← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · PaleoconAvatar

Platform of the New Zealand National Front

Thread ID: 16624 | Posts: 8 | Started: 2005-02-07

Wayback Archive

PaleoconAvatar [OP]

2005-02-07 02:27 | User Profile

Below is the platform of the New Zealand National Front; the original link is at [url]http://www.nationalfront.org.nz/policies.php[/url] -- this is an example of how the current of Eurocentric nationalism has manifested in that nation.

Preamble

New Zealand now stands at a juncture of crisis, the culmination of centuries of the decline and betrayal of Western Civilisation of which we are part.

The decision we make now will determine probably permanently what type of country we become. The prospect looms large that New Zealand within a few generations will be a Third World State subjected to even more overseas debt and foreign control than at present. Our children and grandchildren stand a very real likelihood of being virtual serfs to global economic and financial interests whose only loyalty is to increasing profit margins.

Failed Treaty

Since the beginning of European colonial settlement New Zealand has faced increasing control by money interests. The Treaty of Waitangi was a laudable attempt by the Crown to head off speculators from controlling the land. The Treaty failed in that respect, and continues to fail as Maoris, far from protecting their inheritance from foreign exploitation, have sold their land and assets to foreign corporations and indebted themselves to overseas banks.

Meanwhile, Euro-New Zealanders are held accountable for the actions of a small faction of bankers and speculators who have exploited European and Maori alike. Yet, Euro-New Zealanders are expected to endure a guilt complex and quietly acquiesce to their own destruction, and the forsaking of their birthright so that they bequeath nothing but slavery to their future progeny

While Euro-New Zealanders are brainwashed into believing they are collectively guilty for colonialism, the historic reality is that the forefathers of most of us came to this land from Britain to escape an unjust economic system that included the poor house, debtor's jail, child labour, slum dwellings, child labour and endemic cholera. Our forefathers uprooted themselves and crossed the seas to carve out a better life from the wilderness for their families. They contended not only with hostile Maoris and the harshness of the terrain, but with bankers and speculators to whom they became indebted by borrowing at exorbitant rates of interest to purchase small plots of land. For this we should feel eternally guilty?

Land Wars – Who Profited?

As for the Land Wars and confiscation of Maori land upon which this racial guilt complex is based, those who profited were not the ordinary European settlers. They were a few business interests largely associated with Frederick Whitaker, Thomas Russell and the Bank of New Zealand, this financial coterie having influential connections in Government. Hence, when Maori land was confiscated, it was through wars funded by these banking interests, who were resold the land at cheap rates. They therefore reaped the rewards doubly, both in land sold to them at illegally discounted prices and by the interest gained from the war loans.

Sir George Grey, one of our greatest statesmen, commented of “these great corporations” that “ one great central power in New Zealand oppresses it from beginning to end. As long as this continues I see no hope for our country.” This “Money Power” continues to dominate us.

The great Labour politician John A Lee was to comment on the Land Wars that, “The Maori thinks the Pakeha won the war, but he only won the debt.”

New Zealand has continued to get further into debt ever since. National's Muldoon tried to create “Think Big” projects to make New Zealand self-sufficient in energy, but these projects have been sold off, while the debt climbed as he went to foreign bankers to fund the schemes. In order to reduce the debt, the Labour Government, at the behest of groups acting for global business interests, started selling off New Zealand assets. They called it “privatisation”. The result has been to open New Zealand up to global business control, while our debt has only climbed further still.

Globalisation

These same business interests persuaded both National and Labour governments that the way to cure New Zealand's economic decline was with a policy of free trade; the very system of exploitation that forced our impoverished forefathers to leave Britain for New Zealand in the first place. Now the New Zealand people own nothing of their own country. Overseas companies, right down to the companies that collect our garbage, own everything. We are told that this “free market” gives New Zealand consumers both cheaper products and more of a variety.

The results have been: (1) to destroy the manufacturing industry so that a permanent pool of unemployables cannot buy much of anything; and (2) to open the country up to global corporations whose standardised malls and fast food chains make New Zealand cities and large town look the same no matter in what part of the country one travels.

“ New World Order”

New Zealand 's economic structure has been deliberately changed to enable us to be slotted into a global economic system controlled by a few corporations and banks. This has fundamentally altered every aspect of our lives, as these global corporations require every race, every nation, every culture, and every family, right down to every individual, to conform to a global standard.

Under global capitalism, nations, races, and cultures, are considered to be barriers for the free flow of money, technology, resources and labour. This global standardisation of the world into a nebulous mass of serfs is actually being promoted under the slogan of “cultural enrichment”. Yet the migrants that are encouraged to come here are largely from a global business class that is the same in outlook and manner from no matter where they come. Who can tell the difference in manner and thinking now between a globe-trotter from the international business class whether they come from China , Singapore , Japan , Britain , the USA , Australia or New Zealand ? None have a rooted loyalty to any race, nation or culture and can transfer themselves to any part of the world in pursuit of business interests. Global media magnate Rupert Murdoch, who changed his citizenship from Australian to American, is a prominent example of this trend. They are upheld as the ideal future “world citizens”.

Wars are fought under moralistic slogans such as “human rights' and “equality”, but this is merely a façade behind which a world tyranny is being erected. Take for instance, South Africa , where the Afrikaner folk struggled for centuries to maintain their identity and sovereignty against foreign capitalists. All the humbug about “human rights” and “equality” and the opposition to “apartheid” was simply to destroy the Afrikaner in order that a Black government could be established that would be easily controlled by the global corporations. As is so often the case, the Left paved the way for global capitalism. The result has not been some great new era for the Black Man in Africa, but the establishment of the free trade and privatisation policies that have further opened mineral rich Africa up to global exploitation, just as mineral rich Kosvo and oil rich Iraq have been forcibly brought into the world economic system.

Nationalist Resistance

It is against this background of encroaching world tyranny that a resurgent nationalism is struggling to preserve and enhance the earth's rich diversity of cultures, nations and races. Far from being motivated by hatred, our motivation is a great love for this diversity that the globalists seek to merge into one vast grey mass of nothingness. Only the Nationalist Right can win back freedom for all the world's races, nations and cultures, for the Marxist Left has always been the in pay and under the direction of global capitalism. In New Zealand the National Front raises the banner of nationalism as our part in this world struggle.

Principles of Policy

1. Our Heritage

We value Western Civilisation as the unique creation of the European folk, and recognise New Zealand as a cultural and demographic outpost of that Civilisation. New Zealand is not part of Asia or of Polynesia , but by virtue of our pioneering race, is a product of the European heritage. That heritage is the basis of our nation's destiny.

Indo-European peoples have been settling New Zealand , and indeed the whole of Polynesia , as part of their world folk-wanderings since ancient times. These folk wanderings saw the European folk traverse the earth, entering China , South and North America, Japan , and down into the South Seas , the legends of many races still referring to these ancient colonists as “white gods” and culture heroes. The Maori legends talk of the Turehu as the “tangata whenua”, described as blond haired, blue eyed and white skinned.

The association of the European folk with this land therefore goes back well beyond the British colonial settlement of the 19 th Century. In more recent times our forefathers sanctified this land with their blood and sweat, through wars and by carving a nation from the wilderness. Today and for future generations Euro-New Zealanders have earned the birthright as “the people of the land”.

1. Nationhood

The nation is the social unit most suitable for maintaining our survival. We reject any notion of New Zealand as part of an Asian economic bloc, or “New World Order”. We oppose the subordination of our national affairs to any outside interference, whether it is by supra-national entities such as the United Nations Organisation or by global corporate interests.

1. Treaty of Waitangi

The Treaty of Waitangi has failed to provide equitable justice for both peoples. A new accord must be reached based on present facts, which recognises the birthright of Euro- New Zealanders as something other than “guests” who are expected to pay “rent” in perpetuity, despite the supposed ‘final settlements”.

A Maori Parliament will be established and Maori self-determination pursued as far as practicable, within the limits of a shared territory. The structure for Maori self-determination already largely exists; it needs only to be recognised.

Self-determination means an end to European patronage. Where laws and privileges exist exclusively for the Maori, these will be repealed. Since Maoris will be full and equal beneficiaries of our banking and economic reforms opportunities will exist without need for condescending privileges.

1. Immigration

Immigration should be based on the determination to maintain New Zealand 's European heritage. In the past immigrants were drawn from the Polynesian islands for their cheap labour. Now Asians are being encouraged here for their economic investment. Both polices are based on short-sighted economic greed.

The right of the nation to determine the composition of its own population is a premise of national freedom, and should not be subjected to United Nations covenants on refugees or any consideration other than that of the national interest. While our nation can sustain a certain level of diverse ethnic groups, large enclaves of unassimilable migrants undermine our cohesion as a nation. There is no shared heritage or common sense of destiny.

Polynesian and Chinese migrants will be encouraged to return to their homelands of origin or suitable alternative destinations, with a humane and gradual policy of repatriation.

We advocate the economic development of the Polynesian states to allow for the islands to sustain their own people in their own lands.

1. Institutionalised Political Correctness

Institutionalised Political Correctness will be eliminated. This includes the repeal of race relations and human rights legislation designed, far from ensuring “rights”, to impose a tyrannical multi-cultural infrastructure at all levels of society. Political Correctness, particularly in the forms of the Treaty of Waitangi and feminism, has become a State dogma as pervasive as the Marxism of Communist states. At present all central and local government employees, whether council labourers or university lecturers, are obliged to sign a commitment to the Treaty of Waitangi and “gender equity” issues. This leaves the most strategic positions, whether as teachers, librarians or local and central government advisers, open to control by liberals and Marxists.

1. Finance & Banking

No nation can be sovereign unless it has control over own banking system. If private banks can create credit as an interest bearing debt for profit, a State bank can create credit as a public service at low interest.

The Reserve Bank must be brought back under the authority of the State, as originally intended, with the function of creating credit at low interest, issued for public works and for private enterprise and mortgage finance through the Kiwi Bank.

The First Labour Government nationalised the Reserve Bank and funded public works such as State Housing with Reserve Bank credit issued at 1% interest. We will follow this precedent.

1. Economy

We stand for national economic planning and reject the so-called “free market revolution” wrought by the misnamed “Labour” Government under Lange and Roger Douglas. If the State does not have the prerogative to oversee the direction of the economy then no party can honestly promise full employment and social security, since private business interests have the power to dis-invest and to relocate to cheap labour markets in the Third World . Private interests can therefore sabotage a nation's economy at will.

Despite what the Marxists claim, there is nothing “inevitable” about “class struggle”. Labouring, entrepreneurial and intellectual classes are all interdependent, and cannot exist alone. Our economic, financial and social reforms will eliminate class divisions and create national unity on the basis of social justice.

We stand for a strong manufacturing sector. This has been deliberately destroyed by cheap imports in order to restructure New Zealand 's economic so that it can fit into an Asian and ultimately a world economic structure. Our manufacturing base can be restored by a combination of import tariffs, State low interest loans, and raising incomes that increase as production increases, thereby ensuring a protected and expanding home market.

Essential utilises such as transport and communications must be returned to the State, on the basis that they are strategic assets apart from any economic considerations.

Only citizens will be able to hold shares in New Zealand enterprises.

Wherever practical, employees will be shareholders and have representation at management level.

We will act against interlocking directorships and company take-overs to reverse the trend towards the concentration of economic power into increasingly fewer hands.

We will withdraw from the world trade system dominated by global corporations and international finance, and will implement barter in order that our surplus agricultural and manufactured products can find an expanded overseas market. This will mean, for example, that nations that do not possess the international credit to purchase food, yet do possess essential resources such as oil can exchange those resources for our food surpluses.

Work is futile unless one has both the means and the time to enjoy the fruits of one's labour. With expanding technology we should be looking towards reducing working hours and the retirement age; yet the reverse is happening. The forty hour week is increasingly fading out of sight. Technical innovation and job share should substantially reduce working hours, as has been the case in France in recent years. Retirement age should be lowered to 55 to enable one to enjoy a substantial number of years beyond work.

1. Green Nation

We desire that New Zealand become again a rural nation, where farming is a central focus.

Agriculture will fully benefit from our banking reforms, whereas at present debt repayment is a primary factor in farm expenditure

Agriculture should find large new markets in the Third World , once a system of barter is instituted.

Agriculture can also be greatly diversified for the growth of crops for the production of organic fuels, thereby contributing to our self-sufficiency.

We shall encourage organic farming through tax incentives and State loans.

We oppose the adulteration of food with additives and the despoliation of the land with chemical fertilisers.

We oppose the global monopolies that are taking control of various facets of agriculture. Genetic modification by corporate interests has for example made varieties of seeds sterile so that food production is now reliant on a few global corporations.

The rural character of communities should be maintained, and urban sprawl halted.

We believe in the return of the ideal of every family owning its own home on a section that is not crammed to maximum capacity like some Asian shanty. We view the trend towards high rise apartments, inner city living and ‘in-filling' with homes having minimal living space as a deplorable reflection of the artificial state in which we live.

We believe that our flora and fauna should be preserved ahead of financial gain.

Only New Zealand citizens should be able to buy New Zealand land.

1. Family

We affirm the traditional family as the basic building block of a stable and healthy nation. The Marxist and liberal Left and its feminist outgrowth has become a tool in the hands of global capitalism, which seeks to destroy family bonds in order that women can be fully integrated into the labour market.

The family must be accorded the highest status in terms of social and economic support. The economic burdens of mortgages and other debts, high taxes and rates, and poor wages that oblige both parents in many families to work will be eliminated by our economic reforms.

We oppose liberal abortion laws. Motherhood will be accorded a place as the most honourable and important of vocations, which requires full attention, without the distractions of economic hardship and the requirement for other employment.

The already overburdened solo-parent will not be expected to find work and routinely offered the option of childcare; parenting is a full-time vocation.

1. Youth

Global capitalism no less than Marxian communism recognises that in order to exercise control, the youth of a nation must be captured and corrupted. Under global capitalism this takes the form of a bogus “freedom” without responsibility, the ultimate goal being enslavement to the production and consumption process at the earliest possible age. Hence, the push in global corporate advertising is to increase the market by appealing to ever lower ages as potential shoppers. This amounts to child exploitation; it is economic paedophilia.

We believe in maintaining the natural developmental phases of childhood, without the present corporate trend to accelerate maturity upon increasingly younger ages. The morality of the young must be the concern of parents, and not the subject of “market forces”

Global corporate capitalism and the role models it provides in the form of degenerate “stars” has reared several generations of youth that are “spoilt brats”. The egocentric and hedonistic mentality is encouraged to continue into later life, as it is the basis of the greed on which the money interests thrive. This self-centred attitude manifests in a myriad of ways from adolescent yobbishness to lack of civility in all classes and ages. This is “freedom” without responsibility.

Civic duty, patriotism and individual responsibility will pervade all sectors of education from primary to tertiary levels. If our treacherous cliques are shocked that this is “totalitarian”, we reply that it is no more so than the liberal dogmas that have come to pervade society.

National Labour Service will be established for all youth for a period of 6 months, after having completed their secondary education; which will encourage a sense of solidarity and respect for productive labour among all sectors of society. A period of 6 months Military Service will follow.

Student debt will be eliminated by restoring free education at tertiary level. This social debt will be worked off within New Zealand .

1. The Arts

We stand for the cultivation of a national culture, distinctly New Zealand , but anchored in the ethics and traditions of Western civilisation; a counter-blast to the Hollywood and Madison Avenue derived global consumer “culture” that spews forth from the USA .

The arts that are sponsored by central and local governments should reflect the health and vigour of a new found sense of purpose; not the formless mass of charlatans posing as “artists.” Culture is a living thing spanning thousands of years; not an industry subject to the ever changing demands of corporate profits.

“Culture” as a life-form is bequeathed through the generations and is built upon in each generation (or is eroded in periods of decadence). Hence, every member of the cultural organism by virtue of his birthright is entitled to fully appreciate his cultural heritage, regardless of his income or social background. That there is any individual who cannot afford to attend an opera, play, art exhibition, is intolerable. The State will subsidise the arts which will ensure that its appreciation is as affordable to the welfare beneficiary as to the millionaire.

1. Foreign Affairs

New Zealand 's foreign policy shall be based on national interest, not United Nations dictates, commitments to “world peace” or to our supposed debt to the USA .

We advocate an ANZAC alliance with Australia forming a self-contained trading and defence bloc that can protect our interests within the South Pacific region, without recourse to interference by the USA or UNO.

Ultimately we desire the re-constitution of the White Commonwealth of Nations, comprising Australia , Britain , Canada , and New Zealand based on shared kinship and heritage, as an alternative to the globalist schemes for herding “humanity” into a “New World Order”.

Our foreign policy will be one of neutrality in any super-power rivalry.

1. Defence

Every able citizen must be capable of defending the nation if necessary.

We look to the Swiss model for guidelines, where universal military service is only the beginning of a commitment to defence. In addition to military service, the school cadets shall be re-established to provide youth with basic training in weapons and survival skills.

We do not consider the USA to be “our traditional ally”. The assistance rendered to New Zealand during World War II was based solely on US interests in the region; not to any sentimental or moral commitment to defend New Zealand . The USA has global ambitions which mix global capitalism with a commitment to Israel . What the USA offers the world is a global consumer culture backed by guns where necessary; a standardised world of junk culture backed by guns where necessary.

We consider any territorial threat to most likely come from Asia whose population is bursting at the seams, and where any war or natural catastrophe could prompt a mass population exodus, backed by force of arms.

1. Law & Order

A nation is a living social organism. Any organism that does not eliminate its waste products or that tolerates a virus, dies.

Violent recidivist criminals should be permanently removed from society, perhaps by being put to work on an outlying New Zealand island.

Where murder is proven beyond doubt, capital punishment will be applied. Capital punishment will also be meted out to repeat sex offenders.

While our social and economic reforms will do much in eliminate juvenile crime and petty theft, there is convincing evidence that criminal traits are inherited. Other variables such as the possibility of poor quality diet contributing to dysfunctional behaviour will also be investigated.

RowdyRoddyPiper

2005-02-07 10:27 | User Profile

Not to sound overly cynical, but the guy who wrote that little manifesto is probably a skinhead selling pot and crystal meth out of his state flat, where he lives with his skanky girlfriend Sharleen and his albino pitbull mastif "Aryan".

(I'm from New Zealand :) )

RowdyRoddyPiper

2005-02-07 10:48 | User Profile

Actually, to expand on my post (so it doesn't end up being a pointless unconstructive snark), the main problem I have with the NF is that large part of it's membership is made up of skinhead thugs. They are generally a very poor advertisement for any sort of white racial consciousness movement, and they indulge in activities that are harmful towards whites e.g. drug dealing. They are also pretty violent, often as not towards other white people.

General Rommel

2005-02-07 16:31 | User Profile

[QUOTE] [size=1]"...the main problem I have with the NF is that large part of it's membership is made up of skinhead thugs."[/size] [/QUOTE] That pretty much describes Stormfront, VNN, and the National Alliance as well.

Kevin_O'Keeffe

2005-02-07 16:43 | User Profile

[QUOTE=General Rommel]That pretty much describes Stormfront, VNN, and the National Alliance as well.[/QUOTE]

How many National Alliance meetings have you attended? I've been to about a dozen, and it doesn't describe the high-caliber people I was fortunate enough to meet on such occasions. Perhaps the Sacramento Local Unit and the San Francisco Bay Area Proto-Unit of the National Alliance were above-average in their membership quality, but I see no reason to assume such to be the case. Besides, the 2001 Sacramento Eurofest included many NA members from Southern California, as well as the other western states, and they seemed to be of a similar quality. VNN is pathetic, counterproductive, stupid, and frankly disgusting, while Stomfront is too heavily censored/"moderated" to have any value. Your stereotype of the National Alliance membership, however, is totally false, and I suspect, utterly without anything remotely akin to the sort of informational basis that would justify such a (slanderous) statement being made. Perhaps that's a little too delicate. Try this one on for size: **YOU ARE A DAMN LIAR.[/B]

Julian the Apostate

2005-02-07 21:45 | User Profile

[QUOTE=RowdyRoddyPiper]Not to sound overly cynical, but the guy who wrote that little manifesto is probably a skinhead selling pot and crystal meth out of his state flat, where he lives with his skanky girlfriend Sharleen and his albino pitbull mastif "Aryan".

Actually, to expand on my post (so it doesn't end up being a pointless unconstructive snark), the main problem I have with the NF is that large part of it's membership is made up of skinhead thugs. They are generally a very poor advertisement for any sort of white racial consciousness movement, and they indulge in activities that are harmful towards whites e.g. drug dealing. They are also pretty violent, often as not towards other white people.

(I'm from New Zealand :) )[/QUOTE]

From what I understand the manifesto was put together/collated by Kerry Bolton, the secretary of the National Front. I know little of him but I've read some of his articles and he seems to have some brains. As for the rest of the membership I'm afraid I have to go along with you. Nevertheless, whilst the skinheads may not be the best advertisement no one else is making any stand whatsoever. My city is now a coloured one and my suburb some sort of hybrid Indian/Polynesian/Somali ghetto - even my one time university is now only 40% European - and it all happened without a whisper of discontent.

PaleoconAvatar

2005-02-07 23:34 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Julian the Apostate]From what I understand the manifesto was put together/collated by Kerry Bolton, the secretary of the National Front. I know little of him but I've read some of his articles and he seems to have some brains. As for the rest of the membership I'm afraid I have to go along with you. Nevertheless, whilst the skinheads may not be the best advertisement no one else is making any stand whatsoever. My city is now a coloured one and my suburb some sort of hybrid Indian/Polynesian/Somali ghetto - even my one time university is now only 40% European - and it all happened without a whisper of discontent.[/QUOTE]

Exactly right--I assumed Kerry Bolton had an influence here since a lot of the phrasing used matches other texts written by him that I have. He's definitely not a skinhead. It seems to be a universal feature, though, where you have a "difference in quality" between the senior leadership and (some of) the rank-and file.

As for what Kevin O'Keeffe says, he's right on target. The NA is generally composed of intellectual, middle-class people, and that difference can be seen in the high-quality of National Vanguard magazine and the like. General Rommel delights in highlighting media stereotypes, and it's a losing proposition to deal with him on this issue because he blames the entire White Nationalist movement for the excesses of the costume crowd.

The thing is that using the media stereotype as a weapon on the NA and the like is foolish because even if there were only one person wearing a swastika armband or such, and every single other person in the country associated with WN were dressed normally, the media would still snap pictures of the one with the swastika. And you'll never be able to get rid of that one oddly dressed guy (or more in reality), since they'll always be out there. Therefore, there's no way to win with General Rommel.

Franco

2005-02-08 02:24 | User Profile

[QUOTE=General Rommel]That pretty much describes Stormfront, VNN, and the National Alliance as well.[/QUOTE]

Please tell us which pro-White groups you recommend and which pro-White websites you recommend, if any.