← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Brooke
Thread ID: 17252 | Posts: 50 | Started: 2005-03-11
2005-03-11 18:44 | User Profile
[url=http://judicial-inc.biz/Bush_Mossad11.htm][B]A look into WW2 leaders and their bloodlines[/B][/url]
Genealogy charts, pictures, etc.
2005-03-11 21:01 | User Profile
A lot of that is conjecture and unfounded speculation at best. Stalin's mother was very religious, in fact, I would like to see it demonstrated that Stalin or any of the others did anything that they did because of a distant Jewish ancestor (if they even had any of them). There is a funny anecdote involving this. In the 1930s Stalin and some of his associates went to Georgia, and while they were there, they stopped to see Stalin's mother, whom he hadn't visited in years. If my memory is right, it may have been 30-40 years, anyhow, it had been a long time. Stalin's mother asked him what sort of work he was doing. He replied, "Do you remember the Czar? Now I am sort of like the Czar." She responded "So-so (his nickname), you should have been a priest."
2005-03-12 12:23 | User Profile
[URL=http://www.worldhistory.com/wiki/A/Alois-Hitler.htm]Here's an interesting discussion [/URL] of Adolf Hitler's questionable ancestry. The article concludes that it's most likely that AH was NOT Jewish, but the question remains open.
2005-03-22 15:38 | User Profile
Hitler wasn't Jewish. But his Luftwaffe operations chief Field Marshall Erhard Milch was on his father's side...Milch was Goering's right hand man in the Air Ministry.
Source:
Justice at Nuremberg, Robert E. Conot, 1983, Carroll & Graf P.330. Himmler, Peter Padfield, 1990, MJF Books P.375. Phoenix Triumphant: The Rise and Rise of the Luftwaffe, E. R. Hooton, 1994, Arms & Armour Press P.97.
'We live in an age where the ridicule of Blacks is forbidden, where anti-Semitism is punishable by political death, but where Christian bashing is a popular indoor sport; and films mocking Jesus Christ are considered avant-garde' ~Pat Buchanan~
2005-04-10 00:00 | User Profile
I have no official proof at the moment, but I highly doubt Winston Churchil was Jewish. In fact that whole article seems like propaganda Bullsh-it....
2005-04-10 03:04 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis][URL=http://www.worldhistory.com/wiki/A/Alois-Hitler.htm]Here's an interesting discussion [/URL] of Adolf Hitler's questionable ancestry. The article concludes that it's most likely that AH was NOT Jewish, but the question remains open.[/QUOTE] Question remains open? That might be going a bit too far - but if it could be shown that he was - all I can say is - we need more like him.
2005-04-10 17:53 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Walter Yannis][url="http://www.worldhistory.com/wiki/A/Alois-Hitler.htm"]Here's an interesting discussion [/url]of Adolf Hitler's questionable ancestry. The article concludes that it's most likely that AH was NOT Jewish, but the question remains open.[/QUOTE]More likely just another plate of crapola served up by the same crowd who brought us the one-testicled, dope fiend "virgin" Adolf Hitler who sired children by his own niece. The spin on this one seems to be the ol' self-hating jew routine.
Wish they'd make up their minds already, this is all getting very confusing...
2005-04-11 02:45 | User Profile
[color=#0000ff]"The silence in mainstream America concerning Jews is simply deafening. The old adage has it that, when visiting a foreign country, to ascertain who really runs things, one need only determine who is spoken about in whispers....if at all.[/color] "
[color=blue]- Edgar J. Steele[/color]
No one really speaks about Skull and Bones and the WASP elite either......
The Jews are a big problem in my estimation, but there still is a very large white/wasp/gentile power base in America and the rest of the world.
Two Words: Bill Gates..... NOT A JEW!
Remember, Ole Bill has over 100 billion dollars more than the next wealthiest Jew. And any WASP of his caliber is definaely race conscious and aware of Jewdom.
2005-04-11 02:49 | User Profile
And by the way, Roosavelt and Churchill were not Jews.....:smartass: nor did they have any jewish descent. Churchill was one of the most openly anti-jewish european leaders of the 20th century. Why do you think George W. likes him so much...:cool:
2005-04-11 03:21 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel][color=#0000ff]"The silence in mainstream America concerning Jews is simply deafening. The old adage has it that, when visiting a foreign country, to ascertain who really runs things, one need only determine who is spoken about in whispers....if at all.[/color] "
[color=blue]- Edgar J. Steele[/color]
No one really speaks about Skull and Bones and the WASP elite either......
The Jews are a big problem in my estimation, but there still is a very large white/wasp/gentile power base in America and the rest of the world.
Two Words: Bill Gates..... NOT A JEW!
Remember, Ole Bill has over 100 billion dollars more than the next wealthiest Jew. And any WASP of his caliber is definaely race conscious and aware of Jewdom.[/QUOTE]Yeah, too bad no one's in on how how bad S&B and the WASP Elite's been wrecking havoc on all things Western for the past two thousand years, huh? Almost have done as much damage to our society as The Illuninati, IMHO.
Get real -- the quote speaks the absolute truth pertaining to....(sshh! you know who! :caiphas: ). NO GENTILE is allowed to question ANYTHING done in the name of jewry -- whether domestic or int'l. Hell, in Canada and in half of Europe you can't even argue certain aspects of their history -- the so-called Holocaust being the perfect example -- without the possibility of a prison sentence hanging over your head. What's up with that??? I've yet to receive a satisfactory answer from apologists such as yourself as to why, in half a dozen European countries and Canada, laws prohibit the open denial of Holocaust assertions under penalty of imprisonment. And all of these countries are supposed to be democracies with freedom of speech and press. You can deny ANY other event ever recorded in history -- no matter how horrific -- but you can not deny the "official" version of The Holocaust.
Are you going to tell me that you can publicly and fairly debate The Holocaust or who's really at fault in the ME right now? And if you cannot speak openly of the "Jewish Question"....then why is this so, if not for the fear of retribution at the hands of the Jews and their willing Gentile underlings?
2005-04-11 04:06 | User Profile
Dude, I agree with you about the Jewish problem. I think it is rediculous how their history is swept under the rug in Western Society. However, Jews don't rule American government or American government decison making. They do have an over represented influence though. We all know about the Jewish Lobby and the disproportionate amount of Jewish millionaires and billionaires, and the Jewish global bank.
My point is, is that there are plenty of wealthy/powerful gentiles and prominant gentiles in Politics that are race conscious. These people did not make large amounts of money being stupid dumb-a-ss.' Any wealthy businessman has dealt with Jews and knows their ways. The Fox News channel is an example of reverse brainwashing and it is spearheaded by the gentile Rupert Murdoch -- definately an anti-Jewish media power. I listed Bill Gates as a gentile example because he has more wealth and power than just about any Jew I can think of. And he is your typical WASP who I'm sure was fathered into dislike for the Jews. And I think Mel Gibson struck the fear of God in just about every Jew with The Passion.
Back to my point: There is a Jewish problem, but have some faith in your own people, there are plenty of us who have money and power and are very aware.
2005-04-11 04:08 | User Profile
By the way, Fox News has invaded Canada.
2005-04-11 20:21 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Julian the Apostate]Question remains open? That might be going a bit too far - but if it could be shown that he was - all I can say is - we need more like him.[/QUOTE]
One would think that genetic tests could finally resolve the dispute, no?
Has that ever been done?
2005-04-11 21:51 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel] Jews don't rule American government or American government decison making. [/QUOTE]Come again???
Both of us are new here, but only one of us, apparently, is new to the extent of Jewish chicanery in US/Western domestic and foreign affairs...
You really should check into just how deeply Zionists and their lobbies, well-financed orgs, and The Holocaust industry have influenced Western decision-making at the highest levels of federal govt. Not to mention the overwhelming influence Jews exert in the media, academia, and finance. I think you'll be both astounded and alarmed by what you find.
2005-04-11 22:25 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel]
My point is, is that there are plenty of wealthy/powerful gentiles and prominant gentiles in Politics that are race conscious. [/QUOTE]But not a damned one of them will name the jew -- unless re-election is not an option. And even then it's an extremely rare act of belated political courage. Last pol I can recall doing it -- albeit mildly -- was outgoing US Senator Fritz Hollings of South Carolina. Read --
[url="http://www.thestate.com/mld/state/news/opinion/8609339.htm"]http://www.thestate.com/mld/state/news/opinion/8609339.htm[/url]
also --
[url="http://www.ihr.org/news/040716_hollings.shtml"]http://www.ihr.org/news/040716_hollings.shtml[/url]
No Western politician makes it to the big leagues without acknowledging and obeying Jewish power. American presidents are scared to death of offending Israeli/Jewish sensitivities in the slightest. Remember that.
Again -- educate yourself.
2005-04-12 04:07 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel]Churchill was one of the most openly anti-jewish european leaders of the 20th century.[/QUOTE]
WTF? Compared to Hitler and Mussolini? Maybe you mean "one of the most openly anti-jewish european leaders of the 20th century in a country that was traditionally philosemitic" or something, because otherwise that makes no sense.
2005-04-12 10:26 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel] Churchill was one of the most openly anti-jewish european leaders of the 20th century. Why do you think George W. likes him so much...:cool:[/QUOTE]This makes even less sense.
2005-04-12 20:18 | User Profile
[QUOTE=RowdyRoddyPiper]WTF? Compared to Hitler and Mussolini? Maybe you mean "one of the most openly anti-jewish european leaders of the 20th century in a country that was traditionally philosemitic" or something, because otherwise that makes no sense.[/QUOTE] I didn't mean Churchil was openly anti-semetic to the point of genecide! I just meant that he was very open with his anti-semetic mindset. England as I'm sure you know also has a long negative history with the Jews -- as Jews were excommunicated from England on several occasions in not so distant history... You don't have to a mastermind of genecide to be openly very anti-semetic...
2005-04-12 20:22 | User Profile
Ledhead,
George Bush has been quoted as saying that Churchil was one of the greatest political leaders of the 20th century. And in turn, Churchil was very openly anti-semetic. Thus, George is in essence stating that a anti-semite was one of the greatest political leaders of our time....
2005-04-12 20:30 | User Profile
And please don't give me any propaganda garbage that George W. is controlled by the Jews. The Bush administration is not just spreading democracy in the Middle East to secure Isreal from crazy Arabs. A democratized Middles East will safe guard white people economically and national security-wise, just as much as will help the Jews.
Not to mention that Kerry still got about 80% of the Jewish vote. That hints that the Bush administration is not in Iraq soley because of the Omniciently, Omnipresent, all knowing, conspiratory Jews....
2005-04-12 20:57 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ledhead V-2]Come again???
Both of us are new here, but only one of us, apparently, is new to the extent of Jewish chicanery in US/Western domestic and foreign affairs...
You really should check into just how deeply Zionists and their lobbies, well-financed orgs, and The Holocaust industry have influenced Western decision-making at the highest levels of federal govt. Not to mention the overwhelming influence Jews exert in the media, academia, and finance. I think you'll be both astounded and alarmed by what you find.[/QUOTE]I have educated myself on these matters, and I am well aware of Jewish influence on Western Civilization. But you seem to carry the attitude that prominant gentiles are helpless to this phenomenon and are doing nothing about it.
You still haven't responed to my thoughts on the Fox News channel. And really aside from Finance and the Media, Corporate America is largely gentile controlled. A few examples: oil, steel, software, construction, automobile industry (and everyone knows the best engineers are German), airlines -- the list goes on.
And yeah there are a tone of annoying Jewish lawyers, but there just a bunch of annoying pompous upper-middleclassmen who don't exert much influence outside of Miami and New York.
And as far as no gentile politician saying anything negative about the Jews, I mean that is basically just politics. In the information age, you cannot say anything racially negative against any race. Jewish politicians can't get away with saying, "The WASP elite -- Skull and Bones conspiratorily runs America." You see, political correctness really works both ways.
2005-04-12 21:51 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel]Ledhead,
George Bush has been quoted as saying that Churchil was one of the greatest political leaders of the 20th century. And in turn, Churchil was very openly anti-semetic. Thus, George is in essence stating that a anti-semite was one of the greatest political leaders of our time....[/QUOTE]Churchill was [u]not[/u] "very openly anitisemetic" (sic), by anyone's standards. He was probably the biggest proponent in the UK of fighting a world war in the name of international Jewry -- to appease Jewry, at the cost of hundreds of thousands of his own countrymen's lives. A war the Juden Elite of both Europe and the US wanted since AH assumed control of the Reich. And here we have the notorious anti-semite, Winston Churchill, steering his nation and the rest of the world into a conflict that would ultimately claim roughly 50 million lives.
You, my man, are woefully misinformed.
(Can we get a Brit or two's opinion on the well-known anti-semitism of Winnie? Thanks).
2005-04-12 21:55 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel]And please don't give me any propaganda garbage that George W. is controlled by the Jews. The Bush administration is not just spreading democracy in the Middle East to secure Isreal from crazy Arabs. A democratized Middles East will safe guard white people economically and national security-wise, just as much as will help the Jews.
Not to mention that Kerry still got about 80% of the Jewish vote. That hints that the Bush administration is not in Iraq soley because of the Omniciently, Omnipresent, all knowing, conspiratory Jews....[/QUOTE]I'm [u]not[/u] going to start from square one with you on this. (Why me, Lord?! I'm a newbie here...)
Like I said -- educate yourself!
2005-04-12 21:58 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel]I have educated myself on these matters, and I am well aware of Jewish influence on Western Civilization. But you seem to carry the attitude that prominant gentiles are helpless to this phenomenon and are doing nothing about it.
You still haven't responed to my thoughts on the Fox News channel. And really aside from Finance and the Media, Corporate America is largely gentile controlled. A few examples: oil, steel, software, construction, automobile industry (and everyone knows the best engineers are German), airlines -- the list goes on.
And yeah there are a tone of annoying Jewish lawyers, but there just a bunch of annoying pompous upper-middleclassmen who don't exert much influence outside of Miami and New York.
And as far as no gentile politician saying anything negative about the Jews, I mean that is basically just politics. In the information age, you cannot say anything racially negative against any race. Jewish politicians can't get away with saying, "The WASP elite -- Skull and Bones conspiratorily runs America." You see, political correctness really works both ways.[/QUOTE]goodbye, Winslow...
2005-04-12 23:45 | User Profile
Ledhead,
Did not Germany physically attack England by launching missles into England's capital city -- London. I highly doubt England's (Churchill's) retaliation against Germany was a product of international Jewery. Although, I have no doubt jews helped finance Churchil's efforts.
And the rest of your argumentation is weak. You come across like you have this superior knowledge of Western events, than fail to answer my strongest arguments: Again, what are your thoughts on Fox News, and the fact that aside from Finance and Media, corporate america is largely gentile controlled. Please enlighten me with your superior knowledge. I am ready for the revelation!
2005-04-13 00:12 | User Profile
Deadhead,
This may be a propaganda article (articles that have probably influenced you way too much), but it was the quickest one I could find. Read it and weep Heinrick.
[url="http://www.stormfront.org/whitehistory/hwr61ii.htm"]http://www.stormfront.org/whitehistory/hwr61ii.htm[/url]
2005-04-13 00:44 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel]Ledhead,
Did not Germany physically attack England by launching missles into England's capital city -- London. I highly doubt England's (Churchill's) retaliation against Germany was a product of international Jewery. Although, I have no doubt jews helped finance Churchil's efforts.
And the rest of your argumentation is weak. You come across like you have this superior knowledge of Western events, than fail to answer my strongest arguments: Again, what are your thoughts on Fox News, and the fact that aside from Finance and Media, corporate america is largely gentile controlled. Please enlighten me with your superior knowledge. I am ready for the revelation![/QUOTE]You're either a twit or a troll, Winslow, I can't figure out which. I did'nt come to OD to go at it with a lemming the likes of you -- I'm here for the intelligent conversation this board's renowned for in the pro-White corner of cyberspace.
You've put up some incredibly naive posts in this thread alone (I have'nt braced myself to take a gander at what other nonsense you've posted elsewhere on the board), and I'll be damned if I'm going to let some smug, fence-sitting neophyte goad me into a flame contest. Find someone else, Cap'n, I'm simply not taking the bait.
Is it my fault that you're totally ignorant regarding the Jew and his history of power and treachery in the affairs of the West? You think I'm acting "superior" and that I'm on the wrong track? Tell you what: why don't you ask the opinion(s) of anyone else posting on this board? You, have a lot to learn, my friend...
You can take this response in whatever way you choose -- it simply makes no difference to me. I'll even concede the argument. How's that?
So, one more time --
goodbye, Winslow
2005-04-13 01:19 | User Profile
Okay DungeonMaster,
You obviously cannot take 3 minutes of time out of your third reich role playing game, and address any arguments that go beyond the scope of your subjective propagandized viewpoint. Remember, if you can only hang with your own style of people then your arguments will never get more thourough or more sophisticated. I'm starting to see why the Gentile IQ is below that of the vermin jew: Because dunmbass twits like you take these tests and bring down the average gentile score.
You think I'm naive. You have no idea who I am or where I come from or the extent of my education or role in international business (and no I'm not jewish).
You pathetic creep. You will bitch and propagandize all you want about jews. And you know what, nothing will change. The only way to change what you don't like is to be a mover and shaker, aquire personal wealth, and then exert the power and influence that wealth allows.
Like I said, go back to your white trash nazi role playing game, and beat-off while you fantasize about a 21st century holocaust. You bald-ass, tatooed, leather boot wearing, twit.......
2005-04-13 01:31 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel]Okay DungeonMaster,
You obviously cannot take 3 minutes of time out of your third reich role playing game, and address any arguments that go beyond the scope of your subjective propagandized viewpoint. Remember, if you can only hang with your own style of people then your arguments will never get more thourough or more sophisticated. I'm starting to see why the Gentile IQ is below that of the vermin jew: Because dunmbass twits like you take these tests and bring down the average gentile score.
You think I'm naive. You have no idea who I am or where I come from or the extent of my education or role in international business (and no I'm not jewish).
You pathetic creep. You will bitch and propagandize all you want about jews. And you know what, nothing will change. The only way to change what you don't like is to be a mover and shaker, aquire personal wealth, and then exert the power and influence that wealth allows.
Like I said, go back to your white trash nazi role playing game, and beat-off while you fantasize about a 21st century holocaust. You bald-ass, tatooed, leather boot wearing, twit.......[/QUOTE]Thanks, Winslow, for showing your true colors...
I rest my case. :thumbsup:
2005-04-13 01:49 | User Profile
Yeah, you rest your case that you have no substantive arguments to anything I said except your subjective propagandized banter. You have not specifically addressed any of my argumentative examples with convincing examples of your own. Dude, Hitler would have put you on the front line at Normandy, and you would have questioned nothing.
And you banter about being pro-white. You must go deeper than just being "white" in deciphering world events. In WW II, America was fighting the Saxons, America is controlled by the Anglo-Saxons. There is a difference. But like I said, you your IQ is but that of a white trash Welshman who brings down our high Anglo-Saxon score.....
2005-04-13 01:54 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel] But like I said, you your IQ is but that of a white trash Welshman who brings down our high Anglo-Saxon score.....[/QUOTE]You really should stop before you embarrass yourself any further, Winslow. You've repeatedly made mention of high IQ's, but, have you taken the time to actually go over the piss-poor use of diction you've exhibited in this thread? Seriously...
2005-04-13 01:56 | User Profile
List examples.
2005-04-13 02:11 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel]Deadhead,
This may be a propaganda article (articles that have probably influenced you way too much), but it was the quickest one I could find. Read it and weep Heinrick.
[url="http://www.stormfront.org/whitehistory/hwr61ii.htm"]http://www.stormfront.org/whitehistory/hwr61ii.htm[/url][/QUOTE] List examples of your piss-poor diction? You mean like this, Winslow? While you sit there scratching your pointed little head, I'll address the post. Okay?
Did you by chance actually READ what you've posted? And If so, did you happen to notice the year in which Churchill had written his piece...1920? Many Western observers of the Russian Revolution knew of, and wrote about, the overwhelming Jewish representation in the leadership ranks of the Party. Many were alarmed by it. That's hardly "anti-semitism", now is it? (Of course, by today's journalistic standards, such articles would be considered "hate speech", no doubt). Don't forget, AH and his anti-semitic views would not arrive on the scene for almost another decade at least. Churchill whined about Jews and communism -- Adolf Hitler meant to do something about them. Therein lies the difference.
You still have'nt answered my question, Winslow: Why, if Churchill was such a notorious anti-semite, did he lead the rush to enter the West into a conflict totally fought for, and instigated by, international Jewry? (Oh, and btw -- f**k your "question" about what I think of Fox Network "invading" Canada. I'm sure Canadian Jews are thinking, "Oi, Sol! The Nazis are everyvhere! Vhat are vee goingk to do? With Reichfuhrer Murdoch and his gang of goosestepping reporters and cameramen -- it's off again to the showers for us!")
Later,
Heinrick (LOL!)
2005-04-13 02:37 | User Profile
Didn't I give the disclaimer (and I'm making a conscious effort to proof-read as I go here) that the article I posted was the quickest one I could find. And if you read my earlier posts, I said that Churchill was anti-semetic, but not to the degree of organizing genecide. Jews, were and are a nuisance to the English, but they were no where near the problem exemplified in Hitler's Germany.
You refer to Murdoch as basically a non-entity, when you catergorize the jews as "controlling the media" by virtually doing the same thing for last 30 years. Those cameras have effect. You and I both know this. Fox News is not something to be scoffed at. And I am truly curious about your thoughts on the gentile controlled wealth that I have exemplified in previous posts.
2005-04-13 02:51 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel]Didn't I give the disclaimer (and I'm making a conscious effort to proof read as I go here) that the article I posted was the quickest one I could find. And if you read my earlier posts, I said that Churchill was anti-semetic but not to the degree of organizing genecide. Jews, were and are a nuisance to the English, but they were no where near the problem exemplified in Hitler's Germany.
You refer to Murdoch as basically a non-entity, when you catergorize the jews as "controlling the media" by virtually doing the same thing for last 30 years. Those cameras have effect. You and I both know this. Fox News is not something to be scoffed at. And I am truly curious about your thoughts on the gentile controlled wealth that I have exemplified in previous posts.[/QUOTE] Hey...you're the one who asked for examples!
Look, as I said, I've got to go, but I'll leave you with this..."shocker" to ponder overnight (we'll talk again tomorrow):
You say Churchill was anti-semitic, but not to the degree of organizing genocide? Well, do I have news for you! Hitler did'nt "organize" genocide either. Jews never were killed en masse by poisonous gas or any other method, nor was there ever any plan to implement the extermination of the Jewish race. Period. (Quick! Someone break out the smelling salts!!)
Mull that one over -- see what you think tomorrow.
ni-night.
2005-04-13 03:06 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ledhead V-2]Hey...you're the one who asked for examples!
Look, as I said, I've got to go, but I'll leave you with this..."shocker" to ponder overnight (we'll talk again tomorrow):
You say Churchill was anti-semitic, but not to the degree of organizing genocide? Well, do I have news for you! Hitler did'nt "organize" genocide either. Jews never were killed en masse by poisonous gas or any other method, nor was there ever any plan to implement the extermination of the Jewish race. Period. (Quick! Someone break out the smelling salts!!)
Mull that one over -- see what you think tomorrow.
ni-night.[/QUOTE] You spelled "didn't" wrong. You spelled it "did'nt." That is wrong. I suppose your IQ went down a couple points.
2005-04-13 03:08 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel]You spelled "didn't" wrong. You spelled it "did'nt." That is wrong. I suppose your IQ went down a couple points.[/QUOTE]ROFL!!! I don't believe what I'm reading!! I spelled it right -- "did'nt". It's a contraction of "did" and "not". DID'NT -- get it?
You're one of a kind, Winslow -- that's for damn sure! LOL!
2005-04-13 03:23 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ledhead V-2]List examples of your piss-poor diction? You mean like this, Winslow? While you sit there scratching your pointed little head, I'll address the post. Okay?
Did you by chance actually READ what you've posted? And If so, did you happen to notice the year in which Churchill had written his piece...1920? Many Western observers of the Russian Revolution knew of, and wrote about, the overwhelming Jewish representation in the leadership ranks of the Party. Many were alarmed by it. That's hardly "anti-semitism", now is it? (Of course, by today's journalistic standards, such articles would be considered "hate speech", no doubt). Don't forget, AH and his anti-semitic views would not arrive on the scene for almost another decade at least. Churchill whined about Jews and communism -- Adolf Hitler meant to do something about them. Therein lies the difference.
You still have'nt answered my question, Winslow: Why, if Churchill was such a notorious anti-semite, did he lead the rush to enter the West into a conflict totally fought for, and instigated by, international Jewry? (Oh, and btw -- f**k your "question" about what I think of Fox Network "invading" Canada. I'm sure Canadian Jews are thinking, "Oi, Sol! The Nazis are everyvhere! Vhat are vee goingk to do? With Reichfuhrer Murdoch and his gang of goosestepping reporters and cameramen -- it's off again to the showers for us!")
Later,
Heinrick (LOL!)[/QUOTE] I did answer your question about Churchill's engagement in war against Germany. It may have had something to do with the fact that Hitler took the offensive by bombing London.
Then you say Hitler never organized "genOcide" against Jews, but then in your above quote you belittle gentile influence (a la Fox News), and state that Hitler really "did something about the Jews." What did he do if he never organized genOcide against SemItes? He certainly did not succeed in stopping communism. You can mostly thank American Anglo Saxons for that accomplishment. Oh, but Skull and Bones is as bad as the Jews, I forgot. Ledhead and company should right now take over the American government. We would all benefit greatly......
2005-04-13 04:23 | User Profile
Off topic but for the record,,,,,,the Dresden raid by allied forces in Germany is now officially called a "HOLOCAUST" and that means that it dosen't mean only the killing of a few Jews by Herr Hitler......love it.
2005-04-13 04:33 | User Profile
"ROFL!!! I don't believe what I'm reading!! I spelled it right -- "did'nt". It's a contraction of "did" and "not". DID'NT -- get it?"
Yeah, and the correct spelling of the contraction is "DIDN'T," not "did'nt." GET IT? Look it up DOOSHBAG! Your apostrophy is in the wrong place. :thumbsup: How do you like them apples Dungeon Master?
2005-04-13 04:48 | User Profile
But for the Jews of Europe, Churchill's refusal to reach a negotiated peace with Hitler closed the door on a deathtrap. In 1933 there were approximately 9.5 million Jews in Europe. After the war the number had been reduced to 3.5 million. Almost two-thirds of the European Jewish population had been destroyed in the Nazi extermination machine. But the gas chambers at Auschitwz, Betzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibór, and Treblinka only began their nightmarish work in late 1941 and 1942. If peace had been made in 1940, how many of the millions of the victims who were sent to these camps might have lived instead? The mass, compulsory deportation of millions of innocent human beings to a faraway island off the east coast of Africa would have been a tragic and despicable inhuman act. The hardships and sufferings would have been immense. And if these millions of European Jews had been forced into exile on Madagascar under German administration, there is no way to know what evils the Nazis might still have tried to perpetrate there.
But what is certain is that Churchill's war against Hitler meant that the Nazi plan to expel the Jews of Europe was thwarted and the final solution became mass murder on an unspeakable scale. In turning his back on the potential for peace -- no matter how unpleasant with the likes of Hitler -- Churchill helped to ensure the reality of the Jewish holocaust.
Professor Ebeling is the Ludwig von Mises Professor of Economics at Hillsdale College, Hillsdale, Michigan, and serves as vice president of academic affairs for The Future of Freedom Foundation.
2005-04-13 09:35 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel]"ROFL!!! I don't believe what I'm reading!! I spelled it right -- "did'nt". It's a contraction of "did" and "not". DID'NT -- get it?"
Yeah, and the correct spelling of the contraction is "DIDN'T," not "did'nt." GET IT? Look it up DOOSHBAG! Your apostrophy is in the wrong place. :thumbsup: How do you like them apples Dungeon Master?[/QUOTE]ehh.... my what's in the wrong place, Winslow?
2005-04-13 09:38 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel]But for the Jews of Europe, Churchill's refusal to reach a negotiated peace with Hitler closed the door on a deathtrap. In 1933 there were approximately 9.5 million Jews in Europe. After the war the number had been reduced to 3.5 million. Almost two-thirds of the European Jewish population had been destroyed in the Nazi extermination machine. But the gas chambers at Auschitwz, Betzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibór, and Treblinka only began their nightmarish work in late 1941 and 1942. If peace had been made in 1940, how many of the millions of the victims who were sent to these camps might have lived instead? The mass, compulsory deportation of millions of innocent human beings to a faraway island off the east coast of Africa would have been a tragic and despicable inhuman act. The hardships and sufferings would have been immense. And if these millions of European Jews had been forced into exile on Madagascar under German administration, there is no way to know what evils the Nazis might still have tried to perpetrate there.
But what is certain is that Churchill's war against Hitler meant that the Nazi plan to expel the Jews of Europe was thwarted and the final solution became mass murder on an unspeakable scale. In turning his back on the potential for peace -- no matter how unpleasant with the likes of Hitler -- Churchill helped to ensure the reality of the Jewish holocaust.
Professor Ebeling is the Ludwig von Mises Professor of Economics at Hillsdale College, Hillsdale, Michigan, and serves as vice president of academic affairs for The Future of Freedom Foundation.[/QUOTE]You are indeed a lemming...are'nt you? (The boy uses establishment sources as "proof" of his Holocaust assertions and sees absolutely nothing wrong with it. Nice).
That's definitley it -- I concede. I'll have nothing further to do with you. This is getting rather embarrasssing -- this child-like carrying on. Just let me leave you with this last thought and you can have the last word --
In 1989, the Auschwitz museum quietly and unceremoniously removed the plague memorializing the FOUR million jews "killed" there with one reading ONE million dead. Now, seeing as how the four million jew-dead at Auschwitz was used to arrive at the "official" total jew-dead figure of the famous "Six Million", how is that now possible....Mr. Jew Apologist? By anyone's math? Should'nt the new total be three million?
Have fun, Winnie, 'cause like I said -- this is my last post to you. You are sadly misinformed and yet you try to present yourself as being somewhat of an expert not only on WWII history, but also Jewish intelligence (I'm referring to the "Jewish IQ" thread). You're a joke, Winslow, nothing more.
2005-04-13 21:18 | User Profile
First off, your argumentation started getting very personal just because I presented arguments against your solidified beliefs. You started the childish name calling by referring to me as "either a twit or troll." And this animosity toward me was obviously fueled by my difference of opinion on certain matters. Then you got even more childish by critisizing my grammar and spelling ability (talk about being smug). And for the record, anyone can cut and paste their posts on Word and do a spell check.
You did all this without ever presenting a convincing argument against the points I made. You continually referred to me as "naive" or "sadly misinformed." I suppose you are omniscient when it comes to Western Civilization and Jewish affairs. Dude, just about everything posted on this board is founded on conjecture. You weren't even alive when WW II events took place, and all your info comes from the written word of some human. A human who could not hide from his own subjectivity.
Again:
1) You said Jews wreak treachery by their media control. I suggested that the gentile controlled media outlet (Fox News - Murdoch) could be neutralizing this effect. You countered by well, saying nothing -- that basically I am misinformed.
2) You also basically said that the Jews wreak havoc by controlling the financial realm. I countered by listing several other American industries that were, are, and always will be gentile controlled -- oil, steel, software, etc. You chose to ignore this point. I also listed Bill Gates (another gentile) who has more money than any jew in the entire world. I.E., he is individually wealthier than the Rothchild dynasty. He could start several of his own lending institutions and probably has, thus exerting tremoundous gentile influence. You also chose to ignore this point.
3) Third, if you read my posts carefully, I am not defending Jews, I was just giving examples of how your own people still harbor great control in this world. But you seem to only want to focus on Jewish accomplishment. It is just my opinion that the extreme right wing should stop once in awhile, and take a look at all the wealth and power that is currently in gentile hands.
4) I am sorry if you think I am a "joke." I never claimed to be an expert in any capacity when it comes to Western Civilization. It is my hobby at best. I just don't have the time to reach expert status in this area -- when as a young man I am working my ass off to acquire my own wealth -- so maybe one day I can exert my own gentile influence. You have conveyed to me that you are basically a Neo-Nazi. It is my opinion that the joke is on you. Neo-Nazism has to be the funniest thing in the world. Your Nazi vision will never be realized. You are toiling in vain.
2005-04-14 00:00 | User Profile
I think you're a typical, everyday Western lemming -- a product of the American edjewcational system. And here's why, Winslow:
You believe that Winston Churchill, the man most responsible for leading the West into WWII , a war fought for, and at the instigation of, world Jewry, to have been a well-known, "open" anti-semite -- merely because he'd written a piece critical of the Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution. He, like FDR, was under the nefarious influence of his Jewish advisors and backers and did their bidding with unrelenting zeal and eagerness.
You believe (apparently hook, line, and sinker) that six million Jews were gassed to death in the so-called "extermination" camps of eastern Poland. I also noticed you conveniently glided over my reference to the memorial plaques at Auschwitz being changed from four million Jews "killed" to one million in 1989. And the fact that this information, absolutely crucial to the rest of The Holocaust House of Cards -- and which is accepted as FACT by major Jew orgs worldwide -- has been [u]purposely[/u] kept hidden from the American populace for 16 years! Students and the general public are still told six million Jews were "murdered" by the Nazis you detest so much.
You believe Fox News' "invasion" of Canada is somehow going to awaken the general lemming population out of the trance they've been under these past few decades. Ooooo! Scary "conservative" Fox network is going to enlighten the sleeping masses to the Jewish problem, is it? Murdoch -- or any of his cohorts for that matter -- has'nt the balls to publicly name the Jew, and you think Fox is going to light a fire under the sleeping asses of the Canadian public???
You believe that Jews do not pull the strings in the upper echelons of American/Western govt. You could'nt be more wrong, Winslow. We are in Iraq now [u]solely[/u] because Israel wants us there (but, according to you, we're there to make the Western world safe from "terrorism". Is'nt that right?) Whenever an Arab nation seems even remotely ready to challenge Zionist arrogance and military might in the ME, Israel simply unleashes its attack dogs -- the US military juggernaut. (Funny, is'nt it, how the White people of industry you so generously praise -- wealthy steel magnates and such -- make a lot of their money keeping both the US and Israel military well-supplied with weapons to annihilate the general Arab population? Yeah, man -- these are the noble, "honorable" men who are going to put the Jews in their place).
I told you several posts ago that I had no intention whatsoever of enlightening newbies such as yourself on pro-White issues. That's your responsiblity. I'm not here to argue with a neophyte (that's not name-calling -- I'm merely being truthful. You're still under the spell of the jewsmedia and are a product of a subverted edjewcational system. You think you know a lot, but you have a tremendous amount of learning to do). I've put in my time, Winslow -- I've read and listened to what others more in tune with what Jewry has up its sleeve have to say about the situation. I suggest you do the same.
You knock "neo-naziism", as you call it, without even knowing what its tenets are. Have you, by chance, read Mein Kampf? The question's rhetorical, Winslow -- you would'nt waste time on something you've been taught to loathe from the moment you first entered school....would you?
2005-04-14 03:53 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ledhead V-2]- You believe Fox News' "invasion" of Canada is somehow going to awaken the general lemming population out of the trance they've been under these past few decades. Ooooo! Scary "conservative" Fox network is going to enlighten the sleeping masses to the Jewish problem, is it? Murdoch -- or any of his cohorts for that matter -- has'nt the balls to publicly name the Jew, and you think Fox is going to light a fire under the sleeping asses of the Canadian public??? [/QUOTE]
What about the Carl Cameron expose of Israeli spies in the USA that was broadcast on FOX? Do you really think that would have been allowed if Murdoch was scared of offending Jewish interests, like you claim?
2005-04-14 10:18 | User Profile
[QUOTE=RowdyRoddyPiper]What about the Carl Cameron expose of Israeli spies in the USA that was broadcast on FOX? Do you really think that would have been allowed if Murdoch was scared of offending Jewish interests, like you claim?[/QUOTE]To be perfectly honest, I know nothing of this Cameron expose (I killed my jewtube back in Oct. '04). I do know however that expose's of other Israeli spies -- Jonathan Pollard, for example -- have been done by Jewish-owned American newspapers and TV networks (NYT, WSJ, WP, ABC, CBS, NBC). Apparently, the Juden Elite who control the lion's share of American airwaves see no threat at all to their fellow Chosen's stranglehold on Western institutions when publishing/broadcasting such treachery on the part of Western Jews.
Tell me, do you really feel Murdoch & Co. are going to have any effect whatsoever toppling the Jew? I certainly have no such illusions...
2005-04-14 10:47 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ledhead V-2]Tell me, do you really feel Murdoch & Co. are going to have any effect whatsoever toppling the Jew? I certainly have no such illusions...[/QUOTE]
No, I don't think he will. But he's certainly not afraid to offer up piecemeal criticism of here and there. I don't believe that to be adequate, my point was merely that he is perhaps not as gun-shy as you imply.
2005-04-14 21:30 | User Profile
***"I think you're a typical, everyday Western lemming -- a product of the American edjewcational system." ***
"You believe that Winston Churchill, the man most responsible for leading the West into WWII , a war fought for, and at the instigation of, world Jewry, to have been a well-known, "open" anti-semite -- merely because he'd written a piece critical of the Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution. He, like FDR, was under the nefarious influence of his Jewish advisors and backers and did their bidding with unrelenting zeal and eagerness."
-This may be my naive opinion, but I think Hitler and certain sects of the German establishment were just pissed that they never really got their piece of imperial pie, like the English and French. I.E., Germany didn't acquire vast wealth by bringing its brand of civilization to the rest of the world. Germany attempted to get her pie in WWI, failed; and tried once again in WWII and failed. Could Hitler's Aryan vision just have been propaganda used to convince his German children into dying for an imperial cause? This question remains open to me.
"You believe (apparently hook, line, and sinker) that six million Jews were gassed to death in the so-called "extermination" camps of eastern Poland. I also noticed you conveniently glided over my reference to the memorial plaques at Auschwitz being changed from four million Jews "killed" to one million in 1989. And the fact that this information, absolutely crucial to the rest of The Holocaust House of Cards -- and which is accepted as FACT by major Jew orgs worldwide -- has been [u]purposely[/u] kept hidden from the American populace for 16 years! Students and the general public are still told six million Jews were "murdered" by the Nazis you detest so much."
***"You believe Fox News' "invasion" of Canada is somehow going to awaken the general lemming population out of the trance they've been under these past few decades. Ooooo! Scary "conservative" Fox network is going to enlighten the sleeping masses to the Jewish problem, is it? Murdoch -- or any of his cohorts for that matter -- has'nt the balls to publicly name the Jew, and you think Fox is going to light a fire under the sleeping asses of the Canadian public???" ***
"You believe that Jews do not pull the strings in the upper echelons of American/Western govt. You could'nt be more wrong, Winslow. We are in Iraq now [u]solely[/u] because Israel wants us there (but, according to you, we're there to make the Western world safe from "terrorism". Is'nt that right?) Whenever an Arab nation seems even remotely ready to challenge Zionist arrogance and military might in the ME, Israel simply unleashes its attack dogs -- the US military juggernaut. (Funny, is'nt it, how the White people of industry you so generously praise -- wealthy steel magnates and such -- make a lot of their money keeping both the US and Israel military well-supplied with weapons to annihilate the general Arab population? Yeah, man -- these are the noble, "honorable" men who are going to put the Jews in their place)."
Well, Llke I said earlier: I do believe that Jews have a vastly over represented influence on American governmental affairs (and I like you am not particularly happy about this). However, it seems to me that whatever is in America's economic interest is the true impetus of American foriegn policy. In my opinion oil is the true incentive for America's presence in Iraq. Believe me, I am not a sheep (or a lemming as you call it) who thinks that a bunch of crazy Arab terrorists hate our freedom -- and that is why they attacked us on 9/11. And I never cited that the wealthy "steel magnates" were honorable -- just citing examples of gentile controlled wealth and power.
"I told you several posts ago that I had no intention whatsoever of enlightening newbies such as yourself on pro-White issues. That's your responsiblity. I'm not here to argue with a neophyte (that's not name-calling -- I'm merely being truthful. You're still under the spell of the jewsmedia and are a product of a subverted edjewcational system. You think you know a lot, but you have a tremendous amount of learning to do). I've put in my time, Winslow -- I've read and listened to what others more in tune with what Jewry has up its sleeve have to say about the situation. I suggest you do the same."
Fair enough. But I'm not as ignorant as you think. I'm just not entirely convinced that gentiles are currently in helpless peril at the hands of Jews. Call me a neophyte, but I have tremendous faith in my fellow gentile brothers.
"You knock "neo-naziism", as you call it, without even knowing what its tenets are. Have you, by chance, read Mein Kampf? The question's rhetorical, Winslow -- you would'nt waste time on something you've been taught to loathe from the moment you first entered school....would you?"
I have read Mein Kampf. And I don't loath its content. I just think there is a more sophisticated way of beating the Jews -- dominating them at their own game.
[u]And please don't take this post as harboring argumentative animosity toward you. Peace to you Led......
[/u]
2005-04-14 21:42 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Winslowkimmel]***"I think you're a typical, everyday Western lemming -- a product of the American edjewcational system." ***
"You believe that Winston Churchill, the man most responsible for leading the West into WWII , a war fought for, and at the instigation of, world Jewry, to have been a well-known, "open" anti-semite -- merely because he'd written a piece critical of the Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution. He, like FDR, was under the nefarious influence of his Jewish advisors and backers and did their bidding with unrelenting zeal and eagerness."
-This may be my naive opinion, but I think Hitler and certain sects of the German establishment were just pissed that they never really got their piece of imperial pie, like the English and French. I.E., Germany didn't acquire vast wealth by bringing its brand of civilization to the rest of the world. Germany attempted to get her pie in WWI, failed; and tried once again in WWII and failed. Could Hitler's Aryan vision just have been propaganda used to convince his German children into dying for an imperial cause? This question remains open to me.
"You believe (apparently hook, line, and sinker) that six million Jews were gassed to death in the so-called "extermination" camps of eastern Poland. I also noticed you conveniently glided over my reference to the memorial plaques at Auschwitz being changed from four million Jews "killed" to one million in 1989. And the fact that this information, absolutely crucial to the rest of The Holocaust House of Cards -- and which is accepted as FACT by major Jew orgs worldwide -- has been [u]purposely[/u] kept hidden from the American populace for 16 years! Students and the general public are still told six million Jews were "murdered" by the Nazis you detest so much."
***"You believe Fox News' "invasion" of Canada is somehow going to awaken the general lemming population out of the trance they've been under these past few decades. Ooooo! Scary "conservative" Fox network is going to enlighten the sleeping masses to the Jewish problem, is it? Murdoch -- or any of his cohorts for that matter -- has'nt the balls to publicly name the Jew, and you think Fox is going to light a fire under the sleeping asses of the Canadian public???" ***
"You believe that Jews do not pull the strings in the upper echelons of American/Western govt. You could'nt be more wrong, Winslow. We are in Iraq now [u]solely[/u] because Israel wants us there (but, according to you, we're there to make the Western world safe from "terrorism". Is'nt that right?) Whenever an Arab nation seems even remotely ready to challenge Zionist arrogance and military might in the ME, Israel simply unleashes its attack dogs -- the US military juggernaut. (Funny, is'nt it, how the White people of industry you so generously praise -- wealthy steel magnates and such -- make a lot of their money keeping both the US and Israel military well-supplied with weapons to annihilate the general Arab population? Yeah, man -- these are the noble, "honorable" men who are going to put the Jews in their place)."
Well, Llke I said earlier: I do believe that Jews have a vastly over represented influence on American governmental affairs (and I like you am not particularly happy about this). However, it seems to me that whatever is in America's economic interest is the true impetus of American foriegn policy. In my opinion oil is the true incentive for America's presence in Iraq. Believe me, I am not a sheep (or a lemming as you call it) who thinks that a bunch of crazy Arab terrorists hate our freedom -- and that is why they attacked us on 9/11. And I never cited that the wealthy "steel magnates" were honorable -- just citing examples of gentile controlled wealth and power.
"I told you several posts ago that I had no intention whatsoever of enlightening newbies such as yourself on pro-White issues. That's your responsiblity. I'm not here to argue with a neophyte (that's not name-calling -- I'm merely being truthful. You're still under the spell of the jewsmedia and are a product of a subverted edjewcational system. You think you know a lot, but you have a tremendous amount of learning to do). I've put in my time, Winslow -- I've read and listened to what others more in tune with what Jewry has up its sleeve have to say about the situation. I suggest you do the same."
Fair enough. But I'm not as ignorant as you think. I'm just not entirely convinced that gentiles are currently in helpless peril at the hands of Jews. Call me a neophyte, but I have tremendous faith in my fellow gentile brothers.
"You knock "neo-naziism", as you call it, without even knowing what its tenets are. Have you, by chance, read Mein Kampf? The question's rhetorical, Winslow -- you would'nt waste time on something you've been taught to loathe from the moment you first entered school....would you?"
I have read Mein Kampf. And I don't loath its content. I just think there is a more sophisticated way of beating the Jews -- dominating them at their own game.
[u]And please don't take this post as harboring argumentative animosity toward you. Peace to you Led......[/u]
[/QUOTE]Not a bad post. Maybe there's hope for you yet...(kidding)