← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Quantrill
Thread ID: 16009 | Posts: 32 | Started: 2004-12-17
2004-12-17 20:56 | User Profile
From Badlands -- Yep, Mr. Conservative Family Values is giving Elizabeth Taylor a run for her money. Limbaugh, who shortly after he married his third wife, Marta, began mentioning ââ¬Åour rabbiââ¬Â on his radio program, is [url="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/248633p-212941c.html"]headed down the altar [/url]with another Jew, [url="http://www.cnn.com/CNN/anchors_reporters/kagan.daryn.html"]Daryn Kagan[/url], a CNN anchor. Heââ¬â¢s been dating her for some time, and has already popped the question, but being the conservative family values type, heââ¬â¢s going to wait until his third divorce is actually final before once again making a mockery of the sacred institution of marriage.
[url="http://littlegeneva.com/badlands/index.php?p=143"]http://littlegeneva.com/badlands/index.php?p=143[/url]
2004-12-18 01:57 | User Profile
Four marriages and a drug rap for Bush Limbaugh. I can hardly listen to this fellow without laughing any more.
2004-12-18 05:52 | User Profile
Rush Limbaugh is a fat clown. That's basically all I can say about him.
2004-12-18 08:21 | User Profile
Quantrill,
Were his first two wives J.A.P.s too? I wonder? I did not know Marta was wife number three, I hought she was number two. You would think with all that money he could get better looking wives.
[QUOTE]Daryn Kagan's Family History
...
KAGAN: I have the name -- Peg, stay with us -- of my great-grandfather, my grandfather's father, who I knew came over from Russia in 1907. I gave Allison the information earlier. It was Eiser Cohen (ph). And I had the year: 1907. We're going to show you what Allison found on your Web site.
...
KAGAN: Interesting. I learned this when we were trying to do the story a few months ago when the site opened up. He comes up, my great-grandfather, with you guys on Ellis Island as Eiser Kagan, which is the name that we he use, but on the naturalization, he comes up as Eiser Cohen
He probably had already changed his name. There is a common misconception that names were changed regularly at Ellis Island.
KAGAN: And that's true.
ZITKO: That is not the case. We believe most people changed their names maybe at the time of naturalization. They wanted something that maybe was more Americanized, although Kagan and Cohen (ph) are pretty similar.
KAGAN: Interestingly enough, if you look at the other descendants of this great-grandfather, we do have some cousins that go by Kagan and some that go by Cohen (ph).
[url]http://www.sfu.ca/~joes/jnn/cnn_features/kaganellis.html[/url][/QUOTE]
2004-12-18 20:07 | User Profile
I think his first marriage was a goofy teenage runaway thing. The second lasted some years and ended shortly after he first moved to New York. I heard he was the dumpee in that one. I don't know the circumstances of the third; I just recall what a disaster the magazine she started was. She gave Rush a couple of step kids temporarily.
Success has more or less ruined him. Talk radio is now totally neo-con, as far as I can see.
2004-12-18 20:54 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Buster]Talk radio is now totally neo-con, as far as I can see.[/QUOTE]
This is why, Buster: [url=http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6631]Clear Channel Sucks[/url]
2004-12-18 21:33 | User Profile
Four wives, two of them trophies?
Not bad for a deaf pillhead with anal warts.
2004-12-18 23:29 | User Profile
From the picture I have seen I would not call Daryn Kagan a "trophy." Marta was better looking. I thought Neocon hated CNN?
Marta & Rush Limbaugh [url]http://www.rosecity.net/rush/delete_photo5.html[/url]
Daryn Kagan CNN Anchor [url]http://www.cnn.com/CNN/anchors_reporters/kagan.daryn.html[/url]
More on rush: [QUOTE]Rush.. Who is He to Represent Family Values?...
by Kirk Muse
Recently Rush Limbaugh announced on his radio program that he and his third wife of just over ten years are getting divorced. Certainly his fans and detractors alike are wondering what happened, since Rush frequently told his listeners that he was happily married.
It looks like their contract expired--that's all. Rush and Marta Limbaugh apparently had a contract that stated that Marta would act as his adoring "trophy wife" in public, and in private they would go their separate ways.
Public records available on the internet show that Marta Limbaugh has owned a separate home in her name only, near Rush's palatial estate on a different street but in the same zip cope in Palm Beach, Florida. Marta has owned her separate home since May of 2000. The property tax records indicate that Marta's home has 3,870 square feet and has a tax appraised value of $1,140,979.
The Palm Beach County property records show that Rush Limbaugh's $24,000,000 palatial estate consists of four separate homes on a 2.92 acre parcel. It looks like his main home has 11 bedrooms and 15 bathrooms. Why would someone with no children need or want a home with 11 bedrooms? Why would he need or want 15 bathrooms? Perhaps the 15 bathrooms played a major role in his ample weight loss. And he's still full of you know what.
Rush Limbaugh is 53 years old and has been married three times and will soon be divorced three times. He has never fathered any children. Why?
Rush pretends to be a strong supporter of family values, yet he has never fathered any children.
Could he be that Rush Limbaugh is of the gay persuasion? Perhaps.
If Rush Limbaugh is gay, this will be the third time that Rush has been "outed."
The first time Limbaugh was "outed" was when a reporter searched the public records and found out that Rush had never registered to vote. Rush was 35 at the time and approximately two years into his current gig as conservative spokesman and talk radio show host on station KFPK in Sacramento, California.
So why didn't Rush register to vote and vote? He didn't care about the outcome of any elections.
People only register to vote and vote if they care about the outcome of an election. Rush didn't bother to vote for Ronald Reagan or any other conservative politicians until he was 35 and "outed" by the newspaper columnist in Sacramento.
Rush is not really a conservative. He's just an actor playing one on the radio. Rush started his career in radio by playing Jeff Cristy, the cool rock 'n' roll DJ. Rush got fired twice as Jeff Cristy, so Rush re-invented himself into Rush Limbaugh the ultra-conservative.
So it looks like Rush Limbaugh is just an actor playing the part of a conservative, and a pretty good actor, he has obviously fooled lots of people. [/QUOTE]
2004-12-19 10:02 | User Profile
[QUOTE]From the picture I have seen I would not call Daryn Kagan a "trophy." Marta was better looking. [/QUOTE]
Maybe not, but I'll bet she turns into Catherine Zeta-Jones after two Oxycontin.
2004-12-22 15:08 | User Profile
If things do not work out with Daryn Kagan; Rush could always marry Monica Lewinsky.
:pimp: Hey they both love Cigars!
:cheers:
2004-12-22 16:22 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Buster] Talk radio is now totally neo-con, as far as I can see.[/QUOTE]
1190 AM in NYC hosts Air America and is definitely not neo-con. Now, I don't agree with some of their stances, especially, when they defend homo rights and black rights and issues of diversity, but there are times when I'm listening to them when I'm happy to hear them shred Bush and his Neo-con Cabinet by name. I'm delighted and in agreement to hear them ripping apart the Iraq War, the ChristianZionuts, Patriot Act, illegal immigration, outsourcing, brainwashed American public and the pernicious US Government Propaganda which confuses them, as well as the dangerous merging of Government and Corporate interest. Yes, sometimes they might sound shrill but I can't say anymore than Pollyanna imbeciles like Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity.
Air America: It leans Left but it ain't Neo-con. Paleos and Libertarians would nod in agreement alot more times listening to AA than RusHannityO'Reilly any day of the week.
2004-12-22 17:15 | User Profile
I just heard Walter Rogers on CNN tell Jim Clancey that the Dutch are awakening to the fact that their assmuption that Muslims can be integrated (born of their historical experience of Catholics and Protestants patching things up after the Wars of the Refomration) is FALSE, that Muslims will not be assimilated, and that deep demographic trends mean that the Dutch are in very real danger of losing their country.
Interesting.
2005-02-01 14:42 | User Profile
He simply wishes to maintain his kosher certification. This reminds me of a story Rush used to tell a few years back after his first trip to Israel where he had the other half of his brain removed. He was meeting some senior officials of the Israeli government when Shimon Peres started unbuckling and buckling his belt. After doing this a couple of times he proceeded to get all over Limbaugh for things that Reagan did that Peres didn't like. And what did our fearless "conservative" defender do? Absolutely nothing. As he put it he stood there silently while Peres bitched him out. And to think, this self styled "Reagan conservative" who didn't even vote for the man couldn't find the moral courage to defend Reagan or at least have the decency to turn and walk out of the room. This is what I expect out of a chicken hawk. It doesn't take any courage to sit on one's ass behind a microphone in a pink and baby blue cocoon know as a radio broadcast booth raising the devil about "liberals and Democrats". Limbaugh had a chance to put his money where his mouth is and choked. What a candy ass.
2005-02-01 16:44 | User Profile
I agree with everything that's been said here (except for the post about Marta being better looking than Kagan-- the latter is no looker either, with that anorexic mousy Jewish look). When I was listening to Ramsey Clark on C-SPAN this morning, agreeing with damn near everything he said, after watching some nauseating Fox News, I asked myself how I could consider myself really within the definition of conservative. I don't think my Weltanschauung has changed since I first registered as a Republican at 18 and voted GOP consistently and listened to and agreed with conservative radio. Yet we paleos are definitely the minority and far from the thought and rhetoric of mainstream conservatism. Did they and it-- mainstream conservatives and the GOP-- change??
2005-02-01 16:58 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Jack Cassidy]I agree with everything that's been said here (except for the post about Marta being better looking than Kagan-- the latter is no looker either, with that anorexic mousy Jewish look). When I was listening to Ramsey Clark on C-SPAN this morning, agreeing with damn near everything he said, after watching some nauseating Fox News, I asked myself how I could consider myself really within the definition of conservative. I don't think my Weltanschauung has changed since I first registered as a Republican at 18 and voted GOP consistently and listened to and agreed with conservative radio. Yet we paleos are definitely the minority and far from the thought and rhetoric of mainstream conservatism. Did they and it-- mainstream conservatives and the GOP-- change??[/QUOTE]
Actually, Jack, I'd say that conservatism has been redefined by neocons or better yet, hijacked by necons who hoodwinked many in the GOP to believe that the destiny of America is interwoven and linked directly to the destiny of Israel.
Anyway, I know what you mean when you concern yourself to question your own conservatism after agreeing with someone like Ramsey Clark, who for years was an arch enemy of conservatives. It's funny because I saw my post above from December praising "liberal" Air America Radio. I find myself in agreement with almost every darn thing that afternoon host Randi Roades (who is a jewish woman) says on her show. Some of her talk could've been pulled from any number of websites that paleos, libertarians, conservatives peruse on a daily basis. Her rants agains the war and the corporate state are not as shrill as you would expect, and definitely no where near as shill as Rush Hashanah, Sean Dickhead or Weiner Savage shilling for Busharon. Yesterday she had a great, awesome discussion with former weapons inspector and Republican Scott Ritter and a scathing analysis of the whole Iraq debacle. I get much more insight from her than 1000 Rush Hashanah shows or any other neocon hack any day of the week.
These are crazy times, indeed.
2005-02-01 20:57 | User Profile
XM,
I have some bad news for you about Randi. She ain't black.
[IMG]http://www.airamericaradio.com/whatson/images/photo_show.04.jpg[/IMG]
She's Jewish. :oh: :huh:
Fun aside, some times Air America does have some interesting guests like Ritter as you noted. I've heard Juan Cole and Michael Scheuer.
I agree with you about conservatism today. For people like me to paraphrase Reagan "I didn't leave the Republican party. They left me" when the cowardly "leadership" decided on taking 30 pieces of silver. Funny about Savage. Lately he has been trashing the hell out Hannity, Rush, Drudge and Bush mainly over Iraq and immigration. Must be either ratings or maybe he senses a cold wind blowing.
2005-02-01 21:14 | User Profile
Btw, did you guys happen to see (or hear-- here in DC we get C-SPAN on FM radio) Bill Kristol on the C-SPAN morning call-in show? He endorsed Condi Rice as the GOP candidate for President in 2008. It wasn't off-the-cuff either, because he followed it up with a sentence or two reinforcing what he'd said. Rice is pro-abortion, pro-Affirmative Action, pro-immigration (legal, and not anti illegal), pro-gay marriage! Plus, she's one dumb boofer IMO.
2005-02-01 21:28 | User Profile
Jack,
Hannity will be heart broken. I'll have to find this. Kristol at one time attempted to remove the abortion plank from the G.O.P. platform. The rest of this doesn't surprise me.
2005-02-01 21:42 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius]Jack,
Hannity will be heart broken. I'll have to find this. Kristol at one time attempted to remove the abortion plank from the G.O.P. platform. The rest of this doesn't surprise me.[/QUOTE]He (Hannity) rallies around Rudy, Arnold, and Pataki with no problem.
2005-02-01 21:46 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius] Hannity will be heart broken.[/QUOTE] Somehow, I think he'll get over it. He's a spineless yes-man, and it would take a lot more than a simple bald-faced betrayal of all his (purported) principles for him to reconsider his allegiance to the Holy Republican Party. Sean Hannity will take the backstabbing, and then praise his masters that the shiv was sharp.
2005-02-01 21:54 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius]XM,
I have some bad news for you about Randi. She ain't black.
[IMG]http://www.airamericaradio.com/whatson/images/photo_show.04.jpg[/IMG]
She's Jewish. :oh: :huh:
Fun aside, some times Air America does have some interesting guests like Ritter as you noted. I've heard Juan Cole and Michael Scheuer.
I agree with you about conservatism today. For people like me to paraphrase Reagan "I didn't leave the Republican party. They left me" when the cowardly "leadership" decided on taking 30 pieces of silver. Funny about Savage. Lately he has been trashing the hell out Hannity, Rush, Drudge and Bush mainly over Iraq and immigration. Must be either ratings or maybe he senses a cold wind blowing.[/QUOTE]
Sert, thanks for clarifying and I can't believe I've misunderstood Randi for black when she's a Jewess! Anyway, I'll still tune into her. But, now I realize more than ever why Randi can get away with some of the things she says...especially her rants against the corporate media and it's damaging effect on everything. I'll go and edit my post now. Thanks again.
2005-02-01 23:08 | User Profile
XM,
Hell, I wouldn't worry about it. That is an easy mistake to make. She does sound like she's black. I bet being a member of the tribe does give her a pass on a lot of things. It works for Franken as well.
2005-02-01 23:37 | User Profile
Sorry but I cannot abide political talk-radio. Whether it's the braying jackasses of the Right or the quiet and thoughtful moral jellyfish of the Left, I [I]don't [/I] like it coming over my radio, which should either provide soothing white noise or Big Band music, both of which lower stress and brighten one's outlook. (Big Band music sounds absolutely wonderful coming through an AM radio signal, unlike most rock music- which I also enjoy, obviously.) But listening to the talking heads is [B]intolerable[/B]; it's like the termites who [I]already [/I] decide the affairs of America are loose on my kitchen table and skittering into the corners to begin chewing the support beams.
I already know who the bad guys are, and I also know that the [I]other [/I] guys aren't the Good Guys - they're just the Other Guys. I don't need either of them sitting on my chest and selling me snake-oil besides. And since there hasn't been a Make Believe Ballroom on the air for nearly 20 years now, I just tune in a nice meaningless sports station instead, or throw my hands up, pop 5 cds in the changer and press 'shuffle' (often the best alternative).
2005-02-02 00:01 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]Sorry but I cannot abide political talk-radio.
It's been in decline ever since the big media mergers of the 90's. Back in the Perot days Chuck Harder was pretty good--and he used to take Israel to task too. Then it started to get harder to find him on the AM dial because of his un-PC rhetoric, so he sold out and where still available he has AIPAC reps and journos from WorldNutDeli on his show along with neocon warmonger Cliff Kincaid.
FWIW, [url=http://www.gcnlive.com]Genesis Communications Network[/url] still has some worthwhile programming by Derry Brownfield, Alex Jones and Jeff Rense on streaming audio, if you can abide the apocalypticism, the Bigfoot/UFO stuff and other assorted kookery.
2005-02-02 02:04 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]Sorry but I cannot abide political talk-radio....listening to the talking heads is [B]intolerable[/B];[/QUOTE]
I agree, which is why I've recently made the switch from the talking heads to The Talking Heads.
[I]Same as it ever was.... Same as it ever was...[/I]
Merely an alernate path to lower stress.
2005-02-02 04:09 | User Profile
Any thoughts on the stories about Rush being a queer and the "marriages" are all fake?
Yes il ragno Right! "Sorry but I cannot abide political talk-radio....listening to the talking heads is intolerable;
And Marta is better looking than Kagan; Randi is better looking too. Kagan is Tori Spelling ugly.
Is the Kagan marriage story true, I do not recalling seeing anything else about?
2005-02-03 15:00 | User Profile
Here's one segment of talk radio that [u]is worth listening to,[/u] if for any reason to hear Neocon shill John Fund of the Wall Street Journal voice go up four octaves to the hammering he receives on illegal immigration.
[url]http://www.johnandkenshow.com/audio.php?offset=0&per_page=15[/url]
Funny as hell! He sounds like Don Knotts.
2005-02-05 22:02 | User Profile
Rush Limbaugh is a hypocrite to the umpth degree. I must admitt I listened to him and was a admirer of him. I took part in the 1994 shake up of congress that Rush Limbaugh was at the forefront of. I liked listening to him back then because conservative talk radio was something new. The issues he mentioned a lot.. liberal media, Affirmative Action, modern day civil rights leaders, and others I was in full agreement with him. After the election in 1994 the Zionists wanted him in their camp(or maybe to check him to see if he had the proper view on Israel since he never mentioned the Pal/Israeli issue on his show) and payed for his trip to Israel. When he came back he said without any reservation that he was a full fledged Zionist bootlicker.
When he did that my opinion changed very fast.
He is just another fat f**k that will do his best to convense his listeners that everything in regards to this nation's [font=Arial]sovereignty[/font] should be comprimised in the name of Israel. His listeners will check in everyday and recieve messages from the Zyborg mother ship and continue to be assimulated into the Zionist thought collective. Their ability to think for themselves will have destroyed by mind numbing Zionist propaganda that Rush, the great orator that he is, will present as fact and the dittoheads will eat it up like the good programmed Zyborgs they are.
2005-02-05 23:14 | User Profile
Limbaugh started to show his true side around 1994 when NAFTA was "debated". It is interesting to look at his books and compare them with his rhetoric today. The difference is that of night and day.
2005-02-06 02:25 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius]Limbaugh started to show his true side around 1994 when NAFTA was "debated". It is interesting to look at his books and compare them with his rhetoric today. The difference is that of night and day.[/QUOTE]
The same could happen to anyone that attains influence like Limbaugh. Their thinking must brought in-line or checked that it posses no threat to the taxpayer gravy train our politcians and their special interests friends feed off of. These very same forces that got Limbaugh to compromise have got their sights on Buchanan as his popularity and influence increases. Buchanan is even more of a threat because his message is gaining an audience on the left side of the political spectrum. Parts of his(PB)thinking must be neutralized before it gains resinance and converts to some kind of political action.
2005-02-06 07:21 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]Four wives, two of them trophies?
Not bad for a deaf pillhead with anal warts.[/QUOTE]
It's money.
There was some flap not too long ago about how much he made.
I don't remember. It's probably over a million smacks per show.
2005-02-06 20:20 | User Profile
[IMG]http://ancapistan.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/dancart1403.jpg[/IMG]