← Autodidact Archive · Original Dissent · spiker

Be prepared to lose ALL of your guns if John Kerry becomes President

Thread ID: 15038 | Posts: 7 | Started: 2004-09-18

Wayback Archive


spiker [OP]

2004-09-18 00:28 | User Profile

[size=4] If a picture is worth a thousand words, this John Kerry photo album is worth a million!

[img]http://keepandbeararms.com/images/Kerry001.jpg[/img] PICTURED ABOVE: Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John Kerry embracing gun control activist Sarah Brady in Washington, DC on September 13, 2004. Kerry rebuked president George W. Bush for letting the ban on "assault weapons" expire.

[img]http://keepandbeararms.com/images/Kerry002.jpg[/img] PICTURED ABOVE: Gun control advocate Sarah Brady plots new gun ban strategies with Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry at campaign event in Washington, DC on September 13, 2004.

[img]http://keepandbeararms.com/images/Kerry003.jpg[/img] PICTURED ABOVE: Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry, flanked by gun banning Senators Schumer, Feinstein and Kennedy (left to right), gives thumbs up after all four helped kill the Senate bill to protect the firearms industry from frivolous lawsuits.

[img]http://keepandbeararms.com/images/Kerry004.jpg[/img] PICTURED ABOVE: Sen. John Kerry at Boston anti-gun rally October 3, 2000 -- with signs that read "GUN OWNERS KILL!" and "BAN ALL GUNS".

[img]http://keepandbeararms.com/images/Kerry005.jpg[/img] PICTURED ABOVE: Sen. John Kerry, seen from behind, addressing anti-gun rally in Boston on October 3, 2000. [/size]


Faust

2004-09-18 01:02 | User Profile

spiker,

You live in Denver, CO so you are not the Spiker from Kiwiland? The GOP record on Guns is far from great. It is congress that has the power to make new gunlaws. Remember bush said he wanted the AWB not to sunset. Bush is very pro invasion of America by hordes of aliens.

The GOP is such a seemingly hopeless mess, I have a hard time getting upset by John Kerry's nonsense.


Happy Hacker

2004-09-18 16:09 | User Profile

I'm not worried about one candidate being worse than the other. And, neither of the two are getting my vote.


Exelsis_Deo

2004-09-19 01:01 | User Profile

A Kerry Presidency would have no impact on your gun ownership rights. In those photos he was only doing what politicians do, and the Democratic Party as you know is often consisted in urban areas of places where uncontrolled crime with guns is rampant. Kerry has stated many times he will always stand by the right to bear arms. Does that mean that everyone can own an uzzi or AK-47 ? no..

see here. [url]http://www.sportsmenforkerryedwards.com/[/url]


Exelsis_Deo

2004-09-19 01:20 | User Profile

that site is an alarmist site which wants you to believe that just because Kerry voted against assault weapons and armor-piercing ammunition means that he's going to work diligently to take away all your semi-automatic pistols, rifles and shotguns and its a total joke !! This is how they divide us on issues. Gun owners get all worried about how Kerry is going to " take away their guns " // GIMME A BREAK !!! As Faust said, its Congress only that can vote upon and bring forth such a bill, and then it would be challenged in the Supreme Court !! This is all a sad joke. Vote for Bush if you think you can muster up the ammo to hold back all the sophisticated weaponry of the NWO. Buncha hillbillies. " Gosh Garnit, Bobby Joe, John Kerry voted against assault weapuns for every Amerricun.. I reckon he's hankerin' to grab this Smith n Wesson from my cold dead hands, dat God fersaken yankee. Im votin faw Geawge Dubya Bushh "

do you see the mentality here ?


londo

2004-09-19 07:20 | User Profile

[QUOTE=Happy Hacker]I'm not worried about one candidate being worse than the other. And, neither of the two are getting my vote.[/QUOTE] [img]http://www.baycj.com/14.republicrat.jpg[/img]

You know it's pretty bad when the best you got to choose from is two Johns, a Dick and a Bush... And people wonder why they're getting screwed!


Ron

2004-09-19 19:40 | User Profile

I believe a domino theory of gun confiscation is overstated. The practicality of such a thing is enormous. Besides, this would only create a black market for weaponry which would be more difficult to control.
The huntsman has more to fear from his nearsighted kinsmen than the Government.