← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Gabrielle
Thread ID: 16623 | Posts: 21 | Started: 2005-02-07
2005-02-07 00:27 | User Profile
[img]http://www.missiontoisrael.org/images/did-she.jpg[/img]
**EVE
Did She or Didn't She? The Seedline Hypothesis Under Scrutiny**
As a historian my first concern is maintaining strict adherence to the documentary record and the rules of evidence. Ted R. Weiland is not only a scholar by the preceding criteria, he is the consummate scholar of Christian Israel theology and Old Testament law. In this important book, he delivers a devestating critique of both the seedline hypothesis and the repeatedly parroted media mantra, which characterizes the entire Christian Israel movement as believing with one mind that "Jews" are the descendants of Satan. After reading, Eve: Did She or Didn't She?, an honest person can no longer be deluded into accepting either the unscriptural seedline hypothesis or the media mantra by which a legitimate school of Christian hermeneuteics is perpetually maligned and distored. - Michael A. Hoffman II, Historian & Author Independent History and Research, Idaho
Occult writings, including the Jewish Talmud, teach that Cain is the offspring of Satan. In his book Eve: Did She or Didn't She? Ted R. Weiland brings to the forefront the preponderance of biblical evidence that confronts and dispels the occult lie that Eve was physically seduced by Satan. Eve: Did She or Didn't She? will help you find your way through the loose conclusions and maze of the dual seedline teachings and reveal through the Scriptures the truth that will set you free from the fallacy of this destructive myth. -Dave Barley, Pastor America's Promise Ministries, Idaho
The seedline doctrine has a long history. Modern proponents, like those of the past, have embraced this doctrine as a means to explain how certain evil persons came into the world. Eve: Did She or Didn't She? discloses the inconsistencies, speculations and misinterpretations that are used to support this doctrine. In this book, Ted R. Weiland, examines all of the scripture verses, arguments and counter-arguments of this hypothesis, and in doing so, he also provides lessons in biblical exegesis. - Charles A. Weisman, Author What About The Seedline Doctrine? Weisman Publications, Minnesota
[url]http://www.missiontoisrael.org/books-summary.html[/url]
This book is a must read for truthseekers!
2005-02-07 03:32 | User Profile
[center][font=Arial][size=2]RESEARCH PAPERS [u][color=red]PROVING[/color][/u]<?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = O />
[left][font=Arial]
[center][font=Arial]
2005-02-07 05:50 | User Profile
Give us all a break Gabby. Why is it, that You, and Klaliff, aka Lydia the faithful, aka Klunt, always got to start this?:caiphas: [QUOTE=Gabrielle][img]http://www.missiontoisrael.org/images/did-she.jpg[/img]
EVE Did She or Didn't She? The Seedline Hypothesis Under Scrutiny
As a historian my first concern is maintaining strict adherence to the documentary record and the rules of evidence. Ted R. Weiland is not only a scholar by the preceding criteria, he is the consummate scholar of Christian Israel theology and Old Testament law. In this important book, he delivers a devestating critique of both the seedline hypothesis and the repeatedly parroted media mantra, which characterizes the entire Christian Israel movement as believing with one mind that "Jews" are the descendants of Satan. After reading, Eve: Did She or Didn't She?, an honest person can no longer be deluded into accepting either the unscriptural seedline hypothesis or the media mantra by which a legitimate school of Christian hermeneuteics is perpetually maligned and distored. - Michael A. Hoffman II, Historian & Author Independent History and Research, Idaho
Occult writings, including the Jewish Talmud, teach that Cain is the offspring of Satan. In his book Eve: Did She or Didn't She? Ted R. Weiland brings to the forefront the preponderance of biblical evidence that confronts and dispels the occult lie that Eve was physically seduced by Satan. Eve: Did She or Didn't She? will help you find your way through the loose conclusions and maze of the dual seedline teachings and reveal through the Scriptures the truth that will set you free from the fallacy of this destructive myth. -Dave Barley, Pastor America's Promise Ministries, Idaho
The seedline doctrine has a long history. Modern proponents, like those of the past, have embraced this doctrine as a means to explain how certain evil persons came into the world. Eve: Did She or Didn't She? discloses the inconsistencies, speculations and misinterpretations that are used to support this doctrine. In this book, Ted R. Weiland, examines all of the scripture verses, arguments and counter-arguments of this hypothesis, and in doing so, he also provides lessons in biblical exegesis. - Charles A. Weisman, Author What About The Seedline Doctrine? Weisman Publications, Minnesota
[url="http://www.missiontoisrael.org/books-summary.html"]http://www.missiontoisrael.org/books-summary.html[/url]
This book is a must read for truthseekers![/QUOTE]
2005-02-07 06:54 | User Profile
[QUOTE=6KILLER]Give us all a break Gabby. Why is it, that You, and Klaliff, aka Lydia the faithful, aka Klunt, always got to start this?:caiphas:[/QUOTE] "Being ready at all times to give an account for the faith that is in you - New Testament"
They always say the first side to start throwing mud around in an argument is usually the loser, but maybe you've been unfairly maligned and not given a fair chance in the past. Common DSLers. This is your chance to shine, and defend what you say you really believe.
2005-02-07 08:30 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Okiereddust]"Being ready at all times to give an account for the faith that is in you - New Testament"
They always say the first side to start throwing mud around in an argument is usually the loser, but maybe you've been unfairly maligned and not given a fair chance in the past. Common DSLers. This is your chance to shine, and defend what you say you really believe.[/QUOTE] The word BEGUILD is used when describing how the "snake" charmed Eve. First of all, anyone that believes that snakes talk must also think that the bible is a fairy tale too. Beguiled transliterates to SEDUCED. Do you suppose that Eve had sex with a snake? I don't. Need I tell you what the word FRUIT means? That evil cunning snake tricked her into eating an apple which caused her to sin because the apples were off limits. How stupid is that? The bible does not read like a novel. One has to nearly study each and every word or the intended message will be clouded with mistranslations and the outright deception of the scribes.
2005-02-07 13:17 | User Profile
[QUOTE=john b. whiteman]The word BEGUILD is used when describing how the "snake" charmed Eve. First of all, anyone that believes that snakes talk must also think that the bible is a fairy tale too. Beguiled transliterates to SEDUCED. Do you suppose that Eve had sex with a snake? I don't. Need I tell you what the word FRUIT means? That evil cunning snake tricked her into eating an apple which caused her to sin because the apples were off limits. How stupid is that? The bible does not read like a novel. One has to nearly study each and every word or the intended message will be clouded with mistranslations and the outright deception of the scribes.[/QUOTE]Interesting concept. And the word serpent was originally a hebrew word nachash and from what I understand it means enchanter.
5172 nachash naw-khash' a primitive root; properly, to hiss, i.e. whisper a (magic) spell; generally, to prognosticate:--X certainly, divine, enchanter, (use) X enchantment, learn by experience, X indeed, diligently observe.
5173 nachash nakh'-ash from [url="http://www.eliyah.com/cgi-bin/strongs.cgi?file=hebrewlexicon&isindex=5172"][color=#800080]5172[/color][/url]; an incantation or augury:--enchantment.
5175 nachash naw-khawsh' from [url="http://www.eliyah.com/cgi-bin/strongs.cgi?file=hebrewlexicon&isindex=5172"][color=#800080]5172[/color][/url]; a snake (from its hiss):--serpent.
2005-02-07 14:25 | User Profile
That evil cunning snake tricked her into eating an apple which caused her to sin because the apples were off limits. You bet. ;) And that's also why Adam and Eve made something to cover their mouths - because they were ashamed they ate that apple. Oh, wait. That's [u]not[/u] what they covered, was it? :)
The bible does not read like a novel. One has to nearly study each and every word or the intended message will be clouded with mistranslations and the outright deception of the scribes. I couldn't agree more.
2005-02-08 08:18 | User Profile
[QUOTE=6KILLER]Give us all a break Gabby. Why is it, that You, and Klaliff, aka Lydia the faithful, aka Klunt, always got to start this?:caiphas:[/QUOTE]Because to Gabby and Klunt, Eve was jewstified in doing whatever she did. That is why they hate Dual-Seedline Christian Identity. They post baal-priests like Wieland. They never post any Bertrand Comparet, Willie Martin, Wesley Swift, or Clifton Emhiser. In fact, in the case of Willie Martin, Klunt got him banned after all the rest of the Dual-Seedliners were banned from a suspect jewhoogruppen.
Everytime I see these spawn of Satan try to muddy up their geneology, I have to take into account why they do it. After all, it is those who have no pedigree worthy of recital who are most against reciting the racial heritage of the pure. Gabby and Klunt have plenty of the proverbial 'niggers in the woodpile' of their ancestry, but in this case, its jew!
Like Herman Goering supposedly said, "Every time I hear the word 'Culture' I want to reach for my revolver!" Well, everytime I hear "Eve -- Did She or Didn't She?" like a devout Dual-Seedliner I think, "Klunt -- Did She or Didn't She?" The only rightful answer, is, "Yes, of course! The grrrrrlzzz gone wild, and Satan was an prediluvian reg'lr Snoop Doggy Dogg."
You would think that Gabby had more sense than to bring up a question demanding an answer. But femnisheviks have no sense. They, like most spawn of Satan, bite our heels, and us heels stomp they'se heads.
--Martin Lindstedt Malleus Klunt [url="http://www.martinlindstedt.org/"]www.martinlindstedt.org[/url]
2005-02-08 08:42 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Gabbyrelle]
EVE Did She or Didn't She? The Seedline Hypothesis Under Scrutiny
As a historian my first concern is maintaining strict adherence to the documentary record and the rules of evidence. Ted R. Weiland is not only a scholar by the preceding criteria, he is the consummate scholar of Christian Israel theology and Old Testament law. In this important book, he delivers a devestating critique of both the seedline hypothesis and the repeatedly parroted media mantra, which characterizes the entire Christian Israel movement as believing with one mind that "Jews" are the descendants of Satan. After reading, Eve: Did She or Didn't She?, an honest person can no longer be deluded into accepting either the unscriptural seedline hypothesis or the media mantra by which a legitimate school of Christian hermeneuteics is perpetually maligned and distored. - Michael A. Hoffman II, Historian & Author Independent History and Research, Idaho Michael Hoffman is a paytriot, still whining that since being fired from the jew Yawk Slimes, he doesn't get as many sheckles.
[url="http://www.martinlindstedt.org/hfmnbegs.html"]http://www.martinlindstedt.org/hfmnbegs.html[/url] [url="http://www.martinlindstedt.org/jf011300.html"]http://www.martinlindstedt.org/jf011300.html[/url]
[QUOTE=Gabbyrelle]
Occult writings, including the Jewish Talmud, teach that Cain is the offspring of Satan. In his book Eve: Did She or Didn't She? Ted R. Weiland brings to the forefront the preponderance of biblical evidence that confronts and dispels the occult lie that Eve was physically seduced by Satan. Eve: Did She or Didn't She? will help you find your way through the loose conclusions and maze of the dual seedline teachings and reveal through the Scriptures the truth that will set you free from the fallacy of this destructive myth. -Dave Barley, Pastor America's Promise Ministries, Idaho [url="http://www.missiontoisrael.org/books-summary.html"]http://www.missiontoisrael.org/books-summary.html[/url]
This book is a must read for truthseekers![/QUOTE]This book is a must read for the spawn of Satan, like the flies of Baalzebub, eating shit and bothering Dual-Seedliners.
What else is to be expected from some 'New Covenant' Cornholer & baal-priest but a Genesis 3:15 hatred of Dual-Seedline?
[QUOTE=Gabbyrelle] The seedline doctrine has a long history. Modern proponents, like those of the past, have embraced this doctrine as a means to explain how certain evil persons came into the world. Eve: Did She or Didn't She? discloses the inconsistencies, speculations and misinterpretations that are used to support this doctrine. In this book, Ted R. Weiland, examines all of the scripture verses, arguments and counter-arguments of this hypothesis, and in doing so, he also provides lessons in biblical exegesis. - Charles A. Weisman, Author What About The Seedline Doctrine? Weisman Publications, Minnesota Pete Peter's pet jew isn't likely anytime soon to admit that as a spawn of Satan that it can't be saved.
Gabby shows that 666 out of 666 paytriots, baal-priests, and jews ALL agree! Have a genuine Genesis 3:15 enmity against Dual-Seedline and Dual-Seedliners.
--Martin Lindstedt A Defender of the Faith [url="http://www.martinlindstedt.org/"]www.martinlindstedt.org[/url]
2005-02-08 20:55 | User Profile
One thing concerns me, I've been on these message boards for several years now. Many people know who I am, Martin Linstedt knows who I am. I know no one, who knows this Gabrielle. She lurks from one forum to the other giving us DSL'ers, grief by sniveling to the Mods, about DSL'ers and eventually getting what she wants, i.e. us banned or censored. She brings up the same material verbatim, where ever she goes. She claims that she is no friend of Deb, but always comes to Deb's aid, when a DSL'er is in the crosshairs of Deb's scope. Many of these individuals such as Gabrielle, and her cohorts over at SF, such as F & F, Ibere,76WMD, Pycca88 etc. dont even read the websites and books, etc. they quote as sources.:caiphas:
2005-02-09 00:18 | User Profile
6KILLER, I am Satan. I am going to put you in the lake of fire along with all my other true followers.
[size=6]I AM THE TRUE SATAN! THE GREAT LUCIFER! THE DEVIL! QUAKE IN MY PRESENCE![/size]
2005-02-09 00:41 | User Profile
Are you sure you're not Satan's daughter Lilith? You sure sound like her.:caiphas: [QUOTE=Gabrielle]6KILLER, I am Satan. I am going to put you in the lake of fire along with all my other true followers.
[size=6]I AM THE TRUE SATAN! THE GREAT LUCIFER! THE DEVIL! QUAKE IN MY PRESENCE![/size][/QUOTE]
2005-02-09 03:11 | User Profile
If I am Satan's daughter, you are Satan...this Satan...
[img]http://www.waxy.org/random/images/weblog/gay_satan.jpg[/img]
2005-02-09 03:18 | User Profile
Naughty Satan with his teddy bear.
[img]http://lightning.prohosting.com/~yizhar/images/satan.jpg[/img]
2005-02-09 04:16 | User Profile
Gabrielle. Why is it that you haven't replied to any of the posts made here that are in context to the topic in which [u]you started[/u] but instead choose to troll your own thread ? I would suggest that a moderator just delete this whole thread, because of your behavior, but I prefer to let it remain so folks can see just how childish and out of touch you really are. Keep it up, you're working wonders for your argument.
2005-02-11 23:26 | User Profile
I'll bet you a hundred dollars Roy, that Gabby doesn't respond. Not even too a thread which she started.:caiphas: got her tongue.[QUOTE=Rapid Roy]Gabrielle. Why is it that you haven't replied to any of the posts made here that are in context to the topic in which [u]you started[/u] but instead choose to troll your own thread ? I would suggest that a moderator just delete this whole thread, because of your behavior, but I prefer to let it remain so folks can see just how childish and out of touch you really are. Keep it up, you're working wonders for your argument.[/QUOTE]
2005-02-12 01:40 | User Profile
666Killer, since you have been so faithful, I am going to promote you to a demon.
[SIZE=6]Satan[/SIZE]
[img]http://www.sportsfrog.com/archives/satan.jpg[/img]
Here you are in your new demon outfit... how do you like the new you? [img]http://mrffriends.tripod.com/images/picture/satan.jpg[/img]
2005-02-12 02:59 | User Profile
[QUOTE=6KILLER]I'll bet you a hundred dollars Roy, that Gabby doesn't respond. Not even too a thread which she started.:caiphas: got her tongue.[/QUOTE] I would say that you owe me a hundred dollars, but I think you were talking about whether or not she'd respond to the context of the thread and not respond with some more of her childish antics. So you get to keep your money 6killer.
2005-02-12 03:00 | User Profile
[size=7]DAMN! GABBY YOU SURE HAVE A SATAN FETISH.:twisted: [/size]
2005-02-12 22:55 | User Profile
[SIZE=6]Satan can take many forms...[/SIZE]
[img]http://www.fiftynine.org/images/Pictures/July2004/satan.jpg[/img]
2005-02-13 00:30 | User Profile
And so can the saints. [SIZE=2] Yours truly.
Saint Ponce.[/SIZE]