← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · Exelsis_Deo
Thread ID: 15091 | Posts: 9 | Started: 2004-09-22
2004-09-22 16:38 | User Profile
[url]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/09/22/wnuke22.xml&sSheet=/portal/2004/09/22/ixportaltop.html[/url]
i hate false israel because they hate God.
2004-09-22 19:06 | User Profile
Are [URL=http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/blu-109.htm]these things [/URL] nukes?
I was under the impression they were conventional.
2004-09-22 19:47 | User Profile
They are equiped with conventional warheads, not nuclear.
2004-09-22 20:09 | User Profile
Guys,
Possibly one should be looking in another direction.
[URL=http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steveseymour/nuke/bali_micro_nuke.htm]Bali Micro Nuke - Lack of Radiation Confuses "Experts"[/URL]
Consider this aspect:
"The years rolled by and top-secret projects were initiated in America and Israel to replace the old SADM with its overly heavy weight and excess radioactivity, culminating in the successful development and testing at Dimona during 1981 of the ââ¬Ånewââ¬Â micro nuclear device. Using advanced nuclear physics, the scientists found a way of detonating the new ââ¬Åsuitcaseââ¬Â bomb without the use of a Uranium 238 reflector, and further refined the Plutonium 239 in its core to 99.78%. These measures resulted in a weapon considerably smaller and lighter than SADM, which also had another enormous advantage.
The new Dimona micro nuke was the very first critical weapon that could be used in ââ¬Åstealthââ¬Â mode. Gone was the dirty Uranium 238 reflector, and up went the purity of the smaller Plutonium 239 core. You see, Plutonium emits only alpha radiation, which for all practical purposes is ââ¬Åinvisibleââ¬Â to a standard Geiger counter. If you do not believe me then ask the American Environmental Protection Agency, whose staff will confirm this".
The cited 500 BLU-109 bombs, might simply be slated to take out Iran as a threat to Israel. The unspoken question concerns Israelis ability to set off an undetacted nuke device. Trust that the will to use one is self evident.
SARTRE
2004-09-22 22:32 | User Profile
The 500 bombs, as shown in the article, are a specific reaction to the " Iran issue ". Good point, SATRE. Also, we must remember that this is only information made available to the press, often there is additional weaponry in the deal that the DoD doesn't submit to the public. Regardless, these bombs are capable of penetrating over 7 feet thick reinforced concrete.
Just our tax dollars at work under Zionism. ZOG ( Zionist Occupied Government ) once again bares it bones. God Damn Israel. God Damn those Bastards. And God Damn the United States for kissing their rotten mouth for all these years. This is serious stuff.
ANYONE BUT BUSH 2004
2004-09-22 23:19 | User Profile
Exelsis_Deo,
Regretfully, ANYONE BUT BUSH 2004 translates into Barney Franks sucking us dry while his sister Ann Lewis explains why it's good for you even if it hurts!
The real equation is: An Israel First policy = 911.
Note the twisted logic that is offered up. [URL=http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1095828007181]Israel asks UN to stop Iran's nukes[/URL]
[I]"For many years, the world believed that this threat from Iran could be launched only toward Israel. But the Europeans realize that the Iranians are developing missiles with a range that will include Paris, London, Berlin, the southern part of Russia within this range," Shalom said. [/I]
The Samson threat originates with the Zionists. Germany builds subs for Israeli (by way of the USA) nukes that are meant for Europe if they oppose a greater Israel.
Submit the cry should be - No RepubLIKUDemocrat need apply.
SARTRE
2004-09-23 05:16 | User Profile
[QUOTE=SARTRE]Guys,
Possibly one should be looking in another direction.
[URL=http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steveseymour/nuke/bali_micro_nuke.htm]Bali Micro Nuke - Lack of Radiation Confuses "Experts"[/URL]
Consider this aspect:
"The years rolled by and top-secret projects were initiated in America and Israel to replace the old SADM with its overly heavy weight and excess radioactivity, culminating in the successful development and testing at Dimona during 1981 of the ââ¬Ånewââ¬Â micro nuclear device. Using advanced nuclear physics, the scientists found a way of detonating the new ââ¬Åsuitcaseââ¬Â bomb without the use of a Uranium 238 reflector, and further refined the Plutonium 239 in its core to 99.78%. These measures resulted in a weapon considerably smaller and lighter than SADM, which also had another enormous advantage.
The new Dimona micro nuke was the very first critical weapon that could be used in ââ¬Åstealthââ¬Â mode. Gone was the dirty Uranium 238 reflector, and up went the purity of the smaller Plutonium 239 core. You see, Plutonium emits only alpha radiation, which for all practical purposes is ââ¬Åinvisibleââ¬Â to a standard Geiger counter. If you do not believe me then ask the American Environmental Protection Agency, whose staff will confirm this". SARTRE[/QUOTE] Steve Seymour seems rather confused to me. Plutonium possibly could be "invisible" to a standard Geiger counter before detonation, but I can guarantee you it will be highly visible afterwards.
The Israeli's may be able to sneak them in undetected, but they certainly wouldn't be able to explode them undetected as simple non-nuclear devices. Not that it really makes any difference (whether you're incinerated by non-nuclear or nuclear explosives) anyway.
2004-09-23 06:15 | User Profile
[URL=http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/480620.html]Iran said it will react "most severely" to any Israeli action against its nuclear facilities, issuing the warning after Israel said the United States was selling it 500 bunker buster bombs. [/URL]
2004-09-23 09:45 | User Profile
Okiereddust,
Point of clarification. The citation was in quotes and the author is Joe Vialls, not myself or Steve Seymour. The email address for Mr Vialls is: [EMAIL=joevialls@gawab.com]joevialls@gawab.com[/EMAIL]
Sorry if it wasn't clear.
Would you be interested in sending Mr Vialls a request to explain better?
If so, would be glad to follow-up.
SARTRE