← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Gabrielle

Judge rules test-tube embryo is a person

Thread ID: 16670 | Posts: 5 | Started: 2005-02-09

Wayback Archive


Gabrielle [OP]

2005-02-09 03:15 | User Profile

Chilling effect possible on IVF, abortion, stem cell research

All Alison Miller and Todd Parrish wanted was to become parents. But when a fertility clinic didn’t preserve a healthy embryo they had hoped would one day become their child, they sued for wrongful death.

advertisement A judge refused to dismiss their case, ruling in effect that a test-tube embryo is a human being and that the suit can go forward.

Though most legal experts believe the ruling will be overturned, some in the fertility business worry it could have a chilling effect, threatening everything from in vitro fertilization to abortion rights and embryonic stem cell research.

An end to IVF? “If the decision stands, it could essentially end in vitro fertilization,” said Dr. Robert Schenken, president of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Few doctors would risk offering the procedure if any accident that harmed the embryo could result in a wrongful death lawsuit, said Schenken, chairman of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Texas in San Antonio.

He said the society, a professional group for fertility doctors, is considering filing a court brief opposing Friday’s ruling by Cook County Judge Jeffrey Lawrence.

[url]http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6935477/[/url]


Righteous Fist

2005-02-09 21:30 | User Profile

:disgust: Great to hear them openly speak on the policy reasons behind who is a human being and who must not be.


starr

2005-02-09 22:19 | User Profile

This judge made the right and honorable decision, but a ruling with these type of implications will, without a doubt, be overturned.


Happy Hacker

2005-02-10 20:56 | User Profile

Abortion is 100% safe, even if this ruling is not overturned.


starr

2005-02-10 22:51 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Happy Hacker]Abortion is 100% safe, even if this ruling is not overturned.[/QUOTE] I do believe you are correct in a legal sense. But this is a type of case that could get people talking and thinking about certain aspects of the abortion issue, when life begins,etc.