← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Kevin_O'Keeffe

ADL fifth columnists pushes anti-White Hate agenda in violation of Constitutional law

Thread ID: 17029 | Posts: 3 | Started: 2005-03-01

Wayback Archive


Kevin_O'Keeffe [OP]

2005-03-01 01:19 | User Profile

[url]http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4558[/url]

New Federal Hate Bill to Pass This Spring: The ADL Mafia pushes anti-White Hate agenda in violation of Constitutional law.

by Rev. Ted Pike

Although defeated in conference between the House and Senate on Oct. 8, the Big Brother federal Hate Bill, the "Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act" (LLEEA), will easily become law when it is re-introduced by the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith and its gay lobby this spring.

In a procedural, non-binding vote on Sept. 28, the House of Representatives voted 213 to 186 in favor of passage. This concurs with the Senate vote of 65 to 33 in its favor on April 15. This means that the ADL Mafia, originator of this legislation, can boldly re-introduce it through their lackeys, Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass) and Senator Gordon Smith (R-OR), and it will surely pass. The overwhelming majority of Republican and Democratic members of Congress have pledged to pass it.

Although the ADL was successful, during the 1990's, in persuading 48 states to adopt some version of its "model Hate bill," the ADL is intent on the real prize: establishment of a vast federal Hate bureaucracy forcing the states to submit to a federal Hate agenda. "The Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act" would demolish all restrictions against federal intrusion into states' enforcement of "civil rights" law. In fact, if the federal government did not like the verdict of a Hate trial on the local level, the federal bill gives the government the right to intervene and, presumably, retry the case to its satisfaction.


Sertorius

2005-03-01 22:15 | User Profile

This sounds like a further extenstion of the noxious idea that if you can't get a state level conviction say, like the Greensboro trial of the late '70s, you can go after them for a so-called "violation of civil rights" at the federal.

[IMG]http://www.nationalvanguard.org/images/teaser/foxman_wincing.jpg[/IMG]

What's he wincing about or is he saying "just this little bit more"?


Kevin_O'Keeffe

2005-03-01 22:51 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Sertorius]This sounds like a further extenstion of the noxious idea that if you can't get a state level conviction say, like the Greensboro trial of the late '70s, you can go after them for a so-called "violation of civil rights" at the federal.[/QUOTE]

Yep. Once that self-serving, insincere "civil rights violation" precedent got established during the 1960s, and subsequently the Federal government went into the thought/"hate" crime business, it was only a matter of time before the two notions were combined, and a large and rapidly expanding Federal agency would be created and tasked with enforcing said combination, in order to create the basic framework of an emerging Soviet-style, anti-White, politically correct police state. I'm frankly surprised its taken them until 2005. They've probably been thinking about it since the Truman administration, if not earlier.