← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Otho_Isch
Thread ID: 16549 | Posts: 12 | Started: 2005-02-03
2005-02-03 01:00 | User Profile
via bluegrass on libertyforum.
Wall Street Journal, Jan 26, 1926 pg. 13
Henry Ford feels that in the past he may have been too severe in criticisms of the Jews, according to an interview with Farm & Fireside.
Asked if he believes the Jews a menace to America, Ford is quoted: "No, they are not a menace. On the whole they are a good influence. They are so much smarter than the boob Gentiles that it makes them hustle to keep up. That's where the good comes in. It serves people right if they let the Jews work them."
Ford emphasized that he had no prejudice against Jews as such. Jews are employed not only in his manufacturing plants, but by Dearborn Publishing Co. itself. He admitted he now felt some of the articles about Jews in the Dearborn Independent "had been too severe."
"What I oppose most is the international Jewish money power in every war," said Ford. "No matter what happens to the nations in a war, the money power always wins. No war starts without it, every war stops when it says so. That is what I oppose - a power that has no country and can order young men of all countries out to death."
"Most people who talk about world peace never penetrate to the cause of war. Pacifist organizations and others are just wabbling about the surface. As long as the international money power constitutes the invisible government of backward nations and has so strong a hand upon politics of the greater nations, peace is impossible."
"Profits of the international money power are not produced by peaceful industry, but by war; until we dig those influences out and expose them and neutralize them, world peace cannot be hoped for. That is the chief element of the Jewish question, for the international money power is Jewish."
"They have overplayed their hand, as they always do. It is destined, it seems, that such influences should always overplay their hands at a critical moment. Their setback in Great Britain and the United States occurred just as they thought they were sitting on top of the world."
"The Jewish question is here, and too many are afraid to study it. Neither Jews nor others benefit by concealment. At first I was blamed for bringing the question into the light, but public opinion now approves what I did."
[URL=http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_history&Number=293308883&page=&view=&sb=&o=&vc=1&t=1#Post293308883]link[/URL]
2005-02-03 02:28 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Otho_Isch]"They have overplayed their hand, as they always do. It is destined, it seems, that such influences should always overplay their hands at a critical moment. [/QUOTE]Not to discredit Henry Ford, as less recorded history of Jewish maneovers was available then, but he is wrong on this one. I still hear people saying this today....the Jews always go too far, their mistake is they overplay their hand....blah, blah, blah.
Give credit where credit is due. They are clever enough to know exactly how to play their hand and they get by with it. I think people must downplay the obvious as a justification for inaction. There is nothing they understand better than strategy, and that's why most of the world's chess champions are/were Jews.
2005-02-03 02:38 | User Profile
They [I]did[/I] overplay their hand in Germany in the 1930s, and payed dearly for it.
Petr
2005-02-03 02:50 | User Profile
Tell us Petr, oh great defender of the clever tribe, how did they pay dearly? They got millions of gentiles killed fighting each other and were able to pull off the hollow-cost story elevating themselves to the highest level of victim status for all the world to be guilty and show sympathy for, they got Israel out of the deal as arranged and made any kind of White unity synonymous with evil and tryanny ever since. I would say they were the greatest benificiaries of WW2. There was a little "collateral damage" but I doubt they have any regrets.
2005-02-04 00:24 | User Profile
There was a little "collateral damage" but I doubt they have any regrets.
You're correct on this one.
2005-02-04 00:28 | User Profile
[I][B] - "They got millions of gentiles killed fighting each other"[/B][/I]
Sorry to interrupt your fantasy of allmighty Jewish puppetmasters who can make Gentiles do whatever they please, but Adolf Hitler and his fatalistic [I]drang nach osten[/I]-[I]lebensraum[/I] policies must take an abundant share of the responsibility for plunging Europe into this fractricidal conflict.
All the Jews in the world would not have been able to make France and England to declare war on Germany if Hitler had stopped after Munich and the annexation of Sudetenland.
Petr
2005-02-04 00:38 | User Profile
Hitler wouldn't have had the funds to do it unless the Warburgs et al had kept the credit flowing. IG Farben was instrumental in the creation of the Wehrmacht.
2005-02-04 00:39 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Petr][I][B] - "They got millions of gentiles killed fighting each other"[/B][/I]
All the Jews in the world would not have been able to make France and England to declare war on Germany if Hitler had stopped after Munich and the annexation of Sudetenland. [/QUOTE]Why not? They were able to get the US involved.
2005-02-04 00:46 | User Profile
[B][I] - "Why not? They were able to get the US involved."[/I][/B]
Wow, what a deep political analysis.
Lots of things happened between 1938 and 1941, you know.
[I]And even in December 1941[/I], Roosevelt could not have sold the war against [B]Germany[/B] to the American people had not Hitler [U]lost his nerves [/U] at this extremely critical point and [B]declared war on the United States[/B] on December 11, four days after Pearl Harbor.
Hitler gave Jews and Roosevelt exactly what they wanted on the silver plate. If he had just "kept his cool" for a few critical weeks, Americans would have concentrated in beating the Japanese to a pulp and would have probably paid even [I]less [/I] attention than before to what was going on in Europe.
Petr
2005-02-04 00:50 | User Profile
[COLOR=Blue][I][B] - "Hitler wouldn't have had the funds to do it unless the Warburgs et al had kept the credit flowing." [/B] [/I] [/COLOR]
Funds to do what? Could you be a bit more specific?
Petr
2005-02-04 01:12 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Petr][COLOR=Blue][I][B] - "Hitler wouldn't have had the funds to do it unless the Warburgs et al had kept the credit flowing." [/B] [/I] [/COLOR]
Funds to do what? Could you be a bit more specific?
Petr[/QUOTE]
To build his war machine. The Money Gods can't make a living unless people are buying weapons.
International Money is Jewish. War doesn't happen without international money.
2005-02-06 10:06 | User Profile
Give the Jews credit, they control most of the world - and I don't mean to take it from the "Conspiricy" theories...
The current State of Israel is a fake, a fraud, a lie, and a counterfeit. Although a few do make up Yudahites, many are fakes from the Khazars - read "The Thrteenth Tribe" by Arthur Koestler.
Many of the Israelites (the 10 Northern Tribes) are found in Modern Anglo races - Saxons, Celts...etc - of course the Jews deny this because if we are the Israelites then most of them are not, and this will open the door to truth. That is why they deny Yeshua - he knew who they were so they killed him for it, just like they attack anyone who questions their past.
But their time will come...