← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Franco
Thread ID: 16759 | Posts: 1 | Started: 2005-02-14
2005-02-14 14:31 | User Profile
[I][The murders-committed-by-communists-in-Italy topic is already mentioned here at OD, but this is a monologue about it and other communist crimes; also, a disclaimer: OD admin. may not agree with the views shown here, e.g. the idea of an allied/Nazi partnership][/I]
[B]Evil is legit in the West today, since its opposition was crushed in 1945[/B]
[I][We apologize if this seems to wander a bit] [/I] Read the article below [the URL after this paragraph] about a communist crime that occurred in Europe at the end of WWII. We want to comment on matters related to that event, and also on communism as an evil ideology [1]. The crime that the article refers to is the murdering of thousands of people in Europe by communists at the end of WWII. Of course, that event was just one event - such mass murder by communists happened all over Europe:
[url]http://www.guardian.co.uk/italy/story/0,12576,1410698,00.html?gusrc=rss[/url]
We want to make a couple of points relating to that crime:
1: [B]Why has that horrible communist crime received so little media attention in Europe?[/B] In fact, why do Westerners hardly ever hear about horrific communist crimes - for example, the murders of 7 million people in the Ukraine in the early 1930s? The answer is because the Western media is usually too busy focusing on Nazi-committed crimes.
And how did the Western media come to be so obsessed with Nazi crimes and so unconcerned about communist crimes?
Ever since the Nazis were defeated by the allied forces in WWII, the West has been a stronghold of pro-liberal and pro-Marxist ideas. The Nazis - and their allies such as Italy - were a physical and also psychological "hedge" against those ideas, but when the allies defeated Germany in 1945, that hedge was removed, and any remaining "roots," anywhere in the world, were also removed, or at least permanently discredited.
Interestingly, Nazism was actually much tamer and far more logical than communism, but no matter, the Western allies made the West safe for communist ideas - such as racial equality - anyway. Indeed, the allies gave Soviet madman Joseph Stalin half of Europe to play with. How strange, then, that immediately after WWII, the allies entered a long "cold war" with the Soviets. Translation of the meaning of that cold war fact: the Western allies were merely using the Soviets in WWII to crush far-less-sinister Nazism. And an important feature of that is why they crushed Nazism: in order to please powerful global Jewry, e.g. Jews such as FDR's advisors and various international bankers, who agitated for war with Hitler as early as the mid-1930s; they eventually managed to get Hitler to declare war on America.
[And while we are on the subject of the Nazis: they were not trying to enslave Europe when they invaded other countries. For one thing, Hitler was trying to re-take territory that was stolen from Germany via the fraudulent 1919 Versailles Treaty; and also, Hitler also needed raw materials which he couldn't get because of circumstances imposed on Germany by the allies, hence Hitler's invasion of other countries. Hitler also needed to deny the allies possible launching pads for an allied invasion of Germany/Europe. Nazi Germany could be very reasonable when not endlessly provoked [like the allies were doing almost since Hitler took office]. In fact, Hitler wanted to form a partnership with England against the murderous Soviet Union, but of course the Brits were having none of that logic - they instead preferred the "friendship" of a Marxist dictator with an iron hand and an obscenely high bodycount: at least 10 million Russian citizens were murdered by 1939].
2: [B]Given that communism is the most evil ideology mankind has ever produced, why are communists serving in European governments today?[/B] [2]. With the terror that communism has brought the world [including around 90 million murders since 1917], why would a modern Western country, e.g. Italy, allow communists anywhere near its government? The simple answer is that the entire West has been weakened by liberal and Marxist ideas, i.e. cultural Bolshevism, and as a result Western countries now accept ideas that they would not normally accept. And who delivered that cultural Bolshevism to the West? The answer is: a race of people called Jews [3]. True, some non-Jews helped with that delivery, but the pointmen, the ship-captains, the pilots of that cultural Bolshevism were Jewish, starting with the actual Bolsheviks in Russia and continuing onward from there.
So to sum up/reiterate, the points we wish to stress here are:
a) communism has committed far more crimes than any other ideology, but Westerners rarely hear about those crimes because the West has become Jewed and liberalized;
b) a greater evil - communism - is now either "legit" or at least semi-legit in most Western countries [4], while a far lesser "evil" - Nazism - was crushed into dust by the allies and their temporary Soviet pals; and, Nazism was crushed to benefit world Jewry;
c) regardless of any of its faults, Nazism was pro-Western and pro-traditionalist and it championed the White culture that ancient Greek and Roman statesmen intended for the West to have. Communism - and its softer sibling, race-blind liberalism - is a sickness that is destroying White Western culture, and once that superior White culture is gone, it will never return. Not in 500 years, not in 5,000 years, not ever. Yes, an evil fungus has been allowed to grow in the West since 1945, a malevolent creature that hides under titles such as "anti-racism," "anti-fascism" and "anti-Nazism." Those titles are phony and meaningless. They're Jewy.
The Western countries made a truly boneheaded move when they joined together in the destruction of Nazi Germany for the benefit of world Jewry. Nazism wasn't perfect, and neither was Hitler, but America and Britain should have nonetheless joined forces with Nazi Germany early on, in one way or another, to curb the Jew-built Soviet Union and its allies, to curb the spreading of communism and cultural Bolshevism throughout the world, and to curb the awesome power of world Jewry. And for the mainstream conservatives who may cringe at that last sentence, that sentence doesn't mean that the U.S. should have blindly aided Nazi-committed murder without any form of critique, it merely means that America and the White allied countries should have more carefully considered Western culture and its critical importance when they decided to destroy Nazi Germany, for Germany was the last hedge against cultural Bolshevism in the West [5]; in fact, White Western culture was crippled with the defeat of Germany in 1945.
Whether the West can retain its White-maleness, its traditionalism and therefore its cultural superiority after the total destruction of Germany in WWII, or whether it will instead become a foul soup ruled by Jews, Blacks, Browns, Marxists, feminists and homosexuals, remains to be seen.
[1] Jews mentioned as creating and spreading communism: [url]http://wsi.matriots.com/CommunismIsJewish.html[/url] ; communism is a hopeless, Jewish fraud, whereas Nazism was very successful until the allies crushed it. Communism is an evil ideology in that it promises its followers a paradise but gives them only murder and oppression instead; Nazism makes no bogus promises of paradise and so is much more sincere
[2] in 2004, both France and Italy had communists in their coalition governments; a mention of communists being in the post-WWII Italian government can be seen here: [url]http://www.bartleby.com/65/it/Italy.html[/url] [near the bottom of the page]
[3] technically, the Jews are a hybrid ethnic group, but we use the similar word "race" for simplicity; the genetic hybrid is Arab + Armenid when referring to the main branch of Jewry, the Ashkenazi aka "Eastern" Jews, according to author John Baker. [Baker's great book "Race" is mentioned here: [url]http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/baker_race.htm[/url] ]
[4] most Western countries have at least one communist party and one communist newspaper, whereas Nazi parties and symbols are banned throughout Europe; most of those countries have coalition governments that either have, or had, communist legislators in them [see footnote #2]
[5] art being one example. The Nazis championed great art, while their enemies foisted "modern" art onto the West, e.g. Picasso's painting "Guernica"