← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · londo
Thread ID: 15670 | Posts: 27 | Started: 2004-11-17
2004-11-17 11:37 | User Profile
Muslim Immigration Time Bomb Ignored by American Jews By Ilana Mercer
It was the most crucial question in the American election, yet it remained largely unspoken.
It is the issue that will decide whether American values and institutions endure, yet Messrs Bush and Kerry did not see fit to debate it.
Unfortunately, itââ¬â¢s a debate American Jews can put off no longerââ¬âalthough itââ¬â¢s too late for their European, British, and Canadian brethren.
To speak plainly: a gathering danger threatens the Jews of Americaââ¬âto whom George Washington promised peace and goodwill in a 1790 address to a synagogue congregation in Newport, Rhode Island.
American Jewry has "lived up to the standard asked of them by Washington," observes philosopher David Conway in his In Defence Of The Realm: the Place of Nations in Classical Liberalism. But "the stock of Abraham," which has flourished in the New World, producing uniquely entrepreneurial, creative, and philanthropic citizens, is now threatened by what it perversely promotes: mass immigrationââ¬âin particular, immigration from Muslim countries.
The history of immigration to the U.S. is very different from the misty myths that surround it. Before 1965, immigration occurred in manageable ebbs and flows, ensuring the new arrivals were thoroughly assimilated and integrated. Multiculturalism was unheard of.
But in 1965, with no real debate or voter participation, the U.S. Congress replaced the national-origin immigration criterion (which ensured newcomers reinforced the historical majority) with a multicultural, all-nations-are equal quota system, which effectively resulted in an emphasis on mass importation of people from the Third World. The new influx was no longer expected to acculturate to liberal democratic Judeo-Christian traditions. With family "reunification" superseding all other considerations, immigration became an economic drainââ¬âas demonstrated, for example, by Harvardââ¬â¢s George Borjas.
This new immigration policy has produced a continuous human tsunami. Every qualified immigrant holds an entry ticket for his entire extended family. Stephen Steinlight of the Center for Immigration Studiesââ¬âin High Noon to Midnight: Does Current Immigration Policy Doom American Jewryââ¬â courageously (for it runs counter to the views of most of his fellow American Jews) highlights the bizarre situation where entire villages from rural Mexicoââ¬âand on the West Bank in Israelââ¬âhave U.S. citizenship. Why? One member qualifies and then brings in the entire town.
Jews donââ¬â¢t benefit in the least from open-door immigration, having long since settled in the US, Israel, and other First World countries. But the Jewish community has continued to generously support this unsustainable policy. Why the totemic attachment?
"For American Jewry," writes Steinlight, "the debate over immigration is a classic confrontation between the heart and head, nostalgia and foresight, illusion and reality." Jews mistakenly draw parallels between todayââ¬â¢s immigrants and their forefathers. The Jewish immigrant experience, however, is better compared to that of refugees or asylum seekers.
Like Steinlightââ¬â¢s father, my grandfather fled the Latvian town of Riga after the pogroms that followed the Bolshevik Revolution. Grandfather Jack, RIP, settled in South Africa, where Jews thrived until the recent ascendancy of the pro-PLO and pro-Islamist ANC.
Our forefathers typified the Jewish immigrant experience in that they assimilated entirely, becoming productive, loyal citizens. Unlike todayââ¬â¢s immigrants, they were not encouraged by self-serving politicians and identity-politics activists to cling to a militant distinctiveness.
[url=http://www.vdare.com/misc/mercer_041113_muslim.htm] more crap here [/url]
2004-11-17 13:01 | User Profile
To prove that they're not Evil Anti-semites, of course. Paging Mister Tay-lor! Paging Mister Jared Tay-lor!
2004-11-17 13:20 | User Profile
Well give them credit - they've been publishing an awful lot of good articles lately. Maybe they just thought they needed some balance.
2004-11-17 14:45 | User Profile
Okiereddust,
[QUOTE]Well give them credit - they've been publishing an awful lot of good articles lately. Maybe they just thought they needed some balance. [/QUOTE]
I agree, most of their articles are great, and the one's that are not often look stupid.
2004-11-17 15:53 | User Profile
[QUOTE=londo]But "the stock of Abraham," which has flourished in the New World,
Stock of Abraham? I didn't know Mercer was a Christian.
Romans 9:6-33:
For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel. Nor because they are his descendants are they all Abraham's children. On the contrary, "It is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned." In other words, it is not the natural children who are God's children, but it is the children of the promise who are regarded as Abraham's offspring. For this was how the promise was stated: "At the appointed time I will return, and Sarah will have a son." Not only that, but Rebekah's children had one and the same father, our father Isaac. Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad--in order that God's purpose in election might stand: not by works but by him who calls--she was told, "The older will serve the younger." Just as it is written: "Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated."
What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! For he says to Moses, "I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion." It does not, therefore, depend on man's desire or effort, but on God's mercy. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: "I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth."
Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden. One of you will say to me: "Then why does God still blame us? For who resists his will?" But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? "Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, 'Why did you make me like this?' " Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use?
What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath--prepared for destruction? What if he did this to make the riches of his glory known to the objects of his mercy, whom he prepared in advance for glory--even us, whom he also called, not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles?
As he says in Hosea:
"I will call them 'my people' who are not my people; and I will call her 'my loved one' who is not my loved one," and, "It will happen that in the very place where it was said to them, 'You are not my people,' they will be called 'sons of the living God.' "
Isaiah cries out concerning Israel:
"Though the number of the Israelites be like the sand by the sea, only the remnant will be saved. For the Lord will carry out his sentence on earth with speed and finality."
It is just as Isaiah said previously:
"Unless the Lord Almighty had left us descendants, we would have become like Sodom, we would have been like Gomorrah."
What then shall we say? That the Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, have obtained it, a righteousness that is by faith; but Israel, who pursued a law of righteousness, has not attained it. Why not? Because they pursued it not by faith but as if it were by works. They stumbled over the "stumbling stone." As it is written: "See, I lay in Zion a stone that causes men to stumble and a rock that makes them fall, and the one who trusts in him will never be put to shame."
Other than this it's just typical jewish point-of-view drivel. They just can't ever see past themselves, and why they keep getting it wrong ever since they crucified Christ.
2004-11-17 16:53 | User Profile
londo,
The article is far from all bad. She defended the national origins quota system from the Immigration Act of 1924. And she came close to defending South Africa's white government.
[QUOTE]The history of immigration to the U.S. is very different from the misty myths that surround it. Before 1965, immigration occurred in manageable ebbs and flows, ensuring the new arrivals were thoroughly assimilated and integrated. Multiculturalism was unheard of.
But in 1965, with no real debate or voter participation, the U.S. Congress replaced the national-origin immigration criterion (which ensured newcomers reinforced the historical majority) with a multicultural, all-nations-are equal quota system, which effectively resulted in an emphasis on mass importation of people from the Third World. The new influx was no longer expected to acculturate to liberal democratic Judeo-Christian traditions. With family "reunification" superseding all other considerations, immigration became an economic drainââ¬âas demonstrated, for example, by Harvardââ¬â¢s George Borjas. [/QUOTE]
2004-11-18 12:41 | User Profile
Every time V-Dare publishes an article somewhat friendly to the Jews or other protected groups, they make the SPLC, the Center for New Community, and any other PC groups which have listed them as a "hate group," look faintly ridiculous, which is a presumably not-entirely-intended benefit of such "balance." They've done so much good work lately, I think we can afford to cut them some slack; its clear that Brimelow's heart is in the right place, as are those of most of the writers (all but Malkin, essentially).
2004-11-19 03:05 | User Profile
Kevin_O'Keeffe,
I do not see any need to attack Vdare.com. I think the SPLC has already listed Vdare.com as a "Hate Site."
2004-11-19 15:13 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Faust]Kevin_O'Keeffe,
I do not see any need to attack Vdare.com. I think the SPLC has already listed Vdare.com as a "Hate Site."[/QUOTE]
I suspect you either have my post confused with another one, or you might benefit from briefly re-reading it. My post was very much intended as a defense (and praising) of V-Dare, with the single exception of noting that Michelle Malkin, late of Manila, isn't worth reading.
I'm aware that the SPLC has listed V-Dare, ludicrously, as a "hate group." I believe the "Center for New Community," if I'm remembering their non-memorable name correctly, has also done so. Presumably other multiculturalists in that racket have followed suit. I noted that by publishing mildly philo-Semitic pieces like the one referenced in this thread, Brimelow was helping to discredit such PC thugs by making them look stupid and unreliable as a source of useful information, i.e. they claim groups that do not appear to be "hate groups" are, in fact, "hate groups," thus calling into question their credibility on essentially any other matter such PC groups might decide to address. I hope that clears up any confusion; Peter Brimelow is a great man and V-Dare is an excellent site I discovered years before coming across OD, it has been long on my list of "Favorite Places," and I visit (and inevitably enjoy) it at least twice a week.
2004-11-19 17:49 | User Profile
I think it's E.O.E. V-Dare is possibly avoiding discrimination lawsuits by allowing for diversity. Part of the reason Jews pushed for these laws was because they were infiltration laws. This is how they got into all the major corporations as spies and took them over.
Mercer is a clever Jewess who plays the anti-immigration game. We don't want her as our spokesperson on the issue. It's the "false opposition" game.
2004-12-09 05:26 | User Profile
Now this is real trash! I like Ilana Mercer better than Malkin.
AWOL AND AINO by Michelle Malkin [url]http://www.vdare.com/malkin/041207_awol.htm[/url]
2004-12-09 05:39 | User Profile
This is a good article because it sneaks in the awful truth that Jews "perversely" support mass immigration, as manifested in their stealth passage of the 1965 immigration act and their zealous preaching of their neo-Marxist ideology of multiculturalism, through their control of the press and academia.
[QUOTE]But "the stock of Abraham," which has flourished in the New World, producing uniquely entrepreneurial, creative, and philanthropic citizens, is now threatened by what it perversely promotes: mass immigrationââ¬âin particular, immigration from Muslim countries.
The history of immigration to the U.S. is very different from the misty myths that surround it. Before 1965, immigration occurred in manageable ebbs and flows, ensuring the new arrivals were thoroughly assimilated and integrated. Multiculturalism was unheard of. [/QUOTE]
In short, this article smuggles in the message that the transformation of your once-safe white neighborhood to a crime infested barrio is the fault of American Jews.
It's their fault. They foisted this whole bloody multiculti mess upon us, and they did it with the intent of increasing their own tribal power by underminng white Christian preeminence. We were stupid enough to believe them, yes, but the fact remains that Jews grifted us big time. And we all should be killing mad about it.
That's one of those explosive truths that the Jewish media have succeeded in marginalizing in the minds of the sheeple to the looney right. Prof. McDonald's work on this comes to mind.
But you couldn't present it as forthrightly as I did above, and so VDARE got that truth in as effectively as it could.
Peter Brimelow, the check is in the mail.
Walter
2004-12-09 12:03 | User Profile
Jewess Mercer is maneovering for anti-immigration spokesperson status so she can set up a false opposition and protect her people from scrutiny. This is typical Jew modus operandi, don't fall for it. She lies thru her teeth. I read one anti-immigration article of hers where she referred to her "European ancestors", yet she is a Jewess who immigrated from South Africa where her father was an anti-apartheid activist, or so I've heard.
2004-12-09 13:44 | User Profile
Walter Yannis,
Great Post. [QUOTE]This is a good article because it sneaks in the awful truth that Jews "perversely" support mass immigration, as manifested in their stealth passage of the 1965 immigration act and their zealous preaching of their neo-Marxist ideology of multiculturalism, through their control of the press and academia.
Quote:*But "the stock of Abraham," which has flourished in the New World, producing uniquely entrepreneurial, creative, and philanthropic citizens, is now threatened by what it perversely promotes: mass immigrationââ¬âin particular, immigration from Muslim countries.
The history of immigration to the U.S. is very different from the misty myths that surround it. Before 1965, immigration occurred in manageable ebbs and flows, ensuring the new arrivals were thoroughly assimilated and integrated. Multiculturalism was unheard of.*
In short, this article smuggles in the message that the transformation of your once-safe white neighborhood to a crime infested barrio is the fault of American Jews. [/QUOTE]
travis,
Yes you are right. [QUOTE] she is a Jewess who immigrated from South Africa where her father was an anti-apartheid activist, or so I've heard.[/QUOTE]
2004-12-09 14:22 | User Profile
What's wrong with Malkin? She wrote a book on Japanese internment during WWII that laid bare the lies about who, how and why, and she took a lot of flack for it. She's been vociferously anti-immigration since I caught up with her a few years back.
2004-12-09 15:19 | User Profile
It's fascinating to me how this one hymn book enjoys such wide distribution among Jews and their Christian apologists. It attests to the efficiency of their network. When Jews are blamed for their role in undermining this country's culture by promulgating laws that are anathema to our health, in this case the Immigration Reform of 1965, the stock reply from them is, these aren't real Jews but secular Jews who have no religion other than their own greed and misguided liberalism. By cutting them from the herd the Jewish elites hope to confuse the gentiles with a selective culpability based on a flimsy red-herring of exclusion. However, it remains clear that a Jew remains a cultural/racial Jew regardless of his relgious observance quotient and the prime mover and shaker of that radical law which tipped the scales in favor of Third World immigration into this country was none other than Emmanuel Cellar, D-Rep. NY, who used Fat Teddy Kennedy for window dressing.
2004-12-09 16:02 | User Profile
Most Jews I know personally (6 people) were all adamantly against the war in Iraq which would seem to contradict their Zionist war mongering cousins in the US government and mass media. However, those same Jews I know would still cheat you out of a dollar because they can't help it...it's who they are. I forgive them for that much.
Some of those same Jews I know personally also have spoken to me about the alarming growth of non-Whites in the city and how they feel about it and I usually join them in their lamentations, but their attitudes seem to contradict what their Zionist cousins say in the mass media. However, those same jewish friends will spend 80% of our conversations concetrated solely on talking about themselves and their struggles and superficial neuroses because they can't help it.....it's who they are. I also forgive them that much.
I think you get the point.
2004-12-09 17:05 | User Profile
[QUOTE=travis]I think it's E.O.E. V-Dare is possibly avoiding discrimination lawsuits by allowing for diversity.
Discrimination lawsuits? Since when is the press required to run columns by anyone and everyone?
2004-12-09 22:00 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Centinel]Discrimination lawsuits? Since when is the press required to run columns by anyone and everyone?[/QUOTE]I figured he was being tongue in cheek.
2004-12-09 22:03 | User Profile
[QUOTE=DakotaBlue]What's wrong with Malkin? She wrote a book on Japanese internment during WWII that laid bare the lies about who, how and why, and she took a lot of flack for it. She's been vociferously anti-immigration since I caught up with her a few years back.[/QUOTE]Do a search on Malkin. I forget, I think the issue has got to do something with her being married to a neocon, and some general tendencies in this area I don't know. Maybe she was pro-Iraqi war.
2004-12-09 22:17 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Okiereddust]Do a search on Malkin. I forget, I think the issue has got to do something with her being married to a neocon, and some general tendencies in this area I don't know. Maybe she was pro-Iraqi war.[/QUOTE]
Bingo. She's a rabid neo-con, married to the leading Israel-firster in Congress. Mitch something, I believe.
2004-12-10 03:44 | User Profile
Throughout history, Europeans and Asians have always been able to keep the Jews in check. But they did that within relatively homogenous societies, and societies that did not have the crass complications of modern life, nor was the sinful allure available to the masses. We live in such a different world now than those old worlds that resisted the Jews. The brotherhood of blood is broken, the ties to fruit of labor are broken, the connection to the land is broken, the identity factor is broken, and the racial structure is broken. Industrialism, money changing, all evil schemes which we now take for granted. The family itself has been vilified. And no longer economically necessary. The true meaning of the word Zionist is washed in the Blood of Christ. On Holy Mountain Zion, Yahweh gave the Ten Commandments to Moses. How such profound identifications get twisted to opposite doublespeak over the ages is only another example of the timeline of God's will. This world shall not rest until false physical Israel is eliminated. Spriritual Israel is what we should attain to. Any so-called Jew who holds his or her pride as being Jew over Christ is a brood of Satan, and every word spewed from their mouth is layden in covetousness and transgression.
2004-12-10 05:05 | User Profile
The only reason that the Jews have been unable to infiltrate Asia is because they don't look Asians, yet.
Sixty seven countrys have kicked out the Jews over a period of time with some of them, like Spain and Italia, doing it more than once.
At this time, and thanks to the American aid, the Jews are buying land all over the world in order to set up settlements and slowly make trouble for that country.
Myself and others from my country who think like I do have sworn that the Jews will never make trouble in Cuba once that Castro is gone, if they were to do it then they also would be "gone".
2004-12-10 16:54 | User Profile
I can't condemn Malkin on the sole basis of marrying a neocon or for being pro-Iraqi War. In that case, Mary Matlin should be tarred and feathered. I used to be married to a liberal. Rather than convert me, it reconfirmed all my strongly held Conservative beliefs. No one is 100% anything, 100% of the time if he's a thinking person. Malkin's opinions on most cultural issues are right on the money, but I'll google her when time permits.
2004-12-10 18:59 | User Profile
[QUOTE=DakotaBlue]What's wrong with Malkin?[/QUOTE]
She's a neo-con Filipina with a few relatively sensible ideas about immigration. A foreigner holding American citizenship, who supports Bush, his wars and his lies. That's what's wrong with Malkin. She'd stick the knife in Buchanan, Francis and Sobran (not to mention Jared Taylor, or her patron, Mr. Brimelow) so quick it would make your head spin, were she ever in a position to do so, despite her writing appearing regularly on the same site as Messrs. Francis and Sobran. Like all neo-cons, she is a serpent. If you're not a serpent, you don't BECOME a neo-con....
2004-12-10 19:05 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Texas Dissident]Bingo. She's a rabid neo-con, married to the leading Israel-firster in Congress. Mitch something, I believe.[/QUOTE]
I don't doubt she's married to a Congressional neo-con (what with her being a journalistic one), but when you say "Mitch something," I get the impression you're confusing her neo-con serpent with Sen. Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky (of whom I don't know a whole lot about, but whom I've always liked, due to his vehement and outspoken opposition to McCain/Feingold), as he's married to Bush Labor Secretary Elaine Chao, i.e. another east Asian female prominent within the national Republican Party (there aren't more than 3 or 4, thankfully).
2004-12-10 19:06 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]Myself and others from my country who think like I do have sworn that the Jews will never make trouble in Cuba once that Castro is gone, if they were to do it then they also would be "gone".[/QUOTE]
Castro is going to be dead soon, so we're going to hold you to that. Remember, Miami/Haifa West is only 90 miles away....