← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Bardamu
Thread ID: 17233 | Posts: 24 | Started: 2005-03-11
2005-03-11 03:18 | User Profile
[url]http://www.heretical.com/ofarrell/gloating.html[/url]
Dumb Niggers and Gloating Jews Sometimes People Say More Than They Mean To
As Dr Johnson almost said, a black intellectual is like a dog walking on its hind legs: it's not done well, but you're surprised to find it done at all. One of Britain's most prominent black intellectuals is Trevor Phillips, the Chair of the Commission for Triangular Squares and Flying Pigs ââ¬â better known as the Commission for Racial Equality. If Phillips' intelligence matched his self-regard and self-righteousness, he'd be pushing back the frontiers of physics or computer science somewhere. But he's black and it doesn't, which means that he sometimes says more than he means to.
He recently wrote an article for The Independent, one of Britain's two big liberal newspapers, arguing for the economic benefits of mass immigration and describing a recent trip he had made to the United States and Canada. One city he visited was failing, another was flourishing, and he explained the difference using immigration. The failing city hadn't been blessed by it, the flourishing city had. This is how he put it ââ¬â see if you can spot the blatantly racist conclusion he drew without realizing it:
Immigration in North America is really about economics. I spent much of last week there, starting on the banks of the Mississippi. In the small, African-American district of East St Louis, the only businesses that thrive are fast-food outlets and beauty parlours; the tax base is so low that 80 per cent of the city's education spending comes from federal handouts. By contrast the city in which I ended my trip, Vancouver, lies at the heart of a dazzling growth surge in western Canada. One thing above all accounts for the transformation of this Pacific coast backwater into an economic success story: immigration. Nearly half of those who live in the city centre are immigrants, among them over 300,000 Chinese and 200,000 Indians.
Did you spot it? That's right: Trevor Phillips, Guyanese Chair of the British Commission for Racial Equality, was complaining in one of Britain's big liberal newspapers about lazy, dumb, good-fer-nothing niggers. A city with lots of blacks fails, because blacks are lazy and stupid and just want to fill their guts fast and look good so they can get sex. But a city with lots of Chinese and Indians flourishes, because they're clever and materialistic and work hard for themselves and for their children. And what would happen if East St Louis got lots of Chinese and Indian immigrants? The blacks would still be lazy and stupid, but now they'd have two new groups to feel envy and resentment towards, and two new groups would learn to hate and despise blacks. Something similar will already be happening in Canada: Vancouver's surface glitter will hide a lot of racial tension, and when that glitter fades, as it inevitably will, the racial tension is going to turn nasty.
That's a part of why White nations don't need Chinese and Indian immigrants. Even if they "help the economy" in the short term, it's better to be poor and racially healthy than rich and racially diseased. We can survive on our own; we cannot survive in company with other races. What Phillips and other blacks are asking us to do is build our own funeral pyre, soak it in kerosene, and then hand them the matches. Phillips & Co are on the funeral pyre too and they're going to go up with us when they strike the match, but they're dumb niggers and don't quite get that part.
The people pulling their strings aren't dumb though. White nations never voted for mass immigration and with the exception of greedy, selfish businessmen, never wanted it. Only the small Jewish minority wanted it, but Jews aren't stupid and they got what they wanted.
You can see them regularly gloating over their success in The Independent and The Guardian, the other big liberal paper in Britain. In the latter, one David Aaronovitch wrote of "the Joys of Diversity" and how he prefers the "quiet, paper-reading ethnicities" of his train-journey to work to the "exotic, incomprehensible" White racists of northern England, where the chickens of Muslim immigration are now coming home to roost.
Another Jewish columnist on The Guardian, Jonathan Freedland, recently spent a month in South Africa. He'd campaigned hard during the 1980s to overthrow apartheid, and was naturally eager to see the fruits of his labors.
Alas, he didn't find things in South Africa quite as rosy as he'd hoped and on his return to Britain he wrote a column saying so. But Freedland wasn't worried about South Africa's horrendous crime rate: the thousands of rapes and murders committed every year by lawless blacks against Whites and against each other. He wasn't worried about the AIDS epidemic there, caused by black promiscuity and black stupidity. He wasn't worried about corrupt black politicians cheating their own people and blaming all their problems on the legacy of apartheid. No, Freedland wasn't worried about any of that. The burning question that occupied him during his stay in South Africa was this:
Would I see, at any point in nearly four weeks in the country, a white person serving a black person? I looked hard ââ¬â at restaurants, at petrol stations, in bars, in shops, in banks. I never saw it. Not once. I looked at magazine covers and window-displays in clothing stores. White, white, white. Occasionally, there would be a token black face, usually very light-skinned.
"White, white, white," wails Jew Freedland. Bad, bad, bad. But thanks to him and his fellow Jews, things are looking better and better in the formerly White nations of the world every day. Better for Jews, that is. For Whites, things are looking worse and worse, and they're not going to look better again until We Get Rid of the Yid.
LUKE O'FARRELL
2005-03-11 03:32 | User Profile
Excellent post Bardamu.
[QUOTE]White nations never voted for mass immigration and with the exception of greedy, selfish businessmen, never wanted it. Only the small Jewish minority wanted it, but Jews aren't stupid and they got what they wanted.[/QUOTE]
That's it in a nutshell.
2005-03-11 03:57 | User Profile
A gun-to-your-head what-if.
[B]If [/B] you could trade every black in America for a Hindu or a Chinaman...would you do it?
Bear in mind "none of the above" is unacceptable. Assume we're going to be stuck with [I]one [/I] of the above nonwhite groups - but [I]only [/I] one. (And you're free to include Mexicans or Samoans or any nonwhite group you wish....you're not limitedco Chinese and Indian.)
The far thornier part of this equation - finding some nation or nations who would willingly take American blacks, lock stock and barrel - we'll leave aside. We're playing a game here...not trying to find the square root of pi.
2005-03-11 04:02 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]A gun-to-your-head what-if.
If you could trade every black in America for a Hindu or a Chinaman...would you do it?
Bear in mind "none of the above" is unacceptable. Assume we're going to be stuck with one of the above nonwhite groups - but only one. (And you're free to include Mexicans or Samoans or any nonwhite group you wish....you're not limitedco Chinese and Indian.)
The far thornier part of this equation - finding some nation or nations who would willingly take American blacks, lock stock and barrel - we'll leave aside. We're playing a game here...not trying to find the square root of pi.[/QUOTE] My hierarchy of preferences among non-whites:
Japanese and Koreans Hindus and Sikhs Chinese (continental and Taiwanese) Pacific Islanders Amerindians Arabs, Iranians, Turks, Pakistanis Mestizos Negroes
Not that the Japanese would trade their own people for our coloreds, but I take your question to be a flying pig one to begin with.
2005-03-11 04:04 | User Profile
I would trade them for upper caste Hindus. Where do I sign? The blacks we can simply unload in South Africa and Rhodesia in exchange for the White people there. They are getting a good deal, 2 for 1.
2005-03-11 04:11 | User Profile
[QUOTE=AntiYuppie]My hierarchy of preferences among non-whites:
Japanese and Koreans Hindus and Sikhs Chinese (continental and Taiwanese) Pacific Islanders Amerindians Arabs, Iranians, Turks, Pakistanis Mestizos Negroes
Not that the Japanese would trade their own people for our coloreds, but I take your question to be a flying pig one to begin with.[/QUOTE]
Well AntiYuppie as long as you are giving a home to everyone I sure as hell would like to know where I belong, the half breeds?
By the way where are the Jews? are they so far below the Negroes that you can't even see them?
2005-03-11 08:56 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]If you could trade every black in America for a Hindu or a Chinaman...would you do it?[/QUOTE] In a nanosecond.
2005-03-11 09:41 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]Well AntiYuppie as long as you are giving a home to everyone I sure as hell would like to know where I belong, the half breeds?[/QUOTE]
You're second from the bottom Ponce, filed under under "Mestizos". Which I think is a little harsh. Personally I'd take a Pinochet or a Batista over a Ghandi any day :)
2005-03-11 10:26 | User Profile
Think again, Bardamu. Under [I]no [/I] circumstances would any African nation sit still for the repatriation of American blacks. They are despised over there.
Try Greenland, or Pago Pago, perhaps. But not Africa.
2005-03-11 11:23 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]Think again, Bardamu. Under [I]no [/I] circumstances would any African nation sit still for the repatriation of American blacks. They are despised over there.
Try Greenland, or Pago Pago, perhaps. But not Africa.[/QUOTE]
Well, yeah, but they'll do anything for a little money.
Pay them. Build a lot of housing, give them half, and settle American Nogs in the other half.
As I believe you said a while back, make sure they have 7-11 stores well stocked with orange soda.
Once they all move there, we can forget about them. It will turn into hell in a few years, but by then it will be their problem and not ours.
Out of sight, out of mind.
2005-03-11 11:25 | User Profile
I am a happy white skin, blond hair, gree eyes Cuban. At least I wasen't the last one........miracles do happen hehehehehehehehe.
Anti? where should the Jews and "whites" be on your "I believe" list?
2005-03-11 11:42 | User Profile
I've had a word with the Minister of Ethnic Expulsions; you can stay, Ponce.
2005-03-11 14:38 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]I am a happy white skin, blond hair, gree eyes Cuban. At least I wasen't the last one........miracles do happen hehehehehehehehe.
Anti? where should the Jews and "whites" be on your "I believe" list?[/QUOTE]
Ponce de Leon, you're White, therefore you're at the top of the list with every other White, therefore you stay.
BTW, there are Cuban mulattoes but not Cuban mestizos. There were no Indians left in Cuba by the time the Spanish set up their colony there and brought over the black slaves. The Indians were "disappeared" before all that happened.
2005-03-11 15:10 | User Profile
RowdyRoddyPiper,
Pinochet and Batista were both white Eueopeans. [QUOTE]You're second from the bottom Ponce, filed under under "Mestizos". Which I think is a little harsh. Personally I'd take a Pinochet or a Batista over a Ghandi any day [/QUOTE]
2005-03-11 15:14 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]Think again, Bardamu. Under [I]no [/I] circumstances would any African nation sit still for the repatriation of American blacks. They are despised over there.
Try Greenland, or Pago Pago, perhaps. But not Africa.[/QUOTE]
Did you originally say that the receiving nation (the catcher) had to like it?
2005-03-11 15:39 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]Think again, Bardamu. Under [I]no [/I] circumstances would any African nation sit still for the repatriation of American blacks. They are despised over there.
Try Greenland, or Pago Pago, perhaps. But not Africa.[/QUOTE]
On at least two occasions the Atlanta newspaper has run articles about "campus life" at the two downtown black colleges, Morehouse and Spelman. Both articles I've read, particularly the older one from six-eight years ago, commented on how the real African students (From Africa) found themselves alienated from the "African American" students surrounding them. These students were quoted as saying they related more to the white friends they made off campus, and couldn't tolerate the laziness and lifestyle of the black students. The more recent article, of course, played this down to comment on the "new" phenomenon of the down-low lifestyle now prevalent on black campuses. Neither article lamented a student population made of of over 99% of one racial background.
2005-03-11 16:51 | User Profile
[QUOTE=weisbrot]These students were quoted as saying they related more to the white friends they made off campus, and couldn't tolerate the laziness and lifestyle of the black students. [/QUOTE]
We had an Ethiopian at my work. This guy was a decent man. He could quote practically all of King Lear. He spoke three languages. And he never took part in the race card-games of our American negro, but he was just [I]as lazy[/I] as you can possibly imagine.
2005-03-11 21:19 | User Profile
I once worked in an office with black Americans, black Africans and black Haitians. They all sucked, save one American black dude who actually worked and this light-skinned black nationalist guy who was pretty funny (and I could sympathize with his nationalism). The Haitians spoke, thought and behaved like children. The American blacks were barely better. And the black African was vile: he reeked of liquor and cologne and actually made that little clicking noise that some African tribes communicate with.
2005-03-11 21:45 | User Profile
I've been affirmative actioned several times in my 20 yr working life in favor of blacks. Most blacks I've ever worked with have been outright awful. They're either constantly late, big-mouths, confrontational, unprofessional, or just not smart enough to do the job or too drugged out to learn. The good thing was alot of them never lasted long at the various jobs. I learned that even the ones who appear to have it all together were nothing but total losers outside of work.
There were just a handful of blacks that I knew that worked hard and were pleasant enough to converse with everyday, but the rest were just awful.
What are you gonna do? This is the 'Kwa, you know.
2005-03-12 06:12 | User Profile
[QUOTE]What are you gonna do? [/QUOTE]
Trade 'em! - at the winter meetings; for Koreans, and a couple of Fiji Island prospects to be named later.
2005-03-12 06:16 | User Profile
There was more realism in the Soviet media on the controversial issues specific to a Commie state, than in the American media on the issue of race.
2005-03-12 06:20 | User Profile
[QUOTE=madrussian]There was more realism in the Soviet media on the controversial issues specific to a Commie state, than in the American media on the issue of race.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.iisg.nl/exhibitions/chairman/sovintro.html[/url]
2005-03-12 06:32 | User Profile
I re-watched an old Soviet TV series about a high-placed Soviet spy in Berlin. That was the longest TV series in the Soviet Union, at 12 installments :D
I was amazed that it had quite a sympathetic portrayal of the Nazy Germany of that era. Know which one I am talking about?
2005-03-12 07:21 | User Profile
[QUOTE=madrussian]I re-watched an old Soviet TV series about a high-placed Soviet spy in Berlin. That was the longest TV series in the Soviet Union, at 12 installments :D
I was amazed that it had quite a sympathetic portrayal of the Nazy Germany of that era. Know which one I am talking about?[/QUOTE]
12 Days of Spring?