← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Faust
Thread ID: 15435 | Posts: 7 | Started: 2004-10-25
2004-10-25 01:07 | User Profile
Kennedy had plans to invade Alabama!
MONTGOMERY -- In the weeks before Gov. George Wallace's attempt to block enrollment of two black students at the University of Alabama, the Kennedy administration was poised to send more than 20,000 troops into Alabama if resistance to integration had become more violent, according to declassified documents and interviews with former military and civilian sources. - (Tyrone N. Butts) - (NNN Confederacy)
[url]http://www.al.com/news/mobileregister/index.ssf?/base/news/109860944011800.xml[/url]
NNN Confederacy [url]http://www.newnation.org/NNN-news-confederacy.html[/url]
2004-10-25 05:48 | User Profile
Faust, come on.. Kennedy was only going to maintain order if necessary. Negroes had the right to attend college and yes, they also deserved to be protected from angry racist mobs if their well being was in danger. It doesn't make sense to say Kennedy was " declaring war " on Alabama, or that his signing off on a precautionary action to maintain peace and safety represented Federalism at its extreme. It did not.
2004-10-25 11:42 | User Profile
E.D.-
Have you seen the pictures of the National Guard aiming their rifles at White protestors while Negroes walked through the doors of White schools and universities? That this act was done because there was a segment of the population that was opposed to integration. What you witness, racial-wise, in academia today is the product of such "integration". Now you see why historically Negro colleges are mired in corruption and lack of funds.
2004-10-25 14:52 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Exelsis_Deo]Faust, come on.. Kennedy was only going to maintain order if necessary. Negroes had the right to attend college and yes, they also deserved to be protected from angry racist mobs if their well being was in danger. [/QUOTE] ED-- I must respectfully disagree. Kennedy was going to send troops to impose an unconstitutional court decision upon the people of the South, who knew full well that it was another step down the road towards cultural genocide. If the Supreme Court rules next year that sodomites must be allowed to 'marry', would Pres. Bush/Kerry be justified in sending the US army into Alabama to force that state to perform and recognize these 'marriages'? I would say not. It is all about control.
2004-10-25 15:10 | User Profile
Should a state be able to determine if they will have segregated schools ? I think so. However, when you have to segregate...its already too late. Alabama's problem started with Lincoln, a thirst for black labor by the Plantation class with no plans to repatriate them...and the 1965 immigration act didnt help matters either. Almost everything else has gone down the memory hole. The only thing that time cant erase is the fact that blood is thicker than water...however that too might become meaningless as miscgeneation and forced integration continues while White folks continue to practice abortion and sodomy.
2004-10-25 16:54 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Exelsis_Deo]Faust, come on.. Kennedy was only going to maintain order if necessary. Negroes had the right to attend college and yes, they also deserved to be protected from angry racist mobs if their well being was in danger. It doesn't make sense to say Kennedy was " declaring war " on Alabama, or that his signing off on a precautionary action to maintain peace and safety represented Federalism at its extreme. It did not.[/QUOTE]
Blacks had their own colleges to attend, dumbed down to their IQ level. And who was racist? Blacks still have their own colleges and whites can attend integrated colleges. Whites can attend a black college if they want to be harassed and discrinimated against.
2004-10-26 12:58 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Exelsis_Deo]Faust, come on.. Kennedy was only going to maintain order if necessary. Negroes had the right to attend college and yes, they also deserved to be protected from angry racist mobs if their well being was in danger.
It should be noted here that Alabama, as well as numerous other Southern states, maintained a system of higher educational colleges & universities which were intended for use by the Black community. Most, if not all, of these institutions are still in operation, and in point of fact, they remain virtually all-Black to this day. It is only Whites who can't have their own higher educational system. We have National Hispanic University right here in San Jose, which is all Mexican, and I'm pretty sure the Jews have some institutions of their own in New York and such various places.
The Black universities down south all remain publicly funded, as I'm pretty sure the National Hispanic University is (else why is it called "National?") and you can pretty well bet your bottom dollar that some small portion of said dollar is going to fund the Jewish separatist educational enclaves as well. Its only we Whites who can't have our own schools, even as we pay for the schools of other groups, via the taxes stolen directly from our paychecks. If we actually try to forcibly and manfully object to such a state of affairs (as the otherwise feckless Gov. Wallace attempted to lead his people in doing down in Alabama at the time), then they will be subjected, apparently, to military occupation (which happens to be arugably both a violation of the federal Posse Comitatus Act, as well as the Constitution of the United States, as I'm sure we can all agree that failing to permit a couple of Blacks to matriculate at the university of their choice does not constitute an "insurrection"). Why such an unjust and tyrannical state of affairs causes you to focus your criticism on the existence of "angry racist mobs" (which I suspect were largely the product of the media's imagination, in that no one in or near the University of Alabama was ever attacked by any such mob, and had they actually existed, at least in any statistically relevant sense, they'd have found a way to make their presence felt, I'm sure).