone for whom it has become a survival, life or death, situation.
Nichols was stupid because he misjudged the situation. My bet is that he would've been out within 3 to 6 years if convicted. And if he had known about the judge what we now know, he would have had a chance to explain himself and his actions in a self-deprecating and ameliorative way, and it would've been taken to heart by the judge. Maybe I'm a little out of touch, but I view the rape of a current girlfriend, fiancee, or wife as fully different from the rape of a stranger or acquaintance. Likewise an equal level of mitigation should be given to any concomitant crimes (e.g., posession of gun, kidnapping, et al.).
2005-03-14 21:23 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jack Cassidy]Maybe I'm slowly going insane, because when I heard the term "murder" ("murderer") used in reference to the killing of the judge, court reporter, and/or deputy, I thought it was odd (kind of like "terrorists" used to describe Iraqis attacking U.S. troops). I know murder is merely a legal term and I am against anyone being killed, especially judges, who perform a valuable function in orderly society. But, I kind of view the justice system as a sort of victor over vanquished type situation, and if you are are going down for the rest of your life are you going to be like some docile little lamb or go down swinging? And I view anyone connected with the law and order side of this criminal justice system fair game for someone for whom it has become a survival, life or death, situation.
Nichols was stupid because he misjudged the situation. My bet is that he would've been out within 3 to 6 years if convicted. And if he had known about the judge what we now know, he would have had a chance to explain himself and his actions in a self-deprecating and ameliorative way, and it would've been taken to heart by the judge. Maybe I'm a little out of touch, but I view the rape of a current girlfriend, fiancee, or wife as fully different from the rape of a stranger or acquaintance. Likewise an equal level of mitigation should be given to any concomitant crimes (e.g., posession of gun, kidnapping, et al.).[/QUOTE]
Hey Jack, couple of questions: - Do you have daughters? - Ever done time?
2005-03-14 21:41 | User Profile
Jack, you sure are attributing a finely-tuned reasoning process to an enraged black man. You should read Richard Lynn's American Renaissance article on black pathological behavior --- especially the part about lack of impulse control. Here in NYC a year or so back, a black buddy-turned-enemy of a city councilman snuck his gun into council chambers and gunned down the councilman before being tackled. What's going on here is that blacks are significantly more likely to explode in violence than white men are, the Wisconsin nutjob notwithstanding. It's not better courthouse security we need --- it's better racial security.
Post-Script: the black gunman in Georgia was quoted as saying, "America has declared war on me," pre-rampage. To me, this sounds like a Black Man In America (TM) strutting his Calypso Louis white-devils-is-out-ta-get-me strut. Definitely racial.
2005-03-14 21:43 | User Profile
[QUOTE=weisbrot]Hey Jack, couple of questions: - Do you have daughters? - Ever done time?[/QUOTE] I didn't say that rape of a current girlfriend, or fiancee, should not be prosecuted, I was merely suggesting that a long-term, current relationship should definitely be a mitigating factor. Is this so absurd? If so I'm always willing to change my mind.
2005-03-14 22:22 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Hugh Lincoln]Jack, you sure are attributing a finely-tuned reasoning process to an enraged black man. You should read Richard Lynn's American Renaissance article on black pathological behavior --- especially the part about lack of impulse control. Here in NYC a year or so back, a black buddy-turned-enemy of a city councilman snuck his gun into council chambers and gunned down the councilman before being tackled. What's going on here is that blacks are significantly more likely to explode in violence than white men are, the Wisconsin nutjob notwithstanding. It's not better courthouse security we need --- it's better racial security.
Post-Script: the black gunman in Georgia was quoted as saying, "America has declared war on me," pre-rampage. To me, this sounds like a Black Man In America (TM) strutting his Calypso Louis white-devils-is-out-ta-get-me strut. Definitely racial.[/QUOTE]Look, you're preaching to the choir. Of course blacks are much more hostile and criminally-minded, but I think Nichols is not your average hostile street congoid. I'm no psychologist, but his comments about being a soldier and "America has declared war on me" seem to me that he did have a grasp of what he had done in taking the lives of four human beings, and by creating a scenario in his head and/or articulating that he was a soldier in a war seems to me a perfect way to alleviate the grave mental anquish. I think I'd do the same thing. There are guys walking around the streets of America who have killed hundreds of times more people than Nichols, and have gotten ribbons and adulation for doing so. Who do you have more contempt for, Nichols in his desperate last gasp as his life is spiraling downward in a fast way, or some smug B-52 pilot who dropped hundreds of cluster bombs on young, white Christian Serb boys, killing and maiming hundreds of them as they group in an open field in an internal conflict to defend their homeland against Musli monkeys?? The latter guy is strutting around like he's some great warrior and patriot, beaming as he brings his FReeper-megadittos wife and children off to Sunday services at the Evangelical church they probably attend, as some Serb mother lays flowers and icons at the grave of her young boy, or another Serb mother lovingly attends to her son's needs as he lies in bed-- for the past six years so far-- with brain trauma. Please, I can't muster up too much anger at Brian Nichols, especially when I know he has shown more remorse than all the white-Christian-slaughtering military marauders put together.
2005-03-17 21:25 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Hugh Lincoln]To me, this sounds like a Black Man In America (TM) strutting his Calypso Louis white-devils-is-out-ta-get-me strut. Definitely racial.[/QUOTE]
I was right!
Revenge on system cited as motive for rampage Nichols saw himself as 'soldier on a mission'
By BETH WARREN The Atlanta Journal-Constitution Published on: 03/15/05
Brian G. Nichols considered himself a "soldier on a mission" the day he terrorized a courthouse and a city with a gun, according to a law enforcement official who witnessed Nichols' first statement to authorities.
The official said Nichols, who was being tried in a rape case when Friday's deadly shooting spree occurred, considered himself a wrongly accused man in a legal system unfair to African-Americans.
After his capture Saturday afternoon, Nichols gave a three-hour statement to local, federal and state law enforcement agents at FBI headquarters in DeKalb County.
In an interview with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the official said Nichols described how he had been stewing in jail while awaiting retrial on charges that he held his ex-girlfriend hostage and sexually assaulted her. The first jury couldn't agree and the judge declared a mistrial.
Nichols said he was angry that many of the inmates around him were also black and he wondered how many were innocent.
"He called it systematic slavery," the law enforcement official said. Nichols didn't feel he was mistreated by deputies at the jail or courthouse, the official said. But he also didn't care that the deputies he would soon hurt were black. His anger was focused more on the legal system than race. And the main target was Superior Court Judge Rowland Barnes, who was preparing to resume hearing Nichols' rape trial.
Just before 9 a.m. Friday, Nichols was transported from the Fulton County Jail to a holding area of the Fulton County Justice Center Tower, a new addition to the Fulton County Courthouse in downtown Atlanta.
He told officials he felt like a "soldier" when he slammed sheriff's Deputy Cynthia Hall to the concrete floor of a courthouse holding cell.
After knocking Hall unconscious, Nichols told authorities, he strolled across a skybridge to the older part of the courthouse complex to find Barnes, who was in his courtroom hearing a civil case.
Nichols said he first headed to Barnes' chambers, where he herded four hostages before entering the courtroom. He opened a private door behind Barnes' bench, approached the judge and fired, he told investigators.
Nichols said the attack wasn't personal. In fact, he told authorities he thought Barnes had been fair to him during court proceedings. Julie Ann Brandau, the judge's court reporter, stood up to check on Barnes, and Nichols said he shot her in the head before making his escape, the law enforcement official said.
As Nichols ran from the courthouse, he turned and fired at Deputy Hoyt Teasley, who was pursuing him across Martin Luther King Drive, the official recounted. Teasley died of his wounds.
Nichols said his flight took him to a downtown Atlanta garage where he carjacked Journal-Constitution reporter Don O'Briant. Nichols told police he struck O'Briant, whom he called "a civilian casualty," because the reporter used a racial slur.
O'Briant said Nichols pistol-whipped him because he refused orders to get in the trunk.
"The only other thing I said besides 'No' is 'Please,' " O'Briant said Monday. "When someone has a gun pointed at you, the last thing you're going to do is taunt them. All I was trying to do was get away."
Nichols eventually made his way by public transit to Lenox Road, where he found another carjacking victim, U.S. customs agent David Wilhelm, who was working on his house.
Nichols told police Wilhelm identified himself as a federal agent, which prompted him to kill the man.
The account witnessed by the law enforcement official is similar to what Nichols told his last hostage, Ashley Smith, 26. But Smith said Nichols told her he didn't want to kill Wilhelm but had to when the agent fought back.
Nichols, who is in Fulton County custody, is expected to appear today before a magistrate for a brief hearing. A judge will explain that he is being held without bond on the pending rape charges.
Murder charges in the shooting spree are expected but not today, according to Erik Friedly, a spokesman for the Fulton County district attorney's office.
2005-03-18 07:13 | User Profile
Jack Cassidy, maybe we can figure out where you thinking process has gone a little astray by asking why you don't consider Muslim Terrorists, Muslim Terrorists. The continuous brainwashing with buzzwords like "neocons" and "ZOG" can possibly cause this viewpoint in regards to the middle east and you are then simply carrying it over to the USA. From an objective viewpoint, clearly the rapist/mass murderer is indeed a Black Terrorist since he tried to undermine the system of law and order in the USA of behalf of Blacks who are in prison for serving notice on society they are unfit to be amongst us.
Obviously Clinton's order to bomb Serb targets was a tragic "wag the dog" trick to distract from his pathetic Monica situation or it might have been an actual mistake. Either way it only embolded the Muslims; the enemies of civilization.
2005-03-18 08:42 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Snouter] From an objective viewpoint, clearly the rapist/mass murderer is indeed a Black Terrorist since he tried to undermine the system of law and order in the USA of behalf of Blacks who are in prison for serving notice on society they are unfit to be amongst us.
.[/QUOTE] You are completely correct. This guy said he wanted to strike back at the system for slavery and racism and then he killed a judge, among others. Why, isn't he classified as a "domestic terrorist" Why isn't he being labeled as such in the Jewsmedia? His stated motivations certain fit that classification. Why does he get a pass because he is a precious nigger?
2005-03-18 18:58 | User Profile
Because a strong brotha who blows away a white judge, white court reporter and assorted white local law enforcers is barely a nuisance to the Jewish power core. No, they wouldn't want that to happen to them. Sure, it's terrible, they'd say. But this is basically a black engraged at what Jews continue to see as a white gentile power structure -- a fellow "underdog" against a common "overdog." A black man on trial for rape is a black man in the clutches of the Old South, cracker sheriffs, unforgiving white judges, uptight and sexually repressed white Christians and unduly fearful white women. All of this, Jews laugh at, and deep down don't get exercised about attacks upon. "Hah. Looks like a few dumb Southern crackers didn't count on a black man with an attitude. Good for him." In other words, they consider Nichols' shooting an attack on a system in which they have a stake, or they control.
This is quite unlike Islamic terrorism, which is aimed at a big white/American puppet while operated by Jewish marionetteers. Or suspicion that a "white supremacist" is behind the killing of a federal judge. All of this will garner great media attention and troop strength. They have a very pronounced stake in the federal system, because that is the tool they use to advance their pro-Israel foreign policy and their domestic campaign of white gentile destabilization through forced racial integration, housing acts and anti-discrimination laws.
2005-03-18 19:32 | User Profile
[QUOTE]if you are are going down for the rest of your life are you going to be like some docile little lamb or go down swinging?[/QUOTE] This is straight out of Hobbes's "Leviathan", chapters 13-15.