← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · 6KILLER
Thread ID: 17121 | Posts: 41 | Started: 2005-03-05
2005-03-05 14:15 | User Profile
[center][size=6][color=#0000ff]Liar and Coward calls it Quits[/color][/size][/center] [center]From the desk of Pastor Morris L Gulett[/center] [center] [/center]
[center][url="http://www.churchofthesonsofyhvh.org/liar_and_coward_calls_it_quits.htm"][color=#800080]http://www.churchofthesonsofyhvh.org/liar_and_coward_calls_it_quits.htm[/color][/url][/center]
2005-03-05 18:31 | User Profile
6KILLER... I don't see how organizations like the Aryan Nations are doing anything to help our cause as White Nationalists. They don't seem to be interested in reaching out to mainstream Whites or promoting a realistic political agenda.
Your thoughts?
:smile:
2005-03-06 01:27 | User Profile
I think that's why I am a member of the Church of the Sons of YHVH / Legion of Saints.
2005-03-06 18:06 | User Profile
There is no scriptural basis for merit based on skin color.
2005-03-06 18:39 | User Profile
[QUOTE=SCRIPTURESEZ]There is no scriptural basis for merit based on skin color.[/QUOTE] And "there is no scriptural basis for" being hostile toward Jews either... eh?
How many Jews do you have in your family SCRIPTURESEZ?
There has got to be some reason that you're so sympathetic toward them...
:smoke:
2005-03-06 20:44 | User Profile
That is correct, and you are ignorant of Jesus.
But you can always ask Jesus if He is Real and Who He is.
2005-03-06 21:37 | User Profile
[QUOTE=SCRIPTURESEZ]There is no scriptural basis for merit based on skin color.[/QUOTE]
There's no scriptural basis for the Pythagorean Theorem either, but the last time I checked it was still true.
2005-03-06 21:40 | User Profile
Yes, mathematics, just another one of the creations of Yeshua.
But hatred, that is created by another spirit in you.
2005-03-07 22:43 | User Profile
[QUOTE=SCRIPTURESEZ]Yes, mathematics, just another one of the creations of Yeshua.
Now that's strange. I don't remember seeing much mathematics in either the Old or New Testament. It isn't in the "Apocrypha" either. Might it be in the Gospel according to Thomas?
Perhaps you could tell us what "Scripture Sez" about Euclid and Pythagoras, and where.
2005-03-07 22:45 | User Profile
Who is the Creator of all things? Jesus. John 1:1
2005-03-08 13:33 | User Profile
[QUOTE=SCRIPTURESEZ]But hatred, that is created by another spirit in you.[/QUOTE] Hatred is a God given emotion just as love is. We must have a healthy balance of all emotions in order to be healthy in Christ. Here is what the scripture tells us about Hatred.
A Psalm of David...139
21: Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee? 22: I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies.
YHVH God himself hates, therefore we must hate !
Malachi 1
2: I have loved you, saith the LORD. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the LORD: yet I loved Jacob, 3: And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness. 4: Whereas Edom saith, We are impoverished, but we will return and build the desolate places; thus saith the LORD of hosts, They shall build, but I will throw down; and they shall call them, The border of wickedness, and, The people against whom the LORD hath indignation (hatred) for ever.
The words of Christ in Luke 19
27: [color=red]But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.[/color]
And then let us look at another Psalm. 21
"1": The king shall joy in thy strength, O LORD; and in thy salvation how greatly shall he rejoice!
"2": Thou hast given him his heart's desire, and hast not withholden the request of his lips. Selah.
"3": For thou preventest him with the blessings of goodness: thou settest a crown of pure gold on his head.
"4": He asked life of thee, and thou gavest it him, even length of days for ever and ever.
"5": His glory is great in thy salvation: honour and majesty hast thou laid upon him.
"6": For thou hast made him most blessed for ever: thou hast made him exceeding glad with thy countenance.
"7": For the king trusteth in the LORD, and through the mercy of the most High he shall not be moved.
"8": Thine hand shall find out all thine enemies: thy right hand shall find out those that hate thee.
"9": [u]Thou shalt make them as a fiery oven in the time of thine anger: the LORD shall swallow them up in his wrath, and the fire shall devour them.[/u] "10": [u]Their fruit shalt thou destroy from the earth, and their seed from among the children of men. [/u] "11": For they intended evil against thee: they imagined a mischievous device, which they are not able to perform.
"12": Therefore shalt thou make them turn their back, when thou shalt make ready thine arrows upon thy strings against the face of them.
"13": Be thou exalted, LORD, in thine own strength: so will we sing and praise thy power.
Now if you want to talk about Race, interracial marriages, remaining seperate, racial purity and how it is spoken of in the scriptures, just say the word SCRIPTURESEZ and I'll give you a Bible lesson.
2005-03-08 23:07 | User Profile
Please see Romans 11.
By the way,
Why did God die and then rise from the dead?
2005-03-08 23:28 | User Profile
[QUOTE=SCRIPTURESEZ]Please see Romans 11.
By the way,
Why did God die and then rise from the dead?[/QUOTE]
Scrip? he did it just to give you a hard time......me? I sleep very good thinking about naked women as you do with your Gods.
Is all a matter of value and what takes precedence over what.
I know, I know......I sound really stupid but a person can take only so much of this warfare goin on because of religion, religion is supposed to bring peace and not war.
2005-03-08 23:30 | User Profile
Stay away from man made religion. Jesus did not give you religion, man did.
What God gave you was a relationship. Ask Jesus who he is. See what happens.
2005-03-08 23:43 | User Profile
Hmmmmm......
[url]http://home.datawest.net/esn-recovery/artcls/gta.htm[/url]
2005-03-09 01:06 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]Hmmmmm......
[url]http://home.datawest.net/esn-recovery/artcls/gta.htm[/url][/QUOTE]
Yeap, Hummmmmmmmmmm........the way scrip keeps defending the Jews and badmouthing Jesus makes me think of only one thing, I wonder for how long more will he be around.
2005-03-09 01:35 | User Profile
[QUOTE=SCRIPTURESEZ]Please see Romans 11.
[/QUOTE] Obviously you are confused.
2005-03-09 04:31 | User Profile
[QUOTE=SCRIPTURESEZ]Please see Romans 11. ...[/QUOTE] Thank you SCRIPTURESEZ.
Turning to Romans 11:7, I especially like this part: "...Most of the Jews have not found the favor of God they are looking for. A few have - the ones God has picked out - but the eyes of the others have been blinded. ..."
This makes perfect sense here in the modern world SCRIPTURESEZ... simply because so many brave Jews have come forward to warn us about their own people. People like Benjamin Friedman and Israel Shamir have told us all about ââ¬Åit.ââ¬Â
So you can stop defending them.
:smoke:
2005-03-09 18:02 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Phantasm]Thank you SCRIPTURESEZ.
Turning to Romans 11:7, I especially like this part:
So you can stop defending them.[/QUOTE] [color=red]Romans 11:7 What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded[/color]
These we know of as Jews today aren't of the nation of Israel spoken of in the Bible.
The words of Christ Revelations 2:9
[color=red]9: I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews ([color=black]decendants of Judah[/color]), and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.[/color]
2005-03-09 18:41 | User Profile
I am not badmouthing Jesus, or defending any wickedness.
I am telling you what Scripture says. I will tell you also that Jesus is the greek word for Yeshua. There is no J in Hebrew.
[QUOTE=Ponce]Yeap, Hummmmmmmmmmm........the way scrip keeps defending the Jews and badmouthing Jesus makes me think of only one thing, I wonder for how long more will he be around.[/QUOTE]
2005-03-09 18:47 | User Profile
I don't know where you are getting information on the Jews in this day. No one knows the exact heritage of Jews. No one knows who the lost ten tribes are. It is simply a spiritual hatred, you can think of it as a hatred of esau or edomites. Always opposed to God, always opposed to Yeshua!
Furthermore, you quote out of context. Re-read Romans 11.
Are you saying all the prophets are dead wrong? Ezekial, Jermiah and so on?
And further, have you not seen Jewish people (those that id themselves as such) become believers in Yeshua? They are everywhere.
[QUOTE=6KILLER][color=red]Romans 11:7 What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded[/color]
These we know of as Jews today aren't of the nation of Israel spoken of in the Bible.
The words of Christ Revelations 2:9
[color=red]9: I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews ([color=black]decendants of Judah[/color]), and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.[/color][/QUOTE]
2005-03-09 18:48 | User Profile
"Turning to Romans 11:7, I especially like this part: "...Most of the Jews have not found the favor of God they are looking for. A few have - the ones God has picked out - but the eyes of the others have been blinded"
Sorry, fellas...
.....Romans eleven does not say "jews"; it refers to Israelites, and the two are not the same...
2005-03-09 19:11 | User Profile
[QUOTE=SCRIPTURESEZ]I don't know where you are getting information on the Jews in this day. No one knows the exact heritage of Jews. [/QUOTE]So then these we know of as Jews, who have taken possession of Palestine at the expense of American tax payers and at the cost of the lives of thousands of American and British soliders have no Biblical claim to it ? So then you are saying that we just helped the Jews murder thousands of Palestinian men, women and children for a giant fraud to be perpetrated on the world ? Your are 100% correct about that !
[QUOTE=SCRIPTURESEZ]No one knows who the lost ten tribes are. [/QUOTE]No just those who haven't studied history.
THE HERALD'S COLLEGE.-It occasionally happens that when a new thoroughfare is made in an old district treasures are revealed and houses brought to public notice which have hitherto been obscured by mean streets. The Herald's College in Queen Victoria Street is a case in point. The present building dates from 1683 and was originally the town house of the Earls of Derby. The Herald's College is the office of the Earl-Marshal of England, the Duke of Norfolk, and [u]contains the records and pedigrees of the nobility[/u].
An interesting relic kept here is the sword of King James IV. of Scotland, who was killed at Flodden Field in 1513. There are also many series of Genealogical Charts, [u]among them that of the Saxon Kings who trace their descent from Adam.[/u]
[url="http://www.oldandsold.com/articles06/london-61.shtml"][u][color=#22229c]http://www.oldandsold.com/articles06/london-61.shtml[/color][/u][/url]
It is interesting to note that "Odin" was a descendant of Judah, the partriarch of the Israelite tribe of Judah, who Christ was also a descendant of.
"Odin" introduced among the people a new religion, the tenants of which faith included the "Fatherhood of God", the immortality of the soul, future rewards and punishments, the consecration of valor, "seeking ever to die in battle rather than in peace" - this being the ultimate goal by which they might attain to "Valhalla", or heaven. After the death of Odin, his authority was transmitted to his five sons, whom he had placed on neighboring thrones. In time "Odin" came to be regarded by the early Scandinavians as a mythical "god".
From Odin's son, Skiold, descended the "Skiolduns" - a race of Kings, which long held the scepter of Denmark. Yngue another son reigned in Sweden, and from him sprang the "Ynglings" - a name by which the ancient sovereigns of that country were disntinguished in history. Yet another son Balder, became the viceroy over the Angels, and from him the Anglo-Saxon Princes all traced their origin. Horsa and Hengist the two Saxon Chiefs who fought the English in the fifth century, reckoned Odin (or "Wodin" in their dialect) as their ancestor.
[size=1]Taken from; Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tablets page 176 (E. Raymond Capt)[/size]
[size=1].................................................. .................................................. .............[/size]
E. Raymond Capt for over 40 years has been a practicing archaeologist.
Mr. Capt holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Christian History and Biblical Archaeology, from Covenant College, Lake Wales, Florida and California State teaching credentials in Biblical Archaeology and History. He is also a member of the Archaelogical Institue of America.
In 1972 Capt was elected a fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland and in 1976 received an honorary Doctorate of Literature from the Accademia Testina Per Le Science, eatablished A.D. 450 in Pescara, Italy.
2005-03-09 19:11 | User Profile
That is not correct according to Scripture. Who do you think the Israelites are?
[QUOTE=Patrick]"Turning to Romans 11:7, I especially like this part: "...Most of the Jews have not found the favor of God they are looking for. A few have - the ones God has picked out - but the eyes of the others have been blinded"
Sorry, fellas...
.....Romans eleven does not say "jews"; it refers to Israelites, and the two are not the same...[/QUOTE]
2005-03-09 19:33 | User Profile
"That is not correct according to Scripture. Who do you think the Israelites are?"
.....Read it again and see if the term "jews" is in there; the Israelites are the people who fulfill the "marks" of Israel, and there is only one race that so does...
.....The caucasian race...
2005-03-09 19:39 | User Profile
.....Here are the ââ¬Åmarksââ¬Â of Israel; we can discuss them individually if anyone cares to and how they apply to only one peoples on the planet through fulfillment of the prophetic utterance... this will probably be all I have time for this evening, but I have the next installment started...
.....It is a matter of inspired record that God placed ââ¬Åmarksââ¬Â on His people Israel. During the Christian dispensation, ââ¬Ålostââ¬Â Israel was to possess these marks of identification. So then, if we can discover the nations and peoples that possess these marks, we have found the people
whom God chose to serve Him to be a channel of blessing to all mankind. There are many God-given marks; the list I am providing is not exhaustive, but they constitute a chain of evidence that only the unlearned can ignore.
.....One race of mankind, and one race alone, has all of these marks. With few exceptions, Joseph, (the birthright nation), was the recipient of them all. By inheritance, his two sons, Ephraim, (Great Britain), and Manasseh, (USA), will be found possessing them all.
.....While Israelites remain in other countries, (such as Benjamin of Iceland), America is the home of millions of all the thirteen tribes, (E pluribus unum meaning, ââ¬Åout of many, oneââ¬Â), and thus is representative of the whole house of Jacob. We are bound by Israelââ¬â¢s responsibilities, fulfilling Israelââ¬â¢s destiny. The MARKS are on us everywhere; in our NAME; in our SABBATH; in our INSTITUTIONS; in our PHILANTHROPY; in our COMMERCE; in our WEALTH; in our MINES; in our AGRICULTURE; in our CHURCHES; in our MISSIONARY; in our ENTERPRISES; in our ARMED FORCES; in our POSSESSION OF THE BIBLE; all BIRTHMARKS, which neither time, nor the ages, nor even our sin can wipe out.
Israel to be a great and mighty nation. Gen. 12:2; 18:18; Deut. 4:7, 8.
Israel to have multitudinous seed. Gen. 13:16; 15:5; 22:17; 24:60; 26;4, 24; 28:3, 14; 32:12.
3.Israel to spread abroad to the west, east, north and south. Gen. 28:14; Isa. 42:5, 6.
Israel to have a new home. II Sam. 7:10; I Chron. 17:9.
Israelââ¬â¢s home to be north - west of Palestine. Isa. 49:12; Jer. 3:18.
Israel to live in islands and coasts of the earth. Isa. 41:1; 49:1-3; 51:5; Jer. 31:7-10.
7.Israel to become a company of nations. Gen. 17:ââ¬Â4-6, 15, 16; 35:11; 48:19; Eph. 2:12.
Israel to have a Davidic King, (a perpetual monarchy within Israel). II Sam. 7:13, 19; II Chron. 22:10; II Chron. 13:5; Psa. 89:20, 37; Eze. 37:24; Jer. 33:17, 21, 26.
Israel to colonize and spread abroad. Gen. 28:14; 49:22; Deut. 32:8; 33:17; Psa. 2:8; Isa. 26:15; 27:6; 54:2; Zech. 10:8, 9.
Israel to colonize the desolate place of the earth. Isa. 35:1; 43:19, 20; 49:8: 54:3: 58:11, 12.
Israel to lose a colony, then expand, demanding more room. Isa. 49:19, 20.
Israel to have all the land needed. Deut. 32:8.
Israel to be the first among nations. Gen. 27:29; 28:13; Jer. 31:7.
Israel to continue as a nation forever. II Sam 7:16, 24, 29; I Chron. 17:22-27; Jer. 31:35-37.
Israelââ¬â¢s home to be invincible by outside forces. II Sam7:10; Isa. 41:11-14.
Israel to be undefeatable - defended by God. Num. 24:8, 9; Isa. 15-17; Micah 5:8, 9.
Israel to be Godââ¬â¢s instrument in destroying evil. Jer. 51:19-24; Dan. 2:34, 35.
Israel to have a land of great mineral wealth. Gen. 49:25, 26; Deut. 8:9; 33:15-19.
Israel to have a land of great agricultural wealth. Gen. 27:28; Deut. 8:7, 9; 28: 33:13, 14, 28.
Israel to be rich by trading. Isa. 60:5-11; 61:6.
Israel to be envied and feared by all nations. Deut. 2:25; 4:8; 28:10; Isa. 43:4; 60:10, 12; Micah 7:16, 17; Jer. 33:9
Israel to lend to other nations. Deut. 15:6; 28:12.
Israel to have a new name. Isa. 62:2; 65:15; Hos. 2:17.
Israel to have a new language. Isa. 28:11.
Israel to possess the gates of his enemies. Gen. 22:17.
Israel to find the aborigines diminishing before them. Deut. 33:17; Isa. 60:12; Jer. 31:7.
Israel to have control of the seas. Deut. 33:19; Num. 24:7; Psa. 89:25; Isa. 60:5.
Israel to have a new covenant. Heb. 8:10-13; 9:17; Matt. 10:5-7; Lue 1:77; 2:32; 22:20; John 11:49-52; Gal. 3:13.
Israel to lose all trace of her lineage, (vital), Isa. 42:16-19; Hos. 1:9, 10; 2:6; Rom. 11:25.
Israel to keep the Sabbath forever, (one day in seven set aside). Ex. 31:13, 16, 17; Isa. 58:13, 14.
Israel to be called the sons of God, (i.e. accept Christianity). Hos. 1:10-11.
Israel to be a people saved by the Lord. Deut. 33:27-29; Isa. 41:8-14; 43:1-8; 44:1-3; 49:25, 26; 52:1-12; 55:3-10, 13; Jer. 46:27, 28; Eze. 34:10-16; Hos. 2:23; 13:9-14; 14:4, 6.
Israel to be the custodians of the oracles, (Scriptures), of God. Psa. 147:19, 21; Isa. 59:21.
Israel to carry the gospel to all the world. Gen. 28:14; Isa. 43:10-12, (witnesses), 21; Micah 5:7.
Israel to be kind to the poor and set slaves free. Deut. 15:7, 11; Psa. 72:4; Isa. 42:7; 49:9; 58:6.
Israel to be heir to the world. Rom. 4:13.
Israel to be Godââ¬â¢s glory. Isa. 46:13; 49:3; 60:1, 2.
Israel to possess Godââ¬â¢s Holy Spirit as well as His Word. Isa. 44:3; 59:21; Hagg. 2:5.
Israel to be Godââ¬â¢s Heritage, formed by God, forever. Deut. 4:20; 7:6; 14:2; II Sam. 7:23; I Kings 8:51, 53; Isa. 43:21; 54:5-10; Hos. 2:19, 23; Joel 2:27; Micah 7:14-18.
Israel is the nation appointed to bring glory to God. Isa. 41:8-16; 43:10, 21; 44:23; 49:3.
2005-03-09 19:44 | User Profile
History of the Early British Kings
What follows is a summary of the history of the early kings of the early Britons as it is given in both Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Welsh chronicles. It is a recorded history that was consigned to oblivion after the massacre, at the instigation of Augustine, of the British monks at Bangor in AD 604 and was thus entirely unknown or ignored by the later Saxon and Norman chroniclers of England. Consequently, it came to be generally and unquestioningly assumed amongst English scholars by the 16th and 17th centuries that no such record had ever existed, and that works such as Geoffrey of Monmouth's or the Welsh chronicle were forgeries and fairy tales. That opinion persists today. We have seen, however, in the previous chapter how these records enjoy a great deal of historical vindication in spite of modernism's cursory and fashionable dismissal of them. But here, plain and unadorned, is the story that the chronicles themselves tell, a story that no child will have learnt at his desk in any school of this land. It spans over two thousand years, and its survival to the present day, being little short of a miracle, is a tribute to those Welsh scholars of old who recognised its importance and preserved it entire for our reading.
[color=red]Amongst the ancient records that the Britons themselves left behind, there is preserved (in Nennius at least) a list of the ancestors of the early British kings as they were counted generation by generation back to Japheth, the son of Noah.[/color] But the history of the Britons as a distinct nation had its beginnings with the fall of Troy, and it is at this point that Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Welsh chronicles take up the story.
[url="http://www.creationism.org/books/CooperAfterFlood/CooperAF05.htm"][color=#990000]http://www.creationism.org/books/CooperAfterFlood/CooperAF05.htm[/color][/url]
2005-03-09 19:51 | User Profile
SS...
.....May as well begin at the beginning; you may find at least a partial answer by the time you read this all, (and Iââ¬â¢m looking for a more concise asnwer)... I ask that those unfamiliar with this information try to suspend judgement until all of the evidence is in; I donââ¬â¢t mind at all taking time for questions, but I donââ¬â¢t wish to get into another term parsing contest until after the fact... no concept from Scripture hinges exclusively upon a single term or even a single verse; we are told that ââ¬Åout of the mouth of two witnesses, shall a thing be established, which precludes such a notion completely...
.....Scripture is a Book solely intended for ââ¬ÅAdam-kindââ¬Â, or ââ¬ÅAdamitesââ¬Â; it is the story of the History, (His story), of the race of Adamic man and the only time any other peoples, (yes, races), are mentioned is when they come into contact with Adam-kind... Unless one holds the unScriptural evolutionary view, then they will have to admit that the other races do not descend from Adam, or that YHVH is a liar and violates His own immutable Law of ââ¬Åkind after itââ¬â¢s kindââ¬Â... He also declares in 1Corintians fifteen that not all ââ¬Åfleshââ¬Â is the same...
.....From Adam, the chosen Holy Seed had to go through the ââ¬Åsubstituteââ¬Â of Seth, (which translates to ââ¬Åsubstituteââ¬Â), due to the murder of Abel by the first murderer and son of the wicked one, Cain; after a goodly number of generations, the Holy Seed was corrupted by those nephilim, (from the root word ââ¬Ånephalââ¬Â, meaning, to fall), those fallen angels came down unto the daughters of Adam and took for wifes, all that they chose, (this is the ââ¬Åmarrying and giving in marriageââ¬Â from Matthew twenty four), until the only Godly Sethite, (and his family), that remained was Noah, whom we are told was ââ¬Åperfect in his generations, (posterity)... The next progenitor of the scarlet thread was in the person of Eber, from whom we get the name ââ¬ÅHebrewââ¬Â; from Eber and his descendent Hebrew family, who, once again, after generations they became corrupted, but YHVH directed Abram to ââ¬Åseparate himselfââ¬Â, even from his own people...
.....This choosing of Abraham was a profound occurance to YHVHââ¬â¢s people; inspite of their tendency at disobedience, YHVH had made a covenant with His people, whom He had chosen as a peculiar people unto Himself... YHVH promised He would never forsake His people, nor choose any other, (Deuteronomy, 4:31, 34, 37; 7: 6-8); His promises of incredible blessings to come for His people, some of which were contingent upon their moral behavior, but the main thrust was unconditional... The Paternal head, upon the death of Abraham, passed to Isaac, then on to His son Jacob, as the younger brother of Esau, who had despised his birthright and sold it for pottage, then to slap YHVH in the face, took wives from the Canaanites; Jacobââ¬â¢s name was changed by YHVH to Israel, which translates to ââ¬Åhe who reigns as a pince with YHVH over man successfullyââ¬Â...
.....Years passed and Israel grew to a great multitude; YHVH, through Moses, then gave the first written Law to His people and formally married his bride Israel and they had accepted their place in the covenant by agreeing to do all that He commanded... It was at this time that He also gave them a special Name by which they alone were to call upon, that of YHVH, (pronounced, Yaââ¬â¢ ho vay, not Je hoââ¬â¢ vah); this was a covenant Name... after many more years the Israel people would often wander away from their promises to their Father; they had gone after ââ¬Åstrange fleshââ¬Â as we read in Ezra, 9:2, among other offenses and came under the judgements of Deuteronomy, 28:15, on, Leviticus, 2:6 and 2Samual, 7, as their sins went beyond where He could withold His judgement; after the death of king Solomon, (around 931 B.C.), the ââ¬Åwhole House of Israelââ¬Â had split into the House of Judah, consisting of Judah, Benjamin and Levy and the House of Israel, consisting of the ten northern tribes...
.....The House of Israel had their capital in Samaria and was under the headsip of King Omri; the House of Judah had their capital in Jerusalem... In the timeframe around 721 B.C., the House of Israel, (as well as a good portion of the House of Judah), were taken captive by the Assyrians; an-hundred-thirty-five years later, the remaining portion of the House of Judah was taken to Babylon in captivity... The entire population at this time was approximately thirteen million people; eleven million in the northern House and two million in the House of Judah... Of these, a mere 40,000 returned to Jerusalem after seventy more years; question... What happened to this large mass of people? The acclaimed Historian, Flavius Josephus, in his work Antiquities, Book XI, Chapter V, paragraph 2, states: ââ¬Å the entire body of people of Israel remained in that country, (Assyria); wherefore, there are but two tribes, (a remnant of Judah and Benjamin, which were present in Jerusalem at the time of the Ministry of The Christ), in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while the ten tribes are beyond the Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, not to be estimated by numberââ¬Â...
.....The Book of Esdras, (Ezra), of The Apocrypha reveals to us that these Israelites left Assryia and migrated into a new country, which was uninhabited: ââ¬Åthese are the ten tribes that in the days of King Hoshea were carried away from their own land into captivity, whom Shalmaneser, King of Assyria, made captives, and carried beyond the river, (Euphrates, which was always the spiritual border between Jerusalem and Babylon), they were carried off to another country. But they formed this plan among themselves, to leave the heathen population, and to go to a more distant region, where the human race had never lived, so that there perhaps they might keep their statutes, which they had not kept in their own country. And they went by the narrow passage of the Euphrates River. For the Most High then did wonders for them, for He held back the sources of the river until they had passed over. But it was a long journey of a year and a half to that country, and that country is called Azarethââ¬Â, (2Esdras, 13:40-47)...
.....Now, Herodotus, (Greek Historian of the fifth century B.C. known as the father of History), confirms every detail of this account; This is a fulfillment of Sciptural prophecy... YHVH declared that due to the sin of His people, he would drive them from the land He had given them and scatter them throughout the earth; they would have a new home to the north and the west of jerusalem, (Isaiah, 49:12, Jeremiah, 3:18), a land that was previously not inhabited by man, a wilderness, virgin, uncultivated, a new land... Azareth was a country that was to the north and west of Jerusalem, a one-an-one-half yearââ¬â¢s walk away...
.....Israel is to number as the sands of the sea, and youââ¬â¢re looking at a people that never went above 13 million or so; duh! How about them losing their identity? The ââ¬Åjewsââ¬Â can count themselves clear back to their ancestors; again, not Scriptural... The trail never got cold; itââ¬â¢s there to be found... like a lost dog, if one were to go looking and not find it where last seen, heââ¬â¢d go looking for the trail... but just because the dogââ¬â¢s collar was found empty, even the dimmest bulb on the planet wouldnââ¬â¢t conclude that the dog failed to exist...
.....Is it not rather odd to you, that at the time Israel supposedly disappeared from History there was another huge body of people, of roughly the same number, discovered in roughly the same place? The secular minds say they have no clue as to the destiny of the one peoples nor the origin of the other? Cââ¬â¢mon... even when the Historical records prove they are the self-same people? Can it be they are just plain ignorant, or are they trying to hide something from you? Why is it that no one in the religious monopolies of recent times has ever publically connected the disappearance of the Israelites with the emergence of the Germanic tribes? Particularly when enormous proof exists that these tribes are, in fact, the Israelites of Scripture? Note: the Germanic peoples existed for at least a thousand years before the ââ¬ÂGermansââ¬Â. Secular minds have proposed an elaborate ââ¬Åtheoryââ¬Â of evolution, deducing that man came from an ape, but have not suceeded in determining from whence originated these Germanic peoples... These ââ¬Åscientistsââ¬Â and ââ¬Ågreat mindsââ¬Â can supposedly trace the earthââ¬â¢s origins back hundreds of billions of years using bits and pieces of weeds, bugs and animals, yet they claim they cannot trace the origins of the Germanic peoples back a mere 2,500 years?! Right...
.....The above was by way of introduction only; the Historical proof of the identification of the Israel peoples is no less than astounding, and the scholarship is unassailable... Just as the lost dog could conceivably receive a new name, the Israelites were known by their captors of a number of names, which changed across time in their differing locales; beginning mainly with ââ¬ÅIskuzaââ¬Â in a number of forms... Secular Historians have proven that this name was the earlier name for those that were later known as Scythians; the Scythians were the self-same people that populated Europe as the Germanic tribes...
..... This Assyrian derivative was due to the fact that these captives referred to themselves as ââ¬Åsons of Isaacââ¬Â, (which was yet another fulfillment of prophecy, see the declarations of Genesis, 21:12, Hosea, 11:1, Romans, 9:7 and Hebrews, 11:18); there is also one occurance in Scripture of the reference to the ââ¬ÅHouse of Isaacââ¬Â, (Amos, 7:16)... In her punishment, Israel was to be driven from her land and given a new home and that she would lose her identity, (Deuteronomy, 32:26, but not to YHVH, Hosea, 2:17); this identity loss was to History, for a time, due to her disobedience...
.....During captivity, Israel had come into contact with many other peoples and were given differing names by the differing nations throughout her migrations; Isaac, in various languages, became such as Saka/Sakia, (Roman), Sacae/Sakae/Saka/Sakka/Sakiya/Scythia/Scythian, (persian, Median and Susian), Saksuna/Sacasene/Sakkas, (Indian), Skuthes/Skuthae, (Greek), Scolotoi, (Crimean), Skythes, (Welsh), and Sgaithanach, (Scots-Gaelic), most of the variation of which, was a result of the lack of vowells in the Hebrew... All of these names were later translated as Scythians, with minor variations...
.....Madison Grant, an Historian of no small stature, had indicated in his work, The Passing of The Great Race that ââ¬Åthe Sacae, or Saka were the long-headed blonde peoples who carried the Aryan language into Indiaââ¬Â; he informs us that ââ¬ÅStrabo recorded these people were the Scythians and Sacasenaââ¬Â, (pp. 511)... ââ¬ÅThe Essene and other literature of the Israelites found in the catacombs reveals that the Israelites and Jesus Christ Himself were the blonde-haired, blue-eyed peole who averaged six feet in heightââ¬Â...
.....Scripture declares that YHVHââ¬â¢s Israel would be scattered north of the river Euphrates, (1Kings, 14:15); the fulfillment came when Israel was taken captive into the Assyrian empire.. As Israel left Assyria, they passed northward through the ââ¬Ånarrow passââ¬Â of the Caucasus mountains, from whence we get the very term ââ¬Åcaucasianââ¬Â; passing through the Kerch straits into the Crimea...
.....The name Saxon was derived from the Hebrew, Saka-sunni and it means ââ¬Åson of Saksââ¬Â or ââ¬ÅIsaacââ¬â¢s sonsââ¬Â; in Documents of Destiny, by F. Wallace Connon, (London, 1958), it is stated, ââ¬ÅDr. Holt Yates says: ââ¬ËThe word Saxon comes from sons of Isaacââ¬â¢, and he gives Saak, Saac, Saax, Saach-en and shows that in many eastern languages , ââ¬Åsons ofââ¬Â is often written sunnia, which would give the sons of Isaac as saac-sunnia...
.....The Babylonians also referred to the Scythians as Gimirra/Gimiri, meaning ââ¬Åtribesââ¬Â as the Israelites were virtually the only people broken into subsets of tribes and sub-tribes, and this is borne out by Strabo, greek Historian and geographer; the Romans called them Kimmiroi... all of these names translated to the English ââ¬ÅCimmerianââ¬Â or ââ¬ÅCimbriââ¬Â... The Assyrians and Babylonians also called the Israelites ââ¬ÅSak-Galuthaââ¬Â or ââ¬ÅBit-Khumriââ¬Â; ââ¬ÅGaluthaââ¬Â meaning ââ¬Åcaptiveââ¬Â in Hebrew and ââ¬ÅBit-Khumriââ¬Â being the Assyrian equivalent to the Hebrew ââ¬ÅBeth-Omriââ¬Â, which meant ââ¬ÅHouse of Omriââ¬Â...
.....To demonstrate that the Cimmerians, Sacae, Saxons and Scythians were of the same race of people as the Angles, Celts, Danes, Gaels and Goths, I will rely upon the words of the scholars; to wit...
.....George Moore, in his Saxons East and West stated, ââ¬ÅThe Sacae and the Getae who formerly invaded India sprang from the same source as the Saxons and Goths of the West, and were distinctly connected with the Israelitesââ¬Â...
.....Pliney the Elder, (23-79 A.D.), the Roman scholar and author of Historia Naturalis, said, ââ¬Åthe Sakai were among the most distinguished people who lived in Scythia and that they had been called Sacca-suniââ¬Â, (Connon, pp. 102)...
.....Ptolemy, (2nd century, A. D.), Greco-Egyptian astronomer, mathematician, and geographer, stated the ââ¬ÅSaxons were a Scythian people descended from the Sakae, who came from Mediaââ¬Â...
.....Professor Hans F. K. Gunter, (German ethnologist), states, ââ¬ÅWhatever peoples, whatever individual Viking bands, may have trodden English ground, Celts, Angels, Jutes, Danes, Norweigian and Icelandic Vikings, Normans, they were all predominantly Nordic peoples.ââ¬Â The Racial Elements of European History, 1927...
.....Professor Huxley, stated, ââ¬ÅIf what I have to say in a matter of science weighs with any man who has political power, I ask him to believe that the arguments about the differences between Anglo-Saxons and Celts are a mere sham and delusion.ââ¬Â, (from a quotation by Sir Arthur Keith, in The Sunday Times, October 27, 1935)...
.....Sir F. Palgrove, stated, ââ¬ÅBritons, Anglo-Saxons, Danes and Normans were all relations, however hostile, they were all kinsmen, shedding kindred blood.ââ¬Â, (English commonwealth)...
.....Sir Arthur Keith, stated, ââ¬ÅAs regards shape of skull or form of bones I do not think a practised craniologist could distinguish the skulls and bones found in an ancient Saxon cemetary in Surrey from the remains of a Celtic grave in Connemara, so much are the Celtic and Saxon types alike. Were we to dress one group of fishermen from the coast of Norfolk and one group of fishermen from the shores of Connaught in the same garb, I do not think there is an anthropologist in Europe who by mere inspection could tell the Irish from the English group. From a physical point of view the Celt and the Saxon are one; whatever be the source of their mutual antagonism, it does not lie in a difference of race. It is often said that we British are a mixed and mongrel collection of types and breeds; the truth is that as regards physical type the inhabitants of the British Isles are the most uniform of all the large nationalities of Europe.ââ¬Â, (Nationality and Race From an Anthropologistââ¬â¢s Point of View, (1919, pp. 23-24)...
.....Sir T. Nicholas, wrote, ââ¬ÅThe researches of modern Historians, unequivocally favor the opinion that under the name Keltai, Galaltai, Gauls, Gaels, Gwyddils, Celts, Cimmerii, Cimbri, Cymry, Brythons, Lloegrians, Scots and Picts, only one race under different tribe or clan divisions, political organizations and periods of existence, is spoken of, hence, one people.ââ¬Å, (Missing Links, pp. 225)...
.....Professor Sharon Turner, F.S.A., R.A.S.L., in his History of the Anglo-Saxons, (1799-1805), states, ââ¬ÅThe Anglo-Saxons, Lowland Scotch, Normans and Danes have all sprung from the great fountain of the first human race which we have distinguished by the terms Scythian and Gothic... (the Scythians migrated)... crossed the Araxes, (Aras River), passing out of Asia, and suddenly appeared in Europe in the sixth century B. C....
.....William Camden, states, ââ¬ÅI think the conjecture of those learned Germans, who imagine the Saxons are descended from the Saci, the most powerful people of Asia; that they are so called, as if one should say Sacasones, that is ââ¬ËSons of Sacaeââ¬â¢; and that out of Scythia or Sarmatae Asiatica, they poured little by little into Europe, along with the Getes, the Swevi, and the Daci; deserves credit the best of any other. And indeed, the opinions of those men who fetch the Saxons out of Asia, where mankind had its rise and growth, does not want some color of reason.ââ¬Â, (from Missing Links, pp. 225, quoting The Seed of Isaac, by J.D. Granger, pp. 168)...
.....Professor Dr. Joseph Ehret, states, ââ¬ÅLess blood would flow, if the European inhabitants knew how closely they are related as brother and sister, in law. With few exceptions, we constitute a close community of peoples, a true family encompassing the majority of national cultures, stretching from the Islandics in the north to the Italians in the south, and from the Old-Indians in the east to the Portuguese in the west.
.....This Indo-European family, also called by some the Indo-Germanic. encompasses a rich History and for those who take the trouble to leaf through its pages, it promises a rich harvest. This is especially true when one disregards the more recent peoples and works back toward the oldest who have retained their original primordiality, such as... the Greeks of antiquity or the Lithuanians and their stock brothers, the Latvians. In this case one obtains highly valuable knowledge from which one can draw conclusions about their fore-fathers, about the primordial people from which we stem.ââ¬Â (Lithuania: The European Adam, 1983, pp. 9, 10)...
.....In the British Museum, there are Assyrian tablets which were found in Ninevah in which we find the first mention of the Scythians in History around 699-681, B.C., (ironic that the city that was spared judgement by YHVH plays a role in identifying Israel); there were additional records discovered in Ninevah and Babylon that illustrate beyond a doubt that the Israelites were the Sacae and the Scythians, (Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tablets, by E. Raymond Capt, M.A., A.I.A., F.S.A., 1985)... In the timeframe mentioned the Scythians were living in Medes; the significance of this discovery was that with this, we see the beginning of the fulfillment of prophecy... The Assyrian term Iskuza, was the result of the name the Israelites had for themselves as ââ¬ÅIsaacaââ¬Â, which was more than likely to remind themselves that they were, indeed, the children of the promise, and that YHVH would keep them, even in their captivity; they eventually had forgotten why they were so named and shortly thereafter, forgot they were Israel at all...
.....About 1800 in England, (which coincides with the ending of the 2520 years of national punishment), the population began to wonder of their roots and question from whence they came; there was an exceptional gentleman and scholar that rose to the questions... Sharon Turner, F.S.A., R.A.S.L., (1768-1847), wrote his several volumes of impeccable scholarship, establishing himself as the foremost authority on The History of the Anglo-Saxons, which, even today stands as the final word on the subject; His 1,820 pages reveals that the Anglo-Saxons descend from the Scythians who had come to Europe from the Median cities on the Gaozan River, (this is the exact spot wherein defeated and deported Israel had been located by Shalamanezer V of Assyia)... Mr. Turner quotes The Vetus Chronicon Holstatioe, ââ¬ÅThe Danes and the Jutes are Jews, (read: Israelites), of the tribe of Danââ¬Â; it doesnââ¬â¢t take a brain surgeon to realize that if the Danes and Jutes of European stock are of the tribe of Dan that the other European peoples were derived of the other Israelite tribes...
.....Diodorus Siculus, (1st century), a noted Greek Historian, states, ââ¬ÅThe Scythians anciently enjoyed but a small tract of ground, but through their valor, growing stronger by degrees, they enlarged their dominion far and near, and attained at last to a vast and glorious empire... seated themselves near the River Araxes... This nation prospered more and more, and had kings that were very famous; from whom the Sacans and the Massagetae, (ââ¬Ågreaterââ¬Â Getae, as opposed to the Thyssagetae, ââ¬Ålesserââ¬Â Getae who together became the Goths; Ostrogoths, east, and Visigoths, west), and the Arimaspians, and many other names derive their origin. Amongst others, there were two remarkable colonies that were drawn out of the conquered nations by those kings; the one they brought out of Assyria and settled in the country lying between Paphlagonia and Pontus, (south Russia near the Black Sea); the other out of Media, which they placed near the River Tanais, (Don), which people are called the Sauromatians, (Lituanian Balts)ââ¬Â...
.....F.C. Danvers, K.C.C., F.R.S.S., in his Israel Redivivus, 1905, (Redivivus=second hand), indicates that Diodorus also identified two colonies among the Scythians who were Israelites out of the Babylonian captivity; fascinating indeed that the Scythians came out of the very two locations of their captivity as described by Scripture and illustrated by History...
.....William Pascoe Goard, L.L.D., F.R.G.S., F.R.E.S., in his book, The Post-Captivity Names of Israel, (1934), as he quotes Rollins Ancient History, (Charles Rollins was a distinguished French Historian and the Rector of the University of Paris in 1694; the quote is from Book VI, Chapter I, Section III), ââ¬ÅAccording to this author, (Justin), the Scythians lived in great innocence and simplicity... and ... they were... unacquainted with vice. They did not make any division of their lands among themselves... since they did not cultivate them. Horace, in one of his odes, tells us... they had no houses nor settled habitation; but wandered continually with their cattle and their flocks fom country to country... and made milk and honey their principle diet... This contempt of all conveniences of life, says Justin, was attended with such an honesty and unrightness of manners as hindered them from ever coveting their neighborsââ¬â¢ goods.ââ¬Â...
.....Colonel J. C. Gawler, (Keeper of the Crown Jewells in the Tower of London), in his book, Dan: The Pioneer of Israel, (1879) states, ââ¬ÅStrabo likewise quotes several authors who speak of the excellent laws and habits of the Sakai, a tribe of Scythians who are called ââ¬Ëa righteous raceââ¬â¢, (emphasis mine, Patrick ), the laws, customs, and manners of the Scythia, (says Epiphanius), were received by the other nations as the standards of policy, civility, and polite learningââ¬Â; (for the Scythians rapid growth and expansion, evidence of their excellent laws, great learning and abhorrance of swine, see Diodorus, Herodotus, Strabo, Aeschylus, and Epiphanius... Also, Ephorus quotes Choerilus, who called the Sakai of Asia ââ¬Åa colony of nomads, a righteous raceââ¬Â; Herodotus also records, (volumes IV, pp. 76), that the Scythians ââ¬Åstudiously avoid the use of foreign customsââ¬Â...
.....Colonel Gawler went on, stating, ââ¬Åthe people, the Dacae called Polistoe, I do verily believe are the same with those which Strabo called Plistoe, and were the stock of the Abii, (a Scythian tribe whom Arrian calls ââ¬Åthe justest people in the worldââ¬Â)ââ¬Â...
.....Frederick Haberman in his work, Tracing our White Ancestors, (1934), says, ââ¬ÅAeschylus, the Greek poet tells us, the Sacae were noted for their good laws, and were preeminently a righteous peopleââ¬Â; further, ââ¬ÅThe Scythians told Herodotus that their nation had been in existence for a thousand years previous to the invasion of Darius. If we date, therefore, a thousand years back from the time of Darius, 515 B.C., we arrive at 1485 B.C., the date of the exodus, (from Egypt), when Israel was founded... these lived on the Gerrhus, a tributary of the present Dneister. Herodotus includes among the Scythian tribes, the Getae, who lived on the shores of the Danube, (i.e. the Arsareth of Esdras, mentioned above). Those Getae, as Herodotus tell us, believed in their immortality, going after their death to ââ¬ÅZalmoxisââ¬Â, which means nothing less than the ââ¬ÅGod of Mosesââ¬Â. So also was the country where the Getae lived named Moesia, for in it lived a ââ¬Ëpeople of Mosesââ¬â¢.ââ¬Â (pp. 129)... .....King James was known as ââ¬ÅJacobusââ¬Â, (Jacob) and thus the flag got itââ¬â¢s name, the Union Jack. However, the symbology of the flag goes far deeper, not just back to the turn of the 17th century AD, at the beginning of the formation of the nation of Britain, (covenant nation), but all the way back to the ending of the 17th century BC at the beginning of the formation of the nation of Israel... I shouldnââ¬â¢t need to reiterate the story of Josephââ¬â¢s blessing of Ephraim and Manasseh, but the ââ¬Åcrossââ¬Â of the Union Jack is the result of those crossed arms...
.....The west window of Westminster Abbey, which is over the main door, has a row of panels... The three at the top contain the figures of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob; the next two rows of seven each contain figures of Rueben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Zebulon, Issachar and Dan; Asher, Napthali, Joseph, Benjamin, Moses and Aaron, and the bottom row contains the emblem of Moses and the emblem of Aaron at each end, but at the center, the Lion of Judah, the Bull of Joseph, the Arms of Britain.
.....The coronation service throughout is an intensely interesting study... the by-far largest collection of evidence as to the whereabouts of the throne, (both figurative and literal), are detailed in a book called Jacobââ¬â¢s Pillar by E. Raymond Capt... and moreso in Connerââ¬â¢s Documents of Destiny...
.....Brigadier General W. H. Fasken, C.B., in his book Israelââ¬â¢s Racial Origins and Migrations, states, ââ¬ÅIt must be realized, as Dr. Goard has reminded us, that the History of Israel as given in the Bible is the History of Israel in Palestine. If any section of Israel, during Israelââ¬â¢s national sojourn in ââ¬Åthe landââ¬Â, left the geographical boundaries of that land, they ceased to find a place in itââ¬â¢s, (Biblical), History. They are not forgotten in the covenant or prophecy, but having marched out of the land they have, for that very reason, marched out of the, (Biblical), Historical record.ââ¬Â...
.....Colonel J. C. Gawler, again, from his book Dan: The Pioneer of Israel, (1879), states, ââ¬ÅSailman, a Jewish writer in 1818, in Researches in The East quotes Ortellius, ââ¬Ëthat the Kingdom of Arsareth, (2Esdras, 13:45), was where the ten tribes finally settled and took the name Gauthei.ââ¬â¢Ã¢â¬Â
.....The name Gauthei is of no small import; this distinguishes the Israelites as the Germanic tribes of Europe. In addition Colonel Gawler relates, ââ¬ÅThe Scythians were later known as Goths, or Gothi, possibly because Getae, an important branch of the Scythian nations, were most in contact with the Romans, with whom, therefore, all Scythians were called Gothi.ââ¬Â...
.....Dr. George Moore, in his work, British History Traced From Egypt to Palestine, (1927, London), states, ââ¬ÅThe name Goth, as already surmised, was probably transferred from Palestine to the neighborhood of the Caspian Sea, where the Getae and the Sacae, the Goths and the Saxons, are Historically found together.ââ¬Â...
.....Pliney the Elder, Roman Historian, (c.50 A.D.), states, ââ¬ÅThe name Scythian has extended in every directin, even to the Sarmatae and the Germans, beyond the Danube are the peoples of Scythia. The Persians have called them by the general name of Sacae. The more ancient writers give them the name Aramii. The multitude of these Scythians is quite innumerable, (Genesis, 13:16; 15:5; 17:4, 6, Patrick); in their life and habits they much resemble the people of Parthia. The tribes among them that are better known are the Sacae, the Massagetae, the Dahae.ââ¬Â...
.....Dr. Hans Gunther, Professor of Berlin University in the 1920ââ¬â¢s, in his book, Racial Elements of European History, states, ââ¬ÅAncient writers, such as Polemon of Ilium, Galienos, Clement of Alexandria, and Adamantios, state that the Sacae, (Scythians), were like the Kelts and Germans, and describe them as ruddy-fair, (not red-Patrick). The Scythian tribe of the Alans are also described as having Nordic appearance. Ammianus, (c. 350 A.D.), describes them as ââ¬Ëalmost all tall and handsome, with hair almost yellow, and a fierce lookââ¬â¢.ââ¬Â...
.....J. Llewellyn Thomas, F.R.C.S., in his book The Assyrian Invasions and Deportations of Israel, states, ââ¬ÅIt is noteworthy that the tribe of Dan is not mentioned in these accounts, (of Assyrian deportations), whilst the other tribes are named. The northern Danites should have been the first to feel the Assyrian impact. They were not there, and are believed to have migrate by sea, (which I will soon prove, Patrick), to avoid the Assyrian menace.ââ¬Â...
.....Dr. J. Franklin Snook, in his book, To Heal The Nation, (1977), confirms what Mr. Thomas says when he states, ââ¬ÅDuring the 38 years between the two censuses taken in the wilderness, the five tribes of Reuben, Gad, Ephraim, Naphtali and Simeon decreased in numbers by 61,080 men. During the same period the other seven tribes increased by 62,260 men. These figures can only be the result of the beginning of the fulfillment of Godââ¬â¢s promise in Genesis, 28:14, wherein He told Jacob that he should spread abroad to the west, east, north, and the south.ââ¬Â, (pp.10), (see also Numbers, 1, 3:39, & 26)... Recall that an Israelite census counted only men of military age, (twenty-one and up), and that the numbers rendered were slightly more than 600,000. This would be about one-fifth of the total Israelite population; Rev. J.R. Dummelow, M.A., Queenââ¬â¢s College, Cambridge, (1954), editor of The One Volume Bible Commentary, indicated that the entire population of Israelites at that time was in the neighborhood of three million...
.....More evidence to the fact that the Scythian peoples who fathered the Germanic tribes, are, in fact the Israelites of Scripture, is found in the tombs of Scythia, which were discovered in the south eastern portion of Russia, (Scythia and Crimea); these tumuli, (tombs), date from 580 B.C. to the 1st century A.D. and had contained many of the symbols of the Israelites along with fine animal drawings, (as can be seen in the American Journal of Archeology, 1914, Volume 18, and the Illustrated London News, January 3rd and February 14th, 1914), along with a number of Hebrew manuscripts which were translated by Professor Hannay and included in the previously mentioned book by Frederick Haberman, wherein he documented the content of some, ââ¬ÅI am Jehudi, the son of Moses, the son of Jehudi the Mighty, a man of the tribe of Naphtali, which was carried captive with the other tribes of Israel, by Prince Shalmaneser, from Samaria during the reign of Hoshea, King of Israel. They were carried to Halah, to Habor-which is Cabul- to Gozan and to Cheronesus-which is the Crimea.ââ¬Â, (Haberman, pp.129)...
.....In the Crimea, there were many thousands of tombstones found in Scythian graveyards that carried Hebrew-Phoenician inscriptions; Professor Chwolsen of Petrograd had translated some 700 of these, among which we read, ââ¬ÅThis is the tombstone of Buki, the son of Itchak the priest; may his rest be in Eden, at the time of the salvation of Israel. In the year 702 of the years of our exile.ââ¬Â Another reads, ââ¬ÅTo one of the faithful in Israel, Abraham ben Mar-Sinchah of Kertch, in the year of our exile 1682, when the envoys of the Rosh Meschek came from Kiou to our master. Prince David, Halmah, Habor and Gozan, to which place Tigleth Pilesar had exiled the sons of Reuben and Gad, and half have been scattered through the entire coast, even as far as China.ââ¬Â, (Haberman, pp. 130)...
.....E.P. Ingersoll, in his book, Lost Israel found in the Anglo-Saxon Race, (1886), states, ââ¬Åmany of these tombstones were in St. Petersburg, and others of them read, ââ¬ËMoses Levi, a priest, died in the year 726 of our exile;ââ¬â¢ and ââ¬ËZadok the Levite; son of Moses, died 4,000 years after the creation, 785 of our exile.ââ¬â¢Ã¢â¬Â, (pp.34)...
.....E. P. Ingersoll, (mentioned above), tells us that according to Oxonian, (in his Wanderings of Israel), Herodotus himself was an Israelite from the tribe of Dan; in the Book of Maccabees, (The Apocrypha), the author speaks to the Lacedaemonian Spartans were of Israelite heritage, which is confirmed by Flavius Josephus in his Antiquities, XII, IV, 10 & XIII, V, 8...
.....Brigadier General W. H. Fasken, C.B., (mentioned above), states, ââ¬Åit was Israel, and principally the tribe of Dan, which furnished the human element of classic Greece.ââ¬Â, (pp.64)...
.....Colonel Gawler, (mentioned above), quotes Latham, from Ethnology of Europe with the following words, ââ¬ÅI think the eponympous, (for the unfamiliar, an eponymous is the name of a real or mythological person upon whom is presumed to be the origin of the name of a particular place or region), of the Argive Danai, (a region of ancient Greece), was no other than that of the Israelite tribe of Dan, only, we are so used to confine ourselves to the soil of Palestine in our consideration of the Israelites, that we treat them as if they were adscripti gleboe, (meaning, tied to the land), and ignore the share they may have taken in the ordinary History of the world. The sea ports between Trye and Ascalon, or Dan, Ephraim, and Ashur must have followed the History of sea ports in general, and not have stood on the coast for nothing. What a light would be thrown on the name of Peloponnesus and the History of the Pelopid family, if a bona fide nation of Pelopes, with unequivocal affinities and contempory annals, had existed on the coast of Asia! Who would have hesitated to connect the two? Yet with the Danai and the tribe of Dan this is the case, and no one connects them!ââ¬Â, (pp. 11, 12)...
.....Now; think of the good Colonelââ¬â¢s words for a moment... It would have to be either profound ignorance or a conspiracy to conceal these truths from the world that results in virtually the entire world remaining in the dark as to the identity of Israel in this day; did not YHVH declare that His people Israel had a very particular role which they were to fulfill, namely, to be through whom the world would be blessed? From Father Abraham forward, Israel was to be a light unto the world and the prophecy makes the inherent demand upon her to fulfill this role; in every century since, this people have been playing this role of distinction and it doesnââ¬â¢t require that close of an inspection by which to see... so far thrust into the forefront of History have these people been that it cannot be missed, (or dismissed); one people and one people alone have ever been able to step up to the plate and assume the role that has been given... yet, we see an ugly step-sister attempt to stuff her fat foot into the glass slipper of Israelââ¬â¢s Cinderella role, but it doesnââ¬â¢t come even remotely close to fitting inside; modern ââ¬Åscholarsââ¬Â seem to believe it impossible for our Israelite brethren to be in existence outside of the Scriptural parameters of the land of Israel of old, yet, all evidence declares, nay, proves, the facts are to the contrary...
.....E. P. Ingersoll, (mentioned above), unveils, ââ¬ÅFrom Historic evidences that have come to light recently, it seems that Dan had been long familiar with the then-western world; that he had been accustomed to the performance of voyages with the Phoenicians all over the Mediterranean Sea, and beyond outside the Straits of Hercules; and that alone, unaccompanied by any of his neighbors, he had sailed to Egypt, and thence to Greece, taking with him a colony of his own people; and that these Danai are said to have been among the first settlers of Greece. It is further stated that Dan was engaged in the sacking of Troy; that afterwards he conquered Macedonia, and that Alexander, (the Great), seems to have descended from this very tribe of Israel. It is furthermore stated that Dan settled, after his sacking of Troy, in that very region, where he built twelve cities.ââ¬Â, (pp. 14)...
.....Colonel Gawler states, ââ¬ÅAllatius supposes that the Israelites peopled the countries of Iberia, (modernday Spain; ââ¬ÅIberiaââ¬Â translates to ââ¬Åland of the Hebrewsââ¬Â), and Golchis, (modernday Greece); and he adduces the authority of Constantine Porphyrogenetes in support of the Israelitish origin of the inhabitants of Iberia. The name Iberia, as well as Bithynia-also on the south of the Black Sea-certainly strike one as of Hebrew originââ¬Â, (pp. 18)...
.....Keating in History of Ireland states, ââ¬ÅThe Dan-ans were a people of great learning and welth. They left Greece after a battle with the Assyrians and went to Ireland, and also to Denmark, and called it Danmares, Danââ¬â¢s country.ââ¬Â
.....Herodotus, (mentioned above), states, ââ¬ÅThe most distinguished of the expelled foreigners, (from Egypt), followed Danus, (Dan), and Cadmus into Greece, but the greater number of them was led by Moses into Judah, (Canaan)ââ¬Â... Cadmus, should you know your Scripture, was the great-grandson of Chacol, as per 1Kings, 4:31 and 1 Chronicles, 3:6, who was the great-great-grandson of Judah. Cadmus and those with him entered Greece subsequent to those of Israel that had entered the promised soil; the ancient land of Greece, Colchia, had derived itââ¬â¢s name from Chacol...
.....Elizabeth C. Evans, in Physiognomics in the Ancient World, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, I, 1969, states, ââ¬ÅThe pure Greek is, according to Polemo, (considered the foremost ancient physiognomist), of the moderate and erect stature, of a fair face with light complection mixed with red; he is lean with hands and elbows of moderate size, watchful, quick to learn, with medium-sized head, with thickness and strength in the neck, soft reddish hair, not curly, but combed and straight, with a square contenance, thin lips, and a moderate straight nose, moist, shining eyes, which move quickly and contain much light.ââ¬Â...
.....Hans F.K. Gunther, in his book, The Racial Elements of European History, states, ââ¬Åwhenever the Hellenic and Ionic race has been kept pure, according to Adamantios, (Hebrew Sophist and Physician, 4th century A.D.), we see proper tall men of fairly broad and straight build, neatly made, of fairly light skin and blond; the flesh is rather firm, the limbs straight, the extremities well made, the eyes bright, piercing and full of light, for of all nations, the Greek has the fairest eyes.ââ¬Â...
.....I wanted to get in this last bit of the Greek connection before moving on; that, as well as pointing out that in places, such as John, 7:35, the bastard term of ââ¬Ågentilesââ¬Â was substituted for ââ¬ÅHeleneââ¬Â, (Strongââ¬â¢s #1672), so that the verse should have been translated thusly, ââ¬ÅWill He go unto the dispersed among the Greeks and teach the Greeks?ââ¬Â, as opposed to the way the KJV reads and the Israelites being spoken to here knew the Greeks were of Israel... Above I had posted the ââ¬Åmarksââ¬Â of Israel, placed upon her by YHVH, by which we could identify them in the latter days; I think we should look at a few of them against the evidence of the world History related and perhaps compare and contrast the actual happenings of the people purported in this day to be Israel against those in whom the actual fulfillment has been found... Again, this will take a bit of time, as I have more to do than just post, but i will try to move in a timely fashion; thanks in advance for your patience...
.....Letââ¬â¢s look at a few of the marks that Scripture declares would be upon Israel and see if we can determine from the Scriptural proofs just who Israel is in the world today; the marks posted above tell quite a story and it is contrary to the ââ¬Åconventional wisdomââ¬Â of ââ¬Åeverybody knowsââ¬Â thus and so...
.....Israel to have multitudinous seed and number as the ââ¬Åsands of the seaââ¬Â and the ââ¬Åstars of the heavensââ¬Â. Genesis, 12:2,3; 13:16; 15:5; 17:4, 6, 16, 19, 21; 18:18, 19; 21:12; 22:17, 18; 24:60; 26:4, 24; 28:3, 14; 32:12; 35:11; Psalms, 89:29, 36; Isaiah, 65:15. Do the caucasian Israelites come closer to fitting this description than those in the ME? I believe they have never numbered more than 20 million and they actually have a regressive birthrate, which is why they have always had to mix with those among whom they have lived; the regressive birthrate is a Scriptural sign of a ââ¬Åcurseââ¬Â, as opposed to a blessing... YHVH declared through the blessing given by Jacob to Ephraim and Manasseh that they would grow into a multitude ââ¬Åin the midst of the earthââ¬Â, (Genesis, 48:16), but the word ââ¬Ågrowââ¬Â, (Strongââ¬â¢s #1711), is used only one time in the Hebrew here; it means ââ¬Åto grow rapidly or spawn in great numbers as fishââ¬Â... what was the symbol of the Christians very early on? Now? Coincidence? Hmmm...
.....Israel to be a great and mighty nation. Genesis, 12:2; 18:18; Deuteronmy, 4:7, 8, as well as Israel to become a company of nations. Genesis, 17:4-6, 15, 16; 35:11; 48:19; Ephesians, 2:12; and Israel to be the first among nations. Genesis, 27:29; 28:13; Jeremiah, 31:7... first, America is renowned as the greatest nation ever on the the planet... while itself, technically is a ââ¬Åcompany of nationsââ¬Â, this ââ¬Åcompanyââ¬Â status better applies to the collection of nations on the European continent; America would better fit the definition of ââ¬Ågreat nationââ¬Â... The caucasians from the European continent are our brethren; when Scripture said that ââ¬Åbrother would war against brotherââ¬Â, this has seen fulfillment many times over, (in the last 200 plus years, in particular)... Does the sandbox by the name of Israel in the ME qualify as either a ââ¬Ågreat nationââ¬Â or a ââ¬Åcompany of nationsââ¬Â? Not hardly, much less both; still a shut-out so far...
.....As far as Israelââ¬â¢s prophesied power, Israel to have all the land needed, Deuteronomy, 32:8; Israel to be the first among nations, Genesis, 27:29; 28:13; Jeremiah, 31:7; Israelââ¬â¢s home to be invincible by outside forces, II Samual, 7:10; Isaiah, 41:11-14; Israel to be envied and feared by all nations. Deuteronomy, 2:25; 4:8; 28:10; Isaiah, 43:4; 60:10, 12; Micah, 7:16, 17; Jeremiah, 33:9; Israel to possess the gates of her enemies, Genesis, 22:17; Israel to have control of the seas, Deuteronomy, 33:19; Numbers, 24:7; Psalms, 89:25; Isaiah, 60:5. The very first of this list disqualifies the sandbox, does it not? Is the ââ¬Ëââ¬â¢israelââ¬â¢Ã¢â¬â¢-lie, (emphasis on the lie), first among the nations or does America better fit the bill? Does the ââ¬Ëââ¬â¢israelââ¬â¢Ã¢â¬â¢-lie control the gates of her enemies? In these latter days we have given away our Panama canal, and we can see the effects of the curses of Deuteronomy 28 becoming more evident with each passing day; even a blind man could see who these marks describe... Does the ââ¬Ëââ¬â¢israelââ¬â¢Ã¢â¬â¢-lie control the seas? Still pitching a no-hitter here; are any Christians coming out of their slumber yet?
.....YHVH also said Israel would be his ââ¬Åbattle axeââ¬Â by which He would conquer the nations, (Jeremiah, 51:20; Numbers, 24:8, 9; Psalms, 2:8, 9; Isaiah, 41:10, 16; Micah, 5:8; Malachai, 4:3); who was it that made such an instrument famous in battle? Scripture also said that Israel would conquer Rome, (Daniel, 2:34, 35, 44, 45); it was the Vandals and the Goths, (who we saw from Historical evidence to be Israel), that conquered Rome; their difficulties began under Decius around 255 A.D. during his reign of terror against Christians... The Goths were the first of those Germanic tribes to overpower the Roman empire; the Visigothic king named Alaric I conquered Romae in 410 A.D.... Did the ââ¬Åjewsââ¬Â fulfill these prophecies? This is becoming more ludicrous as an argument by the sentence, donââ¬â¢t you think? The irony lies in the fact that it was the ââ¬Åjewsââ¬Â that so infuriated Rome in 70 A.D. that they sent General Titus in to destroy Jerusalem; Ezra and Nehemiah both record that there were those that were rejected as a result of the geneological records being in the Temple to tell them who was who in the zoo... they planned the very destruction then bemoaned their poor persecuted status after-the-fact; go back and read some of the early portion of this thread and apply what you have since learned...
.....There are also the prophecies concerning Israel having a new name and being called through Isaac, (recall ââ¬ÅSaxonââ¬Â), (also, Christian, 2Chronicles, 7:14); having a new home, (north and west of Palestine), being a perpetual nation and the long and fascinating story, (which I may here tell), of how Israel would have a perpetual throne... the daughters of King Zedekiah and Jeremiahââ¬â¢s sojourn to Ireland; Jacobââ¬â¢s pillar as the very coronation stone... I could certainly go on, but should one not see it by now they will remain blind right up to the end of the age; so much of Our Fatherââ¬â¢s Living Letter to His children has been closed to Christian understanding by the erroneous assignation of YHVHââ¬â¢s chosen to those of the ââ¬â¢Ã¢â¬â¢israelââ¬â¢Ã¢â¬â¢-lie and this is the lie that needs to be exposed for what it is... the biggest lie of the big lie concept; Israel was never to return to the land until the Kingdom age, which does not begin until the return of the King of Kings and Lord of Lords... Selah...
.....Do you not see, Christian, what Scripture has been declaring all along? There is no question as to the identity of Israel; notice, though, that those that decry these facts never refute this position with factual documentation from either History or Scripture? Their position is completely devoid of any factual documentation, instead relying upon emotional pleas, (as well as parsing of terminology), and shouts of ââ¬Åracist! racist!ââ¬Â while never noticing that holding to the erroneous position of the ââ¬Åjewsââ¬Â as YHVHââ¬â¢s chosen is of exactly the same bent! How could one position be racist and the other not?
.....To deal with the ââ¬Åracistââ¬Â epiphet, I would only say that truth oftentimes seems to be severe when it really is not; one must shed many of the false teachings that have been perpetuated since the days of the Apostles... realize that in this world there are such things as learned folly that operates from a base of verbosity; midgets stand in stilts, obscured by the flowing skirts of skillful prose or the wayward usage of the powers of declamation, yet the stilts remain in existence... be not fooled, brethren, as they delight in your deception; deny them their hand-rubbing... do you wish to allow Scripture to declare the truth to you or will you allow the truth to be obscured by the sweet-sounding words of the nephinim in the pull pit? When The Christ declared in no uncertain terms that He came not to destroy The Law and The Prophets, but to fulfill, do you allow some whoring hired servant to tell you The Law was ââ¬Ånailed to the crossââ¬Â in direct contradiction to the Words of The One you profess to serve? YHVH forbid...
The Perpetual Throne of Israel...
.....Above I posted the verses concerning Israelââ¬â¢s blindness to their own identity; He also declared that we would be without an ââ¬Åephod or teraphimââ¬Â for a time, (Hosea, 3:4), that is to say, without a vision from YHVH or a sign... without also true Priests ordained by YHVH to lead His people to Him; all these crazy people that run around saying ââ¬ÅGod told me to wear my blue suit todayââ¬Â, or ââ¬ÅGod told me to park in the shade todayââ¬Â, (or whatever nonsense they attempt to trot out for the foolish people that would sit in their pews), prove that they have not an inkling of Our Fatherââ¬â¢s Word and their own words are witness against them as being the aforementioned nephinim, or ââ¬Åhired servantsââ¬Â... Isaiah called them ââ¬Ådumb dogs that cannot barkââ¬Â; I happen to have a few worse names for them...
.....Now, YHVH swore that the people of Israel would have over them forever a King, specifically, from the tribe of Judah, (Genesis, 49:8-10), and that there would never come a time when there would not be an heir of David to sit on the throne; YHVH made this solemn promise to David, (Numbers, 23:21; 2Samual, 7:13-16; 1Chronicles, 22:10; 2Chronicles, 13:5; Psalms, 89:1-6, 20, 27-29, 35-37; 132:10-14, 17; Jeremiah 33:17-26; Ezekiel, 37;24), and we know that YHVH cannot lie, so this was a vow that could not be broken...
.....At first blush, this would appear to be a contradiction, but only to the weaker student; this vow has never been broken, regardless the verse from Hosea... This, however is easily resolved when the context is properly considered; He declared that the House of Israel would be without a King for a short period... Hosea had prophesied against the northern tribes in their iniquity, and this was roughly 760 B.C.; this particular prophecy came to pass about forty years after the utterance when the House of Israel was carried into the Assyrian captivity... at that point in time, they had not a King; the House of Judah, (no, not the ââ¬Åjewsââ¬Â), however, still had King Jotham on the throne; YHVH had not forsaken His Promise here, or anywhere else... when the northern tribes, (House of Israel), were being taken, the southern tribes, (House of Judah), remained as a Kingdom, although there was a portion of the House of Judah that went into the Assyrian captivity with the northern Kingdom; by the time of Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon had begun taking the House of Judah into the Babylonian captivity, (586-584 B.C.), some of those from the Assyrian captivity were already escaping into Europe, where they began to re-establish small Kingdoms; to add to this fact, even before the time of David, there were Israelites that had already left the main fold of the flock and had begun to establish Kingdoms that were growing into empires, (just as was Greece), and I would imagine the ruling Kings that were over them were of the tribe of Judah... ââ¬ÅThe sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor from between his feetââ¬Â, (put for his posterity), recall?
.....Even beyond all of this, when the House of Judah was in the process of being taken captive to Babylon, YHVH, true to His Word as always, had provided for the displacement of the ââ¬Åseed of Davidââ¬Â, so to speak, sort of a transplantation, from out of Judah proper; the last King of the House of Judah was Mattaniah, whom Nebuchadnezzar had later renamed Zedekiah, (recall the story above concerning his ââ¬Ånever seeing Babylonââ¬Â)... after taking Zedekiah, Nebuchadnezzar had his sons slain and Zedekiahââ¬â¢s eyes put out, which would ââ¬Åappearââ¬Â to have ended the posterity of Zedekiah then and there; but Jeremiah informs us in 41:10 & 43:6 that he had also had daughters... Zedekiahââ¬â¢s daughters were taken by Jeremiah, in his Divine Mission, (Jeremiah, 1:10, ââ¬Åto plantââ¬Â; 18:7, ââ¬Åto pluck upââ¬Â; 31:31-37, see also Ezekiel, 17:1-6 for the clues to this mystery)...
.....I was interrupted partway into this and some of it is complex; I also have to locate a few notes I have on Tea Telphi to illustrate what those Ezekiel verses portray... as Esso said some time back that anything worth doing is worth doing right, (which is wisdom my Dad used to impart), and some of the little things in this story are what make it so fascinating, so I still have to ferret a couple of those out as I go... Iââ¬â¢ll put this up and try to get a bit more of it before the nightââ¬â¢s out...
.....Those daughters of King Zedekiah were taken to the British Isles and we have some Historical proof of such, which I will get to; there can be no excuse, save Divine Providence for the fact that Jeremiah had been given complete freedom of movement by the king of Babylon... he went so far as to give his own general to Jeremiah as a servant, as well as a sum of money to see to his needs, (Jeremiah, 39:11-14); were there other ensamples of any pagan kings so doing with the likes of a prophet from a conquered peoples? One would be hard-pressed to find one; some time later, Jeremiah had been taken into Egypt, (Jeremiah, 43), by the disobedient Judeans, where Jeremiah made his break, along with his scribe, Baruch, (Jeremiah, 36:4), and made his way to Spain with the daughters of Zedekiah, and later to the British Isles...
.....With the knowledge of the fact that the Grecian dynasties were of the Israelites, once Troy was founded, many of the Grecian Israelites had migrated into the British Isles as well and found their Israelite brethren already established; these included the Davidic descendents, including those through Nathanââ¬â¢s, (Davidââ¬â¢s son, who had already established a monarchy there), line... thus, we see that the continuum of the throne existing through the remarriage of Zedekiahââ¬â¢s daughters into the Davidic line, and an heir to David reigning over true Israel; it matters not the ââ¬Ånameââ¬Â they were known by...
.....In Ezekiel, 21:25-27 we read of the throne being taken, in a sense; YHVH declared He would ââ¬Åoverturn, overturn, overnturnââ¬Â, and give it to ââ¬ÅHim to comeââ¬Â... three times would there be an ââ¬Åoverturningââ¬Â, and from History, we document these three when Jacobââ¬â¢s Pillar, representing the throne, was taken to Ireland by Jeremiah... By the Irish name of Lia-fail we recognize the sacred relic that was reported to have been there some five centuries before The Christ; it was upon this stone that all Kings and Queens of, not only Ireland, but England and Wales, were coronated... This was ââ¬Åoverturnedââ¬Â in 498 A.D. by one Fergus the Great to Scotland; taking the name of the ââ¬ÅStone of Sconeââ¬Â by virtue of the fact that it was kept in the Abbey of Scone...
.....The Scottish hold was then ââ¬Åoverturnedââ¬Â to England by Edward I in 1296 A.D. where it spent until recently, (if I am up to speed on the latest information), under the coronation throne in Westminster Abbey and referred to as the ââ¬Åcoronation stoneââ¬Â; yes, there are extensive articles and studies that ââ¬Ådebunkââ¬Â the stone... just as my reading of Jeremiah 31 earlier is said to be in error as it could not mean as I say, but it refers to the millenial reign; this verse was saying ââ¬Åthey shall teach no moreââ¬Â when we know they will teach in the millenium, just as Ezekiel 44 tells us... this is how the confusers work, you see? I had explained said verse and was ridiculed for ââ¬Åimproper sentence structureââ¬Â or some such nonsense, (they do well to keep one off balance); in retrospect, however, for their reading to have validity, they defy other witnesses within Scripture, when they assert that which is not in alignment with the whole of His Word... And they tell me, ââ¬Åcontext, context, contextââ¬Â...
.....The three ââ¬Åoverturningsââ¬Â are exactly as declared; our History is replete with prophetic fulfillment, thus validating, in no uncertain terms, that which Scripture declares... but we donââ¬â¢t all do our homework, do we? We donââ¬â¢t all study the reality of His Story and how perfect is the alignement when roles of the actors on the world scene are properly applied; too many of us listen to the fairy tale being craftily woven for us, thereby obscuring the reality behind a similar veil to the one hiding the midgetââ¬â¢s stilts... About the only observation I find more fascinating is to see how many buy the lie, and defend it with vigor; but then, that is just more validation of the prophetic utterance of Scripture... ââ¬ÅMy people are destroyed for a lack of knowledgeââ¬Â certainly comes to mind...
.....The original concept of the ââ¬ÅDivine Right of Kingââ¬Â was due to the fact that YHVH had established the monarchy in the throne spoken of herein, as opposed to mere man; the evidence surrounding the Stone, or Jacobââ¬â¢s Pillar, (for further information on the story of this stone, see The Stones Cry Out by Bonnie Gaunt, as well as Jacobââ¬â¢s Pillar, by E. Raymond Capt, M.A., A.I.A., F.S.A.), reveals that it came to Ireland, (Hibernia), from Spain, (Iberia), and that it had itââ¬â¢s early days in the Holy Land, (which today is profaned)... it is of no small import that the symbol for the nation of Ireland is the Harp of David; just as the symbols of the tribes are manifest throughout the Christian west...
.....Frederick Haberman, (mentioned above), in his book, Tracing Your White Ancestors, (1934), states, ââ¬ÅIrish Historians are unanimous in agreement that about 580 B.C. there arrived in Ulster a notable man, a Patriarch, or Saint, accompanied by an eastern Princess, and a lesser person by the name of Simon Brach, or Berech, (Jeremiahââ¬â¢s scribe, Baruch; ancient Irish records refer also to this particular arrival as a ââ¬ÅHoly man from the east came to Dan, bringing with him a scribe, Brugsch, also a beautiful Princess, daughter of a King, (Ingersoll, pp. 20)). This party brought with them several remarkable things about which Irelandââ¬â¢s songs and legends reveal; those things were a harp, (Davidââ¬â¢s harp), and a wonderful stoneââ¬âthe Stone of Destinyââ¬â the Lia Phail. According to many traditions, Jeremiah took the princesses to Spain, where one of them married a Prince of Zarragossa, (from the lineage of Zarah/Judah). With the other Princess he arrived in Ulster sometime later. Irish tradition tells us that Jeremiah married Princess Tamar Telphi, (also referred to as Tea Telphi; she was likely named after her ancestor Tamar, the wife of Judah, who was the mother of Zarah and Pharez), to Eochaidh, the Heremon, or head King of Ireland, after the latter had embraced the worship of the true Jehovah, (YHVH).ââ¬Â...
.....Jeremiah himself died and was buried in Ireland; his grave can still be seen today... Jeremiah was a true Levitical Priest from the tribe of Levi; the true High Priest of Israel wore a breastplate which contained a series of twelve precious stones, one symbolizing each of the twelve tribes of Israel... The stone representing Levi was the Emerald; Jeremiah, of the Emerald tribe of Levi, was the Patron Saint of Ireland, (the first Saint Patrick; care to guess what manner of ââ¬Åsnakeââ¬Â he ran out of Ireland?), which is even today recognized as the ââ¬ÅEmerald Isleââ¬Â... Coincidental? Hmmm...
.....Recall above that the House of Israel and the House of Judah had split, one from another; this occurred around 945 B.C., enduring until a reunification under Alfred the great, around 850 A.D.... This was the very beginning of the two sticks of Ezekielââ¬â¢s prophecy becoming fulfilled in a reunification of the House of Israel with the House of Judah, (see also Jeremiah, 3:18 and Hosea, 1:11); the tribe of Judah was divided also between Judahââ¬â¢s two sons, Zarah and Pharez, (Genesis, 38:27-30), and Zarahââ¬â¢s tribe itself was divided between Zarahââ¬â¢s own two sons, Darda and Calcol, (1Chronicles, 2:6)... Tea Telphi was, herself, of the Pharez lineage, who then married King Eochaidh, (the ancestor of all the Kings and Queens of Scotland); Eochaidh was of the Calcol, Zarah, Judah line, and this marriage reunited the first half of Zarah and Pharez... It was with the marriage of Queen Victoria, (possessor of ancestry back to King David), and Prince Albert that the entire Royal lineage of Judah became reunited with the Darda, Zarah, Judah line; thus, were all of the Kings and Queens of Europe, through Prince Albert, (of the Darda, Judah lineage), fully reunited with the Kings and Queens of Scotland and Ireland through Queen Victoria, (Calcol, Judah lineage), and all of Israel was reunited to the current United Kingdom... these Historical names were not pulled out of thin air, Christian; there was great purpose and Historic significance to the usage of words and names in our past and it is of great edification to learn the translational meanings behind the names given in the Scripture, as it adds a second dimension and emphasis to any given story being brought forth within...
.....This is not to say that this will not find secondary fulfillment at some future date, wherein Israel, with her blindness finally lifted, will fully recognize the prophecy being fulfilled even before her once blind eyes; recall that the greater portion of Israel went from approximately 781 to 712 B.C. without an official King or sanctioned Priest, due to the captivity in Assyria... It was not until the reign of Alfred the Great, approximately 850-900 A.D., the first King of all of England, who wa known as a Godly King, who had established the laws of England upon the predication of The Law of YHVH from Scripture; Alfred had also been responsible for the translation of the Scripture into Anglo-Saxon, (the Kingââ¬â¢s English), as he had fully recognized that the Anglo-Saxon peoples were the true Israelites of Scripture, just as those with eyes to see and ears to hear are learning right here... I have said repeatedly that the evidence was overwhelming and the scholarship beyond reproach; the Israel of the time period just before Alfredââ¬â¢s day were in their punishment period, where they were appolumi, or, ââ¬Ålostââ¬Â, (if I recall that spelling correctly), which means ââ¬Åput away, as for punishmentââ¬Â, wherein they had no King to reign,and were blinded to their identity as YHVHââ¬â¢s people... this is another reason for the distinction of this particular time period being known to History as the ââ¬Ådark agesââ¬Â, indeed, Haberman holds that Latin word Cimmerians, actually means ââ¬Åthose in darknessââ¬Â, due to their ââ¬Ålost tribeââ¬Â nature...
.....Now; having expounded upon the solemn promise made by YHVH to the people of Israel to have a perpetual King from the tribe of Judah, more specifically, of the Davidic line, to sit on the throne of Israel, can anyone honestly say that the ââ¬Åjewsââ¬Â, who have no King or Queen, (ââ¬ÅWe have no king but Ceasar!!ââ¬Â), are of the true Scriptural Israel? The Europeans have had the monarchy in perpetuity, always declaring their lineage from King David; indeed, the Scottish Declaration of Indepence itself mentions this lineage... It is no coincidence that Queen Victoria has traced her lineage directly to King David; her very name translates to ââ¬Åoath of YHVHââ¬Â, (which is a direct reference to the solemn vow from YHVH concerning this throne)... Howââ¬â¢s that for some alignment between Scripture and History, (read: His Story), of such profound perfection? I see not how a soul would find this anything less than fascinating to the nth degree; this is how I was drawn into these studies as a result of Historical study... this, inspite of extreme discomfort some years back every time I had stumbled across a reference to the devout nature of the founding fathers of this country; my, how far knowledge can deliver us out of darkness...
.....There has existed a strong rivalry between the House of Judah and the House of Israel that persists to this day; this rivalry had manifested itself yet again in the break of our forebears from the English monarchy in the establishment of this land... even though the two Houses have been since united; another fascinating prophetic utterance is given in Isaiah, 9:21... here we read that Ephraim Israel, (Britain) and Mannaseh Israel, (America), would unite, one to the other for the purpose of fighting Judah Israel, (Germany); sound at all familiar to anyone reading?
.....With the vast amount of information on this subject, I am constantly amazed that, not only is this not widely known at this point, but that people, so conditioned have they become, that they immediately assail the messenger as some manner of vile creature, (I had done so myself in the past), never realizing that by so doing, they are in actual, open, rebellion to The Living God of Israel, YHVH, Father of the Sons of The Living God and Our King and Saviour, Christ Jesus, the Very Lamb of YHVH; let the blindness of my Israel brethren continue to lift that they may realize the wonderful heritage left them by their forebears and throw off the yoke of the antiChrist element that has assaulted our people and left them laden with the false guilt of the lies of them
2005-03-09 20:12 | User Profile
Now Patrick the saying out of the mouth of two or three witnesses? You will have us following the written law, the Torah?
What about the rest of the Torah?
2005-03-09 20:49 | User Profile
.....I don't use the word "torah"; are you referring to the oral traditions of the elders?
ââ¬ÂTorahââ¬Â means TALMUD
Working With Words of Torah, by Jane Rachel Litman. Shma (Jewish Family and Life!), April 2001
.....ââ¬ÂThe background sound in the small library is muted but intense. Pairs of scholars lean over their talmudic texts whispering energetically, trying to puzzle out the meaning of the particular sugya, passage. The teacher directs them back toward the group and asks for questions. One student raises a hand: ââ¬ÅI donââ¬â¢t understand verse 5:4 of the tractate Niddah. What does the phrase ââ¬Ëit is like a finger in the eyeââ¬â¢ mean?ââ¬â¢ The teacher responds, ââ¬ËThis refers to the hymen of a girl younger than three years old. The Sages believed that in the case of toddler rape, the hymen would fully grow back by the time the girl reached adulthood and married. Therefore, though violated, she would still technically be counted as a virgin and could marry a priest. Itââ¬â¢s an analogy: poking your finger in the eye is uncomfortable, but causes no lasting harm.ââ¬â¢ There is a collective gasp of breath among the students. Their dismay is palpable.
.....They do not like this particular talmudic text or the men behind it. But its authors, the talmudic rabbis, hardly wrote it with this particular group of students in mind - mostly thirty- and forty-year-old women in suburban Philadelphia taking a four-week class titled ââ¬ËWomen in Jewish Lawââ¬â¢ at their Reform synagogue. The questioner persists, ââ¬â¢I donââ¬â¢t understand. Are you saying this refers to the rape of a three year-old girl?ââ¬â¢ ââ¬ËOr younger,ââ¬â¢ the teacher responds dryly. ââ¬ËI donââ¬â¢t see how it says anything about rape and hymens. You must be mistaken. I donââ¬â¢t believe the rabbis are talking about rape at all. I think this statement has nothing to do with the rest of the passage.ââ¬â¢ The teacher (Iââ¬â¢ll admit now that it was me, a second-year rabbinic student) responds, ââ¬â¢Well, thatââ¬â¢s the common understanding. What do you think it means?ââ¬â¢ The woman is clearly agitated, ââ¬ËI donââ¬â¢t know, but I do know that it couldnââ¬â¢t be about child rape.ââ¬â¢ This is week three of the class. The woman does not return for week four. Denial ... I find [Elizabeth Kubler] Rossââ¬â¢s model helpful when addressing sacred Jewish texts that are violent or xenophobic, that speak of child abuse, human slavery, or homophobia with gross insensitivity. Like so many of my colleagues and students, I often drift confusedly through denial, anger, grief, rationalization (a form of bargaining); sometimes reaching acceptance, sometimes not.ââ¬Â
2005-03-09 23:35 | User Profile
You are incorrect. The torah is the written word, the first five books of the bible. The oral torah is the Talmud. Babylonian and Jerusalem. You can put that on your back if you like. Have you ever seen a full set? They are huge!!!! But not to say that the sages did not have excellent insight and teachings on some points. But were they hearing from Yeshua?
Nevertheless, we are told by Yeshua to do the [u]written word[/u] and not the tradtions of the Pharisees or the Elders. To keep the commands as found in the Tanach, that is from Genesis to Malachi and further explained in the New Testament as they applied to you. Are you in Jerusalem? Are you a Levite at the Temple? No! Then you can't do them those commands. No sacrificing of animals, No Temple at this time. Do you see? You keep them as best you can. Wondering? Ask Yeshua He will defintely tell you.
See Matt 15 Matt 23 Acts 15 for some examples in the new testament.
Why else would God say, my yoke is easy my burden is light?
What is so hard about not eating food that is bad for you, or singing and dancing and resting on the Sabbaths of the Lord. Is worshipping not fun?The commands are not impossible for you to do. They are not way up in heaven so high you can't reach them or in the sea you have to dive for them! But right there in Your Bible, your very one that you can take with you, and read in your own language. What a miracle is that?
God is Good and we are the apple of His Eye!
Are customs and tradtions bad? No! Only if they contradict with the written word of the Book.
Do you see?
And for the passages below, ask yourself what would Yeshua do, according to his word?
[QUOTE=Patrick].....I don't use the word "torah"; are you referring to the oral traditions of the elders?
ââ¬ÂTorahââ¬Â means TALMUD
Working With Words of Torah, by Jane Rachel Litman. Shma (Jewish Family and Life!), April 2001
.....ââ¬ÂThe background sound in the small library is muted but intense. Pairs of scholars lean over their talmudic texts whispering energetically, trying to puzzle out the meaning of the particular sugya, passage. The teacher directs them back toward the group and asks for questions. One student raises a hand: ââ¬ÅI donââ¬â¢t understand verse 5:4 of the tractate Niddah. What does the phrase ââ¬Ëit is like a finger in the eyeââ¬â¢ mean?ââ¬â¢ The teacher responds, ââ¬ËThis refers to the hymen of a girl younger than three years old. The Sages believed that in the case of toddler rape, the hymen would fully grow back by the time the girl reached adulthood and married. Therefore, though violated, she would still technically be counted as a virgin and could marry a priest. Itââ¬â¢s an analogy: poking your finger in the eye is uncomfortable, but causes no lasting harm.ââ¬â¢ There is a collective gasp of breath among the students. Their dismay is palpable.
.....They do not like this particular talmudic text or the men behind it. But its authors, the talmudic rabbis, hardly wrote it with this particular group of students in mind - mostly thirty- and forty-year-old women in suburban Philadelphia taking a four-week class titled ââ¬ËWomen in Jewish Lawââ¬â¢ at their Reform synagogue. The questioner persists, ââ¬â¢I donââ¬â¢t understand. Are you saying this refers to the rape of a three year-old girl?ââ¬â¢ ââ¬ËOr younger,ââ¬â¢ the teacher responds dryly. ââ¬ËI donââ¬â¢t see how it says anything about rape and hymens. You must be mistaken. I donââ¬â¢t believe the rabbis are talking about rape at all. I think this statement has nothing to do with the rest of the passage.ââ¬â¢ The teacher (Iââ¬â¢ll admit now that it was me, a second-year rabbinic student) responds, ââ¬â¢Well, thatââ¬â¢s the common understanding. What do you think it means?ââ¬â¢ The woman is clearly agitated, ââ¬ËI donââ¬â¢t know, but I do know that it couldnââ¬â¢t be about child rape.ââ¬â¢ This is week three of the class. The woman does not return for week four. Denial ... I find [Elizabeth Kubler] Rossââ¬â¢s model helpful when addressing sacred Jewish texts that are violent or xenophobic, that speak of child abuse, human slavery, or homophobia with gross insensitivity. Like so many of my colleagues and students, I often drift confusedly through denial, anger, grief, rationalization (a form of bargaining); sometimes reaching acceptance, sometimes not.ââ¬Â[/QUOTE]
2005-03-10 00:08 | User Profile
[QUOTE=SCRIPTURESEZ]ask yourself what would Yeshua do, according to his word?[/QUOTE]
Yeshua is telling me your false gospel needs to be stamped out. So long, SS.
And remember, Solus Christos and Sola Fide.
2005-03-10 02:35 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]Yeshua is telling me your false gospel needs to be stamped out. So long, SS.
And remember, Solus Christos and Sola Fide.[/QUOTE]
GWINE!! ...or cyber-raptured? :thumbsup:
2005-03-10 03:07 | User Profile
Maybe cyber bbq'ed.
2005-03-10 03:28 | User Profile
:eek:
Hope it wasn't Br'er Arator in drag...
[QUOTE=Sertorius]Maybe cyber bbq'ed.[/QUOTE]
2005-03-10 03:59 | User Profile
Absolutely fascinating Patrick! :cheers:
I'm going to go through this again... slower this time.
It seems to me that the Khazars have actually ââ¬Åhijackedââ¬Â OUR heritage!
:shocking:
2005-03-10 04:16 | User Profile
"It seems to me that the Khazars have actually ââ¬Åhijackedââ¬Â OUR heritage!"
.....Which is exactly what Scripture has been declaring all along; they're usurped Israel's identity...
Tex...
.....Pleased to see you again; I've been away from here awhile... did you zap that fellow? I was fixing to light him up seven ways from Sunday... :cowboy:
2005-03-10 06:06 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Patrick]Tex...
.....Pleased to see you again; I've been away from here awhile... did you zap that fellow? I was fixing to light him up seven ways from Sunday... :cowboy:[/QUOTE]
Yes I did, Pat. I deliberated on it for quite a while, but each passing day brought more convincing proof to my mind that he showed all the characteristics of the fabled [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll]Internet troll[/url].
2005-03-18 07:19 | User Profile
The whorship of Woden goes back thousands of years in Europe, the eddas and such where written by a christian after the Heathen period and where made to be a collection of entertaining stories for his students and others. The image of Blader and Loki where made up by him. As before Blader was a ancient half god/man and a warrior hero, not the christ like total god image he was rewritten as and Thor was the fire god as Loki never exsisted. Even the story of the gods death was a invention. The funny thing is many heathens use as there main book a christian invention.
As for god being love the old testiment is filled with divine genocide, war, hate and revenge and Racial, cultural hate. The new testiment was not the nicest to jews either, nailed them for the satanic creatures they are. The fact so many christians wail and bitch about Adolf Hitlers genocide of jews when there holy book is filled with holy god ordered genocide is ironic. But then again how many christians really read there bibles.lol
2005-03-18 07:42 | User Profile
[QUOTE=G.Larson]... As for god being love the old testiment is filled with divine genocide, war, hate and revenge and Racial, cultural hate. The new testiment was not the nicest to jews either, nailed them for the satanic creatures they are. ...[/QUOTE] Fascinating. You're into the occult... but you also believe in God and Satan?
Do you use the occult for spiritual adventures... or are you just a researcher?
:confused:
2005-03-18 14:02 | User Profile
I'am what I'am.
[QUOTE=Phantasm]Fascinating. You're into the occult... but you also believe in God and Satan?
Do you use the occult for spiritual adventures... or are you just a researcher?
:confused:[/QUOTE]