← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · EDUMAKATEDMOFO
Thread ID: 15305 | Posts: 19 | Started: 2004-10-14
2004-10-14 03:30 | User Profile
[I]What do you think? Guilty or victim of gold-digger?[/I]
O'Reilly Hit With Sex Harass Suit Female Fox coworker details lewd behavior of cable TV star OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a multimillion dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News producer fired back at the TV star today, filing a lawsuit claiming that he subjected her to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke often, and explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes, masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual fantasies. Below you'll find a copy of Andrea Mackris's complaint, an incredible page-turner that quotes O'Reilly, 55, on all sorts of lewd matters. Based on the extensive quotations cited in the complaint, it appears a safe bet that Mackris, 33, recorded some of O'Reilly's more steamy soliloquies. For example, we direct you to his Caribbean shower fantasies. While we suggest reading the entire document, TSG will point you to interesting sections on a Thailand sex show, Al Franken, and the climax of one August 2004 phone conversation..... Read the rest...
[url]http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html[/url]
2004-10-14 03:37 | User Profile
Based on the extensive quotations cited in the complaint, it appears a safe bet that Mackris, 33, recorded some of O'Reilly's more steamy soliloquies.
Safe bet eh? I'm waiting for the bottom line before I even start to make any judgements.
2004-10-14 04:07 | User Profile
Hey I came on to someone last weekend.. is coming on to a babe all of a sudden a crime ? Not even saying he did it, as there is no proof, proof of what ? Trying to score ? lol
2004-10-14 12:31 | User Profile
[QUOTE=EDUMAKATEDMOFO][I]What do you think? Guilty or victim of gold-digger?[/I][/QUOTE]
Bill O'Reilly is a bully. I wouldn't put it past him.
Besides that, he's anti-white. I don't like him.
2004-10-14 13:01 | User Profile
I believe the woman in this case and I really hope it's true. Anything to discredit a raging, anti-White, misinformed, blowhard, deceiver like Bill O'Reilly has got my support. FOX is an awful disgrace. I hate them and O'Reilly passionately. Couldn't happen to a nicer group of people.
2004-10-14 13:13 | User Profile
I hope the charges are trumped-up [B]and [/B] I hope O'Reilly goes down in flames because of them regardless.
No misfortune can ever be enough for this guy. If his defense of this triggers a flood of other accusers (including a few men coming out of the woodwork), the media camps out fulltime on his front lawn to hound him mercilessly, his wife leaves him and cleans his clock in divorce court, and jettisoned excrement from a passing 747 freezes solid on descent and totals his favorite sports car while he's in it...it won't be enough.
Bill O'Reilly and the FOX News Network are willing and eager accessories to mass murder and [I]deserve [/I] to have agony and disgrace rammed down their throats, like geese being prepped to become [I]foie gras[/I].
2004-10-14 14:44 | User Profile
Were this accusation made against someone of our own mindset, would you be hoping he would be stripped of everything he had?
There is no doubt that women will file "sexual harrassment" lawsuits only to get money and media attention. This is the result of "equality in the workplace" that our country put upon us. These women come into those places, and expect to be treated like men. Human nature makes it difficult for that to be a reality. Then when women are brought back to earth in that environment, they freak out and file a "sexual harrassment" lawsuit.
Just like anything else, women will always be the weak link in anything they belong to.
2004-10-14 15:13 | User Profile
Nonsense.
A comfortable, well-fed, chortling, Zionist-puppet enemy of America is about to be pantsed before the whole world and brought to ruin. [U]Savor every moment, kids.[/U]
After all, it's not as if his name is [I]O'Reiilywitz[/I]. He's gonna be cut loose and cast adrift in an open boat by the very Chosenites he championed. And [I]that [/I] is a small-p passion play that America needs to see up close, as often as possible, if we're ever going to learn just Who Rules America.
2004-10-14 15:42 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Robbie]Were this accusation made against someone of our own mindset, would you be hoping he would be stripped of everything he had?
There is no doubt that women will file "sexual harrassment" lawsuits only to get money and media attention. This is the result of "equality in the workplace" that our country put upon us. These women come into those places, and expect to be treated like men. Human nature makes it difficult for that to be a reality. Then when women are brought back to earth in that environment, they freak out and file a "sexual harrassment" lawsuit.
Just like anything else, women will always be the weak link in anything they belong to.[/QUOTE]
For this one time, Robbie, it will be OK. FOX and O'Reilly have a price to pay, a heavy price, for falsely motivating the unsuspecting masses of American asses to participate in a mass murder and rape of a sovereign country whose leader, consequently, wanted or was searching to become an [I]ally[/I] of the United States (as read in the Duelfer report) before his country was bombed beyond recognition all to the drumbeat of FOX News.
O'Reilly deserves not one iota of sympathy. He bashes, on a daily basis almost, the French people, and also accuses President Chirac as an 'enemy' of the United States. And this moron has the nerve to cry about 'false charges'??
Burn him, I say. And FOX too.
2004-10-14 17:22 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Robbie]Were this accusation made against someone of our own mindset, would you be hoping he would be stripped of everything he had?
There is no doubt that women will file "sexual harrassment" lawsuits only to get money and media attention. This is the result of "equality in the workplace" that our country put upon us. These women come into those places, and expect to be treated like men. Human nature makes it difficult for that to be a reality. Then when women are brought back to earth in that environment, they freak out and file a "sexual harrassment" lawsuit.
Just like anything else, women will always be the weak link in anything they belong to.[/QUOTE]Weak link? Look whose calling the charges!
Listening to MSNBC this morning, the Abrams described it the case sounds a great deal like the Anita Hill case, that is a basically political vendetta filed to intimidate/embarrass the man.
The only difference is while Anita Hill's charges were purely in her own imagination, this case apparently was a result of an apparently conscensal relationship which the woman is now trying to exploit, in classic "black widow" fashion.
O'Reilly obviously is suffering from an ego which has greatly expanded beyond his intellect to do something like this. He certainly isn't the brightest bulb in the world but the whole suit is just another testimonial on sexual politics in the workplace. It is utterly ruthless today.
2004-10-14 17:44 | User Profile
It appears she has him on tape bragging that Roger Ailes is a GOP bagman who will one day arrange to have Al Franken killed and/or arrested by the Feds on trumped up charges. There is nothing in the complaint to indicate she was consensually having sex with him.
If you think that a associate producer earning 60,000 a year is remotely on equal footing with a star blowhard pulling down millions (as your 'consensual' remark indicates) you need to up your medication. Although it comes as [I]no [/I] surprise to see so many defenders of poor beleagured Bill O'Reilly here on The New OD.
Perhaps we should let Gabrielle weigh in with her unbiased and impartial take on the matter, and close the thread with the usual Petr sermonette.
2004-10-14 22:39 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]It appears she has him on tape bragging that Roger Ailes is a GOP bagman who will one day arrange to have Al Franken killed and/or arrested by the Feds on trumped up charges. There is nothing in the complaint to indicate she was consensually having sex with him. I haven't heard the tapes. Is there anything on there to indicate she was having sex at all with him? I hadn't heard of any.
If you think that a associate producer earning 60,000 a year is remotely on equal footing with a star blowhard pulling down millions (as your 'consensual' remark indicates) you need to up your medication. Although it comes as [I]no [/I] surprise to see so many defenders of poor beleagured Bill O'Reilly here on The New OD.
Just because they aren't on an equal footing doesn't per se mean she cannot refuse her consent without harm. You sound like one of those radical feminists that think all sex, and even all flirtation, is inherently oppresive. In this case there seem to be a number of red flags that indicated she went along willingly, and that her present case involves ulterior motives.
I know, as a Christian Republican neoconservative man O'Reilly doesn't arouse great intrinsic sympathy with you. I'll admit he showed pretty bad judgement, but I don't prima facie believe anything bad any liberal Democrats or anyone else says about him.
2004-10-14 23:36 | User Profile
[QUOTE]You sound like one of those radical feminists that think all sex, and even all flirtation, is inherently oppresive. [/QUOTE]
I'd forgotten how dim you are. Do you see my post, above, where I openly state
[I]I hope the charges are trumped-up [B]and [/B] I hope O'Reilly goes down in flames because of them regardless.[/I]
How much plainer can I make it?
[QUOTE]I know, as a Christian Republican neoconservative man O'Reilly doesn't arouse great intrinsic sympathy with you. I'll admit he showed pretty bad judgement, but I don't prima facie believe anything bad any liberal Democrats or anyone else says about him. [/QUOTE]
The further the New OD bandwagon trundles along, the more indistinguishable from Free Republic it becomes. So we've come down to simplistic, let's-role maxims like 'Democrat bad, Republican good' after all these years. Worse: after thousands of (obviously wasted) pages of bandwidth in Neo-Con Watch underlining their noxious influence, the designation [I]neoconservative [/I], when preceded by [I]Christian[/I], is apparently now sacrosanct. No wonder Anti-Yuppie washed his hands of you, and Gabrielle moved in and made herself at home.
So when does the OD fundraiser for Israel kick off?
2004-10-15 01:30 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]I'd forgotten how dim you are. Do you see my post, above, where I openly state
[I]I hope the charges are trumped-up [B]and [/B] I hope O'Reilly goes down in flames because of them regardless.[/I]
How much plainer can I make it?
I know.
No misfortune can ever be enough for this guy. If his defense of this triggers a flood of other accusers (including a few men coming out of the woodwork), the media camps out fulltime on his front lawn to hound him mercilessly, his wife leaves him and cleans his clock in divorce court, and jettisoned excrement from a passing 747 freezes solid on descent and totals his favorite sports car while he's in it...it won't be enough.
Bill O'Reilly and the FOX News Network are willing and eager accessories to mass murder and deserve to have agony and disgrace rammed down their throats, like geese being prepped to become foie gras.
Just your usual New Yorker best wishes, I guess.
No wonder Anti-Yuppie washed his hands of you, and Gabrielle moved in and made herself at home.
Tell me then, why did he wash his hands of you?
So when does the OD fundraiser for Israel kick off?[/QUOTE] Don't knock those pushy mideastern kikes Raggy. I think you might feel right at home there.
2004-10-15 02:18 | User Profile
[QUOTE]Just your usual New Yorker best wishes, I guess. [/QUOTE]
Your hero, Bill O'Reilly, also hails from this area.
Contrary to your usual lies, AY and myself have had no falling-out. In fact, I heard from him just the other day, and nary a cross word was exchanged...until the subject changed to Christian Nationalism, but you can relax: his stated opinions would never make it past the censorware intact.
God only knows what he'd make of Christian Republican Neoconservatism, other than to find it the inevitable result of the change of direction hee.
2004-10-15 03:20 | User Profile
[QUOTE=il ragno]Your hero, Bill O'Reilly, also hails from this area.
So that explains it :lol:
Contrary to your usual lies, AY and myself have had no falling-out. I didn't mean you personally, but the Phora in general. In fact, I heard from him just the other day, and nary a cross word was exchanged...until the subject changed to Christian Nationalism, but you can relax: his stated opinions would never make it past the censorware intact. Tell him whatever his personal opinions of the fighting abilities of Christian soldiers, that at least they're still on the field.
2004-10-15 04:20 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Okiereddust]Tell him whatever his personal opinions of the fighting abilities of Christian soldiers, that at least they're still on the field.[/QUOTE]
Ouch.
2004-10-16 20:38 | User Profile
More on Bill: [warning, graphic content]
[url]http://www.falaphilia.com/smokedgun.php[/url]
2004-10-16 22:05 | User Profile
[QUOTE=Sertorius]More on Bill: [warning, graphic content]
[url]http://www.falaphilia.com/smokedgun.php[/url][/QUOTE]Certainly is graphic and salacious. As always though, I think one should still hold a man innocent till proven guilty. This woman was obviously out to get O'Reilly for some reason. Whether it was just the pent-up rage of an innocent victim or rather more devious motives is the key point.
Regardless, I can understand O'Reilly's one sided stance on the Middle East a little better. The man in some sense is not very bright. The neo's have him snowed like this lady did.