← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · MacDonald CSA
Thread ID: 15600 | Posts: 20 | Started: 2004-11-10
2004-11-10 01:12 | User Profile
And unveils his TRUE HATRED for the White race. Very Jewlike Itz.
From his article, "17 Reasons Not to Slit Your Wrists"...by Michael Moore
[indent][color=blue]*8. 88% of Bush's support came from white voters. In 50 years, America will no longer have a white majority. Hey, 50 years isn't such a long time! If you're ten years old and reading this, your golden years will be truly golden and you will be well cared for in your old age.
[url]http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1271449/posts[/url][/indent]
[center][img]http://www.nationalvanguard.org/images/teaser/michael-moore.jpg[/img] [url=http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=3855][size=3]Something (Gefilte) Fishy about Michael Moore[/size][/url][/center]
.
2004-11-10 01:57 | User Profile
Michael Moore (along with Sean Hannity) is one of the most vile human beings on the planet. His movies are propaganda, and his aim is the destruction of the West.
2004-11-10 02:06 | User Profile
Well, then, Mr. Moore, I wish you a long life so that you will live to experience the paradise that you helped create.
2004-11-10 02:57 | User Profile
I find it interesting that the mayority of those with an IQ above 105 were the ones to vote for Kerry and also the fact that the states that went with Kerry were in the Westo coast and upper East coast.
2004-11-10 12:50 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]I find it interesting that the mayority of those with an IQ above 105 were the ones to vote for Kerry and also the fact that the states that went with Kerry were in the Westo coast and upper East coast.[/QUOTE]
Ponce, I would like to see some documentation for that IQ statement. I find it somewhat dubious. And even if it is true, I would bet that the majority of those with an IQ below 85 voted for Kerry, as well, so I'm not sure what it proves.
2004-11-13 03:29 | User Profile
Moore follows the left-liberal doctrine of anti-anti racism-political-correctisim. His path is one of the least resistance, if his #10 was directed in the defense of White Americans he would be in the poor house. In his latest movie he also fails to mention the israel/jewish question, thus enabling his movie to see the light of day.
I personally know many like him. They won't bat an eye to stereo-typing White Americans in the South and labelling them rednecks...yet everyone else is equal, diveristy is our strength, blah, blah.
Moore and his buddies look forward to the day this country is grey. Blacks are resisting this and an informal study on my part shows even race-mixing blacks are better off then race-mixing Whites. I say this because I very rarely see a White female with mixed breed children and pure-bred types. It's one or the other.
I have many ideas but nothing concrete on why Moore and his type want this? Does having this country go grey/dark lessen the chances of a White awakening? I know many don't take Simon Sheppard seriously but I think he makes some good arguments on why this is going on [URL=http://www.heretical.com/sheppard/wfpim.html]here.[/URL]
What Moore and his mental band of bugle boys don't know is there won't be any room onboard for them if #8 does one day come true. White flight won't even save them. Best bet for them is to not reproduce, which I am sure they won't do anyway.
2004-11-13 04:14 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Quantrill]Ponce, I would like to see some documentation for that IQ statement. I find it somewhat dubious. And even if it is true, I would bet that the majority of those with an IQ below 85 voted for Kerry, as well, so I'm not sure what it proves.[/QUOTE]
Found one of them go to Rense.com and look for [B]"Free state vs slave state, looks familiar?"[/B]
Still looking for the one with the IQ, as a speed reader I read a lot per day and I don't remember where I saw it, if I find it I'll tell you where.
Question, if to you it dosen't prove anything then why are you so eager to see it?,,,,,you make no sense.
2004-11-13 04:17 | User Profile
The first chapter of Moore's 9/11 movie focused on accusing Bush and Republicans of being racists who stole the 2000 election.
2004-11-13 04:29 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Quantrill]Ponce, I would like to see some documentation for that IQ statement. I find it somewhat dubious. And even if it is true, I would bet that the majority of those with an IQ below 85 voted for Kerry, as well, so I'm not sure what it proves.[/QUOTE]
Ok Quantril I found it, go to KEYWORD and write "IQ and politics" and you will see it right away.
PS: Please don't call me a liar again, I might be crazy but I am not a liar.
2004-11-13 05:14 | User Profile
[QUOTE=MacDonald CSA]And unveils his TRUE HATRED for the White race. Very Jewlike Itz.
From his article, "17 Reasons Not to Slit Your Wrists"...by Michael Moore
[indent][color=blue]*8. 88% of Bush's support came from white voters. In 50 years, America will no longer have a white majority. Hey, 50 years isn't such a long time! If you're ten years old and reading this, your golden years will be truly golden and you will be well cared for in your old age.
Certainly shows not every enemy of our enemy (Bush and the neo's) is our friend, ne c'est pa?
2004-11-13 13:58 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]Ok Quantril I found it, go to KEYWORD and write "IQ and politics" and you will see it right away.
PS: Please don't call me a liar again, I might be crazy but I am not a liar.[/QUOTE] Ponce, The table you are referrring to was published by a lot of people a few months ago (and even by The Economist) but it has turned out to be a hoax. If you would like to see it thoroughly debunked, please visit this link: [url]http://www.vdare.com/sailer/brown_debate.htm[/url]
PS -- I never accused you of being a liar. I accused you of being mistaken.
2004-11-13 15:41 | User Profile
Ok Quantrill I stand corrected and you are right,,,,,,, they used an old table in order to make the new one,,,,,,as I can see by the dates.
That's why we are here, no? to find the truth or what passes for the truth.
2004-11-13 16:19 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]That's why we are here, no? to find the truth or what passes for the truth.[/QUOTE] That's right, my friend.
2004-11-13 23:23 | User Profile
[COLOR=Blue][B] - "Certainly shows not every enemy of our enemy (Bush and the neo's) is our friend, ne c'est pa?"[/B][/COLOR]
Very true.
In fact there is another leftist nihilist that we may add to this wall of shame - cartoonist [B]Ted Rall[/B].
[url]http://www.uexpress.com/tedrall/[/url]
[COLOR=DarkRed][SIZE=3][B]CONFESSIONS OF A CULTURAL ELITIST[/B][/SIZE]
[B]Win or Lose, Kerry Voters Are Smarter Than Bush Voters[/B]
NEW YORK--Democratic hand wringing is surrealy out of hand. No one is criticizing the morally incongruous Kerry for running against a war he voted for while insisting that he would have voted for it again. Party leaders have yet to consider that NAFTA, signed into law under Clinton, may have cost them high-unemployment Ohio. No, Indiana Senator Evan Bayh, darling of the "centrist" Democratic Leadership Council, blames something else: the perception "in the heartland" that Democrats are a "bicoastal cultural elite that is condescending at best and contemptuous at worst to the values that Americans hold in their daily lives."
Firstly, living in the sticks doesn't make you more American. Rural, urban or suburban--they're irrelevant. San Francisco's predominantly gay Castro district is every bit as red, white and blue as the Texas panhandle. But if militant Christianist Republicans from inland backwaters believe that secular liberal Democrats from the big coastal cities look upon them with disdain, there's a reason. We do, and all the more so after this election.[/COLOR]
I[/I]
[COLOR=DarkRed][B]I spent my childhood in fly-over country, in a decidedly Republican town in southwest Ohio. It was a decent place to grow up, with well-funded public schools and only the occasional marauding serial killer to worry about. The only ethnic restaurant sold something called "Mandarin Chinese," Midwestese for cold noodles slathered with sugary sauce. The county had three major employers: the Air Force, Mead Paper, and National Cash Register--and NCR was constantly laying people off. Folks were nice, but depressingly closed-minded. "Well," they'd grimace when confronted with a new musical genre or fashion trend, "that's different." My suburb was racially insular, culturally bland and intellectually unstimulating. Its people were knee-jerk conformists. Faced with the prospect of spending my life underemployed, bored and soused, I did what anyone with a bit of ambition would do. I went to college in a big city and stayed there.[/B]
Mine is a common story. Every day in America, hundreds of our most talented young men and women flee the suburbs and rural communities for big cities, especially those on the West and East Coasts. Their youthful vigor fuels these metropolises--the cultural capitals of the blue states. These oases of liberal thinking--New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Portland, Boston--are homes to our best-educated people, most vibrant popular culture and most innovative and productive businesses. There are exceptions--some smart people move from cities to the countryside--but the best and brightest gravitate to places where liberalism rules.
Maps showing Kerry's blue states appended to the "United States of Canada" separated from Bush's red "Jesusland" are circulating by email. Though there is a religious component to the election results, the biggest red-blue divide is intellectual. "How can 59,054,087 people be so DUMB?" asked the headline of the Daily Mirror in Great Britain, and the underlying assumption is undeniable. By any objective standard, you had to be spectacularly stupid to support Bush.
72 percent who cast votes for George W. Bush, according to a University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) and Knowledge Networks poll, believe that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction or active WMD programs. 75 percent think that a Saddam-Al Qaeda link has been proven, and 20 percent say Saddam ordered 9/11. Of course, none of this was true.
Kerry voters were less than half as idiotic: 26 percent of Democrats bought into Bush-Cheney's WMD lies, and 30 percent into Saddam-Al Qaeda.
Would Bush's supporters have voted for him even if they had known he was a serial liar? Perhaps their hatred of homosexuals and slutty abortion vixens would have prompted them to make the same choice--an idiotic perversion of priorities. As things stand, they cast their ballots relying on assumptions that were demonstrably false.
Educational achievement doesn't necessarily equal intelligence. After all, Bush holds a Harvard MBA. Still, it bears noting that Democrats are better educated than Republicans. You are 25 percent more likely to hold a college degree if you live in the Democratic northeast than in the red state south. Blue state voters are 25 percent more likely, therefore, to understand the historical and cultural ramifications of Bush's brand of bull-in-a-china-shop foreign policy.
Inland Americans face a bigger challenge than coastal "cultural elitists" when it comes to finding high-quality news coverage. The best newspapers, which routinely win prizes for their in-depth local and national reporting and staffers overseas, line the coasts. So do the cable TV networks with the broadest offerings and most independent radio stations. Bush Country makes do with Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity syndicated on one cookie-cutter AM outlet after another. Citizens of the blue states read lackluster dailies stuffed with generic stories cut and pasted from wire services. Given their dismal access to high-quality media, it's a minor miracle that 40 percent of Mississippians turned out for Kerry.
[B]So our guy lost the election. Why shouldn't those of us on the coasts feel superior? We eat better, travel more, dress better, watch cooler movies, earn better salaries, meet more interesting people, listen to better music and know more about what's going on in the world. If you voted for Bush, we accept that we have to share the country with you. We're adjusting to the possibility that there may be more of you than there are of us. But don't demand our respect. You lost it on November 2.[/B]
COPYRIGHT 2004 TED RALL
RALL 11/9/04[/COLOR]
White Christian Americans, do not let your justified hatred of neocons blind you from the fact that leftist rootless cosmopolitans still actively despise you, no matter how much they might oppose Bush and his wars!
Petr
2004-11-23 12:08 | User Profile
[QUOTE]
[B]Win or Lose, Kerry Voters Are Smarter Than Bush Voters[/B]
[COLOR=DarkRed][B]I spent my childhood in fly-over country, in a decidedly Republican town in southwest Ohio. It was a decent place to grow up, with well-funded public schools and only the occasional marauding serial killer to worry about. The only ethnic restaurant sold something called "Mandarin Chinese," Midwestese for cold noodles slathered with sugary sauce. The county had three major employers: the Air Force, Mead Paper, and National Cash Register--and NCR was constantly laying people off. Folks were nice, but depressingly closed-minded. "Well," they'd grimace when confronted with a new musical genre or fashion trend, "that's different." My suburb was racially insular, culturally bland and intellectually unstimulating. Its people were knee-jerk conformists. Faced with the prospect of spending my life underemployed, bored and soused, I did what anyone with a bit of ambition would do. I went to college in a big city and stayed there.[/B]
Mine is a common story. Every day in America, hundreds of our most talented young men and women flee the suburbs and rural communities for big cities, especially those on the West and East Coasts. Their youthful vigor fuels these metropolises--the cultural capitals of the blue states. These oases of liberal thinking--New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Portland, Boston--are homes to our best-educated people, most vibrant popular culture and most innovative and productive businesses. There are exceptions--some smart people move from cities to the countryside--but the best and brightest gravitate to places where liberalism rules.[/QUOTE]
I wonder what this guy would make of folks like Jared Taylor, Yggdrasil, the entire editorial staff of VDARE, or even many of the regular contributors on OD?
Here we have people who graduated from some of the best schools in the country and the world who are radically conservative and who despise everything the Blue Liberals hold dear.
Actually, it's a very good thing that these folks underestimate what they're up against. If pride cometh before a fall, this fellow is in for a real doozy of tumble.
Walter
2004-11-23 14:11 | User Profile
[QUOTE][COLOR=Blue]In 50 years, America will no longer have a white majority. Hey, 50 years isn't such a long time! If you're ten years old and reading this, your golden years will be truly golden and you will be well cared for in your old age. [/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Why wait, Mike? Book a one-way flight to South Africa or Zimbabwe today. Your golden years will be truly golden and you will be well cared for.
2004-11-23 16:37 | User Profile
[QUOTE=CrankyFrank]What Moore and his mental band of bugle boys don't know is there won't be any room onboard for them if #8 does one day come true. White flight won't even save them. Best bet for them is to not reproduce, which I am sure they won't do anyway.[/QUOTE]
Moore identifies as a "homosexual," so no, he probably won't. Its bad enough thinking of some dude potentially want to crawl into bed with one, but the idea of some immense, massively hairy, 400 lb. man with a butt ugly face posssibly having the hots for one is positively repulsive. Buth then, I don't think many women would have welcomed the prospect either....still, its enough to give one the creeps.
2004-11-23 16:42 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Okiereddust]Certainly shows not every enemy of our enemy (Bush and the neo's) is our friend, ne c'est pa?[/QUOTE]
Perhaps not, but if Bush had been narrowly defeated, Moore's propaganda film could have been reasonably assigned some credit in that regard. Evil people who do the right things for the wrong reasons can be handy to have around at times....And besides, we all owe Michael Moore a debt of gratitude for showing that phootage of Wolfowitz licking his comb. If we could just get that shown daily on CNN and MSNBC, he'd probably have to resign his post as Deputy Defense Secretary, out of sheer public revulsion.
2004-11-23 16:47 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Ponce]Ok Quantrill I stand corrected and you are right,,,,,,, they used an old table in order to make the new one,,,,,,as I can see by the dates.
That's why we are here, no? to find the truth or what passes for the truth.[/QUOTE]
I still suspect that White Kerry voters had higher IQs than White (essentially all of them) Bush voters, not that such a study will ever be made. I'm not saying that Democrats are smarter than Republicans, rather that those Democrats who swung to Bush were unusually stupid, while those Republicans who swung to Kerry (or voted 3rd party) were unusually bright. For example, I'd say most of the people on this board are registered Republicans, or at least were during the 1980s and would like to be again, given a reason to so register, and that they probably have IQs more than just slightly above average (perhaps the only obvious, probable exception to that second aspect, Gabrielle, voted for Bush; Walter voted for Bush too, but did so in order to destroy Bush and all his ilk stands for, so he gets a pass). And it seems the majority of the people here at least considered voting for Kerry, even if they actually wound up voting for Peroutka, when they would not ordinarily consider voting for any Democrat. Meanwhile, back in Klinton Country, the sort of Democrat I envision voting for Bush is the sort of ignoramus who ***STILL[/B][/I] believes Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11....
2004-11-23 18:37 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Kevin_O'Keeffe]Moore identifies as a "homosexual," so no, he probably won't. Its bad enough thinking of some dude potentially want to crawl into bed with one, but the idea of some immense, massively hairy, 400 lb. man with a butt ugly face posssibly having the hots for one is positively repulsive. Buth then, I don't think many women would have welcomed the prospect either....still, its enough to give one the creeps.[/QUOTE]
I didn't know that Moore was a fudgepacker.
I you sure about that?
Could you please post a link, if possible?
Walter
PS: yeah, the thought of Moore's sagging, hairy, smelly white ass doesn't do much for me either.
PPSS: just found [URL=http://www.michaelmoore.com/books-films/stupidwhitemen/onlinechapters/part01.php]this.[/URL] Moore claims to have a "wife" to whom Moore refers to as "she," which I assume means she doesn't have a dick, but nowadays you never know.
[QUOTE]Stranded in Los Angeles, my wife and I (out there for the annual Prime Time Emmy Awards for our series, "The Awful Truth"), were awakened that morning by my wife's mother, calling us from Flint at 6:15 a.m., L.A. time. I answered the phone and heard her say that "New York was under attack, New York is at war." I remember thinking, "So what's new," but she suggested we immediately turn on the TV. I fumbled for the remote and switched on the hotel room TV. And there it was. The twin towers on fire, black smoke billowing upward. [/QUOTE]