← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · jay
Thread ID: 16895 | Posts: 35 | Started: 2005-02-22
2005-02-22 18:20 | User Profile
[HTML]http://www.nursingclasses.com/nurse-ceu-domestic-abuse.html[/HTML]
Victim Profile Frequency
An estimated 2 million women worldwide are raped each year, with true incidence perhaps double. In the U.S. in 2000, the National Violence Against Women Survey reported nearly 25% women and 7.9% men reported a former or current spouse, live-in partner or date victimized them at least once in their life. 7.7% of women reported rape and 0.3% men. The study reported 22.1% women and 7.4% men suffered physical assault.
Victimization occurs repeatedly, the same survey reported an average of 6.9 assaults by the same partner for women and 4.4 for men. Other figures suggest that a partner has stalked 5% of women and 0.6% of men in the U.S.
There is disparity in result findings regarding the gender of domestic violence victims. Conventional wisdom is that women are more likely to be injured; there are also studies suggesting that male and female victims are equal.
Many victims are pregnant. Disabled males and females are at greater risk, and women from families with an income below $10,000. Women whose job or educational level is higher than their partners are also at increased risk.
Mortality
It is known that a home in which family fighting is the norm is 4.4 times more likely to be the scene of a homicide than one in which there is no violence. The female is 30% more likely to be killed than the man in mixed-sex homicides, and most murders are committed with firearms. However, in approximately a third of homicides a victim-offender relationship cannot be identified, it is difficult to interpret that data.
Almost half of an estimated 4,400 interfamily murder victims are spouses. Of the 1,500 annual deaths caused from murder-suicide, 50 to 75% occur in spousal or consortial relationships. The male partner, often with a history of domestic violence, is associated with over 90% of these acts.
[B][COLOR=DarkRed]Race
The National Violence Against Women survey found that African American and Alaskan Native women and men present the highest minority figures for domestic abuse, while Asian and Pacific Islander represent the lowest. Salber and Taliaferro reported in 1998 that [U]African Americans are 8.4 times more likely to commit spousal homicide than whites. Spousal homicide is 7.7 times higher in interracial couples than in intraracial ones[/COLOR][/U].[/B]
Gender
Women are more likely to be attacked, injured or raped by their male partners than by anyone else. Females are six times more likely than males to suffer from violence committed by an intimate. Lone offenders identified as intimates account for 29% of all violence against females.
A high level of sexual violence is reported by battered lesbians. This may also be true of their gay counterparts but there is little documentation to support this in the literature. Approximately 11% of lesbians report being raped, assaulted or stalked by their cohabitant in comparison to 30.4% of women living with a male partner. Approximately 15% of males living with males report rape, assault or stalking in contrast to 7.7% men complaining of this from a female partner.
Age:
Young women aged 19-29 are most likely to be victims of violence, with 20 to 30% of university women reporting date violence. Homicide among spouses peaks in the 15-24 age category (with rates declining thereafter for African Americans). The greater the age difference between spouses, the higher the risk of spousal homicide.
2005-02-22 18:28 | User Profile
Young women aged 19-29 are most likely to be victims of violence, [I]with 20 to 30% of university women reporting date violence[/I]. Homicide among spouses peaks in the 15-24 age category (with rates declining thereafter for African Americans). The greater the age difference between spouses, the higher the risk of spousal homicide.
Emphasis mine [/QUOTE]
I remember reading something that disputed this claim. The questions in the survey were very leading if I remember them correctly and they catagorized certain behaviors as indicitive of violence that were very questionable.
2005-02-22 18:49 | User Profile
[QUOTE][B]Race[/B]
The National Violence Against Women survey found that African American and Alaskan Native women and men present the highest minority figures for domestic abuse, while Asian and Pacific Islander represent the lowest. Salber and Taliaferro reported in 1998 that African Americans are 8.4 times more likely to commit spousal homicide than whites. Spousal homicide is 7.7 times higher in interracial couples than in intraracial ones.[/QUOTE]
Well, obviously this paper wasn't federally-funded, or the graf cited above would not exist.
But that graf says it all. Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas. Lie down with [I]jigs[/I], however, and you might not get up at all.
2005-02-22 19:01 | User Profile
Negro male/White female pairings are a dire symptom, certainly--but what of those Honkey bucks who co-mingle with distaff flesh of the Mestiza and Oriental variety...?
2005-02-22 21:01 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Howard Campbell, Jr.]Negro male/White female pairings are a dire symptom, certainly--but what of those Honkey bucks who co-mingle with distaff flesh of the Mestiza and Oriental variety...?[/QUOTE]
Numbers or no numbers, Whites having children with non-Whites (of any variety) will lead to the demise of western culture and the White race, its just that simple. One day i hope we once again have anti-miscegenation laws and enforce them.
2005-02-22 21:50 | User Profile
The low birth rate of whites in general is a much more pressing issue than interracial couples. It like focusing on cigarette smoke for the sake of pollution control.
2005-02-23 01:58 | User Profile
Such PCness!
[QUOTE]The National Violence Against Women survey found that African American and Alaskan Native women and men present the highest minority figures for domestic abuse, while Asian and Pacific Islander represent the lowest. Salber and Taliaferro reported in 1998 that African Americans are 8.4 times more likely to commit spousal homicide than whites. Spousal homicide is 7.7 times higher in interracial couples than in intraracial ones.[/QUOTE]
2005-02-23 03:41 | User Profile
Jesus was probably not "white"
We don't know what Jesus looked like, but considering from what part of the world he was from, he was not blond haired or blue eyed, but was a from the Tribe of Judah, a Hebrew nation, a JEW. Dark haired dark eyes olive skin? We don't know but we are told there was nothing in his physical appearance to attract us to him. So like God to instruct us in everything thing.
But we do not know what he looks like, and your statement brings up another good reason not make graven images. Who is that image you see of Jesus painted all over and on the cross? That is not Jesus but imaginations of men.
Is it Dangerous to look at jesus pictures?. Absolutely, we are told that an image will be set up in the Temple in the last days, and many would be fooled and would fall down and worship it!
I see a lot of fear in these statements regarding race and so on. God does not give you a spirit of fear, but of a sound mind. The spirit of fear comes from the little god of this age, satan who is the father of lies and is a murderer and was so from the beginning.
Besides, our battle belongs to the Lord, and is not with flesh and blood but with spiritual wickedness in high places. Eph 6:12
We are told not to hate our enemies, but to pray for them and love them and forgive forgive forgive.
That is the command from the Lion of Judah to which all men will be held in account. You want to get a better picture of who Jesus is? See Revelations.
Remember we are all one with Christ Jesus, with God, Grafted In. Romans 11
Regarding the violence and the goings on? These folks sound as if they are not following the Torah of Jesus, don't you think? Pray for them and help when you can.
2005-02-23 04:43 | User Profile
I used to wonder if white men should adopt the practice of honor killing (well, perhaps "honor tar-and-feathering"). But since I began reading New Nation News, I've come to understand that sooner or later, race-mixing is its own punishment. The woman below and her two black children are among the latest casualties.
Story here, but link may expire.
2005-02-23 04:47 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Howard Campbell, Jr.]Negro male/White female pairings are a dire symptom, certainly--but what of those Honkey bucks who co-mingle with distaff flesh of the Mestiza and Oriental variety...?[/QUOTE]Non-Indian hispanics are white. Hispanics with 1/4 or less Indian blood are white. The rare and occasional mixing of superior-blooded Asians who are thoroughly within Western European acculturation is tolerable.
I have no problem with white females and black males because I am no longer a white racialist, but simply value superior peoples (which are largely white, but can include some European acculturated non-whites). I have no problem with whites with blacks, and in fact I view it is as positive, for it means the inferior whites (white trash) will take themselves out of the propagation of the white race with their congoidian progeny.
I stopped being a white racialist when I realized why should I give a damn about white people when I see most of the white boys blasting hip-hop and rap, walking around in baggy pants and talking like street nigs, or white girls hooking up with stone-cold, tree-swinging congoids. I realized that it was not the individuals of the race I championed but the collective culture and civilization of the race. This culture and civilization is still embodied, if even instinctively and against their conscious desires, among the upper-middle and upper classes. It is rare in upper class areas, where people drive Volvos and Suburus and Saabs, that you will find apparent interracial mixing or wiggerish white boys or glorification of congoid exploits (save for possible Jazz greats). If you doubt this simply go to these upper class areas (where I spend half of my time). If you do see a white girl with a black guy it is almost always the case the black guy is flamboyantly gay.
2005-02-23 05:47 | User Profile
The promotion of racism is another way to control you.
Most people cannot trace their ancestors back more than a few hundred years anyway.
But if you believed the Scriptures we are instructed not to do so.
2005-02-23 05:53 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Tizzard]The woman below and her two black children are among the latest casualties. [/QUOTE] Isn't it disgusting to give birth to a monkey? Don't women want to have children that look like them (and the many generations of ancestors)?
2005-02-23 05:59 | User Profile
Again, you have just insulted The Holy and Annoited one Of Israel, Yeshua Ha Mashiach Ben David, Adonai, Elohim, Our Saviour, Our King, Our Lion of Judah.
Please see Revelations for the result.
All your insults that fall on the saints, fall on Him.
2005-02-23 06:03 | User Profile
You come from parents, but they are only the vessels through which you come, your real "parent" is the creator of all things, Jesus. John 1:1
[QUOTE=Tizzard]I used to wonder if white men should adopt the practice of honor killing (well, perhaps "honor tar-and-feathering"). But since I began reading [url="http://www.newnation.com/index2.html"]New Nation News[/url], I've come to understand that sooner or later, race-mixing is its own punishment. The woman below and her two black children are among the latest casualties.
[img]http://img226.exs.cx/img226/2233/deadtrash6ot.jpg[/img]
Story [url="http://www.kten.com/article.asp?id=6507"]here[/url], but link may expire.[/QUOTE]
2005-02-23 09:20 | User Profile
ewww boy, this is fixin to get interesting
2005-02-23 12:40 | User Profile
[QUOTE]I have no problem with whites with blacks, and in fact I view it is as positive, for it means the inferior whites (white trash) will take themselves out of the propagation of the white race with their congoidian progeny.
I stopped being a white racialist when I realized why should I give a damn about white people when I see most of the white boys blasting hip-hop and rap, walking around in baggy pants and talking like street nigs, or white girls hooking up with stone-cold, tree-swinging congoids. I realized that it was not the individuals of the race I championed but the collective culture and civilization of the race. This culture and civilization is still embodied, if even instinctively and against their conscious desires, among the upper-middle and upper classes. It is rare in upper class areas, where people drive Volvos and Suburus and Saabs, that you will find apparent interracial mixing or wiggerish white boys or glorification of congoid exploits.[/QUOTE]
I sort of hear you ...but you could not be more wrong. If white civilization is to survive it will not be the Upper Classes who do the saving. Just as in war, it will be left to the [I]poor and working class whites [/I] to do the dirty work on [I]behalf [/I] of the Saab Drivers. Not the other way around. Shoot, [I]never [/I] the other way around.
Moreover, you're shockingly naive if you think the Upper Classes are some sort of last bastion against race-mixing; it is the Upper Classes who [I]legitimize [/I] heretofore-taboo behavior in the West. Once upon a time, heroin addicts were considered skells better off dead or locked up; it was only when the children of America's well-to-do families started shooting up that it became fashionable to think of them as [I]victims with an illness[/I].
I don't even believe that the poor and working-class are any more vulgar or [I]declasse [/I] than the well-off; it's just that when you live in a clapboard row-house without an electrified gate around it, your vulgarity is simply more [I]evident [/I] because it's more [I]public[/I].
And don't forget that - in our new, mestizo and Hindu-driven economy - there are more displaced whites than ever (who'd be a helluva lot more upwardly mobile but for the grace of Pablo). Poor or working class, in conjunction with "white", need not mean [I]"stupid"[/I]. But what other word could possibly describe, say, a Paris Hilton?
I cross my fingers for the poor and struggling white folks of America. Without the kind of money required to buffer out the [I]consequences [/I] of the racial-egalitarianism of the well to do - the money that can take the bad stuff out of your line of sight, if not go away altogether - the 'rabble' have to face, [B]every frickin' day[/B], the sort of New America which the Saab drivers can tastefully lower a Venetian blind to avoid witnessing, so they might go on tut-tutting at the latest Hate Crimes on the tv news. But only the rabble can save them, and their Saabs, from the march of the human [I]marabuntas[/I]. Anybody thinking otherwise is kidding himself.
2005-02-23 22:55 | User Profile
The Scriptures tells us not have anything to do with promoting one race over the other. See Romans 11.
We are told not to get into silly arguments of that nature.
Racism is of the world, the elementals, in other words ruling demon spirits, the little god of this age satan.
As long as you occupy yourself with such things, will you be able to understand when the antichrist comes, the lawless one who will set up an image in the temple?
How will you know?
2005-02-23 23:11 | User Profile
1 Timothy, chapter 5, 8 But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.
Also, Lamentations, ch5
SCRIPTURESEZ - id like to know your view of the ADL and SPLC
2005-02-23 23:25 | User Profile
Jesus came for the lost sheep of the House of Israel.
Those are whom the Scriptures speak about.
2005-02-24 00:55 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Non-Indian hispanics are white.[/QUOTE] Actually most Hispanics without Indian blood are Sephardic Jews, Negroes, or a mixture thereof. Where exactly are these white Hispanics?
2005-02-24 04:01 | User Profile
[QUOTE=mwdallas]Actually most Hispanics without Indian blood are Sephardic Jews, Negroes, or a mixture thereof. Where exactly are these white Hispanics?[/QUOTE] Latin Americans of European extraction. In places like Argentina, the population is overwhelmingly white European-- including Irish, Italian, and German ethnicity. Fidel Castro is a white guy. Vincente Fox is a white guy. Most of the successful doctors, bankers, journalists, politicians, etc., in Latin America are white people. You ever watch Telemundo or Univision? Rarely do you see Indian-blooded peoples in dramas, in variety shows, on newscasts, etc. Hispanic television is about the whitest television you'll see outside of Poland!
2005-02-24 20:47 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Fidel Castro is a white guy. [/QUOTE] No, he's a half-Jew. Fox's origins are unclear. As for the doctors, bankers, and politicans you mention, a large proportion are Sephardic Jews.
But my point really was that there are virtually no white Hispanics in the US, and you don't seem to disagree.
2005-02-24 21:31 | User Profile
il ragno,
You are most Right! Bilbo said much the same thing.
[QUOTE]Senator Theodore G. Bilbo:
"The white Southerner firmly, absolutely, and irrevocably denies the contention of the social equality advocates that mongrelization would not degrade the South. Any one who is familiar with the pages of history and the doctrines of biology must know the dangerous results of the amalgamation of the white and black races. That the Negro is inferior to the Caucasian has been proved by six thousand years of world wide experimentation as well as craniologically, and that the mingling of the superior with the inferior will result in the lowering of the higher is just as certain as the fact that half the sum of six and two is only four"....
"Even if only the lower strata of whites mingled with the upper strata of Negroes, the result would be the same. Not only would the other circles be broken within the foreseeable future, but it is wholly erroneous to contend that a child is born of its immediate parents only. Every child is a child of its race, and there is no escape from the almightiness of heredity. However weak the white man, his ancestors produced the greatness of Europe; however strong the black, his ancestors never lifted themselves from the darkness of Africa."
[url]http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13363[/url] [/QUOTE]
2005-02-24 22:54 | User Profile
Again, the bible tells you not to be involved in racism. You exalt yourself against God.
2005-02-24 23:38 | User Profile
sort of hear you ...but you could not be more wrong. If white civilization is to survive it will not be the Upper Classes who do the saving. Just as in war, it will be left to the poor and working class whites to do the dirty work on behalf of the Saab Drivers. Not the other way around. Shoot, never the other way around.
Moreover, you're shockingly naive if you think the Upper Classes are some sort of last bastion against race-mixing; it is the Upper Classes who legitimize heretofore-taboo behavior in the West. Once upon a time, heroin addicts were considered skells better off dead or locked up; it was only when the children of America's well-to-do families started shooting up that it became fashionable to think of them as victims with an illness.
I don't even believe that the poor and working-class are any more vulgar or declasse than the well-off; it's just that when you live in a clapboard row-house without an electrified gate around it, your vulgarity is simply more evident because it's more public.
And don't forget that - in our new, mestizo and Hindu-driven economy - there are more displaced whites than ever (who'd be a helluva lot more upwardly mobile but for the grace of Pablo). Poor or working class, in conjunction with "white", need not mean "stupid". But what other word could possibly describe, say, a Paris Hilton?
If anything, one of the trademarks of modern society is that the upper classes and lower classes differ only in how much money they have. Anyone who thinks that Donald Trump and Ted Turner (or your typical BMW-driving yuppie in his McMansion) go home to read Plutarch and fret about the fall of Western Civilization is living in a world of make-believe.
2005-02-24 23:46 | User Profile
"Racism" is lately denounced as terribly wicked and sinful, but this is only because Christianity lately has subordinated Christian doctrine to conventional morality. Few here will disagree that people prefer those who are most like themselves, and that this is a generally innate characteristic of members of all races. If God designed man with this peculiarity of temperament, but did not denounce it as sin, then it must not be sinful. In fact, this must even be the will of God. Sin is an act contrary to the will of God. If anything's sinful at all, it's the abrogation of this instinct and its implications.
2005-02-25 00:57 | User Profile
[QUOTE=mwdallas] But my point really was that there are virtually no white Hispanics in the US, and you don't seem to disagree.[/QUOTE] Since you have qualifed your statement with 'in the US,' then I think you are correct, as most Hispanics here are Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, Dominicans, or the like. In South America, however, most of the upper classes are still quite white, such as in Chile and Argentina. The lower classes, of course, are mestizos and Indians.
2005-02-25 01:10 | User Profile
[QUOTE=SCRIPTURESEZ]The Scriptures tells us not have anything to do with promoting one race over the other. See Romans 11.[/QUOTE]
So the scriptures are against affirmative action, preferential entry for minorities into academic institutions and all forms of racial-based quotas? Are they also against all attempts to promote the interests of minority groups through negative media stereotyping of whites? Do the scriptures proscribe the advancement of Jewish racial interests by the Zionist movement? Aren't these things all "promoting one race over another"? I don't want the white race to be promoted over all other races, I simply want to be allowed to defend it against the onslaught of efforts to promote other races at the expense of whites.
[QUOTE]We are told not to get into silly arguments of that nature. [/QUOTE]
Why is it silly to take an interest in the preservation of one's identity?
[QUOTE]Racism is of the world, the elementals, in other words ruling demon spirits, the little god of this age satan. [/QUOTE]
I take an interest in this world because I want to conserve it. I'm not prepared to look the other way while civilisation collapses simply because it's supposedly spiritually self-destructive to occupy myself with this mortal realm. By your logic you shold not object to someone stealing from you, or assaulting you, because your possessions and your mortal body are "of the world".
[QUOTE]As long as you occupy yourself with such things, will you be able to understand when the antichrist comes, the lawless one who will set up an image in the temple?
How will you know?[/QUOTE]
I'll be on the lookout for someone starting wars and spreading death and hatred left and right in the name of God. Oh, wait...
2005-02-25 06:36 | User Profile
[QUOTE=mwdallas]No, he's a half-Jew. Fox's origins are unclear. As for the doctors, bankers, and politicans you mention, a large proportion are Sephardic Jews.
But my point really was that there are virtually no white Hispanics in the US, and you don't seem to disagree.[/QUOTE]
Fox is an Irishman. He rather looks like Ronald Reagan, another Irishman.
Too funny, when you think about it.
2005-02-25 17:24 | User Profile
I know one of Fox's relatives. She is engaged to a co-worker. She is of a baffling mixed ancestry. My co-worker is half-Jewish. For what it's worth.
2005-02-25 17:37 | User Profile
Whatever. They're still all messicans.
2005-02-25 18:01 | User Profile
These are God's words, not mine. You have a choice on what you are going to do about it. Follow and Trust in the Lord, or continue on living in fear and anger with all of this stuff all of your life. Fear keeps you stuck in your own head, in your own four walls, in your own little neighborhood.
Do you want the protection of the Lord? Then follow him. Take all the filth out of your communications and your life. Be separate and Holy unto the Lord. Tame your tongue. Celebrate the Feasts and Festivals of the Lord, Talk to Yeshua (Jesus)
Love God, stop looking at images of the Holy and Annoited One, those are just paintings and sculpture from the imaginations of men and we are told not to do it
I am saying either you believe in Yeshua is God, or not. If you believe the Bible or not. If you beleive that God does not treat the righteous and the wicked or life.
Up to you, choose whom you will serve. God or the teachings and doctrines of men or the little god of this world.
[QUOTE=RowdyRoddyPiper]So the scriptures are against affirmative action, preferential entry for minorities into academic institutions and all forms of racial-based quotas? Are they also against all attempts to promote the interests of minority groups through negative media stereotyping of whites? Do the scriptures proscribe the advancement of Jewish racial interests by the Zionist movement? Aren't these things all "promoting one race over another"? I don't want the white race to be promoted over all other races, I simply want to be allowed to defend it against the onslaught of efforts to promote other races at the expense of whites.
Why is it silly to take an interest in the preservation of one's identity?
I take an interest in this world because I want to conserve it. I'm not prepared to look the other way while civilisation collapses simply because it's supposedly spiritually self-destructive to occupy myself with this mortal realm. By your logic you shold not object to someone stealing from you, or assaulting you, because your possessions and your mortal body are "of the world".
I'll be on the lookout for someone starting wars and spreading death and hatred left and right in the name of God. Oh, wait...[/QUOTE]
2005-02-25 18:19 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]Whatever. They're still all messicans.[/QUOTE]
Right.
Different nation.
They ain't us.
2005-02-25 18:25 | User Profile
[QUOTE=SCRIPTURESEZ]These are God's words, not mine. You have a choice on what you are going to do about it. Follow and Trust in the Lord, or continue on living in fear and anger with all of this stuff all of your life. Fear keeps you stuck in your own head, in your own four walls, in your own little neighborhood.
And your argument is with St. Paul, judaizer:
I speak the truth in Christ–I am not lying, my conscience confirms it in the Holy Spirit– I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. For I could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers, those of my own race, the people of Israel. Theirs is the adoption as sons; theirs the divine glory, the covenants, the receiving of the law, the temple worship and the promises. Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them is traced the human ancestry of Christ, who is God over all, forever praised! Amen. - Romans 9:1-5
To love and be ultimately concerned with your own people is no sin or vice.
2005-02-26 22:27 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]To love and be ultimately concerned with your own people is no sin or vice.[/QUOTE]
"The wish to preserve one's identity and the identity of one's nation requires no justificationââ¬âand no belief in superiorityââ¬âany more than the wish to have one's own children, and to continue one's family through them need be justified or rationalized by a belief that they are superior to the children of others, or more fit, or better in business. One identifies with one's family, because it is one's familyââ¬ânot because they are better people than others. For no other reason one identifies with one's national group more than with others. Else there would be no nations." -- Ernst van den Haag